Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Scotland |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I do not agree with it" Agree with what?) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sanitary products are a necessity.most that can afford will still buy them.its the woman and young girl that cant that will most benefit.as a woman I find your comment very selfish. Think of a young girl with parents living under the bread line or junkie or alcoholics.how is that young girl ment to get money to buy sanitary towels? That leads to bullying and that leads to mental health issues." Couldnt agree with you anymore on this well said on all points | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things." Here comes the your a man comments but I 100% agree with you on this. If your thinking about poor or young girls... surely schools can hand them out or make a dispenser in there toilets/changing rooms. Maybe have a bowl of them in a clinic like they do condoms. It's going to be like paracetamol let's waste that £20 quid prescription when I can pop to tesco and get some for 25p. People will take the piss with this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. Here comes the your a man comments but I 100% agree with you on this. If your thinking about poor or young girls... surely schools can hand them out or make a dispenser in there toilets/changing rooms. Maybe have a bowl of them in a clinic like they do condoms. It's going to be like paracetamol let's waste that £20 quid prescription when I can pop to tesco and get some for 25p. People will take the piss with this " Well hopefully they will not take up the Drs appointments like they do for the prescriptions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things." absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad." And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that" when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad." I have to agree with this. We had most of the stuff pre purchased before my son arrived and like you say we didn't use it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things." Got to agree with Bluebell here give to the needy not the greedy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad." Im sure some dont use it but would it not be better to refuse it instead of throwing the cintents away its like the agruement of free sanitarty products im sure women / girls who can afford them wont take freebies to throw away but the free priducts are there for those who cant afford them ...just my view on things | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad." All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It would be nice if everyone had a strong moral compass and if you felt you don't need to use something brought in as a basic to help others (sanitary protection/baby boxes/prescriptions) then buy it yourself but the offer is still there for all. Sadly anything society/government does for a good reason and to help people is often abused by some. That goes for a lot of things, the NHS and Benefits system to name but two." I tried to say something like this in my earlier post but failed miserably lol. 100% agree with you on that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. Im sure some dont use it but would it not be better to refuse it instead of throwing the cintents away its like the agruement of free sanitarty products im sure women / girls who can afford them wont take freebies to throw away but the free priducts are there for those who cant afford them ...just my view on things " and what about for those who can afford cigarettes, alcohol, drugs and latest mobile phone yet still plead poverty? can they "afford" but choose to spend their money on other things? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. " Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. " The above is taken from scot gov website. You didn’t opt either though or given the option to. That’s administration failure on your and those others local health care dept. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. Im sure some dont use it but would it not be better to refuse it instead of throwing the cintents away its like the agruement of free sanitarty products im sure women / girls who can afford them wont take freebies to throw away but the free priducts are there for those who cant afford them ...just my view on things and what about for those who can afford cigarettes, alcohol, drugs and latest mobile phone yet still plead poverty? can they "afford" but choose to spend their money on other things? " Think your now just on your siap box jumping from 1 thing to another lol that topic could go on for the end of time tbh but maybe just maybe there are people out there not on drugs etc who are trying there best but still are in poverty | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It would be nice if everyone had a strong moral compass and if you felt you don't need to use something brought in as a basic to help others (sanitary protection/baby boxes/prescriptions) then buy it yourself but the offer is still there for all. Sadly anything society/government does for a good reason and to help people is often abused by some. That goes for a lot of things, the NHS and Benefits system to name but two. I tried to say something like this in my earlier post but failed miserably lol. 100% agree with you on that. " Thank ya lovely | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. The above is taken from scot gov website. You didn’t opt either though or given the option to. That’s administration failure on your and those others local health care dept. " *opt out* | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. The above is taken from scot gov website. You didn’t opt either though or given the option to. That’s administration failure on your and those others local health care dept. " Hows that my fault????????? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. The above is taken from scot gov website. You didn’t opt either though or given the option to. That’s administration failure on your and those others local health care dept. Hows that my fault????????? " It’s admins failure. But equally you could have just said hey don’t bother with a baby box. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said not give to the poor so God knows where you got that from. I said i do not agree with giving every women in Scotland. Alot are very rich and can afford £3 per month. The money could be spent on far better things. absolutely same with free baby boxes when females give birth, Scotland has gone mad. And thats bad because ????? giving a wee helping hand to a wee family for there newborn ? C'mon no one should grudge that when the family are financially secure they have no need of a baby box and many simply throw away the contents then absolutely no need for one. Scotland has gone mad. All newborn babies in Scotland will be given a box of essential items, containing things like: clothes, from newborn up to 6 months a digital ear thermometer a bath towel a changing mat books The box also has a mattress, mattress protector and a fitted sheet. How you get your baby box The baby box is free and your midwife will help you register for it. During your 20 to 24 week antenatal appointment your midwife will: explain the baby box to you and ask if you would like one fill in a baby box registration card with you arrange delivery You don't need to do anything else. You'll get the baby box between weeks 32 to 36 of pregnancy. Those who don’t need one don’t register for it. Simple really. Not totally accurate. I never opted in for a baby box and still received one in the hospital as did the other six women that were in the ward with me. The above is taken from scot gov website. You didn’t opt either though or given the option to. That’s administration failure on your and those others local health care dept. Hows that my fault????????? It’s admins failure. But equally you could have just said hey don’t bother with a baby box. " Yep did that and the box was left with the reception nurse at the ward then given to my husband when he left during visiting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And your hubby could have said.no thanks we have got everything " He could have. But he assumed it was something he had to take as he was presented it when he left the ward not in front of me and would have told him otherwise. Failing to see your point as usual The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact is more prob use it than dont. Just because you didnt.dosnt mean others wont. I fail to see why folk dont think this is a good thing.everyone means about governments being out of touch with real people and lining their pockets and the min they actually do a good thing its shot down by people who actually dont need it.not thepeople who do." I'm not arguing the case with those that need it getting one. My point was to a poster that quoted off the Scottish Goverment website. I didn't get any option to opt in or opt out it was obviously automatically generated through the system when I registered. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I think every person who has a period has been caught out and been stuck with a toilet paper pad. This benefits everyone that bleeds from their uterus from people who will rely on free sanitary products, to people who are just caught out, to students, people who have lost jobs etc. " And if guys had this plumbing, you can guarantee it wouldn't still be an issue. If anyone is confused about the effects of period poverty, or seeks to marginalise the issue, I'm happy to discuss my first-hand experiences as a youth worker in Raploch. It's the 21st century, and girls shouldn't have to consider suicide because they can't access a simple product. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And your hubby could have said.no thanks we have got everything He could have. But he assumed it was something he had to take as he was presented it when he left the ward not in front of me and would have told him otherwise. Failing to see your point as usual The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one " Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it laughable that guys actually have an opinion on this as it's not as if they'll ever have to understand what it's like to have a period ." Anyone is entitled to post on a thread. Find A bit of a sweeping statement. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sanitary products are a necessity.most that can afford will still buy them.its the woman and young girl that cant that will most benefit.as a woman I find your comment very selfish. Think of a young girl with parents living under the bread line or junkie or alcoholics.how is that young girl ment to get money to buy sanitary towels? That leads to bullying and that leads to mental health issues." Here here People don't realise how many 'normal' famalies live in the bottom 5%. Most of whom have someone in the family in employment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it laughable that guys actually have an opinion on this as it's not as if they'll ever have to understand what it's like to have a period . Anyone is entitled to post on a thread. Find A bit of a sweeping statement. " Aye I get that I just find it strange that never having to go through a period that theres so many opinions towards it from men , I never said you shouldn't comment on the thread what I'm saying is however much it's your opinion the fact that is men have never had to go through a period so cant possible know what it's like, never had to experience getting caught out in public when you come on early never had to expierence leakage and the embarrassment it causes , the truth of the matter is you'll never need to know what it's like. I for one will buy my sanitary products but to know if ever there comes a time I might for whatever reason need access to them is good to know that I can ,what about the people having to use food banks they cant afford to feed their families let alone provide sanitary products . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it laughable that guys actually have an opinion on this as it's not as if they'll ever have to understand what it's like to have a period . Anyone is entitled to post on a thread. Find A bit of a sweeping statement. Aye I get that I just find it strange that never having to go through a period that theres so many opinions towards it from men , I never said you shouldn't comment on the thread what I'm saying is however much it's your opinion the fact that is men have never had to go through a period so cant possible know what it's like, never had to experience getting caught out in public when you come on early never had to expierence leakage and the embarrassment it causes , the truth of the matter is you'll never need to know what it's like. I for one will buy my sanitary products but to know if ever there comes a time I might for whatever reason need access to them is good to know that I can ,what about the people having to use food banks they cant afford to feed their families let alone provide sanitary products ." Think I know first hand if you’ve read my earlier post. Seeing distraught people living from a food bank and helping personally with period poverty. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it laughable that guys actually have an opinion on this as it's not as if they'll ever have to understand what it's like to have a period . Anyone is entitled to post on a thread. Find A bit of a sweeping statement. Aye I get that I just find it strange that never having to go through a period that theres so many opinions towards it from men , I never said you shouldn't comment on the thread what I'm saying is however much it's your opinion the fact that is men have never had to go through a period so cant possible know what it's like, never had to experience getting caught out in public when you come on early never had to expierence leakage and the embarrassment it causes , the truth of the matter is you'll never need to know what it's like. I for one will buy my sanitary products but to know if ever there comes a time I might for whatever reason need access to them is good to know that I can ,what about the people having to use food banks they cant afford to feed their families let alone provide sanitary products . Think I know first hand if you’ve read my earlier post. Seeing distraught people living from a food bank and helping personally with period poverty. " Have you ever experienced a period personally ? Felt the cramps come on , been taken unawares wearing light coloured clothing , I wasnt having a dig at you was just stating a man will never be able to understand what it is like for a girl/woman , heaven forbid what it would be like if u couldnt for whatever reason not be able to afford the products ,however good intentioned you have been to which is commendable you will never know | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow... The I'm ok so screw the rest of you attitude is shocking!." Agree, I'm a little surprised that no one on here has mentioned that menstruation is a totally natural occurrence, not a choice. Tampons aren't a luxury nor a want, they're a need, a necessity for half of the planet's population. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm all for free sanitary products, baby boxes and free prescriptions. A society is be judged by how it treats it's most vulnerable members." It would have more money to spend on the poor and vulnrable if it was not giving out freebies to the very wealthy folk. Just my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And your hubby could have said.no thanks we have got everything He could have. But he assumed it was something he had to take as he was presented it when he left the ward not in front of me and would have told him otherwise. Failing to see your point as usual The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. " The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm all for free sanitary products, baby boxes and free prescriptions. A society is be judged by how it treats it's most vulnerable members. It would have more money to spend on the poor and vulnrable if it was not giving out freebies to the very wealthy folk. Just my opinion." But this falls down because of the amount money it takes to implement means testing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? " I've already drawn my own conclusion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion " These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! " Yip 2 of my friends at work have just had babies and there’s were delivered to their homes around 4 weeks ago | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! " Not true in years gone by. I collected both mine from Boots in 1992 and 1997 after being given a voucher. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Not true in years gone by. I collected both mine from Boots in 1992 and 1997 after being given a voucher." And that was after they were born not before | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Not true in years gone by. I collected both mine from Boots in 1992 and 1997 after being given a voucher." Nope these are different boxes the ones mentioned above were part of a new government initiative ... your box would have contained things like baby wipes, money off vouchers, sample disposable nappies etc etc but nothing comparable to these. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! " Exactly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly " Maybe different Health boards work in different ways. I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly " Are you seriously calling someone a liar, how do you know they never received a box from the hospital. ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly Maybe different Health boards work in different ways. I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population." Things have obviously progressed in the last 20 years As an aside, for folks who supposedly have open and progressive attitude towards sex, there's still a lot of narrow minded thinking being demonstrated | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly Are you seriously calling someone a liar, how do you know they never received a box from the hospital. ?" https://www.parentclub.scot/baby-box I don’t think anybody is saying anyone is lying just that normally the box is delivered to the address given when you fill in the card to register that you want one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly Are you seriously calling someone a liar, how do you know they never received a box from the hospital. ? https://www.parentclub.scot/baby-box I don’t think anybody is saying anyone is lying just that normally the box is delivered to the address given when you fill in the card to register that you want one " Yes I understand that but the person said she never registered for one, how do you or anyone else know that a staff member perhaps asked her if she had registered, she replied no, and the staff ordered for her and delivery was the hospital, just a thought. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly Are you seriously calling someone a liar, how do you know they never received a box from the hospital. ? https://www.parentclub.scot/baby-box I don’t think anybody is saying anyone is lying just that normally the box is delivered to the address given when you fill in the card to register that you want one Yes I understand that but the person said she never registered for one, how do you or anyone else know that a staff member perhaps asked her if she had registered, she replied no, and the staff ordered for her and delivery was the hospital, just a thought. " I guess nobody knows. But people don't need to take ' free ' stuff when it's given, especially if they have no need for it. Most would just ask why they were being given it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Having helped out at my local food bank and bought products from my own pocket I know only to well this is a welcome addition to a forward progressive society. 112 votes in favour and none against shows that even cross party politics can work. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one" "Are you seriously calling someone a liar, how do you know they never received a box from the hospital. ?" "It’s really easy to sign up for your Baby Box. When you’re about 20-24 weeks pregnant, your midwife will fill in a Baby Box registration card with you at your regular antenatal appointment. Your midwife will send this card away to register you for your Baby Box, so you won’t need to do anything else. Your Baby Box will arrive at least 4 weeks before your baby’s due date. How will it be delivered? Your Baby Box will be delivered to the address that you put on your registration card. You will get a text, email or letter (whatever you have told us you prefer) the week before your box will be dispatched. The carrier will then be in touch with your tracking details and an estimated time slot for delivery. What if my address changes? If your address changes, you should contact scotlandsbabybox@theapsgroup.com or phone 0800 030 8003 quoting the registration number on the leaflet you were given at your 20-24 week midwife appointment." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population." The current scheme introduced 15 August 2017 Scotland's first Baby Box was delivered on the 15 August 2017 and since then over 115,000 boxes have been delivered – with uptake now at 96 per cent. Scotland's Baby Box aims to help tackle deprivation, improve health and support parents. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population. The current scheme introduced 15 August 2017 Scotland's first Baby Box was delivered on the 15 August 2017 and since then over 115,000 boxes have been delivered – with uptake now at 96 per cent. Scotland's Baby Box aims to help tackle deprivation, improve health and support parents." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population. The current scheme introduced 15 August 2017 Scotland's first Baby Box was delivered on the 15 August 2017 and since then over 115,000 boxes have been delivered – with uptake now at 96 per cent. Scotland's Baby Box aims to help tackle deprivation, improve health and support parents." If you call someone a liar perhaps you should do your research first. Don't just copy and paste the first website you find. During the baby box development stage it is was clearly documented that most parents would prefer delivery by post however some would be willing and able to collect from distribution centres AND OR NHS premises. Or is maternity wards no longer NHS premises. As already said we will never no for sure but calling someone out without being sure is bang out of order. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population. The current scheme introduced 15 August 2017 Scotland's first Baby Box was delivered on the 15 August 2017 and since then over 115,000 boxes have been delivered – with uptake now at 96 per cent. Scotland's Baby Box aims to help tackle deprivation, improve health and support parents. If you call someone a liar perhaps you should do your research first. Don't just copy and paste the first website you find. During the baby box development stage it is was clearly documented that most parents would prefer delivery by post however some would be willing and able to collect from distribution centres AND OR NHS premises. Or is maternity wards no longer NHS premises. As already said we will never no for sure but calling someone out without being sure is bang out of order. " Can you show me where I called someone a lier ? Then maybe you can sign back into your couples account I’m pasting facts. We can all make our own minds up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And your hubby could have said.no thanks we have got everything He could have. But he assumed it was something he had to take as he was presented it when he left the ward not in front of me and would have told him otherwise. Failing to see your point as usual The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one " I would rather a few people who didn't need the boxes/ sanitary products got them rather than a lot who do need them not get them. We live in an inclusive country let's help our fellow man woman child. Everyone needs a wee helping hand now and again and I'm proud that our wee country is leading the way in many ways. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Not true in years gone by. I collected both mine from Boots in 1992 and 1997 after being given a voucher." Thats was the bounty packs bluebell. Think there were 3 in total. Money off vouchers and sample size testers from companies. Nothing to do with government. You could get one when pregnant. One at hospital when baby was born and one when due for weaning. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The idea came from Sweden I believe. Introduced the baby box and say infant mortality rates go down. They are a great idea and literally just give people a little hand. Back to period poverty shall we, I don't get how anyone could be against the distribution of free sanitary products " Not to some but to everyone yes. It was first suggested it would cost 9millions now estimated more than double that figure. I would rather the money be spent on social housing and feeding the hungry. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The idea came from Sweden I believe. Introduced the baby box and say infant mortality rates go down. They are a great idea and literally just give people a little hand. Back to period poverty shall we, I don't get how anyone could be against the distribution of free sanitary products Not to some but to everyone yes. It was first suggested it would cost 9millions now estimated more than double that figure. I would rather the money be spent on social housing and feeding the hungry." The people who are hungry also probably can’t afford sanitary products. Them being free means the 12 yr old kid doesn’t have to miss school or maybe have to use loo roll. As I sure as hell wouldn’t have gone cap in hand at that age and asked for towels. I think you’re doing a disservice to those who can afford assuming they’ll abuse it. The measure of a civilised society is how we treat our most vulnerable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The fact we got a box even though we didn't ask for one Strange the box was presented other than the normal delivered to a registered address. The box was delivered to the ward at Falkirk hospital. Don't no where your trying to go with this???? I've already drawn my own conclusion These boxes are not delivered to hospitals, they are delivered to homes at least 4 weeks prior to the baby due date! Exactly Maybe different Health boards work in different ways. I must admit the contents of mine i could have afforded to buy but i accepted it as a gift. Its nice to feel apppreciated when you contribute to the population. Things have obviously progressed in the last 20 years As an aside, for folks who supposedly have open and progressive attitude towards sex, there's still a lot of narrow minded thinking being demonstrated " Narrow minds in Scotland forum, who’d have thought it!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sanitary products are a necessity.most that can afford will still buy them.its the woman and young girl that cant that will most benefit.as a woman I find your comment very selfish. Think of a young girl with parents living under the bread line or junkie or alcoholics.how is that young girl ment to get money to buy sanitary towels? That leads to bullying and that leads to mental health issues." I agree with that. Well said. Thats why im for indie 2 because SNO csres for its country | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sanitary products are a necessity.most that can afford will still buy them.its the woman and young girl that cant that will most benefit.as a woman I find your comment very selfish. Think of a young girl with parents living under the bread line or junkie or alcoholics.how is that young girl ment to get money to buy sanitary towels? That leads to bullying and that leads to mental health issues. I agree with that. Well said. Thats why im for indie 2 because SNP cares for its country " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sanitary products are a necessity.most that can afford will still buy them.its the woman and young girl that cant that will most benefit.as a woman I find your comment very selfish. Think of a young girl with parents living under the bread line or junkie or alcoholics.how is that young girl ment to get money to buy sanitary towels? That leads to bullying and that leads to mental health issues. I agree with that. Well said. Thats why im for indie 2 because SNP cares for its country " Nicola Sturgeon was against this due to the cost but has obviously changed her mind as she knows most of her party are turning against her. I would be more concerned and asking why children are living with junkies and not getting cared for at home. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd rather not politicise a thread that has, at its heart, an issue that is about compassion. The same compassion that means we also offer help and support to "junkies" and "alcoholics" (never mind that the flippant use of these labels also exposes ignorance and entitlement). Nobody chooses to be an addict, and it's often an awful cycle of poverty, social deprivation and stigma that means people become trapped in these circumstances. I would encourage anyone who dismisses, marginalises or politicises these things, to get off their high horses and spend a bit of time volunteering or working with those who can't get by without the extra help. It might change your outlook, and inspire a little kindness and compassion." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either." I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd rather not politicise a thread that has, at its heart, an issue that is about compassion. The same compassion that means we also offer help and support to "junkies" and "alcoholics" (never mind that the flippant use of these labels also exposes ignorance and entitlement). Nobody chooses to be an addict, and it's often an awful cycle of poverty, social deprivation and stigma that means people become trapped in these circumstances. I would encourage anyone who dismisses, marginalises or politicises these things, to get off their high horses and spend a bit of time volunteering or working with those who can't get by without the extra help. It might change your outlook, and inspire a little kindness and compassion." Never look down on anybody unless you're helping him up.” ~ Jesse Jackson | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. " Judgemental much?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! " I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there " Have you ever the very reason that we pay National insurance is so we dont gave to pay overthe earth for items and while we pay NI were already paying for it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there Have you ever the very reason that we pay National insurance is so we dont gave to pay overthe earth for items and while we pay NI were already paying for it " I'm unsure what you're point is? In terms of how our country runs the public pay for most things. What I was pointing out is that human beings being human beings they tend to take advantage of things brought into place to help others. Our national health service is one of those things and our Social Services is another. I'm sure I don't have to give examples of that. I do think that of the money taken in various kinds of tax etc is not used to best advantage i.e. the "cake" is not cut up evenly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there Have you ever the very reason that we pay National insurance is so we dont gave to pay overthe earth for items and while we pay NI were already paying for it I'm unsure what you're point is? In terms of how our country runs the public pay for most things. What I was pointing out is that human beings being human beings they tend to take advantage of things brought into place to help others. Our national health service is one of those things and our Social Services is another. I'm sure I don't have to give examples of that. I do think that of the money taken in various kinds of tax etc is not used to best advantage i.e. the "cake" is not cut up evenly. " The point is we slready pay for most thing through National insurance contributions. Which we means we woukd be psying for our prescriptions twice | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahaha well at least I know who not to have sex with from this post, thanks OP" I’m finding the politics threads very good for this as well. Don’t want to have to stop wearing my “Never kissed a Tory” badge. :p | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahaha well at least I know who not to have sex with from this post, thanks OP I’m finding the politics threads very good for this as well. Don’t want to have to stop wearing my “Never kissed a Tory” badge. :p" Haha sounds like the kiss of death to me lol. Politics finished now lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there Have you ever the very reason that we pay National insurance is so we dont gave to pay overthe earth for items and while we pay NI were already paying for it I'm unsure what you're point is? In terms of how our country runs the public pay for most things. What I was pointing out is that human beings being human beings they tend to take advantage of things brought into place to help others. Our national health service is one of those things and our Social Services is another. I'm sure I don't have to give examples of that. I do think that of the money taken in various kinds of tax etc is not used to best advantage i.e. the "cake" is not cut up evenly. The point is we slready pay for most thing through National insurance contributions. Which we means we woukd be psying for our prescriptions twice " Yep I get that, but it's not really what the post was aiming at. Looking at taxation, we pay several ways for the same thing through various taxes but thanks for the point | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I also find it funny how there was a comment about young people being expectant. We are not. We are unfortunately just looked down upon by older people because the younger generation tend to be more accepting and care about their neighbors. Regardless of political position, left or right wing, I don't know any young people who would ever be so stupid to think that things like free health care, prescriptions, condoms and sanitary products are ever a bad thing. Call us soft, but I'd rather have empathy than care about the rich becoming richer. What is the point in living a life where all you care about is the figure in your bank rather than the people around you. If we were to get rid of completely free services a "pay what you can" service would be the only feesible way to do this. There is no way that in out current financial situation (thanks boomers) that we should ever expect people to pay for things that we can very very easily fund through national insurance, and if we can't why not tax the people that make more than £50,000 a year a bit more national insurance" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahaha well at least I know who not to have sex with from this post, thanks OP I’m finding the politics threads very good for this as well. Don’t want to have to stop wearing my “Never kissed a Tory” badge. :p Haha sounds like the kiss of death to me lol. Politics finished now lol" Unfortunately I kissed an incognito UKIP voter, dated him for a few weeks then found out and dumped that shit faster than the morning after a vindaloo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahaha well at least I know who not to have sex with from this post, thanks OP I’m finding the politics threads very good for this as well. Don’t want to have to stop wearing my “Never kissed a Tory” badge. :p Haha sounds like the kiss of death to me lol. Politics finished now lol Unfortunately I kissed an incognito UKIP voter, dated him for a few weeks then found out and dumped that shit faster than the morning after a vindaloo" Oh dear. I’m so sorry. I can’t imagine the horror of that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. " You sound like a channel 5 fan | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The idea came from Sweden I believe. Introduced the baby box and say infant mortality rates go down. They are a great idea and literally just give people a little hand. Back to period poverty shall we, I don't get how anyone could be against the distribution of free sanitary products " It was Finland. It wasn't the baby boxes that reduced infant mortality rates it was the requirement to accept the support that came along with them. Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahaha well at least I know who not to have sex with from this post, thanks OP" It doesn't really help you knowing who you will have sex with either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there " It was tarring all those in receipt of benefits. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there It was tarring all those in receipt of benefits." I believe the comment referred to benefit scroungers not ALL those in receipt of benefits?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality)" Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. " Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there It was tarring all those in receipt of benefits. I believe the comment referred to benefit scroungers not ALL those in receipt of benefits?? " But you do realise often in the media people on benefits are portrayed as scroungers and therefore it’s become a common held view that that’s the norm? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’."" The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Giving every female in Scotlamd free sanitary products. But i do not agree with free prescriptions for everyone either. I don't believe in FREE prescriptions either to a certain degree. Many benefit spongers enjoy the privilege too fund their incapacity. I'm pretty sure these type of people dispose of the medication which costs money. But.. Judgemental much?! I'm not so sure it's totally judgemental, as I said in an earlier post (I think). For every good action or law that is passed there is someone out there that will abuse or take advantage of it. It would be nice if everyone's moral compass was strong and everyone did the right thing. For example I would never dream of clogging up my GP's surgery for a cold or script for paracetamol for many reasons. As I also said earlier it's good the offer is there, I'd rather it was and it helped some than it wasn't and someone suffered. Alas I have no idea how you stop those that abuse such things or taking something for nothing just because it's there It was tarring all those in receipt of benefits. I believe the comment referred to benefit scroungers not ALL those in receipt of benefits?? But you do realise often in the media people on benefits are portrayed as scroungers and therefore it’s become a common held view that that’s the norm?" I do indeed get your point and yes it’s infuriating that people in need don’t get a benefit they are entitled too. Likewise it’s sickening when you see someone working or abusing the system. I think this underlines what everyone is saying really. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. " The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468" You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. " Establishment newspapers? The Guardian? They include extensive quotes from various sources but if you're reduced to claiming that everything is somehow made up then that says it all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"They should be made available especially as girls age 11 get periods. If contraception is free why not sanity products. This would be very handy in public toilets , available to use just as much as toilet roll, soap and hand towels. Sanitary products don't need to be top brand , you can buy a packet for 50p. I don't hear any issues with free contraception available to all. Some people will still buy their own others won't care about the quality as long as it's effective. I think it's a step in the right direction. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468" So are you against it? Yes or no | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. Establishment newspapers? The Guardian? They include extensive quotes from various sources but if you're reduced to claiming that everything is somehow made up then that says it all. " If you think the guardian is impartial your claim is as deluded as your point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!" how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. Establishment newspapers? The Guardian? They include extensive quotes from various sources but if you're reduced to claiming that everything is somehow made up then that says it all. " He has made up his mind, he knows better and woe betide anyone that says otherwise. He is yet another "expert" on the fab forum. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. Establishment newspapers? The Guardian? They include extensive quotes from various sources but if you're reduced to claiming that everything is somehow made up then that says it all. He has made up his mind, he knows better and woe betide anyone that says otherwise. He is yet another "expert" on the fab forum. " Rule 101 anything in “inverted” commas is a lie. You’ll find that’s why print media use them as it’s their version not the truth. You got called out for slavering. We could all see that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Unfortunately Scotgov decided not to bring in the important part (the support) so it's just a giveaway rather than something that has a targetted outcome (reducing infant mortality) Care to elaborate on the support not provided ? Your post makes no sense other than snp bashing. Is anything that points out a flaw in government SNP bashing? Here's part of an article from SNP supporter Robin McAlpine from the Commonspace website, it's form a paragraph about good ideas gone bad: "Another example is baby boxes. This policy was extracted from a much wider Finnish initiative and the Finns themselves consider it to be the least important part. In an attempt to modernise parenting skills they put in place a two-year process of supporting prospective and new parents with extensive training and agency support. But they didn’t want to make it compulsory so they offered ‘baby boxes’ as an incentive for people to sign up. I know from the Finnish side that, when Scottish Government staffers did a fact-finding trip the Finns kept saying ‘no, you’re completely and utterly missing the point’. The Scots kept saying ‘we’re not interested, we only want to know what’s in the boxes’." The box aims to give parents and newborns the best start. There is a wealth of support provided from the parenting club and midwife association. Extensive research to find out exactly what contents and support should be available. To quote mortality rates and the scot gov is disingenuous. The claims about mortality rates were made by the Scottish Government. First Minister and various MPs and MSPs claimed they reduced infant mortality. Problem is, that's not true. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/snp-baby-box-expert-safety-concerns https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/no-evidence-baby-boxes-reduce-deaths-say-finnish-government-295468 You’ve quoted 2 establishment newspapers so the slant would be obvious. I wouldn’t think a box Would reduce mortality more than any other baby bed such as a Moses basket or crib. It’s a great initiative and we all know how out of context quotes work in the media. Establishment newspapers? The Guardian? They include extensive quotes from various sources but if you're reduced to claiming that everything is somehow made up then that says it all. He has made up his mind, he knows better and woe betide anyone that says otherwise. He is yet another "expert" on the fab forum. Rule 101 anything in “inverted” commas is a lie. You’ll find that’s why print media use them as it’s their version not the truth. You got called out for slavering. We could all see that. " Oh hunny no need to get nasty because folks dont agree with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite" I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"whaaaaaaaaaaaat" You kids know you don't have to quote the *whole* thread when replying? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"whaaaaaaaaaaaat You kids know you don't have to quote the *whole* thread when replying? " Ach just easier | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it " without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble" Men don’t need these products. They’re not something we have to regularly spend money on. Making them free to all women reduces inequality by removing an expense that can be significant and applies only to women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble" You do realise that bleeding often quite heavily from your vagina every month is slightly different from having a few days stubble? Would you feel trapped in the house if you haven’t shaved for a few days the way girls who have no access to sanitary products feel in case they leak through their makeshift pad? Girls as young as 9 get periods don’t you think it’s a good thing for them to be able to easily access sanitary products at school without a fuss? I have two daughters and while I’m in the fortunate position of being able to provide sanitary products for us all I’m glad to know if they are ever caught out at school or out with friends then they can access products to save their dignity | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble Men don’t need these products. They’re not something we have to regularly spend money on. Making them free to all women reduces inequality by removing an expense that can be significant and applies only to women. " females dont need those products either. It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple. So you dont regularly spend money on razors even with a beard I still have to buy razors | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble" I see your point to a degree but men not shaving is hardly a necessity or a hygiene issue, nor is it socially unacceptable for a man to shave. Bleeding however is somewhat different surely? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble Men don’t need these products. They’re not something we have to regularly spend money on. Making them free to all women reduces inequality by removing an expense that can be significant and applies only to women. females dont need those products either. It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple. So you dont regularly spend money on razors even with a beard I still have to buy razors " Women (not “females”, please, you sound like a Ferengi) absolutely DO need sanitary products. Claiming otherwise is a bad faith argument. Shaving products are not comparable to needing to stop sometimes massive blood loss on a monthly basis. As it happens, no I don’t regularly buy razors. I think the last time I did was around fifteen years ago. I use an electric beard trimmer which cost about 20 quid and has lasted me for years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple" You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble Men don’t need these products. They’re not something we have to regularly spend money on. Making them free to all women reduces inequality by removing an expense that can be significant and applies only to women. females dont need those products either. It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple. So you dont regularly spend money on razors even with a beard I still have to buy razors " You are joking right? What is your suggestion then for myself who has such a heavy flow that I need to wear a super tampon and towel and change every hour in the first few days? Should I call in to work to tell them I won’t be in or go to work with blood flowing freely? Do you have daughters or in fact actually know any women? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble You do realise that bleeding often quite heavily from your vagina every month is slightly different from having a few days stubble? Would you feel trapped in the house if you haven’t shaved for a few days Me no other guys yes there is a stigma to being unkempt. the way girls who have no access to sanitary products feel in case they leak through their makeshift pad? So you understand it's not a necessity to have bought sanitary products. Girls as young as 9 get periods don’t you think it’s a good thing for them to be able to easily access sanitary products at school without a fuss? Where did I say it's not a good thing for girls or woman ? I have two daughters and while I’m in the fortunate position of being able to provide sanitary products for us all I’m glad to know if they are ever caught out at school or out with friends then they can access products to save their dignity The simple fact is it's an inequality and not an equality men and boys suffer from social stigmas also but right now theres no political weight behind looking into it my point from the get go isn't whether it's good or bad but that it simply is not about equality and more to do with politicised garble " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? " or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better" Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!how does spending money on one gender reduce inequality some folk love a soundbite I think in this case it was more about equality in gaining access to sanitary products between people living in poverty and and people who can afford to purchase these items nothing to do with gender inequality or at least that’s my take on it without free sanitary products is equal. what's being said is men need to pay for sanitary products woman get free that's a pretty clear inequality. why dont men get free razors lol soundbites are seldom factual and more politicised garble Men don’t need these products. They’re not something we have to regularly spend money on. Making them free to all women reduces inequality by removing an expense that can be significant and applies only to women. females dont need those products either. It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple. So you dont regularly spend money on razors even with a beard I still have to buy razors Women (not “females”, please, you sound like a Ferengi) absolutely DO need sanitary products. Claiming otherwise is a bad faith argument. Shaving products are not comparable to needing to stop sometimes massive blood loss on a monthly basis. As it happens, no I don’t regularly buy razors. I think the last time I did was around fifteen years ago. I use an electric beard trimmer which cost about 20 quid and has lasted me for years." nice electricity or batteries free good going you say potato I say females get over it. No they absolutely DONT need bought sanitary products it may be far easier but not a neccesity | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/" no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better" The "what about men" line doesn't hold up after centuries of male privilege, and lines like this harking back to pre-history just expose the male fear of losing that assumed superiority. Just admit you're scared of equalty and we'll understand | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head" Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better" Cjs Greedy Cave Women Gangbang. Claim you're free complimentary towels @ the Dino Hut. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better The "what about men" line doesn't hold up after centuries of male privilege, and lines like this harking back to pre-history just expose the male fear of losing that assumed superiority. Just admit you're scared of equalty and we'll understand " pmsl shows how little you understand what I'm saying I'm all for true equality across every spectrum. What I'm not keen on is pretend equality that hinders one gender and promotes another (not really in this case) As an example an equal opportunity employer who claims equality but any heavy lifting jobs are exclusively given to men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?" why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh" How am I missing the point you are saying that women don’t need to use sanitary products yes? So my point is if they don’t use sanitary products then that will result in them bleeding over chairs, their clothes public transport their car. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh How am I missing the point you are saying that women don’t need to use sanitary products yes? So my point is if they don’t use sanitary products then that will result in them bleeding over chairs, their clothes public transport their car. " where did I say that ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better The "what about men" line doesn't hold up after centuries of male privilege, and lines like this harking back to pre-history just expose the male fear of losing that assumed superiority. Just admit you're scared of equalty and we'll understand pmsl shows how little you understand what I'm saying I'm all for true equality across every spectrum. What I'm not keen on is pretend equality that hinders one gender and promotes another (not really in this case) As an example an equal opportunity employer who claims equality but any heavy lifting jobs are exclusively given to men " How does making sanitary products free to *the people who need them* hinder anyone? Your argument makes no sense, and your analogy there is fatuous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh How am I missing the point you are saying that women don’t need to use sanitary products yes? So my point is if they don’t use sanitary products then that will result in them bleeding over chairs, their clothes public transport their car. where did I say that ?" “No they absolutely DONT need bought sanitary products it may be far easier but not a necessity”. Eh right here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh How am I missing the point you are saying that women don’t need to use sanitary products yes? So my point is if they don’t use sanitary products then that will result in them bleeding over chairs, their clothes public transport their car. where did I say that ? “No they absolutely DONT need bought sanitary products it may be far easier but not a necessity”. Eh right here " key word BOUGHT | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As I said what I've written goes completely over your head you attempt to put words hell sentences in my mouth and completely miss what's actually written. IT IS NOT ABOUT EQUALITY" Yet it's you that mentions equality re shaving etc etc... the original post is not about equality either it's about doing something that can help a section of the community. The fact it is women is neither here or there, it's something positive. If it were men, or ANY other section of the community I'd be happy for it too. To me the issue is one of whether it is abused or not. Some will some won't that's human nature. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As I said what I've written goes completely over your head you attempt to put words hell sentences in my mouth and completely miss what's actually written. IT IS NOT ABOUT EQUALITY How am I putting sentences in your mouth when you literally wrote that sentence? What have I not understood about that sentence? Help me out then " how can it be about equality when you are only looking out for one gender | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well done Monica Lennon MSP...Scottish Parliament usually bans things, you've made something happen that actually reduces inequality. Grown up politics...whatever next?!" original post......something that actually reduces inequality | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Someone's needing to throw a towel in with this thread " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yet it's you that mentions equality re shaving etc etc... the original post is not about equality either it's about doing something that can help a section of the community. The fact it is women is neither here or there, it's something positive. If it were men, or ANY other section of the community I'd be happy for it too. To me the issue is one of whether it is abused or not. Some will some won't that's human nature." Thanks, you saved me from a lot of typing. If his argument was about cost fair enough. But it's not, which is a separate argument that has become inveigled with this one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It may be easier with these products but not essential did eve pop of to a tampon machine before eating the apple You didn't honestly just go back to the mythical creation of humankind to argue against period poverty, did you? or take a cave woman popping off to the dino hut for her tampon if it works for you better Give this a read for a very brief overview of how women have been using some form of sanitary products (some of them not that sanitary) for more than 2,000 years. https://www.bloodandmilk.com/brief-history-of-period-products/no thanks seems what I've written has gone way over your head Do you work? If so are there women in your work? If so by your logic that they don’t NEED sanitary products they have two options when they have their periods, they can phone in to say they aren’t coming into work resulting in more work for the men or they can come into work and bleed over everything resulting in embarrassment for the women and probably most men, what option do you think is best?why do they need to bleed over everything again you miss the point crazy eh How am I missing the point you are saying that women don’t need to use sanitary products yes? So my point is if they don’t use sanitary products then that will result in them bleeding over chairs, their clothes public transport their car. where did I say that ? “No they absolutely DONT need bought sanitary products it may be far easier but not a necessity”. Eh right here key word BOUGHT" Ah ok I get you so we have to make our own sanitary products? Have you ever had a really heavy period? I’m afraid old rags and rolled up toilet roll don’t cut it, but as you are so adamant that women don’t need to buy sanitary products maybe you could suggest what they could use instead? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As I said what I've written goes completely over your head you attempt to put words hell sentences in my mouth and completely miss what's actually written. IT IS NOT ABOUT EQUALITY" It’s absolutely about equality. An inequality exists in women having to spend sometimes significant amounts of money on a regular basis to buy products they absolutely require. This is on top of an existing gender pay gap. The provision of free sanitary products for women helps promote equality by reducing or removing this cost. This “period tax”, if you like. It is entirely about equality. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yet it's you that mentions equality re shaving etc etc... the original post is not about equality either it's about doing something that can help a section of the community. The fact it is women is neither here or there, it's something positive. If it were men, or ANY other section of the community I'd be happy for it too. To me the issue is one of whether it is abused or not. Some will some won't that's human nature. Thanks, you saved me from a lot of typing. If his argument was about cost fair enough. But it's not, which is a separate argument that has become inveigled with this one " Agreed there m'dear | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As I said what I've written goes completely over your head you attempt to put words hell sentences in my mouth and completely miss what's actually written. IT IS NOT ABOUT EQUALITY It’s absolutely about equality. An inequality exists in women having to spend sometimes significant amounts of money on a regular basis to buy products they absolutely require. This is on top of an existing gender pay gap. The provision of free sanitary products for women helps promote equality by reducing or removing this cost. This “period tax”, if you like. It is entirely about equality. " Ah but we don’t need them we’ve obviously to make our own | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Help me out then how can it be about equality when you are only looking out for one gender " Because opinions like yours prove there is still a lot of work to do for women's rights. Some sections of society are still playing catch up to the privileged, hetero white man. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |