Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Scotland |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " You can do that for yourself if you don’t want messages from single guys. Setting it as a blanket rule? Get tae. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone posts a status I believe as long as comments relating to the status are gentlemanly / ladylike then there should not be a problem, however if abusive then should be reported" They could be reported, yes but why exposing yourself to possible abuse unnecessarily. Does that makes sense? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " lol why are males a diffrent species.......oh wait its only single ones. This warcry is hilarious when a cpl split. the male part is never long in changing their opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() No it was so couples and females would have to get off their arse and actually send messages out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where is the link to the survey " In your updates thingy | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() why? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is escalating quickly lol" Lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() ![]() Cos I would love to see them try to think of something to say pmsl x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive." Me sending the first message to certain people, fem, males or couples is not going to improve their banter! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive." Don't read them. Problem solved. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive. Don't read them. Problem solved. " It won't solve the problem though will it. The same threads will appear day after day whether I read them or not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive. Don't read them. Problem solved. It won't solve the problem though will it. The same threads will appear day after day whether I read them or not " So you would rather have a block on certain forum content for everyone? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive. Don't read them. Problem solved. It won't solve the problem though will it. The same threads will appear day after day whether I read them or not So you would rather have a block on certain forum content for everyone?" Now you're just putting words in my mouth. If I wanted that then that's what I'd have said ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive." Cant fault the logic here. Think of it as a reset Try it for a month | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() ![]() If your profile is only attracting what you might consider a lower level of clientele, then you might want to consider putting something interesting on it. Just a suggestion. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not all single men are bad We know that ![]() Thank god I'm not the sort of single man you want to meet .I have never seen a swingers couple so far up there own biased ass that they could kiss there own tonsils Just my own single male opinion of course ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive. Don't read them. Problem solved. It won't solve the problem though will it. The same threads will appear day after day whether I read them or not So you would rather have a block on certain forum content for everyone? Now you're just putting words in my mouth. If I wanted that then that's what I'd have said ![]() Your words "it won't solve the problem though will it" Your the one that seems to have a problem with these type of posts. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just filled in the Fab feedback survey, My main thing was that I think when someone writes a status, we should be able to comment under it... What do others think about this ? And what did you put if you completed it ? " Maybe just join your fab and faceache together . ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation What an utterly ludicrous idea. So Fab should be controlled by women and couples then? Aye, nae bother pal. ![]() ![]() No we get a good wee mix of who contacts us x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a wee look through the forums and the answer is obvious. Guys moaning about not getting replies and women or couples moaning about the standard of messages they receive. Don't read them. Problem solved. It won't solve the problem though will it. The same threads will appear day after day whether I read them or not So you would rather have a block on certain forum content for everyone? Now you're just putting words in my mouth. If I wanted that then that's what I'd have said ![]() ![]() I only mentioned the threads as an example of why single guys messaging first doesn't work for a lot of users on the site ie no replies or shit first messages | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where do you do the survey?" As above said on your update page | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where do you do the survey? As above said on your update page" Thanks. Scanned through but missed it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old backtrack it was just a joke.......it never works folk remember ![]() It wasn't a joke ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like to see ... if 2 profiles hot list each other then they are notified to that fact ![]() or if your put on someone hotlist lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't expect it to get implemented but it's good to see the guys getting upset about it ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like to see ... if 2 profiles hot list each other then they are notified to that fact ![]() This is a good suggestion. Shame No1 on my Hotlist fecked off! (greetin emoji) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not all single men are bad We know that ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like to see ... if 2 profiles hot list each other then they are notified to that fact ![]() Wish I’d thought of it , christ Bunkie had a good idea . ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like to see ... if 2 profiles hot list each other then they are notified to that fact ![]() ![]() A day of firsts. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old backtrack it was just a joke.......it never works folk remember ![]() ![]() EXACTLY, and thats what makes the suggestion of males not being allowed to message first even more stupid. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old backtrack it was just a joke.......it never works folk remember ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The old backtrack it was just a joke.......it never works folk remember ![]() ![]() I can see logic in the idea | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just filled in the Fab feedback survey, My main thing was that I think when someone writes a status, we should be able to comment under it... What do others think about this ? And what did you put if you completed it ? " Commenting on someone's status works great on another site I was on and you can delete the inappropriate ones people leave on yours as well. Surprisingly few of those on there, only ever deleted one. On here i can see it backfire though ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now wish I'd suggested that an OP should be able to block certain people from commenting on their posts on the forum. Crossed my mind often enough, but unfortunately didn't think of it when i filled in the survey. Did suggest to put a filter of some sort on messages to block dick pics. Optional of course, only for those who have seen enough of those pictures ![]() I think your first suggestion would make the forums a really dull uninteresting place | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now wish I'd suggested that an OP should be able to block certain people from commenting on their posts on the forum. Crossed my mind often enough, but unfortunately didn't think of it when i filled in the survey. Did suggest to put a filter of some sort on messages to block dick pics. Optional of course, only for those who have seen enough of those pictures ![]() I think there'd be a whole bunch of new posters who don't want to go there now because of the constant negativity x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx" No no no, omfg no. I've been here over 8 years and it's a NOOO Being photo verified Doesn't stop fake profiles FACT and I have never been photo verified and I ain't fake. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx No no no, omfg no. I've been here over 8 years and it's a NOOO Being photo verified Doesn't stop fake profiles FACT and I have never been photo verified and I ain't fake. ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " I’d never meet anyone then lol. I rarely send the first message. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx No no no, omfg no. I've been here over 8 years and it's a NOOO Being photo verified Doesn't stop fake profiles FACT and I have never been photo verified and I ain't fake. ![]() ![]() ![]() Definitely ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx No no no, omfg no. I've been here over 8 years and it's a NOOO Being photo verified Doesn't stop fake profiles FACT and I have never been photo verified and I ain't fake. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Seconded . ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs been sussed ![]() Had to happen one day - ye've got away wi it for far too long young man ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs been sussed ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs been sussed ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Make sure you take yer socks off - that's a tip lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs been sussed ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But they go sooooooo well with the jesus sandals ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Single men should have a reduction in cost and should be able to take advantage of more exclusive features on the site We as single guys already pay more than anyone else in the lifestyle so a reduction on here to give new guys a taster of what's on offer in the wider swinging world " dream on! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I filled it in a few days ago. I can't remember everything I said but some improvements were: Distance filter along with age / gender etc. Only allow friend requests after messages exchanged both ways. The option to re-set filters. After several years, organising a few socials and replying "no thanks" to a lot of people it would be great to have a fresh start with filters. " few very good suggestions there especially the friend request, I hate friend requests from strangers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Single men should have a reduction in cost and should be able to take advantage of more exclusive features on the site We as single guys already pay more than anyone else in the lifestyle so a reduction on here to give new guys a taster of what's on offer in the wider swinging world " Why should single guys get a discount? It's not obligatory to be here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My gripe was that I am not happy that some people can choose to look at my profile but I can't look at theirs because they have blocked single men. If they are not looking for single men why do they need to look at their profiles." I am seeking men but have them blocked because I prefer to make my own contact... I think the system is pretty good as it is, some tweaks could be made perhaps but mostly with all the tools the site give you, you can have your profile tailored to suit - well done Fab ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My gripe was that I am not happy that some people can choose to look at my profile but I can't look at theirs because they have blocked single men. If they are not looking for single men why do they need to look at their profiles." When someone's blocked single men, it will just mean the messages. You'll still be able to view their profiles x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My gripe was that I am not happy that some people can choose to look at my profile but I can't look at theirs because they have blocked single men. If they are not looking for single men why do they need to look at their profiles. When someone's blocked single men, it will just mean the messages. You'll still be able to view their profiles x " And I'm sure you can still wink and fab pics as well, to get someone's attention. If they like your profile they'll be in touch x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My gripe was that I am not happy that some people can choose to look at my profile but I can't look at theirs because they have blocked single men. If they are not looking for single men why do they need to look at their profiles." Yo the best of my knowledge, you can’t block groups of people from /viewing/ your profile. You can hide your profile entirely, from everyone, or block individuals from seeing you at all. The blocking of groups of people relates only to messages. At the end of the day, though, nobody is forcing you to have a profile on here. If you’re not happy with certain people seeing things, it’s down to you what you publish on here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " That would be me fucked then ! Or not actually lol it’s only men I want messaging me ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another quote might be "Some people want their cake and eat it also"." Same folk??? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another quote might be "Some people want their cake and eat it also". Same folk??? ![]() Nah I want meringue . ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My gripe was that I am not happy that some people can choose to look at my profile but I can't look at theirs because they have blocked single men. If they are not looking for single men why do they need to look at their profiles." Cause I'm a nosey bitch. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " Such a friendly attitude.... ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FAKES, that is the number 1 problem on fabs. 70% fake profiles now!! I believe everyone should have to upload their passport or driving licence to fabs admin, for verification. Video introduction also. When you block someone, stop them showing up in the search results" If that's what people had to do, I reckon there would be a lot less people here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FAKES, that is the number 1 problem on fabs. 70% fake profiles now!! I believe everyone should have to upload their passport or driving licence to fabs admin, for verification. Video introduction also. When you block someone, stop them showing up in the search results" Lol there's no way I'm uploading any form of ID to site admin! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx" I had something similar to this to reduce fake profiles | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FAKES, that is the number 1 problem on fabs. 70% fake profiles now!! I believe everyone should have to upload their passport or driving licence to fabs admin, for verification. Video introduction also. When you block someone, stop them showing up in the search results" What about people who don't have a passport or driving licence? Or people who SAY they don't have them? Don't forget, these documents also have information that can be used and abused by people who might be less than scrupulous, even if they are kept private on the site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messages And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx I had something similar to this to reduce fake profiles" It was a suggestion, I sure admin will look at the suggestions and figure something out. Its just tiresome ing out the fake and real. Xxx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nessarosa We suggested that people that are not photo verified have limited access to the site. No forum No messagest And a 2week clock.... if not photo verified the account is erased. This is to cut down on fake profiles. As to single males messaging us, 99% have been polite.... the other 1% are blocked. Our biggest problem is with fake profiles and our filters are set to try and them out. Xxx I had something similar to this to reduce fake profiles It was a suggestion, I sure admin will look at the suggestions and figure something out. Its just tiresome ing out the fake and real. Xxx" im curious as to how photo verification would solve what is perceived as fake profiles. it wouldnt be that difficult to fake a picture and wouldnt stop them from carrying out the actions that folk interpret as making them fake. it would be crazy for fab to even contemplate this. fab relys on numbers (inc actual fakes not just percieved ones). Alot of genuine users would simply leave the site if forced to photo verify. why stop at photo verify limit access to fab until they are meet verified. that would also have huge problems or folk could just accept that others needs and wants from the site vary from everyone elses | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation " Why should single guys not be able to initiate conversation ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main one I put was for single men not to be able to send an introductory message. Only couples or females can initiate a conversation Why should single guys not be able to initiate conversation ? " The woman and couples would stop moaning about shit first messages and men would stop moaning about getting patched x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |