Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In position such as this you mention. Yes always a concert , however like all things in life. A little discretion is always best way. Hence only verified people and no faces. " Totally agree about the discretion, I'd also add that trying as much add possible to merry people who show respect. You can usually get a sense from their profile or how their conduct during messaging but mainly at a social meet first where everyone has the option to pull out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi all. I know lots of people refer to the need to be discreet due to their jobs (completely understandable whatever your profession). My question is, are any of you in professional roles that are regulated by the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), and if so, have you ever worried about being on here for fear of 'bringing your profession into disrepute' or worse, being disciplined or struck off due to being on here? Female is in a HCPC regulated profession and looking to share anxieties / seek reassurance from similar others... please private message if preferred. Thanks " You might want to look into a court case that happened a few years ago, I believe it was looked after by The Spanner Trust. A care worker (IIRC) was dismissed from their job for attending a fetish club. I believe that they fought and won the case of unfair dismissal. It never hurts to read up on these things, just in case. (And always keep the number of organisations like The Spanner Trust and The Obscenity Lawyer handy in your phone, just in case.) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know people have been struck off for escorting, which of course we know is very different from swinging, but to an outsider I think they would see swinging and escorting as somewhat similar." The only difference is that money is changing hands. Either your employer has an issue with sex outside of marriage... or they don't. Point that out to them if they ever have a problem. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" However, I think that swinging is part of how I express my sexually, and nobody can be struck off for being gay/bi/trans etc. X" Sexual orientation is one of the nine protected characteristics under law (the equality act 2010) so differs slightly in this area. You could argue it forms part of your belief system (also a protected characteristic?) but as with most it would be a judgement call. Unfair dismissal is hard to run as a defence if the care provider can prove damage to organisation reputation. Especially as in emoluments tribunals can often be decided on the basis of the means justifying the ends. Better defence is a solid working history with no disciplinary sanctions and an invasion of privacy. Hope that all makes sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" However, I think that swinging is part of how I express my sexually, and nobody can be struck off for being gay/bi/trans etc. X " Promiscuous sex and non-monogamy is specifically *not* the same as being gay/bi/trans (and trans isn't the same as being gay/bi - transgender is gender, not sexuality). Non-monogamy is not a protected characteristic in law. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |