Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On our profile we have a pic with Sabrina standing next to a police car" That's amazing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I travel regularly with work and clock up 2k+ miles most weeks which leaves me free to visit local dogging sites throughout the UK. I was at a well-known site not far from large town in the Midlands a few weeks ago when the whole event was thrown into chaos and almost violence by the arrival of 2 guys with camcorders. These guys kept approaching cars/groups and would begin filming straight away and attempted to continue filming even after they had been told to stop and leave. These 2 were of the opinion that they could film if they liked as it was a public place and didn't require consent as the films were not for commercial gain. Just wondering what the fabfamily's take on these guys manners is and the general question of filming dogging. " hey didn't you wind windows down and get some light on subject | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I travel regularly with work and clock up 2k+ miles most weeks which leaves me free to visit local dogging sites throughout the UK. I was at a well-known site not far from large town in the Midlands a few weeks ago when the whole event was thrown into chaos and almost violence by the arrival of 2 guys with camcorders. These guys kept approaching cars/groups and would begin filming straight away and attempted to continue filming even after they had been told to stop and leave. These 2 were of the opinion that they could film if they liked as it was a public place and didn't require consent as the films were not for commercial gain. Just wondering what the fabfamily's take on these guys manners is and the general question of filming dogging. " Those guys would make pretty crap ornithologists! I'd love to hear their "chatting up" techniques... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." Totally agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." Whilst that's absolutely the case... the question was about dogging etiquette rather than what's legal. I don't think it's acceptable to film someone without permission. It might not be illegal but it is poor form in terms of manners at a dogging site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I travel regularly with work and clock up 2k+ miles most weeks which leaves me free to visit local dogging sites throughout the UK. I was at a well-known site not far from large town in the Midlands a few weeks ago when the whole event was thrown into chaos and almost violence by the arrival of 2 guys with camcorders. These guys kept approaching cars/groups and would begin filming straight away and attempted to continue filming even after they had been told to stop and leave. These 2 were of the opinion that they could film if they liked as it was a public place and didn't require consent as the films were not for commercial gain. Just wondering what the fabfamily's take on these guys manners is and the general question of filming dogging. " Sounds like they were not dogging so why should they have any sort of dogging etiquette | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." This. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On our profile we have a pic with Sabrina standing next to a police car That's amazing " That quote reminded me of the Fast Show | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On our profile we have a pic with Sabrina standing next to a police car That's amazing That quote reminded me of the Fast Show " which was nice | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places. Whilst that's absolutely the case... the question was about dogging etiquette rather than what's legal. I don't think it's acceptable to film someone without permission. It might not be illegal but it is poor form in terms of manners at a dogging site. " Maybe they were not 'doggers', just a couple of guys who thought they would score themselves some freebie homemade porn? If you're not a 'dogger', why would you abide by any etiquette? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. ." Yes there is, filming a sexual act for the purposes of sexual gratification, or to enable someone else to watch it for the purpose of sexual gratification, without the permission of the participants, is an offence under the Sexual Offences Act. The problem OP, is who is going to report them? (Which is what they rely on) Mr ddc | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." I agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places. Whilst that's absolutely the case... the question was about dogging etiquette rather than what's legal. I don't think it's acceptable to film someone without permission. It might not be illegal but it is poor form in terms of manners at a dogging site. Maybe they were not 'doggers', just a couple of guys who thought they would score themselves some freebie homemade porn? If you're not a 'dogger', why would you abide by any etiquette?" That's also possible... I guess I just believe in good manners all round really and dogger or not, it's pretty poor form to film anyone without their consent. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." I agree. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't care if it's dogging or anything else sexual filming someone without permission is just bad manners. Ok they might have the legal right but I'm supprised they didn't get punched off someone. Xxxx" And that is more or less what happened. Was interested in the opinions of group before I posted the outcome. After approaching the 3rd or 4th group and getting their marching orders they got approached by a group of about 8 guys who took their cameras and removed the data cards and snapped them. They were escorted back to their car and told unless they wanted broken legs to leave and never come back. The dogging etiquette in that group was no cameras, no videos and no touching without an actual invite. I personally agree with them. You and your partner/wife/husband /FB might enjoy this side of the lifestyle but getting a video of what you got up to last Saturday night stuck up on the Internet for anyone to see is not the same as having a few guys looking through the windows otherwise you might as well have a sex party in your back garden. Personally, the sneaky around in the outdoors is half the fun. You shouldn't have to worry about some guy getting paid for what you get up to. As far as I'm concerned, those guys with the camcorders were no better than the picture collecters who steal your photos without asking and before you know what's happening you find your wife's photos are advertising some Russian porn site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't care if it's dogging or anything else sexual filming someone without permission is just bad manners. Ok they might have the legal right but I'm supprised they didn't get punched off someone. Xxxx And that is more or less what happened. Was interested in the opinions of group before I posted the outcome. After approaching the 3rd or 4th group and getting their marching orders they got approached by a group of about 8 guys who took their cameras and removed the data cards and snapped them. They were escorted back to their car and told unless they wanted broken legs to leave and never come back. The dogging etiquette in that group was no cameras, no videos and no touching without an actual invite. I personally agree with them. You and your partner/wife/husband /FB might enjoy this side of the lifestyle but getting a video of what you got up to last Saturday night stuck up on the Internet for anyone to see is not the same as having a few guys looking through the windows otherwise you might as well have a sex party in your back garden. Personally, the sneaky around in the outdoors is half the fun. You shouldn't have to worry about some guy getting paid for what you get up to. As far as I'm concerned, those guys with the camcorders were no better than the picture collecters who steal your photos without asking and before you know what's happening you find your wife's photos are advertising some Russian porn site. " Perhaps people shouldn't have sex in public, threaten others with violence, or send their wives pictures to other men? However you frame it, you were will in the wrong here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't care if it's dogging or anything else sexual filming someone without permission is just bad manners. Ok they might have the legal right but I'm supprised they didn't get punched off someone. Xxxx And that is more or less what happened. Was interested in the opinions of group before I posted the outcome. After approaching the 3rd or 4th group and getting their marching orders they got approached by a group of about 8 guys who took their cameras and removed the data cards and snapped them. They were escorted back to their car and told unless they wanted broken legs to leave and never come back. The dogging etiquette in that group was no cameras, no videos and no touching without an actual invite. I personally agree with them. You and your partner/wife/husband /FB might enjoy this side of the lifestyle but getting a video of what you got up to last Saturday night stuck up on the Internet for anyone to see is not the same as having a few guys looking through the windows otherwise you might as well have a sex party in your back garden. Personally, the sneaky around in the outdoors is half the fun. You shouldn't have to worry about some guy getting paid for what you get up to. As far as I'm concerned, those guys with the camcorders were no better than the picture collecters who steal your photos without asking and before you know what's happening you find your wife's photos are advertising some Russian porn site. " Filming without consent is pretty bad manners, but violence, destroying their property and threatening to break there legs?? Far worse in my opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has anyone thought they might have been filming to try to discourage the doggers ? Maybe they live locally and don't like what is going on there. " or cops getting evidence | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone can film or take pics in public nothing you can legally do about it. Though it's pretty poor behaviour." You can call the Police and have the person removed, and have the film confisticated, if, as a result of having their pics taken, people feel "alarm or distress". This includes being filmed or having your pics taken in "public places". There is also the "Reasonable expectation of privacy" argument that helps define what is considered "public" and what isn't, but I doubt that applies to dogging. The whole situation depends on the individual Police Officers interpretation too, so all in all its a bit of a grey area. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have a broad range of interests within the subject of this forum and website but there is a noticeable minority who like to "look down on" dogging like it's the grotty end of the market. It's the same on most of the other sites too. For people with very liberal views on some things some of us still have quite a few hangups. I would like people to live and let live but also respect others right or need to privacy. " Some people need a hierarchy so that they have someone to feel superior to. If you think they look down on doggers, you should see what they say when the car is moving. It's getting to the point when it's almost impossible to have a wank, while watching porn on my mobile, while Mrs ddc flashes at tanker drivers, nuns and little children, all at 110mph through the centre of town... Mr ddc | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"well this seems to have killed the thread.. lol " Yeah, I often have that effect I'm on a mission to validate the rumour that if you succeed in being the last poster on all the threads on your green arrow, it unlocks the site's other secret features... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places. Totally agree" I hope you had permission to use that profile name. Its copyrighted you know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely dogging is ruleless , ...... someone else won't play by the non existent rules ......" The "rules" of social sex seemed to be very clear and hard-wired into humans. These are manifest in dogging, swinging, etc. Few would agree with your premise??? And these exceptions would stand out as not being company one would choose to keep??? The general rules of human interaction form the core of the-law-of-the-land. However; driven by its "technicians" with ignorances or agendas (eg. trying to further the "deviated" aims of highly political formal patriarchal religion (Christianity, Judaism, Islam in the main)), the law-of-the-land can end up out-of-step with inherent human social rules. * The "law" defines "offences" which are clearly acceptable human interaction * the "law" defines no "offence" is committed when that act is wrong by the inherent rules of human interaction Some of the largest "News headlines" are when one of these "mismatches" occurs. There should be a law of "reasonable privacy" which enforces that different aspects of life should be kept separate. Whose main point is that what is known in one social domain cannot be transferred into another domain unconditionally. That the person doing the transfer eg. from a dating site into a school governors' committee, has probably committed the crime. This law doesn't exist at the moment. But for sure, turning up with cameras at a dogging site and filming without permission is against all inherent rules of human social interaction. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing illegal about what they were doing. On the other hand, dogging participants are almost certainly breaking the law in some way. IMO, if you're not prepared to be caught on film and put all over the internet having sex, then don't have sex in public places." . That is what I thought . I would prefer not to get a conviction for public indecency | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely dogging is ruleless , ...... someone else won't play by the non existent rules ...... The "rules" of social sex seemed to be very clear and hard-wired into humans. These are manifest in dogging, swinging, etc. Few would agree with your premise??? And these exceptions would stand out as not being company one would choose to keep??? The general rules of human interaction form the core of the-law-of-the-land. However; driven by its "technicians" with ignorances or agendas (eg. trying to further the "deviated" aims of highly political formal patriarchal religion (Christianity, Judaism, Islam in the main)), the law-of-the-land can end up out-of-step with inherent human social rules. * The "law" defines "offences" which are clearly acceptable human interaction * the "law" defines no "offence" is committed when that act is wrong by the inherent rules of human interaction Some of the largest "News headlines" are when one of these "mismatches" occurs. There should be a law of "reasonable privacy" which enforces that different aspects of life should be kept separate. Whose main point is that what is known in one social domain cannot be transferred into another domain unconditionally. That the person doing the transfer eg. from a dating site into a school governors' committee, has probably committed the crime. This law doesn't exist at the moment. But for sure, turning up with cameras at a dogging site and filming without permission is against all inherent rules of human social interaction. " I would be annoyed being filmed doing anything without my permission, even if I was doing something totally innocent. Dogging is really not for me but we do like a little bit of outdoor fun just the two of us. I would be horrified if someone tried to film it. What makes someone feel like it is acceptable to try and film anyone? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sex in the woods behind a deserted car park when it is dark; does that fall under public indecency?" public indecency is any act which may cause offence! therefore if the investigating officer feels it could cause offence then its indecent! lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sex in the woods behind a deserted car park when it is dark; does that fall under public indecency? public indecency is any act which may cause offence! therefore if the investigating officer feels it could cause offence then its indecent! lol " Fuck me! All those years I was at it in Harrogate!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe it was their way of preventing doggers from using the area. Not everyone thinks it's harmless fun. I get why the doggers did not like it. But there are plenty of people who don't like doggers, hell there are plenty of people who don't like swingers or and sexual deviance. " Apparently some are left in a total state with used condoms, lube containers etc just left everywhere. Not good for the vanilla visitors during the day who are out for a walk with their kids. It would piss me off too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe it was their way of preventing doggers from using the area. Not everyone thinks it's harmless fun. I get why the doggers did not like it. But there are plenty of people who don't like doggers, hell there are plenty of people who don't like swingers or and sexual deviance. Apparently some are left in a total state with used condoms, lube containers etc just left everywhere. Not good for the vanilla visitors during the day who are out for a walk with their kids. It would piss me off too. " That's; assuming you were vanilla, of course. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again I agree with vanilla, some "beauty spots" are left ruined with debris and not just of the sexual variety. That said most doggers I know are normally tidy taking their used "whatevers" with them. More than can be said for some with cans and food wrappers etc.. " not just a dogging issue but it would flag up what the area is used for. I would rather a toddler picked up an old crisp packet than presenting me with an unusual soggy balloon! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |