Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op,are you saying a man should ask,but a woman doesn't have to? Or have I picked this up wrong?" No. When my partner has played with a girl there will be an interaction between them both. World of difference to a guy just randomly grabbing at tit | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op,are you saying a man should ask,but a woman doesn't have to? Or have I picked this up wrong? No. When my partner has played with a girl there will be an interaction between them both. World of difference to a guy just randomly grabbing at tit" And what if one of the women is straight? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing is a free for all people should always ask before just jumping in ." This! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op,are you saying a man should ask,but a woman doesn't have to? Or have I picked this up wrong? No. When my partner has played with a girl there will be an interaction between them both. World of difference to a guy just randomly grabbing at tit And what if one of the women is straight?" The few times my partner has played with another woman in this scenario it's always followed tbe same lines. During sex the two women brush hands, then hand holding, then looking at each other followed by kissing and groping. Anything more has been when my partner has spoke to them. My partner has had women try it with her by attempting to stroke her hand and if she hasn't felt the vibe she has moved her hand away. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So opinions please. Couples only nights, when you have large beds and couples are playing does that mean a free for all? Whenever we have been on beds before my female partner might play with another woman who is with her partner. She isn't into other guys and it's normally something that just happens with the other woman. We've had a few times now where the male partner thinks just because the 2 girls are touching its ok for him to try and touch my partner without asking permission. Also had once or twice where if a couple is beside us the guy has gone in for a feel even without any interaction between the girls. My partner isn't shy so a quick "no!" Is all that is required. Shouldn't it always be the woman to start proceedings?" No, it most certainly is not. No consent = no play. Anyone who disrespects that should be removed from the club. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. Like you said, It just happens with the women….so don’t chastise a guy for joining in having seen that! People aren’t mind readers." Disagree entirely! Permission should always be sought, no exceptions | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. Like you said, It just happens with the women….so don’t chastise a guy for joining in having seen that! People aren’t mind readers." Yes agree with you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. Like you said, It just happens with the women….so don’t chastise a guy for joining in having seen that! People aren’t mind readers." Absolutely NOT. Just because a door is open and the bed is a large bed where people can play next to each other it is NEVER a green light. Asking first before you touch stops a situation where you have sexually assaulted someone. You should NEVER, NEVER touch unless you are verbally invited or you have asked Permission and they have given consent, it's not rocket science and also respect is paramount | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My reading of the situation is that it is not about random males try to join in, but whether couples play as a unit or the male of the other couple is to be excluded. I would have thought a couple comes as a unit, and although the male partner should have asked before touching, I think OP or his wife should have made it clear upfront before anything starts that this is a girl on girl situation only. Therefore the other couple has full knowledge of the situation and can decide whether to proceed or not. There does not appear to be a clear meeting of all minds before the play starts." I totally agree, that was the point I was trying to make also. I think any reasonable couple would treat a couple as a unit. Single guys jumping on a bed with a couple with hands all over is different to a couple being allowed to lay and 50% play. These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too." Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I totally agree, that was the point I was trying to make also. I think any reasonable couple would treat a couple as a unit. Single guys jumping on a bed with a couple with hands all over is different to a couple being allowed to lay and 50% play. These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. " What makes you think it's ok for your wife to touch without asking ? Any woman who has touched me has always asked or been asked anything else is disrespectful at best and assault at worst | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching." I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. " Yes, all parties need some form of individual consent to play (a/b, a/c, a/d... etc) & no assumptions about consent should be made. Otherwise the person assuming is risking being accused of assault. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. Yes, all parties need some form of individual consent to play (a/b, a/c, a/d... etc) & no assumptions about consent should be made. Otherwise the person assuming is risking being accused of assault. " I better rustle up a check list, risk assessment and sign off sheet then. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think in reality an accusation of assault with all the police investigations would be an unusual occurrence in a club. You’ll probably just end up with a small scene being made in the club. " Are you suggesting the lack of consequences means its OK, or just highlighting it's unlikely? Being asked to leave or being banned is more likely consequence if the person went to management? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. Yes, all parties need some form of individual consent to play (a/b, a/c, a/d... etc) & no assumptions about consent should be made. Otherwise the person assuming is risking being accused of assault. I better rustle up a check list, risk assessment and sign off sheet then. " Or you could just get consent, which takes a matter of seconds??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think in reality an accusation of assault with all the police investigations would be an unusual occurrence in a club. You’ll probably just end up with a small scene being made in the club. Are you suggesting the lack of consequences means its OK, or just highlighting it's unlikely? Being asked to leave or being banned is more likely consequence if the person went to management? " Obviously not suggesting it’s ok! Just that most people will be content with a ‘don’t do that!’ But obviously if someone has been touched somewhere very inappropriate, rather than a shoulder or arm touch then that’s altogether different. Depends how you mean touched. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. " Yes yes yes and yes, consent verbally in all situations. If you were to do this in the clubs we visit and have to say oops, once we report your assault you will then be shown the door and most probably never allowed in again. If a club did not condemn your behavior then that makes the club as bad as the person not asking permission and we would give a club like that a wide birth. To add we have seen people asked to leave (thrown out) clubs for such despicable behavior | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Our various experiences involving 3,4,5other people etc in the bedroom.. Have happened & progressed sort of in the moment, organically naturally without any pre-discussed agenda. Can actually see the advantages of everyone being aware of boundaries etc but who does what, to whom, in what order, sounds like it could be a bit of a downer. " I get that sometimes chat doesn't happen first, but if you don't know boundaries in advance, but don't you just do what you'd do when you have sex with anyone for the first time? How would you get consent in those situations? Eye contact? Facial expressions? Body language cues? Dirty talk/questions? It's just the same, no? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. " We don’t think you understand consent. Implied consent is not consent. Implied consent relies on your interpretation of a situation at the time, without you being fully aware of the facts. It’s basically a guess. And nobody should be guessing when it comes to consent. Freely given, fully informed consent is consent. We ALWAYS ask for consent before we do anything - and we’d never play with anybody who didn’t ask (unless we gave consent openly without them having to ask.) If we’re chatting to a couple and we feel there’s a connection, we’ll ask them what their boundaries are before we ask them to play. That way we all know where we stand so there are no ‘mistakes’ in the heat of the moment. Usually it’s not as involved as Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? We often say (and hear) anything except X, Y and Z. If people aren’t 100% sure (usually with newbies), then we’ll ask questions to help them express their boundaries. E.g. Can we kiss you? Do you full-swap? How do you feeling about spanking? Do you enjoy oral from women? What don’t you want to do? Our most recent meet Mrs gave another guy consent to give her oral and use a vibrator on her. Mr asked the guys wife for consent to touch her - even though the guy was already playing with Mrs. just because Mrs+guy was happening, doesn’t mean that Mr+guy’s wife would happen. You cannot assume anything. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. Like you said, It just happens with the women….so don’t chastise a guy for joining in having seen that! People aren’t mind readers." I disagree. With a previous partner. We played asking side others and on open beds numerous times. We never joined in with others. We had plenty of offers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The choice of space may indicate more chance of openess to join in. But it's never a free for all. Just because people generally play in a group/open space with the intention of others joining doesn't mean those other include you. You always need to check consent. Consent doesn't have to be verbal, quite often it's not. But you need to check it's a 100% ok and if your not 100% sure, check again even if you have to specially verbalise it. Same goes for if your wanting move into something more intimate. For example you may have permission to touch and happily touching away but that shouldn't be taken as implied consent for penetration." Totally this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yup, all those body language indicators and simply saying the: likes/dislikes/do's/donts/etcas its goes along. Someone might say 'Hey let's "xyz" if responses are along the lines of either 'Cmon then'..or.. 'no thanks' then it just carries on accordingly.. " Ah so if I have this right, you are checking in and getting consent feedback along the way in group situations? You just didnt have a group discussion prior to play? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. " So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent!" Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept" You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes." That’s correct . I am responding to the OP who is asking around males simply touching the female. The comment above has exaggerated that, for the drama I suspect, to fucking his wife. I would like them to quote where I said anything about an expectation to fuck the wife. As already affirmed by many a simple touch is sometimes an accepted sign of consent, this is what I am referring to but some people can’t simply understand that. We don’t expect to fuck anyone and I have never said that. For the last time I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that once such close proximity has been allowed and once two people of a foursome have engaged the others can a assume a green light to join in. That’s where that initial touch will happen that the OP is referring to. Of course if a no was given at that point I’m pretty sure we would both get up and leave. But how does anyone expect the non verbal cues to take place with trying ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes." Conscent always people should be communicating all the time verbal and non verbal. However reading this thread some couples only play together they come as a package or not at all. So when in a room with another couple before any play between the ladies (for example) starts they need to communicate this up front as those types of couples wouldn't be happy if another couple started play with their female but then the male wasnt invited. If your a couple only looking for a female to join you then look for just that a single female. If you go into a play room with another couple playing before any interaction make sure you state you only play with other females. I have seen this cause issues in clubs when it's not been made clear up front. Some couples will take an approach from another couple even if it starts as fem to fem as invite to couple to couple play. At the end of the day the couple your approaching isn't a single female. Some couples will see an approach by another couple who just want your female as an insult as well. It all goes back to communicate fully before engaging. KJ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. That’s correct . I am responding to the OP who is asking around males simply touching the female. The comment above has exaggerated that, for the drama I suspect, to fucking his wife. I would like them to quote where I said anything about an expectation to fuck the wife. As already affirmed by many a simple touch is sometimes an accepted sign of consent, this is what I am referring to but some people can’t simply understand that. We don’t expect to fuck anyone and I have never said that. For the last time I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that once such close proximity has been allowed and once two people of a foursome have engaged the others can a assume a green light to join in. That’s where that initial touch will happen that the OP is referring to. Of course if a no was given at that point I’m pretty sure we would both get up and leave. But how does anyone expect the non verbal cues to take place with trying ?? " Really? Because I’m quite happy to sit back and watch if my partner’s engaged in some fun and my participation isn’t wanted. He consented to that activity, I’m not going to stop him. That would be really selfish. And “are you happy just watching, or can I touch you?” is a pretty simple sentence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. That’s correct . I am responding to the OP who is asking around males simply touching the female. The comment above has exaggerated that, for the drama I suspect, to fucking his wife. I would like them to quote where I said anything about an expectation to fuck the wife. As already affirmed by many a simple touch is sometimes an accepted sign of consent, this is what I am referring to but some people can’t simply understand that. We don’t expect to fuck anyone and I have never said that. For the last time I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that once such close proximity has been allowed and once two people of a foursome have engaged the others can a assume a green light to join in. That’s where that initial touch will happen that the OP is referring to. Of course if a no was given at that point I’m pretty sure we would both get up and leave. But how does anyone expect the non verbal cues to take place with trying ?? Really? Because I’m quite happy to sit back and watch if my partner’s engaged in some fun and my participation isn’t wanted. He consented to that activity, I’m not going to stop him. That would be really selfish. And “are you happy just watching, or can I touch you?” is a pretty simple sentence. " Exactly I don’t get what’s so complicated about just asking? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yup, all those body language indicators and simply saying the: likes/dislikes/do's/donts/etcas its goes along. Someone might say 'Hey let's "xyz" if responses are along the lines of either 'Cmon then'..or.. 'no thanks' then it just carries on accordingly.. Ah so if I have this right, you are checking in and getting consent feedback along the way in group situations? You just didnt have a group discussion prior to play? " Yep. That's right. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. Conscent always people should be communicating all the time verbal and non verbal. However reading this thread some couples only play together they come as a package or not at all. So when in a room with another couple before any play between the ladies (for example) starts they need to communicate this up front as those types of couples wouldn't be happy if another couple started play with their female but then the male wasnt invited. If your a couple only looking for a female to join you then look for just that a single female. If you go into a play room with another couple playing before any interaction make sure you state you only play with other females. I have seen this cause issues in clubs when it's not been made clear up front. Some couples will take an approach from another couple even if it starts as fem to fem as invite to couple to couple play. At the end of the day the couple your approaching isn't a single female. Some couples will see an approach by another couple who just want your female as an insult as well. It all goes back to communicate fully before engaging. KJ " This makes a lot of sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These comments of sexual assault in that given situation are ridiculous. If my wife was allowed to touch without asking I could reasonably assume I could too. Thought you might appreciate a definition: What is sexual assault? Sexual assault happens when someone touches another person in a sexual manner without their consent. Or when someone makes another person take part in a sexual activity with them without that person's consent. It includes unwanted kissing and sexual touching. I totally understand that, but you are failing to recognise the situation. I have never been, and don’t expect to be in a situation where we, as a couple start playing with an other couple and alI the parties have to ask specific permissions. It is reasonable to assume a green light is given from one couple to another when 2 people of the group start engaging. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Claiming sexual assault in that situation is just crazy. At best a simple oops would be more the case. If that happened to us we would both apologise for the misunderstanding and both leave. Has any other couples been in a situation where 4 sets of permissions have been asked ? You can potentially make that 8 if you meet people that want to touch but not be touched! Can A touch B? Can C touch D ? Can B touch D ? Can A touch D ? What about in the reverse ? I understand respect, consent and generally courtesy but I’m trying to point out why these situations arise. Sometimes that consent can be implied by certain behaviours towards the couple as a single entity. So you think if my wife is happy for your wife to suck her nipples then you're entitled to fuck her ? No, any person in a group wanting to touch another in a group should get a clear and positive signal. Usually for us that's a gentle rub of a hand or arm and wait for a reaction. Just because I've been involved in soft play with another person I wouldn't just fuck them without asking first ... I wouldn't even fuck my wife without her consent! Please can you quote my words where I said that please ? Another person simply making up statements for dramatic purposes. Jesus wept You said: At the risk of being flamed here I would say by laying down next to another couple or allowing that to happen is seen pretty much as an invitation. Of course it’s polite to ask but Leaving a door open, allowing a couple to lay with you and then allowing interaction between some parties is pretty much a green light in our eyes. That’s correct . I am responding to the OP who is asking around males simply touching the female. The comment above has exaggerated that, for the drama I suspect, to fucking his wife. I would like them to quote where I said anything about an expectation to fuck the wife. As already affirmed by many a simple touch is sometimes an accepted sign of consent, this is what I am referring to but some people can’t simply understand that. We don’t expect to fuck anyone and I have never said that. For the last time I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that once such close proximity has been allowed and once two people of a foursome have engaged the others can a assume a green light to join in. That’s where that initial touch will happen that the OP is referring to. Of course if a no was given at that point I’m pretty sure we would both get up and leave. But how does anyone expect the non verbal cues to take place with trying ?? " The OP was talking about touching without permission, but your comment was that touch between 2 of the 4 is green light for an initial touch from the other 2 of the 4, & thats where the issue comes in. Is that touch, as the op suggests, going in for a feel & seeing what happens, or a hand or more innocent body part? Can you say with certainty that anywhere is really innocent/ok without permission or knowing that person? That's why getting consent takes seconds & prevents any assumptions or conflict in play. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |