Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That is extremely dangerous and actually makes it more likely that the condom will break. So thank you for the suggestion but no." Actually, the limited research done on this suggests the opposite. Look at studies from Emory University School of Medicine (1995) and Chiang Mai University (1997) Breakage rates reduced to 0.12% in the first study (compared to a standard of 2%) and in the second, there was a 1.8% incidence of broken condoms used singly and 0.2% for condoms used doubly. Where three or more were used together, there was no breakage. Now - these were sex workers so more likely to properly apply them and use enough lube, but it’s an option that is available to you if you want it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think they will be create spray on condoms?" Possibly, once they figure out how to spray an airless teat in the end. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Skyns ![]() Yup Skyns are very good | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just prefer to be as safe as possible. If all condoms were very safe then they wouldn’t make extra safe ones I guess!" Ok soooo I'm gonna flip it around - if all condoms weren't so safe there'd be more selection of thicker condoms available! It's not just that people don't want them, it is that they are not really needed. This may sound irrelevant to you but I think it's well worth considering. Back when extra safe condoms were introduced, they were actually marketed for anal sex (read: male homo sex). All the "normal" strength condoms were lubed with spermicide but the extra safe weren't ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |