Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Two lockable butt plugs, approx £96 each from Regulation, two small padlocks and a length of fine chain. Simples" Are they the little "pear of anguish" type expanding locks?... if so, yes they're very appealing (and I've found them for sale elsewhere for about £37 each direct from source) and I might get a pair sometime, but the kind I need for my current idea need to vibrate hard too. Great idea though, so many thanks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Get yourself on dragon's den, quick! " I'd be frightened of making an arse of myself! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The anal plugs made from metal aren't very safe. They can pinch the interior of the bowel as they close back together and cause internal bleeding or tearing of the bowel. I wouldn't personally use one on my partners." Interesting and valid points. I have to admit, there are one or two little nippy bits on those 'pear of anguish' locks that look like they could do some damage if one was unlucky. One or two of the listings have, in the past, recommended they be sleeved within a condom before insertion, but I have no real idea if that would be sufficient if circumstances were wrong. Personally, I favour the idea of using a synthetic design incorporating a prostate vibrator. If it needed to expand once in, probably best by inflation. Sleeving in a condom probably wouldn't affect its sensations into the anus or vagina but would make things far safer. The trick then will be to attach them to some sort of bar or harness to prevent us getting apart once they have us held - it needs to be such that neither of us can release or withdraw them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The anal plugs made from metal aren't very safe. They can pinch the interior of the bowel as they close back together and cause internal bleeding or tearing of the bowel. I wouldn't personally use one on my partners." not just the pear type, Ive just had a week or so of germoloids and too much fibre for a human to eat! after leaving a metal plug in for too long. All ok now, but its not something Id repeat!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Interesting and valid points. I have to admit, there are one or two little nippy bits on those 'pear of anguish' locks that look like they could do some damage if one was unlucky. One or two of the listings have, in the past, recommended they be sleeved within a condom before insertion, but I have no real idea if that would be sufficient if circumstances were wrong." The problem is that if things go 'wrong' you've got the chance of internal infection - peritonitis. My grandmother suffered peritonitis and died painfully within 48 hours, so it's not something I'm keen to pick up from a sex act. The problem is that you just don't know what the inside of someones bowel looks like. For instance recently one of my partners found quite a large lump inside his - it must have been there a while. It's benign but could you imagine if it got caught in one of those locks? Even with a condom over them they could easily catch a lump. I play with RACK principles. Risk Aware Consensual Kink. I make myself aware of all possible risks and then weigh up if we're going to do it or not. While I'm comfortable with some quite extreme edge-play when it comes to BDSM, these locks are a stage too far for me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The anal plugs made from metal aren't very safe. They can pinch the interior of the bowel as they close back together and cause internal bleeding or tearing of the bowel. I wouldn't personally use one on my partners. not just the pear type, Ive just had a week or so of germoloids and too much fibre for a human to eat! after leaving a metal plug in for too long. All ok now, but its not something Id repeat!!" Hmmm, food for thought - so to speak. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Interesting and valid points. I have to admit, there are one or two little nippy bits on those 'pear of anguish' locks that look like they could do some damage if one was unlucky. One or two of the listings have, in the past, recommended they be sleeved within a condom before insertion, but I have no real idea if that would be sufficient if circumstances were wrong. The problem is that if things go 'wrong' you've got the chance of internal infection - peritonitis. My grandmother suffered peritonitis and died painfully within 48 hours, so it's not something I'm keen to pick up from a sex act. The problem is that you just don't know what the inside of someones bowel looks like. For instance recently one of my partners found quite a large lump inside his - it must have been there a while. It's benign but could you imagine if it got caught in one of those locks? Even with a condom over them they could easily catch a lump. I play with RACK principles. Risk Aware Consensual Kink. I make myself aware of all possible risks and then weigh up if we're going to do it or not. While I'm comfortable with some quite extreme edge-play when it comes to BDSM, these locks are a stage too far for me." I think, on the balance of it, you have me convinced - I did have my doubts but now I agree wholly, the metal 'pear' type are one step too far for me too. Thanks. Synthetic prostate vibrators it is then. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Interesting and valid points. I have to admit, there are one or two little nippy bits on those 'pear of anguish' locks that look like they could do some damage if one was unlucky. One or two of the listings have, in the past, recommended they be sleeved within a condom before insertion, but I have no real idea if that would be sufficient if circumstances were wrong. The problem is that if things go 'wrong' you've got the chance of internal infection - peritonitis. My grandmother suffered peritonitis and died painfully within 48 hours, so it's not something I'm keen to pick up from a sex act. The problem is that you just don't know what the inside of someones bowel looks like. For instance recently one of my partners found quite a large lump inside his - it must have been there a while. It's benign but could you imagine if it got caught in one of those locks? Even with a condom over them they could easily catch a lump. I play with RACK principles. Risk Aware Consensual Kink. I make myself aware of all possible risks and then weigh up if we're going to do it or not. While I'm comfortable with some quite extreme edge-play when it comes to BDSM, these locks are a stage too far for me. I think, on the balance of it, you have me convinced - I did have my doubts but now I agree wholly, the metal 'pear' type are one step too far for me too. Thanks. Synthetic prostate vibrators it is then. " It kind of concerns me that a couple of years ago they were a very hardcore item marketing to edgeplaying fetishists - and most people thought they were a bad idea. And suddenly all the mainstream sex toy shops have been marketing them alongside beginners toys with no warning or education. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Were the pear of anguish not used as a torture device back in like the 17/1800s? I'm sure there was a thing they entered into someone's orifice and would screw it open. I'm pretty sure I saw it on one of those torture shows. " I think it was originally inserted into a victim's mouth and opened up to prevent them speaking or eating, as well as to rip their teeth out and snap their jaw - though I thought it was more mediaeval. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Interesting and valid points. I have to admit, there are one or two little nippy bits on those 'pear of anguish' locks that look like they could do some damage if one was unlucky. One or two of the listings have, in the past, recommended they be sleeved within a condom before insertion, but I have no real idea if that would be sufficient if circumstances were wrong. The problem is that if things go 'wrong' you've got the chance of internal infection - peritonitis. My grandmother suffered peritonitis and died painfully within 48 hours, so it's not something I'm keen to pick up from a sex act. The problem is that you just don't know what the inside of someones bowel looks like. For instance recently one of my partners found quite a large lump inside his - it must have been there a while. It's benign but could you imagine if it got caught in one of those locks? Even with a condom over them they could easily catch a lump. I play with RACK principles. Risk Aware Consensual Kink. I make myself aware of all possible risks and then weigh up if we're going to do it or not. While I'm comfortable with some quite extreme edge-play when it comes to BDSM, these locks are a stage too far for me. I think, on the balance of it, you have me convinced - I did have my doubts but now I agree wholly, the metal 'pear' type are one step too far for me too. Thanks. Synthetic prostate vibrators it is then. It kind of concerns me that a couple of years ago they were a very hardcore item marketing to edgeplaying fetishists - and most people thought they were a bad idea. And suddenly all the mainstream sex toy shops have been marketing them alongside beginners toys with no warning or education. " Would you say this about all metal insertables or just the expanding "pear' type? I'm also quite taken by the possibilities of anal hooks as a means of immobilization but, again, I feel I'm straying from my area of knowledge. I also wonder if any anal hooks vibrate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |