FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Scotland

The great equal pay scandal

Jump to newest
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1 OP   Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!

On just now bbc1 very interesting watch anyone else watching it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adbury girlWoman
over a year ago

Lanarkshire


"On just now bbc1 very interesting watch anyone else watching it ?"

Damn I forgot about this, will try get it on i player

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tsallthesame77Woman
over a year ago

edinburgh

Was it on earlier? BBC one got Dublin murders on just now?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m not entirely surprised at how the unions have failed some of their members

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife

I'm surprised at the lack of men posting comments on this thread!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m not entirely surprised at how the unions have failed some of their members"

Tbf, it's not the union that are responsible for setting rates of pay initially

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1 OP   Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!


"Was it on earlier? BBC one got Dublin murders on just now? "
was on before that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m not entirely surprised at how the unions have failed some of their members

Tbf, it's not the union that are responsible for setting rates of pay initially "

No the council fucked that up well and truly but the unions failed to provide their members with the correct information and also failed to mention the legal fees

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1 OP   Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!


"I’m not entirely surprised at how the unions have failed some of their members

Tbf, it's not the union that are responsible for setting rates of pay initially

No the council fucked that up well and truly but the unions failed to provide their members with the correct information and also failed to mention the legal fees "
it was also the misinformation that got some members only 5yrs instead of 12yrs like their colleagues no wonder they are so angry,but there is something far wrong when the women have been hushed from discussing their payouts also why has it not been broken down for them to be able to see they have got the correct amount or not ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife

How have they been hushed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How have they been hushed? "

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1 OP   Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!


"How have they been hushed? "
see non blondes reply

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got"

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?"

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years"

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?"

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adbury girlWoman
over a year ago

Lanarkshire

Just watched it, the unions were not convincing at al

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let's just hope the average 9 hours a week men work more and the retirement age are both brought into line with this pay equality

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Costa xxMan
over a year ago

stirling

Unions charging 6.9% fee of a £500m payout, looks like their dues didn’t cover legal fees

Unions for the people, eh nope!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it"

Wouldn't waste my time, just more British people crying they've been hard done by but do fk all about it, or accept money at the first sniff and let governments and fat cats line their own pockets!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it

Wouldn't waste my time, just more British people crying they've been hard done by but do fk all about it, or accept money at the first sniff and let governments and fat cats line their own pockets!"

It was Scottish women, not British people.

And you really would be better being informed before going off on a nonsensical rant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it

Wouldn't waste my time, just more British people crying they've been hard done by but do fk all about it, or accept money at the first sniff and let governments and fat cats line their own pockets!

It was Scottish women, not British people.

And you really would be better being informed before going off on a nonsensical rant"

Not having a rant, I'm commenting on a post, giving my opinion based on the information on the post, I've already said I've not seen it, everyone else has commented like they know loads about it which is why I've asked a few questions, since I got no answers I gave an opinion based on what I've read from every one posting!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it

Wouldn't waste my time, just more British people crying they've been hard done by but do fk all about it, or accept money at the first sniff and let governments and fat cats line their own pockets!

It was Scottish women, not British people.

And you really would be better being informed before going off on a nonsensical rant

Not having a rant, I'm commenting on a post, giving my opinion based on the information on the post, I've already said I've not seen it, everyone else has commented like they know loads about it which is why I've asked a few questions, since I got no answers I gave an opinion based on what I've read from every one posting!"

Never apologise gonzo, never explain

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"How have they been hushed?

The settlement offer has a non disclosure clause, meaning they can’t divulge what they got

So they've not been hushed, their own greed stopped them from talking?

It's hardly greed if they'd been underpaid for years

I've not seen it, but how were they underpaid?

You'll get a synopsis online if you don't want to watch it

Wouldn't waste my time, just more British people crying they've been hard done by but do fk all about it, or accept money at the first sniff and let governments and fat cats line their own pockets!

It was Scottish women, not British people.

And you really would be better being informed before going off on a nonsensical rant

Not having a rant, I'm commenting on a post, giving my opinion based on the information on the post, I've already said I've not seen it, everyone else has commented like they know loads about it which is why I've asked a few questions, since I got no answers I gave an opinion based on what I've read from every one posting!

Never apologise gonzo, never explain "

And never try to have a debate on a hot topic either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irth VaderMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60? "

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation "

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ast RolloMan
over a year ago

glasgow west

1st off i did not see the programme so cant comment on that,

but when a person goes for a job they are offered a rate of pay it does not matter what it is since it is an employers market and they can offer a pittance for x hours and some one will take it ,

if some one else is offered a different amount then they start to moan - why - they agreed to an amount so tuff luck and if they dont like it leave and get a new job .

it has been going on so long that it is now institutionalised the pay gap and employers can offer ever decreasing amounts no matter what the sex .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston "

I think someone might need some ice for that burn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

I think someone might need some ice for that burn"

What burn?? It's true, Google it if you don't believe me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

I think someone might need some ice for that burn

What burn?? It's true, Google it if you don't believe me "

I know its true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ibblingnewtWoman
over a year ago

by the sea

Wish I’d watched it what channel was it on

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

I think someone might need some ice for that burn

What burn?? It's true, Google it if you don't believe me

I know its true "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

I think someone might need some ice for that burn

What burn?? It's true, Google it if you don't believe me

I know its true

"

Keep up ya muppet! ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1 OP   Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!


"Wish I’d watched it what channel was it on "
Bbc1

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exylicksMan
over a year ago

airdrie

think everyone should be on same rate of pay and i have worked with 6 female electricians in my career and all were paid the same rate of pay. i have worked some places where i was doing double the amount of work as others and being paid the same amount as lazy gets but my high work ethic i have agreed i get extra for work i do now, nothing with gender just i work hard for what i do and i pay apprentices and labourers good money if they work hard. On another note someone mentioned pension ages as a whole this should be the same as well as women shouldnt be treated different. on another note look at tennis men and women on equal pay but men are on court for longer hours so if women get the same there matches should be best of 5 sets as why shoild men have to work harder

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *aledonianDoranMan
over a year ago

fife


"Does this mean that the men who, for decades, had to work Until they were 65 years old before they could retire can claim sex discrimination because women got to retire at 60?

You'd need to ask the men that made that legislation

It was actually a woman, her name was Elizabeth Johnston

I think someone might need some ice for that burn

What burn?? It's true, Google it if you don't believe me

I know its true

Keep up ya muppet! ..."

I can keep it up, it's not true what she said

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top