Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Daily.....should have gone to Specsavers comes to mind! " That's about right xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"all the time!! bt sometimes wen u do bother reading all the likes dislikes etc on some ones profile, and u seem to be exactly what the people are looking 4... so u message and they still say na ur not 4 me makes u wonder!!!! xx" It does | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"all the time!! bt sometimes wen u do bother reading all the likes dislikes etc on some ones profile, and u seem to be exactly what the people are looking 4... so u message and they still say na ur not 4 me makes u wonder!!!! xx" When you think about it, this is a problem with all types of on-line dating/swinging sites, a case of too much information. If you meet someone down the pub or wherever, you and they don't have a list attached to them of likes/dislikes, and other personal info, it's just a case of attraction to start with. The likes/dislikes etc is absorbed at a much slower rate, perhaps making it more palatable. Don't know what the answer is to getting round this problem. Unfortunately, no profile can be perfect, and what is perfect to one person can be an imperfection to another. Perhaps a method could be devised where there is very little information initially available, and the information comes to you in a message to you after an initial message between two parties. Just an idea off the top of my head! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"all the time!! bt sometimes wen u do bother reading all the likes dislikes etc on some ones profile, and u seem to be exactly what the people are looking 4... so u message and they still say na ur not 4 me makes u wonder!!!! xx When you think about it, this is a problem with all types of on-line dating/swinging sites, a case of too much information. If you meet someone down the pub or wherever, you and they don't have a list attached to them of likes/dislikes, and other personal info, it's just a case of attraction to start with. The likes/dislikes etc is absorbed at a much slower rate, perhaps making it more palatable. Don't know what the answer is to getting round this problem. Unfortunately, no profile can be perfect, and what is perfect to one person can be an imperfection to another. Perhaps a method could be devised where there is very little information initially available, and the information comes to you in a message to you after an initial message between two parties. Just an idea off the top of my head!" Would never work! You'd just end up with more messages in your inbox from totally incompatible people trying their luck! The current system works fine for most - and as has been said - If you get a message from someone who hasn't bothered to read your info - an easy choice as to whether to respond - or as is more likely - not !! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This used to annoy me but life is too short. And like someone said, when you meet someone in person you don't know loads about them, you go on initial attraction. So, if someone reads my profile and thinks they'd like to send a message that's great, but every now and again someone will obviously not have read it but they'll have that certain something and I'll like them anyway. I think of it as being a few helpful hints, really, but if you read it you'll have a much better chance of me being in any way interested in replying." Ohhhhhh, someone likes "A Game Of Thrones" Top notch books and mini series. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"all the time!! bt sometimes wen u do bother reading all the likes dislikes etc on some ones profile, and u seem to be exactly what the people are looking 4... so u message and they still say na ur not 4 me makes u wonder!!!! xx" I don't reply to anyone outwith my criteria, only those that meet what I'm looking for. If I say "thanks but no thanks" it could be for a number of reasons. I've done this for: Having "69" in the username. Having a username that turned my stomach is pussy wrecker. Having any reference to 50 Shades. Having photos of bareback sex. Having straight on profile but have pics of being rogered and sucking cock. Having face pics of different women giving a blow job but no clear pic of the man. The "tone" of the profile. I just don't fancy them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it just me, you spend quite a bit of time writing a profile about yourselves and what you like/want, not loads of Do's and Dont's. then you get messages and friend invites from people who clearly haven't been bothered to read what you've put, only looked at your pictures!!! Apart from that we're having loads of fun. We do know about message filters and use them already, this is just about lazy people x" Agree with you 100% We have lost count of the single guy's we have blocked for sending friends invites or messages!! The sad thing is some of them ticked all the right boxes and all they had to do was wink us, but they could not even do that, so they get blocked as rules are rules. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We really couldn't care less if people read our profile fully or not. " It's strange that "you really don't care less if people read your profile fully or not" when your profile is so indepth and includes your rules. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We really couldn't care less if people read our profile fully or not. It's strange that "you really don't care less if people read your profile fully or not" when your profile is so indepth and includes your rules. " Nothing strange about it, our rules are our rules. Whether or not people read them is entirely their choice in much the same way as it's our choice to ignore their message and move on to the next one that interests us | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We really couldn't care less if people read our profile fully or not. It's strange that "you really don't care less if people read your profile fully or not" when your profile is so indepth and includes your rules. Nothing strange about it, our rules are our rules. Whether or not people read them is entirely their choice in much the same way as it's our choice to ignore their message and move on to the next one that interests us " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |