FabSwingers.com forum: Photo verification?

By *rank speaker OP Man
over a year ago

Worcester

For the first time ever I tried to load a video today at the request of a member.

Slightly bemused by the fact that it's asking for photo verification? Despite the fact I have real life verifications from other well multiple verified members? Is it me failing to negotiate the system? I see no need for me to photo verify and won't be going to the trouble. Surely real meets count far more than a possible forged pic?

Answers on a postcard please?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

That is the requirement to be able to post videos

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oxy lady40Woman
over a year ago

bridgwater

Why is getting photo verified a problem it takes two seconds and nobody see it

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Why is getting photo verified a problem it takes two seconds and nobody see it "

I'm with you on this . Photo verified is so easy

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Would be great if users could have a verification on individual photos too. Like an admin tick/flag on a private face photo you can send.

I’ve got a handful of verifications from meets but I could easy send a face pic of Julia Roberts or something and tell a guy that’s what I looked like

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

"That is the requirement to be able to post videos"

Tbh Ruggers it should be the requirement to use the site full stop in my view.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By * and BCouple
over a year ago

Durham

We think all social media should make people verify themselves with proof of ID. There is going to debated in the commons on this subject after Katie Price had a petition for all to sign due to the trolls giving her and Harvey abuse amongst thousands of others.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South

"That is the requirement to be able to post videos

Tbh Ruggers it should be the requirement to use the site full stop in my view. "

Meh I wouldn’t verify with a face - I don’t know who admin are nor have I seen them sign a confidentially statement. My face showing the site name? Hard pass for me ......

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ

"We think all social media should make people verify themselves with proof of ID. There is going to debated in the commons on this subject after Katie Price had a petition for all to sign due to the trolls giving her and Harvey abuse amongst thousands of others. "

Side note. Shame it's KP (Jordan who?) bringing it. Like Harold Shipman wanting to run a UK branch of Dignitas.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton

"For the first time ever I tried to load a video today at the request of a member.

Answers on a postcard please?

Verifications are easy to get and don’t prove anything. I’ve had a few messages asking me for a verification in return for a sexy pic. I’m sure there are a few horny blokes on here who would accept that deal.

Photo verification is easy to get and vetted by admin so we know you are more than likely real (I still don’t like the fact you can do this without a face cause it’s still open to abuse)

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

" (I still don’t like the fact you can do this without a face cause it’s still open to abuse)"

If there is an issue of any sort with an account Admin would ask for a face shot for a PV

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By * and BCouple
over a year ago

Durham

Side note. Shame it's KP (Jordan who?) bringing it. Like Harold Shipman wanting to run a UK branch of Dignitas.

Not a fan of Katie Price but it doesn't detract from the fact she and her son were getting abuse from strangers via social media. When we signed it there was over 40,000 signatures. Think it's when it get's to 10,000 to get a debate in the commons. All a good cause no matter who brings it to the forefront. Trolls, bullying and racism on social media needs to be stopped. So verifications with ID has to help in the fight. We got ourselves verified on fab on Day 1. Face pictures of us both holding up our user name and Fabswingers on a piece of paper. We are proud of what we achieve in our life and love our outlook on life so it was no problem for us. If they ever need an ID from us we'll be sending it without delay

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *rank speaker OP Man
over a year ago

Worcester

Just catching up here. Thanks for the interest. My 'real life' verifications are from other well verified members. Not one offs! I appreciate it's a site condition so reluctantly accept it. But still don't agree with it. As an avid supporter of the site I do find these little anomalies slightly petty. Just my opinion.

And don't get me started on Katy Price! Whilst condemning any form of abuse I'm afraid she's an open goal as she's been a media whore for so many years it's no good complaining when things don't go the way your business plan wants.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately