FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swinging Support and Advice

Ratios

Jump to newest
 

By *andk OP   Couple
over a year ago

Wisbech

Just out of interest does anyone know the ratios of men, women and couples on here. AFF shows it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

It's hard to know, the membership is quite dynamic and varies from one area to another.

You can get a rough idea though by doing a local search. If you search only within 5 miles, and search for men, then women, then couples... it should give you an idea.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I just did that, was an eye opener!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"It's hard to know, the membership is quite dynamic and varies from one area to another.

You can get a rough idea though by doing a local search. If you search only within 5 miles, and search for men, then women, then couples... it should give you an idea.

Cal"

For us, there are 225 men, 28 women, and 143 couples.

8:1 men to women

1.6:1 men to couples

5:1 couples to women

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

[Removed by poster at 29/11/15 17:20:40]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

I don't need 8 of them, one would do right now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andk OP   Couple
over a year ago

Wisbech

Never thought of that good idea, we will try it. I knew they'd be miles more men. I was wondering as Ashley Madison had 3 million men to 5 thousand women (boy they could of had some fun)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wow just done the search cal mentioned!

47 couples

300+ single males

60 single fems

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

a while ago someone did a pretty comprehensive post of this,maybe search 'ratio'?..collated results from all over the place, got people to check at similar times etc, and it came out pretty much 10-1...a lot lower than most moany single men usually reckon!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wow just done the search cal mentioned!

47 couples

300+ single males

60 single fems"
...wonder how many couples and single females were actually men,,,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzabelle and well hungCouple
over a year ago

Edinburgh.


"Wow just done the search cal mentioned!

47 couples

300+ single males

60 single fems...wonder how many couples and single females were actually men,,, "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I knew the ratio was heavily skewed...just not THAT heavily skewed.

Having just seen the odds, I'm probably now not even going to bother to try any more.

Enjoy everyone, and good luck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not sure, but it might be 100 to 1 woman, one thing for sure is, the site is saturated with men lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I knew the ratio was heavily skewed...just not THAT heavily skewed.

Having just seen the odds, I'm probably now not even going to bother to try any more.

Enjoy everyone, and good luck."

How does this differ from what you expected?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not sure, but it might be 100 to 1 woman, one thing for sure is, the site is saturated with men lol "

if you have a look for the previous thread,you will see it was about 10-1...constantly making out its way higher is a feeble attempt to explain lack of success as afar as i can see..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not sure, but it might be 100 to 1 woman, one thing for sure is, the site is saturated with men lol

if you have a look for the previous thread,you will see it was about 10-1...constantly making out its way higher is a feeble attempt to explain lack of success as afar as i can see.."
No I didn't say lack of success did you see me mention it? lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not sure, but it might be 100 to 1 woman, one thing for sure is, the site is saturated with men lol

if you have a look for the previous thread,you will see it was about 10-1...constantly making out its way higher is a feeble attempt to explain lack of success as afar as i can see..No I didn't say lack of success did you see me mention it? lol."

i didnt say you did...i said its used as an excuse for lack of success....the thread that counted was 7 weeks ago,easy to find..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not sure, but it might be 100 to 1 woman, one thing for sure is, the site is saturated with men lol

if you have a look for the previous thread,you will see it was about 10-1...constantly making out its way higher is a feeble attempt to explain lack of success as afar as i can see..No I didn't say lack of success did you see me mention it? lol.

i didnt say you did...i said its used as an excuse for lack of success....the thread that counted was 7 weeks ago,easy to find.."
I see yes. I guess some use that as an excuse, yeah the 7 weeks ago was the last count.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest does anyone know the ratios of men, women and couples on here. AFF shows it."

Not sure ratios matter much - it's the experience of 'meeting' that matters - in 5 years of being on Fab (under another profile previously) - we have met one single woman - kind of puts it into perspective - so much so, we don't bother looking for them anymore.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest does anyone know the ratios of men, women and couples on here. AFF shows it.

Not sure ratios matter much - it's the experience of 'meeting' that matters - in 5 years of being on Fab (under another profile previously) - we have met one single woman - kind of puts it into perspective - so much so, we don't bother looking for them anymore."

There's plenty of them out there. It's just that you have to realise that there's lots of noise created by the thousands of single men profiles and work accordingly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest does anyone know the ratios of men, women and couples on here. AFF shows it.

Not sure ratios matter much - it's the experience of 'meeting' that matters - in 5 years of being on Fab (under another profile previously) - we have met one single woman - kind of puts it into perspective - so much so, we don't bother looking for them anymore."

i agree,the ratio is pretty irrelevant..i've been on here for hours today, and every single message i've had,without a single exception has been from someone who hasnt read or has ignored my profile,so the amount of messages is completely unmportant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlyASoftieWoman
over a year ago

Hull but travel regularly

10 to 1? I've done more...oops that's not what you're talking about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietlyKinkyUsCouple
over a year ago

midlands

It's all bs anyway. More than half of the 'single women' are not single women. They are couples with separate profiles on top of their couples profile.

Then when you take out the number if single women not meeting or cam only profiles, the number isn't great

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

didn't know aff was still going pmsl

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top