FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swinging Support and Advice

Face photo verification!

Jump to newest
 

By *ornycpl1989 OP   Couple
over a year ago

Barnsley

Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But people would just use a fake face pic?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"But people would just use a fake face pic? "

If they were gonna go through the trouble of photoshopping a verification, they could do it now. This would just sift out the fakes/bots.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Admin have said many times they will not make photo-verification mandatory - it is not, after all infallible.

In certain circumstances it is a requirement for some new accounts.

Most people would not choose to join a site without having the chance to try it out first, and P-V on joining would put off genuine members - not just the 'time-wasters/fakes'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

verified by who against what to prove what?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornycpl1989 OP   Couple
over a year ago

Barnsley

I don't know to be quite honest. It's just really annoying that people will message us and talk for a while then send a face pic, so we reverse image it and find it on pintrest or imagefap. Its just annoying. Yes I understand that some people arnt photo verified and do have successfull meets. Surely the site can do something.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The site do plenty. If you find a pic you believe is fake - report it so Admin can take another look at it.

Use the tools the site gives us - do more vetting before committing to a meet - it is not the responsibility of the site to do your due diligence for you.

Block new, unverified profiles and any

profile types that you're not interested in - from mailing you through the message filters to minimise the volume of unwanted approaches.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Personally, as a newbie, I am photo verified and prefer just to chat to photo verified members. Meets are harder to come by for single males so verification will take me time.

There are filters there to help so it does make it easier.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hickennchipsWoman
over a year ago

up above the streets and houses

No I don’t agree. I’ve never done it as I don’t want to, doesn’t make me fake

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Just set your filter done.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something"

Well thats a stupid idea ans completley invalidates the photoverificstion process.

Theres a reason those pics arent published.

Otherwise somone just has to save all those pics wait for people to leave and bing bang bosh a whole load of verified fake profiles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something

Well thats a stupid idea ans completley invalidates the photoverificstion process.

Theres a reason those pics arent published.

Otherwise somone just has to save all those pics wait for people to leave and bing bang bosh a whole load of verified fake profiles"

How on Earth is someone gonna save a load of photos if they are gone.. anyway, no reassigning used usernames unless to previous used email address would sort that stupid idea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Totally off topic but..

You have a gorgeous bum

Chrissie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So in my opinion the fact that someone is photo verified doesn’t mean they aren’t a time waster, some of the biggest time wasters and bullshitters I’ve spoken to on this site have a photo verification and some of the most genuine people I’ve met have had no verification at all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree with anna tv as I find many photo verified people just talk alot of bull and the people I have actually met where un-verified.

Same with meet verified I find the same with many just trying their hardest to get some wank chat that I won't fall for.

So can only come down to experience in judgment and asking the right questions to out the fakes.

Happy fabbing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something

Well thats a stupid idea ans completley invalidates the photoverificstion process.

Theres a reason those pics arent published.

Otherwise somone just has to save all those pics wait for people to leave and bing bang bosh a whole load of verified fake profiles

How on Earth is someone gonna save a load of photos if they are gone.. anyway, no reassigning used usernames unless to previous used email address would sort that stupid idea "

Right click save.

And thats gonna be a pretty huge data base given the site turnover

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We would leave the site if it was compulsory to be face photo verified, don’t want to take the chance the site may be hacked or the data base compromised.

Surely the only true verification is a couple of meet varis from people that have meet varis?

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Anyone can be a timewaster,proving who you are will not cure that. They should start a rating system,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something

Well thats a stupid idea ans completley invalidates the photoverificstion process.

Theres a reason those pics arent published.

Otherwise somone just has to save all those pics wait for people to leave and bing bang bosh a whole load of verified fake profiles

How on Earth is someone gonna save a load of photos if they are gone.. anyway, no reassigning used usernames unless to previous used email address would sort that stupid idea

Right click save.

And thats gonna be a pretty huge data base given the site turnover"

I’ve already answered that

Anyway, it would Still vastly reduce the amount of fakes..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Agreed, but many people here are pretty private, I’d suggest a mandatory full body, with/without clothes, no face necessary holding up sign with screename snd fabswingers on it and must be shown on profile.. not much thought went into that idea so maybe I’ve missed something

Well thats a stupid idea ans completley invalidates the photoverificstion process.

Theres a reason those pics arent published.

Otherwise somone just has to save all those pics wait for people to leave and bing bang bosh a whole load of verified fake profiles

How on Earth is someone gonna save a load of photos if they are gone.. anyway, no reassigning used usernames unless to previous used email address would sort that stupid idea

Right click save.

And thats gonna be a pretty huge data base given the site turnover

I’ve already answered that

Anyway, it would Still vastly reduce the amount of fakes.."

but you're not photo verified...one rule for you and another for everyone else? Does that make you a fake?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!!

Anyone can be a timewaster,proving who you are will not cure that. They should start a rating system,"

It’s for fakes not time wasters..

rating system wouldn’t work, if someone has enough veris to be rated they won’t be fake.. and the forum clique would all be just rating each other and they could be a crap meet..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option.

Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile.

What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked.

What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you.

Enjoying the site is about using your common sense.

I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification.

That really did make me want to give my head a wobble.

I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence.

After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes.

If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee I think the site would have implemented it by now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to"

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here.. "

I don't think that's what they're saying.

How about we ask them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here.. "

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV"

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times? "

Veri's or the PV shown?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *G CoupleCouple
over a year ago

kent

If PV was compulsory, we wouldn't be here. Would guess that would be the same for a lot of others too, it may help with fake accounts but it would also stop genuine people from joining.

We treat everyone to be potentially fake unless we have actually met them, works for us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've yet to meet any fakes and I've been on the site several years. I don't think it's as widespread as people say. Time wasters and no shows yes but that's not being fake

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oney to the beeWoman
over a year ago

Manchester


"If PV was compulsory, we wouldn't be here. Would guess that would be the same for a lot of others too, it may help with fake accounts but it would also stop genuine people from joining.

We treat everyone to be potentially fake unless we have actually met them, works for us. "

Snap! I wouldn't stay if it was compulsory and I guess LOT of women wouldn't be comfortable with it. Its a great idea for killing of the site though with even less women on here.

Besides anyone with any intelligence chatting to someone on here talks on the phone or go on cam with people to be more sure they are who they say they are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times?

Veri's or the PV shown?"

PV are to a better standard too because there are some fakes with them that sneak under the radar

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times?

Veri's or the PV shown?

PV are to a better standard too because there are some fakes with them that sneak under the radar "

I am a bit lost now sorry, if you want PV's to be shown to everyone I doubt anyone would want to do a PV , including us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times?

Veri's or the PV shown?

PV are to a better standard too because there are some fakes with them that sneak under the radar

I am a bit lost now sorry, if you want PV's to be shown to everyone I doubt anyone would want to do a PV , including us.

"

I don’t mean one with a face, just a majority body with signage with name and clothed, naked if preferred

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I was made to verify early on. I guess I was reported as fake. (I'd meant to get round to it then landed in hospital. A likely story on a new single fem account, but occasionally shit happens! Those who didn't abuse me got a *cough* glamorous hospital selfie ) I get it.

But I think making it compulsory across the board would create a false sense of security. There are going to be fakes, no system is foolproof, and you need to watch yourself. With the opportunity of the Internet comes the frustration of trolls and fakes. Such is life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I don’t mean one with a face, just a majority body with signage with name and clothed, naked if preferred"

I don’t get this, why should we have to place anything on here for anyone to see?

You put what you are comfortable with, if people don’t like it use the filters or ignore/block.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

If you set your filters to only accept verified people the site will work for you how you want it to

I think what OP is saying is that there is plenty of verified fakes here..

In which case the logic of wanting everyone to be PV's is flawed

I don't think they are saying what you think though, they are asking for people to be forced to get a PV

It’s the meet veris that’s a flawed system, the PV has to go through admin so is it really that bad of an idea to have them shown at all times?

Veri's or the PV shown?

PV are to a better standard too because there are some fakes with them that sneak under the radar

I am a bit lost now sorry, if you want PV's to be shown to everyone I doubt anyone would want to do a PV , including us.

I don’t mean one with a face, just a majority body with signage with name and clothed, naked if preferred"

You can't have a fully clothed PV, so it would have to be a naked or face pic, which again, lots of people wouldn't want.

I really don't know what it will achieve anyway, if anyone thinks someone could have a fake PV we can report it for Admin to check out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton

But the current PV are naked or face?

Well that’s what I’m saying, we can’t report them because people don’t show them on profiles..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irginieWoman
over a year ago

Near Marlborough


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

No I don’t agree that it will have any impact at all.

And since when does foreskin grow on a face

V x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"But the current PV are naked or face?

Well that’s what I’m saying, we can’t report them because people don’t show them on profiles.. "

Yes, thats what I said, naked or face.

I said if you think a profile is fake and you can report it and Admin will check it out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton

Ok well current system does not work, just thought I’d point out something that would reduce the number of fakes, that is all..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Agree with OP, photo verification would help, I know there will be ways around it. But Photoshop ping a hand written fab name and take a photo, may be too much hassle and the fakes could try other sites

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I always use a pic of Brad Pitt, noone questions it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Fake men?

You mean women are setting up profiles pretending to be men?

No,I don't believe that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How about driving licence or passport verification I know we wouldn't have a problem with that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awtywifeCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

Even popping on cam you can be accused of being fake,just unfortunately too many ppl want to ruin sites with being fake and will always find a way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Even popping on cam you can be accused of being fake,just unfortunately too many ppl want to ruin sites with being fake and will always find a way"

I think theres more people crying fake than actual fakes :p

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Ok well current system does not work, just thought I’d point out something that would reduce the number of fakes, that is all.. "

Now you've got me curious....

How does the current system not work?

How would your suggestion reduce the number of fakes?

What's your definition of a fake?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aomilatteCouple
over a year ago

Midlands

Loads of fakes are photo verified. Some go to great efforts to set up several profiles and veri each. The savy ones of us CAN tell

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irkydirkyMan
over a year ago

bolton


"Ok well current system does not work, just thought I’d point out something that would reduce the number of fakes, that is all..

Now you've got me curious....

How does the current system not work?

How would your suggestion reduce the number of fakes?

What's your definition of a fake?"

You already know the answers..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Ok well current system does not work, just thought I’d point out something that would reduce the number of fakes, that is all.. "

To be honest it was probably me not reading it right, but I am a bit confused as to what you are getting at as it has gone from fake veri's to PV's not working....why doesn't it work for you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yer but I don't want mine public due to privacy, however I'm 100% open to send a picture to anyone proving it's me, like holding paper with there name on or something

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago

Dudley

Or, people could use the tools on the site to filter out people they aren't interested in? Too many people these days need their hands holding, if you use common sense and take precautions, you will very likely not run into these 'fakes'.

I've been here many years and not encountered a fake person, many timewasters and idiots but not a full on fake profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"Admin have said many times they will not make photo-verification mandatory - it is not, after all infallible.

In certain circumstances it is a requirement for some new accounts.

Most people would not choose to join a site without having the chance to try it out first, and P-V on joining would put off genuine members - not just the 'time-wasters/fakes'."

What are these "circumstances"...?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

It would make no difference to the fakes... doesn't take a lot to fake such photos

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Or, people could use the tools on the site to filter out people they aren't interested in? Too many people these days need their hands holding, if you use common sense and take precautions, you will very likely not run into these 'fakes'.

I've been here many years and not encountered a fake person, many timewasters and idiots but not a full on fake profile. "

Tools of the site plus a bit of adult responsibility.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago

Dudley


"Or, people could use the tools on the site to filter out people they aren't interested in? Too many people these days need their hands holding, if you use common sense and take precautions, you will very likely not run into these 'fakes'.

I've been here many years and not encountered a fake person, many timewasters and idiots but not a full on fake profile.

Tools of the site plus a bit of adult responsibility. "

Definitely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When they where doing site suggestions only thing I thought would be good would force pepole to have to do more, is to have a minimum requirement on profile text to complete your profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzz And WoodyCouple
over a year ago

Maidstone

Just arrange a social meet, they can’t fake that. Job done. Too much time is wasted on the whole swapping life stories and photos through text. Sure, have a brief chat first but you will never truly know if you want to continue until you actually meet up. I guess some people like the thrill of the chase and pure fantasy and then end up destroyed knowing they wasted their time on a fantasist on the other end. Life’s too short.

Ed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungle_kingMan
over a year ago

Nuneaton

Some profiles stand out a mile and the way people get "verified" is to create a fake profile and then verify the original profile. So it doesn't matter if you filter verified only as there are ways around it. I agree with the original poster that all profiles should be photo verified just to reduce the number of fakes. You will never get rid of them all but more could be done in my opinion. Half the time you think am I replying to a cock in a frock.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Some profiles stand out a mile and the way people get "verified" is to create a fake profile and then verify the original profile. So it doesn't matter if you filter verified only as there are ways around it. I agree with the original poster that all profiles should be photo verified just to reduce the number of fakes. You will never get rid of them all but more could be done in my opinion. Half the time you think am I replying to a cock in a frock. "

That wouldn't work. A new (fake) unverified profile wouldn't be able to verify and existing profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who agrees with us!

There are so many FAKE men and women on here it's unreal!!

Who thinks that accounts should only be published and made public when the account have been face photo verified? Not a full nude shot, a actual face photo verification.

Surely this will out the fakes time wasters. I mean come on fake profile makers. Foreskin doesn't grow back!!! "

Fully agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How about driving licence or passport verification I know we wouldn't have a problem with that "

Yes like fb does for unusual names

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uxomBloomsWoman
over a year ago

Near Tunbridge Wells

I wouldn't be verified if you had to show your face. I don't trust that the site couldn't be hacked so I'm very careful not to mix filth with face!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 14/04/19 20:45:29]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top