Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Scotland |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am on ma period sorry - too busy looking for a free tampon "no probs your in scotland fill yer boots.....or a 10p bag for life | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine" turn right at the dino hut | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine" There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic "only in the female toilets sorry | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am on ma period sorry - too busy looking for a free tampon no probs your in scotland fill yer boots.....or a 10p bag for life "I remember bags used to be free... is it an equality issue they charge now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic "Hush woman. I only listen to men, for men are superior and full of manly righteousness. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am on ma period sorry - too busy looking for a free tampon no probs your in scotland fill yer boots.....or a 10p bag for life
I remember bags used to be free... is it an equality issue they charge now?"nope everyone's charged the same so its equal  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic
Hush woman. I only listen to men, for men are superior and full of manly righteousness."Apologies ... is it three or four steps I walk behind you... I've forgotten because I'm a mere woman and of course all those hormones make me forgetful... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. " I agree | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic
Hush woman. I only listen to men, for men are superior and full of manly righteousness.
Apologies ... is it three or four steps I walk behind you... I've forgotten because I'm a mere woman and of course all those hormones make me forgetful... "walk where you wish in an equal society | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am on ma period sorry - too busy looking for a free tampon no probs your in scotland fill yer boots.....or a 10p bag for life
I remember bags used to be free... is it an equality issue they charge now?nope everyone's charged the same so its equal "lol on that note... Animal Farm... is a good example of why true equality can never happen but we can make it better  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry, too busy here in the garden of Eden looking for the condom machine There's a bowl of free ones beside the free tampons at the Family Planning Clinic
Hush woman. I only listen to men, for men are superior and full of manly righteousness.
Apologies ... is it three or four steps I walk behind you... I've forgotten because I'm a mere woman and of course all those hormones make me forgetful... walk where you wish in an equal society"In Scotland I think that's true as I think there isn't a tresspass law but not so sure about England...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am on ma period sorry - too busy looking for a free tampon no probs your in scotland fill yer boots.....or a 10p bag for life
I remember bags used to be free... is it an equality issue they charge now?nope everyone's charged the same so its equal
lol on that note... Animal Farm... is a good example of why true equality can never happen but we can make it better "true equality is easily attainable but it reqs all to want equality and not a "version" of it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. " Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apologies ... is it three or four steps I walk behind you... I've forgotten because I'm a mere woman and of course all those hormones make me forgetful... "Which part of hush confuses you, female?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?" SOME can but I agree lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?" can but wont | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?can but wont "Feartie | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?can but wont
Feartie "boots are shaking honest. It's the many diffrent version I was looking to be enlightened on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apologies ... is it three or four steps I walk behind you... I've forgotten because I'm a mere woman and of course all those hormones make me forgetful...
Which part of hush confuses you, female? "(wee ninja emoji) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?can but wont
Feartie boots are shaking honest.
It's the many diffrent version I was looking to be enlightened on "Can you expand that please? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?can but wont
Feartie boots are shaking honest.
It's the many diffrent version I was looking to be enlightened on
Can you expand that please?"no because I only know that equality should be equal clues in the name | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Same rules for everyone. Well that's what I would assume. Ok I will take the bait... thats not equality. Equality means first of all recognising that society is unequal, and that some need a lift (or some need to be lowered) to create fairness. Can anyone argue against that?can but wont
Feartie boots are shaking honest.
It's the many diffrent version I was looking to be enlightened on
Can you expand that please?no because I only know that equality should be equal clues in the name "I understand what equality SHOULD mean the bit I don't understand is the many different version? No matter. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!" yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!" lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread "**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ****** | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******"that thread raised the issue the equality seems to have diffrent meanings to folk yup | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******"I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity "alot of words put in folks mouths who said they ain't a necessity | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity "Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity alot of words put in folks mouths who said they ain't a necessity"You literally said that BOUGHT sanitary products are not a necessity | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal " You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity
Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity
Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun "the guy could get a milling wheel and show how to sharpen a bit of tin roof for shaving also may have a blockbuster show concept here | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity
Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun the guy could get a milling wheel and show how to sharpen a bit of tin roof for shaving also may have a blockbuster show concept here " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. " no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception " Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs "it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me there are no sub sections equality is about equal irrespective of race colour creed gender or anything else " True but each of those have different needs, does addressing a need mean inequality? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
which is still my standpoint I'm sure yet glad to know | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me there are no sub sections equality is about equal irrespective of race colour creed gender or anything else True but each of those have different needs, does addressing a need mean inequality? " it can be especially when not implemented properly to target who its ment to help | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts "I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
"hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me there are no sub sections equality is about equal irrespective of race colour creed gender or anything else True but each of those have different needs, does addressing a need mean inequality? it can be especially when not implemented properly to target who its ment to help" Uhuh but implementation can be difficult , do you NOT do something because of that. In doing so you deny those in need perhaps? I think society is trying to be better by providing it. I would also suggest (in relation to the period issue) the fact that women menstruate and men don't is merely biology. It's a need women have men don't, it's not inequality to try and help women who are too poor to afford it. The bigger issue here is WHY they can't afford it which is more about poverty, jobs etc etc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though "I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. " Well said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. " so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? "if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought " Any bias (or additional support) given toward one group would be to level the playing field. Giving them an equal chance; in comparison to other group. It’s NOT giving them an advantage over any other group. As, going back to the definition, that would not be equality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought " I think you're being a wee bit inflexible which is how most inequalities are produced. Discrimination or inequality is much the same thing but may mean different things to different people. To give one group something it needs is not necessarily inequality. A wee bit of common sense and flexibility is required. For instance, again re periods, I imagine the issue of women not being able to afford it was raised and the government has tried to address it, a good thing surely? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it"You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought Any bias (or additional support) given toward one group would be to level the playing field. Giving them an equal chance; in comparison to other group. It’s NOT giving them an advantage over any other group. As, going back to the definition, that would not be equality. " Again good point | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought Any bias (or additional support) given toward one group would be to level the playing field. Giving them an equal chance; in comparison to other group. It’s NOT giving them an advantage over any other group. As, going back to the definition, that would not be equality. " theirin lies the problem does it level the playing field it's been shown many times it doesn't it creates a bias which can swing to far in the other direction.I get it's mostly done with good intentions but is it equality imo no a good example was a check on car insurance adjustments a form was filled twice all day the same apart from the surname the names Smith and Singh were used the result was over 20% diffrence in price | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity
Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun "To itchy with tinsel surely ?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought Any bias (or additional support) given toward one group would be to level the playing field. Giving them an equal chance; in comparison to other group. It’s NOT giving them an advantage over any other group. As, going back to the definition, that would not be equality. theirin lies the problem does it level the playing field it's been shown many times it doesn't it creates a bias which can swing to far in the other direction.I get it's mostly done with good intentions but is it equality imo no a good example was a check on car insurance adjustments a form was filled twice all day the same apart from the surname the names Smith and Singh were used the result was over 20% diffrence in price " There are many examples of inequality, bias and discrimination. It will always happen regardless of how many laws are made. Sometimes such things are very personal. The important thing is we try to redress it even if it needs refined at times. The example you use is interesting as and I'm grabbing the bull by the horns here. I take it you are implying race made one persons insurance higher??? Just guessing but is that because (for example) statistically those of another culture experience discrimination based aggression such as damage to their car? If that was the case then the extra insurance is not discriminatory but based on statistics if you see what I mean  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives. Therefore, no one should have a poorer life chance because of the way they were born, where they come from, what they believe or whether they have a disability. As a result you have to recognise that certain groups of people experience discrimination on the basis of race, disability, sex and sexual orientation. Thus treating everyone the same does not overcome discrimination and does not produce equality. so is discrimination not the inequality so to break that would it not req equality not a bias towards one group? that's my thought Any bias (or additional support) given toward one group would be to level the playing field. Giving them an equal chance; in comparison to other group. It’s NOT giving them an advantage over any other group. As, going back to the definition, that would not be equality. theirin lies the problem does it level the playing field it's been shown many times it doesn't it creates a bias which can swing to far in the other direction.I get it's mostly done with good intentions but is it equality imo no a good example was a check on car insurance adjustments a form was filled twice all day the same apart from the surname the names Smith and Singh were used the result was over 20% diffrence in price " It feels like you are citing inequality and discrimination there. So that’s not equality - as per the definition. So let me talk through an example of equality in action. I’ve changed it to keep it more neutral... A company advertise a leadership job, open both internally and externally. Now the word leadership has many different definitions and culturally different all over the world. Thus when filling in the application form internal candidates have an advantage over external candidates; as they understand what leadership means in this context. Now if said company added a primer into their candidate pack, which explains what they mean by leadership, then external candidates are getting support / help. But it’s only bring them to the same level of knowledge as internal applicants. Thus equality and not advantage. In the equality world this is referred to as Positive Action. Worth remember Positive Discrimination is illegal in the UK. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining! yes this!! This is the point I was trying to make on the period poverty thread
**** For those who may not know, this thread was on the back of the Period Poverty thread (I think) ******
I’m pretty sure it is, I’m disappointed it got closed as I was looking forward to suggestions of what I could use instead of bought sanitary products as apparently they’re not a necessity
Lol well, I think the post went off topic as is so often the case missus. I can just see Kirsty Allsop on o new craft programme showing us how to make them though - wee bit of tinsel as the thread for Christmas time - ocht it could be fun
To itchy with tinsel surely ? "Canestan that | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? "you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it"I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? "they should employ the person that fits the contract best irrespective of any circumstance | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? "I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ"Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous "Or employ them for half an hour each... or tidy yer ain hoose | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ"The atheist goes to the toilet for a poo n takes 10 minutes. Your atheist is a smoker n goes for a fag. Your atheist is a carer and regularly gets calls from the person they cater for. The person that needs to pray is one hell of a cleaner and does a brilliant job. While taking 10 minutes to pray they get the job done, to a hugger standard than you want. It’s all ifs buts and maybes with fantasy scenario made up to fit your world view | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous "my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
The atheist goes to the toilet for a poo n takes 10 minutes.
Your atheist is a smoker n goes for a fag.
Your atheist is a carer and regularly gets calls from the person they cater for.
The person that needs to pray is one hell of a cleaner and does a brilliant job. While taking 10 minutes to pray they get the job done, to a hugger standard than you want.
It’s all ifs buts and maybes with fantasy scenario made up to fit your world view "is your this group needs more help not exactly what your doing though fitting your narrative around what equality is. I used the scenario I did because it was clear cut and it turns into a raging shit party and a fantastic 50 mins. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired "No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? "only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required "Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting "Fuck equality, I worked hard to get to where I am . If someone wants equality with me or get above me then let them work as hard or harder. If not then tough titty , you Ain't getting equality.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting
Fuck equality, I worked hard to get to where I am . If someone wants equality with me or get above me then let them work as hard or harder. If not then tough titty , you Ain't getting equality. "But did you work equally as hard as anyone else | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears "no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ"As kola says , if you can't do the job I require, you Ain't getting the job, simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting
Fuck equality, I worked hard to get to where I am . If someone wants equality with me or get above me then let them work as hard or harder. If not then tough titty , you Ain't getting equality.
But did you work equally as hard as anyone else "Perhaps , perhaps not , but I certainly worked smarter which makes the difference. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach "The biggest gloves you have and no stool - if I can't reach your ears I'll go for what I can reach | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach
The biggest gloves you have and no stool - if I can't reach your ears I'll go for what I can reach "best get shin guards pmsl | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting
Fuck equality, I worked hard to get to where I am . If someone wants equality with me or get above me then let them work as hard or harder. If not then tough titty , you Ain't getting equality.
But did you work equally as hard as anyone else
Perhaps , perhaps not , but I certainly worked smarter which makes the difference. "On the KIS (Kola Inequality Scale) that's an 11 out of 10 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach
The biggest gloves you have and no stool - if I can't reach your ears I'll go for what I can reach best get shin guards pmsl"I wasn't thinking of shins | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting
Fuck equality, I worked hard to get to where I am . If someone wants equality with me or get above me then let them work as hard or harder. If not then tough titty , you Ain't getting equality.
But did you work equally as hard as anyone else
Perhaps , perhaps not , but I certainly worked smarter which makes the difference.
On the KIS (Kola Inequality Scale) that's an 11 out of 10 "oh I get my own scale for the record there is no scale theres equality or not | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach
The biggest gloves you have and no stool - if I can't reach your ears I'll go for what I can reach best get shin guards pmsl
I wasn't thinking of shins "no clue on what yer thinking | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Period poverty is about financial inequality. The word poverty is a clue. It's not about fairness in helping one sex rather than another. It's about reducing the financial inequality that impacts those who can't afford sanitary products. Hard to believe it needs explaining!lol sorry simply dont agree theres a cost to being male or female and wanting to buy products to feel comfortable. One getting free while another paying simply isn't equal it's a bias you may note I never said it's not a good thing but it simply is not equal You took one example of the government reducing financial inequality and turned it into a gender inequality debate. There are different types of ineauality - racial, sexual, gender, financial. no I stated my thought on the subject and folk took exception Ohhhh you never "just state your thoughts ya midden" by the same token though, others EQUALLY just stated their thoughs it did then I proceeded to defend my thoughts when I'm told I'm wrong and folk can and say their own thoughts
I think that's called a difference of opinion, which of course we are all entitled too
hence this post still no clearer how folk see equality differently though
I think folk see equality pretty much as you said but different folk have different needs. For instance what about religious needs in the workplace - prayers etc. Should folk who don't have a place or time allocated for that feel it's inequality??? if you cant fit the contractual obligation you shouldn't enter into it
You lost me with that comment - what has your religion got to do with contractual obligation??? you wrote in the workplace so if your contracted to work between hours then you should be working if you cant due to religious obligations you shouldn't enter into a contract doesn't allow it
I think you'll find a lot of people would find that comment discriminating. Should an employer then not employ someone of a religion that requires that? Again they would be guilty of discrimination. Same goes for disability or gender??? I want to employ someone to tidy my house between 1500 and 1600 I have no other available hrs. one needs ten mins off at 1520 the others an atheist who should I employ
Good luck on getting anyone for an hour. I do believe breaks are not required for an hour though. Quite frankly your point there is pedantic and ridiculous my point was equality should be about all things equal and nothing to do with gender religion colour or anything else ps yer hired
No one is disputing that
Do I need referees??? only if ya intend to box my ears of no references required
Bejasus - I'd take the job unpaid if it involved boxing yer ears no worry what size gloves ya want and do you need a stool to reach
The biggest gloves you have and no stool - if I can't reach your ears I'll go for what I can reach best get shin guards pmsl
I wasn't thinking of shins no clue on what yer thinking "Clue: You have two of them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knees cant be my balls as apparently I have none "Correct but I do hope they are EQUALLY sized and placed  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knees cant be my balls as apparently I have none
Correct but I do hope they are EQUALLY sized and placed "course they are my body's in perfect symmetry | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knees cant be my balls as apparently I have none
Correct but I do hope they are EQUALLY sized and placed course they are my body's in perfect symmetry "No comment | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knees cant be my balls as apparently I have none
Correct but I do hope they are EQUALLY sized and placed course they are my body's in perfect symmetry
No comment "go on ya know ya wanna lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Knees cant be my balls as apparently I have none
Correct but I do hope they are EQUALLY sized and placed course they are my body's in perfect symmetry
No comment go on ya know ya wanna lol"As Oasis sang “true perfection has to be imperfect” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm just glad folk have stopped quoting the ENTIRE THREAD in their posts. Lazy bums "We are just enthusiastic and it saves folk having to go back over the thread | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It amazes me the crazy swing there is In what equality is. So let's hear your "version" if you feel like it you could also sling some nasty comments as you dont agree with someone could make it interesting "The Holy grail | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Equality will never truly exist because of human bias " Agreed there | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm just glad folk have stopped quoting the ENTIRE THREAD in their posts. Lazy bums " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Equality is when people stop judging women on their looks and making assumptions. Eg a dumb blonde. No one says the same about a guy. I’ve seen a guy try to mansplaiin something to a female friend at CJs who holds an engineering degree. She soon put him in his place. It was great to see him put in his place! " equality cant just be about females | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Equality will never truly exist because of human bias " I think it's super difficult to have as it requires all to want it I believe that's how we end up with the attempts at equality through inequality as some have said they are looking more at equality of outcome over true equality | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
