Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swinging Support and Advice |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I notice that a lot of the messages I send on here often end up unread or unopened and I have made the assumption this is most likely down to the inbox maxing out at a message limit, this would then mean my message drops out of the inbox. I understand women/couples do get an overwhelming amount of messages on here and I'm not blaming anybody for not being able to get to my message. I'm just curious to know if any others know the reason for this." Hi OP. You are correct to a degree in your theory. I'll caveat this reply with the knowledge that there are two types of inbox, the old style where messages drop in one at a time and the new when messages are more like threads. We use the old style inbox. With the old style (and default) inbox each message sent arrives one at a time in a stack. So if you sent ten messages then ten would be in the inbox, if you sent ten with the new style then there would be one thread which would reveal ten messages once opened. I think that the most messages that can be seen on the screen is around 50-60, lets call if fifty for ease. So if you send a message, and then 49 other people do, your message would be at the bottom of the stack. As soon as the 50th message dropped on the top of the stack your's will drop off the screen. It would be visible again if the recipient deletes messages above it. It's also worth noting that many women turn off the option to show they have looked at profiles. So it's just possible that the recipient has looked at your profile unbeknownst to you, and decided to leave the message unopened or unanswered. Either way it's not worth worrying about, move on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi OP. You are correct to a degree in your theory. I'll caveat this reply with the knowledge that there are two types of inbox, the old style where messages drop in one at a time and the new when messages are more like threads. We use the old style inbox." This isn't entirely correct. Whether using old style or new style it's the same inbox- its just that the contents of the mailbox are displayed in a different way. (Very similar to hotmail, Gmail etc) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi OP. You are correct to a degree in your theory. I'll caveat this reply with the knowledge that there are two types of inbox, the old style where messages drop in one at a time and the new when messages are more like threads. We use the old style inbox. This isn't entirely correct. Whether using old style or new style it's the same inbox- its just that the contents of the mailbox are displayed in a different way. (Very similar to hotmail, Gmail etc)" You found the words to descibe it better than I could, well done ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |