FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swinging Support and Advice

Accommodation

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

So, like many others I prefer NOT to accommodate, as I want FAB world and real world to remain separate. Also you really don’t know who people are, and stalking, wtc does happen.

So question is( why do many females think it’s okay to not accommodate, but yet want the male to? I assume it’s for the same reasons?

It’s why clubs are better and hotels marginally safer than own homes.

Anyway, just a question. Merry Christmas everyone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oupleSouthEast69Couple
over a year ago

brighton

Having children at home is more likely for women than men so that's an issue. Personally I have a teenager so unless they were literally out of the country I'd never have a meet at home.

There is also let's be frank the fact that men have to work harder to get meets and this can therefore include having to accommodate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *herryblossom_BJWoman
over a year ago

Oxfordshire/Hampshire

Prefer hotel meets, safer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Safety, mostly. I don't want people to know where I live.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rontier PsychiatristMan
over a year ago

Coventry

The premise of the question is a bit like comparing apples and pears. I think first you have to recognise that the male and female experience generally is very different. Now I know this is generalisationvile but generalisations are generally the case. So:

For Ladies safety is a factor often experienced differently. Far more ladies feel risk from a man in their home than men feel from a lady in their home. Also women statistically are far more likely to have kids at home. Thus the homestead is either not practical and/or they are just uncomfortable accommodating others in their kids homes.

For men it's very often the case on here that men can't accommodate because they are cheating. Thus often seen as a red flag when combined with other suspicious factors.

Naturally everyone's reasons are different. For me I'm a single parent with young kids. For me my homestead is for me, my kids and my fiancée when she stays with us. Both me and my fiancée prefer to keep our swinging world away from our respective households. And I know for lots of others there are many different reasons too. But my point is on the whole there's not an argument of equivalence between men and women because the reasons tend to be different.

Also I think there is a factor of them that hold the cards call the shots to some extent. I think a lot of people would prefer not to accommodate but like people accommodate them. As a lady it is a buyers market and thus not being able to accommodate is never going to be much of a barrier.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornywelsh2sumCouple
over a year ago

Neath valley.


"The premise of the question is a bit like comparing apples and pears. I think first you have to recognise that the male and female experience generally is very different. Now I know this is generalisationvile but generalisations are generally the case. So:

For Ladies safety is a factor often experienced differently. Far more ladies feel risk from a man in their home than men feel from a lady in their home. Also women statistically are far more likely to have kids at home. Thus the homestead is either not practical and/or they are just uncomfortable accommodating others in their kids homes.

For men it's very often the case on here that men can't accommodate because they are cheating. Thus often seen as a red flag when combined with other suspicious factors.

Naturally everyone's reasons are different. For me I'm a single parent with young kids. For me my homestead is for me, my kids and my fiancée when she stays with us. Both me and my fiancée prefer to keep our swinging world away from our respective households. And I know for lots of others there are many different reasons too. But my point is on the whole there's not an argument of equivalence between men and women because the reasons tend to be different.

Also I think there is a factor of them that hold the cards call the shots to some extent. I think a lot of people would prefer not to accommodate but like people accommodate them. As a lady it is a buyers market and thus not being able to accommodate is never going to be much of a barrier."

Very good reply. Also ladies are more likely to get a stalker than a man so people not knowing where you live makes us feel safer. Ladies hold all the cards on here, if you cannot accom another guy waiting on her pick list will. Pussy power really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

All can remain separate if the trust has been built respect is all or nothing some value it more than others

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issmorganWoman
over a year ago

Calderdale innit

It's assumed men are cheating of they can't accom ,although I've said this many times not accomodating alone doesn't mean someone's cheating.

I don't accom ,but my partner is on here too ,we'd just prefer not to have strangers at our home.

Hotels are safer in that people don't know your address ,but I'd always have a public social first before any form of hotel meet anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down

I never presume a man who can't accommodate is married my first thought is that he doesn't accommodate for the same reason as I don't,and that his house is his home and he doesn't want people he barely knows knowing where he lives. It's a sensible thing on here to do in my mind anyhow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sBlueWoman
over a year ago

Up North

I’m very aware people can’t accommodate hotels are to me safer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izandpaulCouple
over a year ago

merseyside


"So, like many others I prefer NOT to accommodate, as I want FAB world and real world to remain separate. Also you really don’t know who people are, and stalking, wtc does happen.

So question is( why do many females think it’s okay to not accommodate, but yet want the male to? I assume it’s for the same reasons?

It’s why clubs are better and hotels marginally safer than own homes.

Anyway, just a question. Merry Christmas everyone.

"

We just don't want people to know about our private life.

Swinging is our secret life and would never dream of mixing with our day to day life.

We love the fact you can go to clubs, parties, holidays and 121 meets and nobody has any idea about your life, its really refreshing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rontier PsychiatristMan
over a year ago

Coventry


"It's assumed men are cheating of they can't accom ,although I've said this many times not accomodating alone doesn't mean someone's cheating.

I don't accom ,but my partner is on here too ,we'd just prefer not to have strangers at our home.

Hotels are safer in that people don't know your address ,but I'd always have a public social first before any form of hotel meet anyway."

Experience has taught me that if you have a decent profile and decent messages that are free of other red flags most women will give you the time of day (even the ones that say you must accommodate). Then when they do give you the time of day and get a better feel for you they can tell your not cheating. And sometimes women who can't accommodate turns out will accommodate the right person. Sometimes won't accommodate is more a defence against assumption and expectation rather than a blacket can't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issmorganWoman
over a year ago

Calderdale innit


"It's assumed men are cheating of they can't accom ,although I've said this many times not accomodating alone doesn't mean someone's cheating.

I don't accom ,but my partner is on here too ,we'd just prefer not to have strangers at our home.

Hotels are safer in that people don't know your address ,but I'd always have a public social first before any form of hotel meet anyway.

Experience has taught me that if you have a decent profile and decent messages that are free of other red flags most women will give you the time of day (even the ones that say you must accommodate). Then when they do give you the time of day and get a better feel for you they can tell your not cheating. And sometimes women who can't accommodate turns out will accommodate the right person. Sometimes won't accommodate is more a defence against assumption and expectation rather than a blacket can't."

I totally agree with you ,it's other red flags that would get me suspicious & if you've made an effort people usually take that into account (well I do anyway).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Prefer hotel meets, safer"

Yes I think so too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilfCrumpet9Man
over a year ago

Wirral

Folk can think what they want to. Why the hell would I accommodate some stranger into my family home, who I have never known or met other than a social meet.

I have invited friends over to stay but that friendship was first built on trust so no I wouldn't accommodate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I never presume a man who can't accommodate is married my first thought is that he doesn't accommodate for the same reason as I don't,and that his house is his home and he doesn't want people he barely knows knowing where he lives. It's a sensible thing on here to do in my mind anyhow. "

Hear hear, my reason is my son who has a family lives with me now as it helps me with costs and it helps him and his family save money.

Many people would think I'm hiding something but tbh I much prefer a women to feel ultra comfortable in a hotel than some random fellas house.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heelerMan
over a year ago

Northants

On my profile i used to have that i could accommodate and got to talking to a couple they asked if could use my house with another guy you can guess my reply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sBlueWoman
over a year ago

Up North

I don’t mind if you can’t accommodate we all have our reasons and a nice hotel is lovely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reamers13Couple
over a year ago

Lancashire


"Safety, mostly. I don't want people to know where I live."

Same here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nwrap4funMan
over a year ago

Ireland


"So, like many others I prefer NOT to accommodate, as I want FAB world and real world to remain separate. Also you really don’t know who people are, and stalking, wtc does happen.

So question is( why do many females think it’s okay to not accommodate, but yet want the male to? I assume it’s for the same reasons?

It’s why clubs are better and hotels marginally safer than own homes.

Anyway, just a question. Merry Christmas everyone.

"

I've stopped accomodating - the reason, I prefer to keep my two worlds separate. I've no problem meeting up for a drink in a public place and seeing where it goes but that's it.

It has possibly cost me but I'm not out there to tap everyone. Sometimes the chats are more worth while

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top