Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason not to do it is because penises are supposed to have foreskin. You should only cut off healthy body parts if there is actually a reason to do it, not because there isn't a reason not to. If we used your logic we'd all be chopping off our earlobes. " Yep, all that. Mental that it's even a question in western society, let alone a presumption in the US of States. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mr retro had too get circumcised due to tight foreskin developing and causing hi pain. The operation / stitches had him in pain for a couple of weeks, and he found it had made him a lot more sensitive when having sex... Therefor he usually lasts around 15 or so minutes the first round, but after this can last a good long time for round 2, so plenty of foreplay for me before, after and in between.. its overall been a plus." I was exactly the same when I had mine done, the discomfort from sex and even masturbation was hell yet after a few weeks and learning how to pee all over again it's been nothing but good times and far more hygienic (had thrush once with a foreskin, never since cut) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a sequel to a thread I saw earlier (difficulties with foreskin retraction...), Is there any downsides to male circumcision? Is there any reason to not do it? On the flip side, is there any upside to not doing it? Any pros and cons to male circumcision? " Speak to your doctor not here tbh I had the same issue actually till only a few years ago, but didnt realise something was wrong till somone told me Went to the doctor and they gave me some steroid cream. That and the use of a fleshlight pretty much sorted it for me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason not to do it is because penises are supposed to have foreskin. You should only cut off healthy body parts if there is actually a reason to do it, not because there isn't a reason not to. If we used your logic we'd all be chopping off our earlobes. " mine was done for medical reasons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason not to do it is because penises are supposed to have foreskin. You should only cut off healthy body parts if there is actually a reason to do it, not because there isn't a reason not to. If we used your logic we'd all be chopping off our earlobes. " What ? ..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason not to do it is because penises are supposed to have foreskin. You should only cut off healthy body parts if there is actually a reason to do it, not because there isn't a reason not to. If we used your logic we'd all be chopping off our earlobes. What ? ....." We evolved to have a foreskin, so it has a function. If its not causing pain, and funtions correctly, then why remove it? We dont really "need" earlobes...but you wouldnt remove them because its an extra bit to wash in the shower. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason not to do it is because penises are supposed to have foreskin. You should only cut off healthy body parts if there is actually a reason to do it, not because there isn't a reason not to. If we used your logic we'd all be chopping off our earlobes. What ? ..... We evolved to have a foreskin, so it has a function. If its not causing pain, and funtions correctly, then why remove it? We dont really "need" earlobes...but you wouldnt remove them because its an extra bit to wash in the shower." Yep, seems pretty fricking obvious to me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was circumcised at a few months old hated it gave me a complex and my life even suicidal at times ive started foreskin restoration to hopefully grow it back" I feel the same | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Medical, fine. Personal choice fine. Done to children for cultural reasons, it is male genital mutilation. Lopping bits off people who are unable to consent... really? Do we even need to consider this? The 'hygiene' defence smacks of a post hoc rationalisation. It's really not difficult to wash properly. " I think the thread is more about male circumcision in adults.. More often than not for medical reasons..? Not known many situations where adult makes are forced to get circumcised. Mine was for medical reasons as a 15 year old. Wasn't forced into it. FGM is important subject but I think not part of this thread? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Medical, fine. Personal choice fine. Done to children for cultural reasons, it is male genital mutilation. Lopping bits off people who are unable to consent... really? Do we even need to consider this? The 'hygiene' defence smacks of a post hoc rationalisation. It's really not difficult to wash properly. I think the thread is more about male circumcision in adults.. More often than not for medical reasons..? Not known many situations where adult makes are forced to get circumcised. Mine was for medical reasons as a 15 year old. Wasn't forced into it. FGM is important subject but I think not part of this thread? " MGM not FGM. Classed as not medically necessary since 1948 but still happens in the uk | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Medical, fine. Personal choice fine. Done to children for cultural reasons, it is male genital mutilation. Lopping bits off people who are unable to consent... really? Do we even need to consider this? The 'hygiene' defence smacks of a post hoc rationalisation. It's really not difficult to wash properly. I think the thread is more about male circumcision in adults.. More often than not for medical reasons..? Not known many situations where adult makes are forced to get circumcised. Mine was for medical reasons as a 15 year old. Wasn't forced into it. FGM is important subject but I think not part of this thread? MGM not FGM. Classed as not medically necessary since 1948 but still happens in the uk" Wow really? Have never heard of it? But I guess for the same reasons.. Religion etc? Crazy world.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |