Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" " "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? " That's a thought that resonates with me, and one I've been slapped down for expressing a couple of times on here before. Like, where's the logic in posting a pic of your chuff that virtually shows your cervix, then acting surprised when the initial approaches are a bit direct, rather than cultured and subtle. Don't get it personally. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common."" Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no "Well, it was an example for the purposes of. The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no
Well, it was an example for the purposes of.
The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense."Nobody should experience disrespect whatever their pics are. A direct approach is not the same thing as a disrespectful one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? " If you dont like the messages you are recieving why not use the tools the site gives you and block all males and your own search for suitors  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no
Well, it was an example for the purposes of.
The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense."I agree, All messages should be respectful but I still think you should provide material in your profile that sets the context. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no
Well, it was an example for the purposes of.
The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense.
I agree, All messages should be respectful but I still think you should provide material in your profile that sets the context. "I do. I can't say exactly how my experience compares to others, but I certainly receive more disrespect than is warranted. But respect should be the default, even if you are telling Ms Cum Slag that her dripping genitals appeal to you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns" This. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns" I agree, but I think the onus should be in both directions. I might be posting provocative pictures on a "sex site", but those who message me still have brains and manners. "She was asking for it" isn't a message that is acceptable in this day and age. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns I agree, but I think the onus should be in both directions. I might be posting provocative pictures on a "sex site", but those who message me still have brains and manners. "She was asking for it" isn't a message that is acceptable in this day and age." You're totally correct, it isn't. Though I've often wondered what kind response ladies are hoping for when they post images of their uterus or colon. Always something polite and genteel from me, obvs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns I agree, but I think the onus should be in both directions. I might be posting provocative pictures on a "sex site", but those who message me still have brains and manners. "She was asking for it" isn't a message that is acceptable in this day and age." No it isn't acceptable in this day and age. It never was but a lot of people thought it and still do. I did say that both sides should judge their audience. I think we need to act according to his things are rather than how we would like them to be while speaking out to change perceptions. I know my views on this are not popular but having been a young woman in the 70s and seen how things have progressed for the better I can see that there is a long way still to go and change does not happen quickly. So for the time being to avoid a certain type of message (as far as possible) I'll keep my internal organs to myself while defending other women's right to display theirs and still be respected by men and women | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns" Is that not victim blaming though? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns I agree, but I think the onus should be in both directions. I might be posting provocative pictures on a "sex site", but those who message me still have brains and manners. "She was asking for it" isn't a message that is acceptable in this day and age. You're totally correct, it isn't. Though I've often wondered what kind response ladies are hoping for when they post images of their uterus or colon. Always something polite and genteel from me, obvs." Women displaying graphic shots or women wearing revealing clothing in public Is there a difference? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should all try and respect each other. However as women we need to take responsibility for ourselves and recognise when our actions might cause certain reactions. I think it's unrealistic and also sends out mixed messages if you post a clear, close up gynaecological shot and expect messages commenting on the state of the union. I also think it's reasonable to expect him sexual messages initially if you have only clothed photos. What I'm saying is that people should judge their audience (both messager and photo poster), realise there's a person behind each profile and hear in mind that this is not a site to exchange knitting patterns Is that not victim blaming though? " Not in my opinion. I've used this analogy before but if I leave my lap top on the back seat of my unlocked car and someone steals it. I am undoubtedly the victim and not responsible for that person's behaviour in any way. However I would realise that if my car was locked and the lap top was in the boot the chances of it being stolen would be reduced. Equally I realise that the type of messages we receive on fab very much depend on the photos we post. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's our fault. I'm saying it's reality. That reality needs to change but in the meantime we choose to protect ourselves as much as possible. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no
Well, it was an example for the purposes of.
The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense."Absolutely this. It’s just a body, we all have them, and we shouldn’t be ashamed of them. We should not be disrespected because we decide to show them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only have my legs on show on this profile and my couples one so naturally used to get a fair few messages saying 'nice legs' etc great, I'll take the compliment and say thank you but if that's all they've got to say the conversation wont go any further. If they can type out a message with a bit more to it while telling me then like the look of my legs then I'm more likely to hold a conversation with that person. I won't hold it against them for a comment like that though because that's what they can see (they might see my face after and decide I'm a troll) It's the 'fancy a fuck' 'Come to mine now' etc messages that I ignore. There's no excuse for rudeness or bad manners no matter what's on a profile " That's the point I was trying to make, a guy looks at the pictures, reads the profile (maybe not) and then writes a message based on what he's seen. In your case he works your legs into the conversation, for others it might be another body part. He assumes you are showing your best features and expect compliments | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Afraid not and I don't really blame them. If you only give the sex dimension, then that is all you'll get. If you were on a serious relationship dating site, you wouldn't get your tits out, and therefore gain better messages. I had a friend, small, blonde, tits, squeaky voice, spent all year trying to gain respect, got pissed at a Christmas party and ruined her career. The guys will mirror your profile, or carry on being idiots!"
I summarise in two ways
1. every action has an opposite and equal reaction
And
2. Batari’s box - my attitude affects your attitude affects my attitude affects your attitude and so on ad finitum | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have any particularly explicit photos but still get disrespectful messages. I generally delete, sometimes I challenge. I think the behaviour lies in the actions of the perpetrator. Going back to the laptop analogy, I wouldn't steal it either way, because I have manners. I understand that people have genitals on show but there are different ways of expressing appreciation. 'You look beautiful on your photos' is acceptable, some of the stuff I've had sent isn't. (In my opinion) But as others say I use it as a filter." Yes. I get eye watering messages, everything you can imagine, worse, and worse again. Did when I had no photos, did when I only showed as much as thigh. I don't steal because stealing is wrong. Doesn't matter how insecure the stuff is. I don't send horrifying messages because there's a human at the other end, no matter how little I think of his or her photographic choices. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? " No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Yes. I get eye watering messages, everything you can imagine, worse, and worse again. Did when I had no photos, did when I only showed as much as thigh. I don't steal because stealing is wrong. Doesn't matter how insecure the stuff is. I don't send horrifying messages because there's a human at the other end, no matter how little I think of his or her photographic choices." Exactly. I did pull someone up on it last week and he apologised. It was just rude. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have any particularly explicit photos but still get disrespectful messages. I generally delete, sometimes I challenge. I think the behaviour lies in the actions of the perpetrator. Going back to the laptop analogy, I wouldn't steal it either way, because I have manners. I understand that people have genitals on show but there are different ways of expressing appreciation. 'You look beautiful on your photos' is acceptable, some of the stuff I've had sent isn't. (In my opinion) But as others say I use it as a filter. Yes. I get eye watering messages, everything you can imagine, worse, and worse again. Did when I had no photos, did when I only showed as much as thigh. I don't steal because stealing is wrong. Doesn't matter how insecure the stuff is. I don't send horrifying messages because there's a human at the other end, no matter how little I think of his or her photographic choices." Out of curiosity, does the same go for men you're already chatting with? Do you consider it OK for them to make a direct comment about a new photo of yours with your assets on display? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong." I I don't disagree. I think we should do what we can to reduce the risk though. There will *always* be people who enjoy sending horrible messages, there will always be people who steal, acknowledging that doesn't mean that I condone it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have any particularly explicit photos but still get disrespectful messages. I generally delete, sometimes I challenge. I think the behaviour lies in the actions of the perpetrator. Going back to the laptop analogy, I wouldn't steal it either way, because I have manners. I understand that people have genitals on show but there are different ways of expressing appreciation. 'You look beautiful on your photos' is acceptable, some of the stuff I've had sent isn't. (In my opinion) But as others say I use it as a filter. Yes. I get eye watering messages, everything you can imagine, worse, and worse again. Did when I had no photos, did when I only showed as much as thigh. I don't steal because stealing is wrong. Doesn't matter how insecure the stuff is. I don't send horrifying messages because there's a human at the other end, no matter how little I think of his or her photographic choices. Out of curiosity, does the same go for men you're already chatting with? Do you consider it OK for them to make a direct comment about a new photo of yours with your assets on display? " If I haven't met someone and they're crass it would put me off. If they're polite but sexual that would be OK. (I.e. Someone told me I have a gorgeous ass today, that's fine) If I've met someone and things have happened then I'd be more accepting. In that circumstance I'm happy with filth but still not crassness. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have any particularly explicit photos but still get disrespectful messages. I generally delete, sometimes I challenge. I think the behaviour lies in the actions of the perpetrator. Going back to the laptop analogy, I wouldn't steal it either way, because I have manners. I understand that people have genitals on show but there are different ways of expressing appreciation. 'You look beautiful on your photos' is acceptable, some of the stuff I've had sent isn't. (In my opinion) But as others say I use it as a filter. Yes. I get eye watering messages, everything you can imagine, worse, and worse again. Did when I had no photos, did when I only showed as much as thigh. I don't steal because stealing is wrong. Doesn't matter how insecure the stuff is. I don't send horrifying messages because there's a human at the other end, no matter how little I think of his or her photographic choices. Out of curiosity, does the same go for men you're already chatting with? Do you consider it OK for them to make a direct comment about a new photo of yours with your assets on display? " Depends on how they do it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong.I I don't disagree. I think we should do what we can to reduce the risk though. There will *always* be people who enjoy sending horrible messages, there will always be people who steal, acknowledging that doesn't mean that I condone it." Sure. And you'll note that my public pictures never show my genitals, rarely nipples, legs generally closed. Classy for Fab. I already act prudently. But the wrong here is the horrible messages, not sexual photos on a sexual site. And regardless of prudence, we should aim the blame firmly where it belongs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong.I I don't disagree. I think we should do what we can to reduce the risk though. There will *always* be people who enjoy sending horrible messages, there will always be people who steal, acknowledging that doesn't mean that I condone it. Sure. And you'll note that my public pictures never show my genitals, rarely nipples, legs generally closed. Classy for Fab. I already act prudently. But the wrong here is the horrible messages, not sexual photos on a sexual site. And regardless of prudence, we should aim the blame firmly where it belongs." I agree that blame should be aimed squarely at the perpetrator. I'm still locking my car and my house though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong.I I don't disagree. I think we should do what we can to reduce the risk though. There will *always* be people who enjoy sending horrible messages, there will always be people who steal, acknowledging that doesn't mean that I condone it. Sure. And you'll note that my public pictures never show my genitals, rarely nipples, legs generally closed. Classy for Fab. I already act prudently. But the wrong here is the horrible messages, not sexual photos on a sexual site. And regardless of prudence, we should aim the blame firmly where it belongs. I agree that blame should be aimed squarely at the perpetrator. I'm still locking my car and my house though." Sure. And my photos are still prudent. I'm not blaming anyone who posts sexual photos on a sexual site for anything, though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we should all stop telling men that having just cock pictures on their profile is wrong? No. It's not wrong. It's not likely to get them what they want. But being rejected is not the same as receiving horrifying messages. It's within any person's right to reject anyone. Sending horrifying messages is at least morally wrong.I I don't disagree. I think we should do what we can to reduce the risk though. There will *always* be people who enjoy sending horrible messages, there will always be people who steal, acknowledging that doesn't mean that I condone it. Sure. And you'll note that my public pictures never show my genitals, rarely nipples, legs generally closed. Classy for Fab. I already act prudently. But the wrong here is the horrible messages, not sexual photos on a sexual site. And regardless of prudence, we should aim the blame firmly where it belongs. I agree that blame should be aimed squarely at the perpetrator. I'm still locking my car and my house though. Sure. And my photos are still prudent. I'm not blaming anyone who posts sexual photos on a sexual site for anything, though." Well we could go on like this all day but I will say one last time, neither am I. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Some people are just vile. If you wouldn't say it to a stranger in real life, don't send it to a stranger as a message. Simples. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sort of agree with OP, if all you have is tits and a wide open garden picture on your profile and no profile text what sort of messages are you expecting to get? "Fancy going on a leisurely evening stroll in Kew Gardens?" "I like the look of you and find you attractive. Let's see what we have in common." Well said, though that can still be considered to be a one liner which apparently is another fab no no
Well, it was an example for the purposes of.
The idea that someone should expect disrespect because they reveal their body on an adult sexual site is nonsense.
I agree, All messages should be respectful but I still think you should provide material in your profile that sets the context. "Is context not subjective though? What might be overtly sexual to one may not be to another. There have been a couple of times where I've clapped back against crass messages and the senders have insinuated that I deserved them because I have nudes on my public profile, by which they mean the picture of my bare butt. To me that does not constitute a nude... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? " To be honest, if you had no pictures at all, as a female you will still get bombarded with messages, many of which will be at a fairly base level - going by other’s comments in the forums. It’s a shame - but that’s the nature of the site, unfortunately. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? " I think when some get home after a long day they have a few to many beers, wack a porn on cock in one hand phone or keyboard in another then you get a nice tits message or faf Meet now Meet anything anywhere lol  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? I think when some get home after a long day they have a few to many beers, wack a porn on cock in one hand phone or keyboard in another then you get a nice tits message or faf Meet now Meet anything anywhere lol "No disrespect intended, but based on your username and profile text even I would write something naughty in a message to you and I'm almost never naughty  .
I'd be very taken aback if you suddenly complained about getting rude messages. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? I think when some get home after a long day they have a few to many beers, wack a porn on cock in one hand phone or keyboard in another then you get a nice tits message or faf Meet now Meet anything anywhere lol
No disrespect intended, but based on your username and profile text even I would write something naughty in a message to you and I'm almost never naughty .
I'd be very taken aback if you suddenly complained about getting rude messages. "well I do like a naughty message. Sadly most don’t read. That is where my frustration comes from. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? I think when some get home after a long day they have a few to many beers, wack a porn on cock in one hand phone or keyboard in another then you get a nice tits message or faf Meet now Meet anything anywhere lol
No disrespect intended, but based on your username and profile text even I would write something naughty in a message to you and I'm almost never naughty .
I'd be very taken aback if you suddenly complained about getting rude messages.
well I do like a naughty message. Sadly most don’t read. That is where my frustration comes from. "Phew!!! I thought I had read the profile wrong. Obviously the problem you have is that you don't have enough naughty pictures on your profile to inspire rude messages. Now if you'd like you send me some in private of course  I'd gladly oblige and sent you some pure filth with a couple of dick pics for good measure | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used the word complain but not in an official capacity. I wouldnt write to my MP about it, its not that serious. I do use filters, delete unsuitable messages etc, i was curious about the topic i raised in the OP. Great discussion so far "Is your MP on here? I always assumed they only frequented the more specific BDSM sites and their ilk | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If as a lady you have nude scanty clad pics on your profile and resulting messages are along the lines of ‘ nice tits’, ‘nice arse’ etc can you complain about the quality of messages/message sender? Should one cover up a bit in the hopes folks who contact will be a bit more respectful? I acknowledge its a swinging site with a view to meeting for sex and everyone uses the site how they please but in do wonder if your photos dictate the type of person you attract. This may be an obvious answer for some, food for thought for others. What are your views....? I think when some get home after a long day they have a few to many beers, wack a porn on cock in one hand phone or keyboard in another then you get a nice tits message or faf Meet now Meet anything anywhere lol
No disrespect intended, but based on your username and profile text even I would write something naughty in a message to you and I'm almost never naughty .
I'd be very taken aback if you suddenly complained about getting rude messages.
well I do like a naughty message. Sadly most don’t read. That is where my frustration comes from.
Phew!!! I thought I had read the profile wrong. Obviously the problem you have is that you don't have enough naughty pictures on your profile to inspire rude messages.
Now if you'd like you send me some in private of course I'd gladly oblige and sent you some pure filth with a couple of dick pics for good measure "I get too many messages, the more pics I have. An as I haven’t found what I’m looking for yet. I don’t like to go through lots of messages. Haha well thank you. I don’t want to be teased tonight | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
