Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Why can't we have pictures etc of women peeing there knickers or just couples in general enjoying watersports...... Its seems a very popular topic and I guess its one of those that if you don't like just scroll on by, there's pictures on here that I don't like but they don't offend me I just move on Because its against site rules" And where would we be without rules! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why can't we have pictures etc of women peeing there knickers or just couples in general enjoying watersports...... Its seems a very popular topic and I guess its one of those that if you don't like just scroll on by, there's pictures on here that I don't like but they don't offend me I just move on Because its against site rules And where would we be without rules! " Fucked | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I believe it is in fact, illegal now isn't it? All the dumb rules brought in my our Tory overlords. Same reason squirting and fisting are banned" I must have missed that... Are you saying... For example.... Squirting is illegal.? Or just sharing pictures of it on a public website? Or privately for that matter? Everyday s a school day.. Unless it's in isolation of course | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I believe it is in fact, illegal now isn't it? All the dumb rules brought in my our Tory overlords. Same reason squirting and fisting are banned I must have missed that... Are you saying... For example.... Squirting is illegal.? Or just sharing pictures of it on a public website? Or privately for that matter? Everyday s a school day.. Unless it's in isolation of course " It's illegal to publish photos or videos of these acts on the Internet. What goes on behind closed doors between consenting adults is not illegal, as I understand it. This is why you're not allowed them on Fabswingers, so the ruling is not limited to the site owners. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on 'content that is not acceptable' (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers: Spanking Caning Aggressive whipping Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual) Urolagnia (known as "water sports") Role-playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting " All completely ridiculous in my view - prohibition (of anything) historically does not work, and has been proven time & again. Trouble is people keep voting these Etonian cretins back in to power. You cannot regulate the Internet (even though they're trying to) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"its uk censorship laws that fab is abiding to" No rules were relaxed in 2019, it’s fabs own rules which seem about right , it’s a swinging site not a fetish site | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"its uk censorship laws that fab is abiding to No rules were relaxed in 2019, it’s fabs own rules which seem about right , it’s a swinging site not a fetish site " I don't believe that to be the case. Fabswingers used to allow all sorts of things that you can no longer post, because of the ruling. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"its uk censorship laws that fab is abiding to No rules were relaxed in 2019, it’s fabs own rules which seem about right , it’s a swinging site not a fetish site I don't believe that to be the case. Fabswingers used to allow all sorts of things that you can no longer post, because of the ruling." Maybe just playing safe but the law is very clear , unless it’s animals or explicitly showing no consent not being honoured or harm to someone pretty much anything is allowed. The 2014 guidance applies to sales of porn only , and is now updated to reflect the 2019 act | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"its uk censorship laws that fab is abiding to No rules were relaxed in 2019, it’s fabs own rules which seem about right , it’s a swinging site not a fetish site I don't believe that to be the case. Fabswingers used to allow all sorts of things that you can no longer post, because of the ruling. Maybe just playing safe but the law is very clear , unless it’s animals or explicitly showing no consent not being honoured or harm to someone pretty much anything is allowed. The 2014 guidance applies to sales of porn only , and is now updated to reflect the 2019 act " So I guess what we're talking about is a bit of a grey area. For me it comes down to adult consent - but of course that cannot be policed fully. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on 'content that is not acceptable' (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers: Spanking Caning Aggressive whipping Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual) Urolagnia (known as "water sports") Role-playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting " Ive been schooled ??, thank you. I missed that. I guess on my no porn period. That's quite a list of verboten interests. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on 'content that is not acceptable' (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers: Spanking Caning Aggressive whipping Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual) Urolagnia (known as "water sports") Role-playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting All completely ridiculous in my view - prohibition (of anything) historically does not work, and has been proven time & again. Trouble is people keep voting these Etonian cretins back in to power. You cannot regulate the Internet (even though they're trying to)" Not sure where they may have gone to school is particularly relevant. I'm sure Eton has its fair share of deviant alumni. (other schools may produce deviant alumni too just in case) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The law changed and certain laws were relaxed in January 2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47069414" Exactly what I was going to post. I mentioned this on an older thread that while the law was relaxed I suspect Fab like a lot of other web hosts would rather not test the legal waters. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on 'content that is not acceptable' (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers: Spanking Caning Aggressive whipping Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual) Urolagnia (known as "water sports") Role-playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting All completely ridiculous in my view - prohibition (of anything) historically does not work, and has been proven time & again. Trouble is people keep voting these Etonian cretins back in to power. You cannot regulate the Internet (even though they're trying to) Not sure where they may have gone to school is particularly relevant. I'm sure Eton has its fair share of deviant alumni. (other schools may produce deviant alumni too just in case) " It was a dig at the Tory nasty squad | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on 'content that is not acceptable' (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers: Spanking Caning Aggressive whipping Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual) Urolagnia (known as "water sports") Role-playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting All completely ridiculous in my view - prohibition (of anything) historically does not work, and has been proven time & again. Trouble is people keep voting these Etonian cretins back in to power. You cannot regulate the Internet (even though they're trying to) Not sure where they may have gone to school is particularly relevant. I'm sure Eton has its fair share of deviant alumni. (other schools may produce deviant alumni too just in case) It was a dig at the Tory nasty squad" It was so well disguised too! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"its uk censorship laws that fab is abiding to No rules were relaxed in 2019, it’s fabs own rules which seem about right , it’s a swinging site not a fetish site I don't believe that to be the case. Fabswingers used to allow all sorts of things that you can no longer post, because of the ruling." Like what? The rules since this owner took over have always been the same | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |