FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

A proper couple for a Dom, Bull

Jump to newest
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All 3 must feel comfortable or it won't work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them."

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *en.....emMan
over a year ago

West mids

wife luvs a dom

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics "

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree. With both...

Mostly with that it is semantics.

And partly with balance and mutual respect and recognition as a couple about needs and context

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

"

Apololgies op, meant context on your complaint, its a very specific thread line apropos of nothing

We find the language is tricky - cuck is historically unpleasant and is the antithesis (betrayal, unfaithful, deceit, cheating etc). A 3 way play is the best way to see it , for mutuality to come to the fore. 'Only' words, but people putting little thought into how they play, plus porn giving a purely acted role-play means its hard to match well without a lot of effort. Too much sometimes!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

Apololgies op, meant context on your complaint, its a very specific thread line apropos of nothing

We find the language is tricky - cuck is historically unpleasant and is the antithesis (betrayal, unfaithful, deceit, cheating etc). A 3 way play is the best way to see it , for mutuality to come to the fore. 'Only' words, but people putting little thought into how they play, plus porn giving a purely acted role-play means its hard to match well without a lot of effort. Too much sometimes!

"

I didn’t complain, please don’t project.

Just have fun.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

Apololgies op, meant context on your complaint, its a very specific thread line apropos of nothing

We find the language is tricky - cuck is historically unpleasant and is the antithesis (betrayal, unfaithful, deceit, cheating etc). A 3 way play is the best way to see it , for mutuality to come to the fore. 'Only' words, but people putting little thought into how they play, plus porn giving a purely acted role-play means its hard to match well without a lot of effort. Too much sometimes!

I didn’t complain, please don’t project.

Just have fun.

"

Lol. Hey it was your thread.

You posed the question

"why do couples not understand this"

The phrasing of the question is similar to many about no meets, poor feedback, etc where an op is aggrieved one way or another

Given that there are an awful lot of couples that DO understand what you referred to (in fact in our experience more so than those that don't) there had to be more, which I tried to ask, but you redirected to a personal insult.

You use the language of complaints draw unqualified stereotypes (at least based around our experience) and an unwillingness to explain or explore your own thread... No, no, I don't think it me that is "projecting".

Sorry if I hurt your feelings - we are all here to have fun!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

Apololgies op, meant context on your complaint, its a very specific thread line apropos of nothing

We find the language is tricky - cuck is historically unpleasant and is the antithesis (betrayal, unfaithful, deceit, cheating etc). A 3 way play is the best way to see it , for mutuality to come to the fore. 'Only' words, but people putting little thought into how they play, plus porn giving a purely acted role-play means its hard to match well without a lot of effort. Too much sometimes!

I didn’t complain, please don’t project.

Just have fun.

Lol. Hey it was your thread.

You posed the question

"why do couples not understand this"

The phrasing of the question is similar to many about no meets, poor feedback, etc where an op is aggrieved one way or another

Given that there are an awful lot of couples that DO understand what you referred to (in fact in our experience more so than those that don't) there had to be more, which I tried to ask, but you redirected to a personal insult.

You use the language of complaints draw unqualified stereotypes (at least based around our experience) and an unwillingness to explain or explore your own thread... No, no, I don't think it me that is "projecting".

Sorry if I hurt your feelings - we are all here to have fun! "

Totally agree !! Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them.

Bit more context would be useful. All have to get something. In a 3 way play there are likely to be 2 opinions in line and the 3rd plays catch up. The couple may have chatted daily for months.

Using terms like 'bull' may be part of the problem. Animals lead by the nose purely for their breeding characteristics

Semantics, the dynamic is fluid (in my world).

If the balance doesn’t involve the passive partner?

Does one use the metaphor of cuck.

Agreed, you need as a couple to expand your needs and context, or what’s the point?

Apololgies op, meant context on your complaint, its a very specific thread line apropos of nothing

We find the language is tricky - cuck is historically unpleasant and is the antithesis (betrayal, unfaithful, deceit, cheating etc). A 3 way play is the best way to see it , for mutuality to come to the fore. 'Only' words, but people putting little thought into how they play, plus porn giving a purely acted role-play means its hard to match well without a lot of effort. Too much sometimes!

I didn’t complain, please don’t project.

Just have fun.

Lol. Hey it was your thread.

You posed the question

"why do couples not understand this"

The phrasing of the question is similar to many about no meets, poor feedback, etc where an op is aggrieved one way or another

Given that there are an awful lot of couples that DO understand what you referred to (in fact in our experience more so than those that don't) there had to be more, which I tried to ask, but you redirected to a personal insult.

You use the language of complaints draw unqualified stereotypes (at least based around our experience) and an unwillingness to explain or explore your own thread... No, no, I don't think it me that is "projecting".

Sorry if I hurt your feelings - we are all here to have fun! "

Explain me psychology projection, and I might agree.

As for the thread, it was a piss take off another thread.

As for aggrieved, well amused me.

Please keep posting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hi

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amesnplanesMan
over a year ago

Banbridge

This is why it's important to speak to new friends to fully understand what they really seek and the red lines of their play.

I've been fortunate enough to meet a great cross section of folks on my journey, and that open conversation allowed me to better grasp what they sought. I think the detail of what they truly wanted wouldn't be possible in a general play - thus making the time to speak to all parties, together and also separately has been interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It’s a three way play, why do couples not understand this, it’s not just about them."

totally agree that when playing its a 3way thing no one should be treated any differently but and its a big but and depends how you like to cuckold emotions and all things outside the concept of play is between me and cuck ... some couples like the bull more involved some want the bull for sexually reasons only its like everything else in life its how you want it and then you hope someone fits or it wont work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top