FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Scotland

Shoebox exposed Sunday Mail

Jump to newest
 

By *unny Guy 67 OP   Man
over a year ago

Glasgow

Sorry to read of a Police bust this week

Not surprisingly the police have stated no criminality taking place but it’s still worthy of a sensationalist headline

Pathetic

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some nosey bugger dropping them in it? Must grab the paper and see what crap they came up with!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lascumMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Just read it, strange how the press seemed to be there at the very time of the visit. Somebody in Polscot giving a tip off perhaps.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't get it as most people know about after8 and cjs. Personally if I owned any of the clubs I'd invite them down to the clubs so they know that no illegal activity takes place

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Words suck as sleazy painting the picture for those with no clue. No criminality found....so no fuss. Just an over the top story

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So its not a brothel then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded blossomCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John "

A lot of couples profiles would seem to indicate that sex parties are a weekly occurrence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded blossomCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

A lot of couples profiles would seem to indicate that sex parties are a weekly occurrence "

That’s fine in the right environment and time but during the day in a flat surrounded by other flats? Same as others that are in a close surrounded by kids etc

John

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John "

Hmm good point. Especially if you have family.

Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

A lot of couples profiles would seem to indicate that sex parties are a weekly occurrence

That’s fine in the right environment and time but during the day in a flat surrounded by other flats? Same as others that are in a close surrounded by kids etc

John "

I think some swingers might have kids...and get this...they might even shag in the daytime

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John "

Totally ageee although I didn't know after8 was in a flat in a close. I thought it was a club on its own

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded blossomCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

A lot of couples profiles would seem to indicate that sex parties are a weekly occurrence

That’s fine in the right environment and time but during the day in a flat surrounded by other flats? Same as others that are in a close surrounded by kids etc

John

I think some swingers might have kids...and get this...they might even shag in the daytime "

Play it down all you want, two adults having fun during the day wouldn’t be noticed but a group of people having sex make a lot more noise... trust me we know. Enjoy you’re fishing

John

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Isn't that how cjs started tho?

Folk have got to start somewhere I suppose?

These kinda places will always get busted sooner or later hell how many times has cjs been in the papers !

Up to individuals to make up their own mind if the risk is worth taking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ola cubesMan
over a year ago

coatbridge

Its a building same as any other anything happening is behind closed doors.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What ive always wondered is what happens to you if you are there during the bust? Just go home with your hardon? Name taken?lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *esparate danMan
over a year ago

glasgow

Id imagine some of the ladies see the battering ram and say "yes please!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andy_FraserTV/TS
over a year ago

Edinburgh

The story is online.

I won't post the link though.

Mandy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzzy-LogicMan
over a year ago

Fochabers


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

Totally ageee although I didn't know after8 was in a flat in a close. I thought it was a club on its own "

After 8 is a club not in a flat

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow

The main problem I see is he’s renting the flat from the housing association and living somewhere else . The association will evict him so they can give the flat to someone that needs a place to stay .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

Totally ageee although I didn't know after8 was in a flat in a close. I thought it was a club on its own

After 8 is a club not in a flat"

After 8 is a business premises below private flats I believe .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estless nativeMan
over a year ago

near Glasgow

Just read the article, there are multiple breaches of GHA's tenancy agreement reported in it, I think the lease might be about to be terminated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty MaxWoman
over a year ago

Edinburgh

This is a thread about the Shoebox right??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awty MaxWoman
over a year ago

Edinburgh

[Removed by poster at 28/01/18 10:32:19]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Its a building same as any other anything happening is behind closed doors.

"

Except the flat concerned is let by the Glasgow Housing Association, and not for business or commercial use, so I expect eviction papers will be forthcoming, and if any benefits were paid on the address, there will be fraud investigations too. It's not as clear cut as consenting adults shagging behind closed doors.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horstrollMan
over a year ago

Caprona


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John

Totally ageee although I didn't know after8 was in a flat in a close. I thought it was a club on its own

After 8 is a club not in a flat"

Being Edinburgh most businesses are part of a tenement building.

Problem with the shoebox is down to perception

" illegality of running a business from a flat"

Am sure there is a a fair few folk that work from home, regardless of the nature of the work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sorry to read of a Police bust this week

Not surprisingly the police have stated no criminality taking place but it’s still worthy of a sensationalist headline

Pathetic

"

So from the information offered here, it's far from a "pathetic" exposè, but in fact a very legitimate piece of journalism uncovering the illegal use of a home which needs to be put to a more purposeful use.

And you're complaining about this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sorry to read of a Police bust this week

Not surprisingly the police have stated no criminality taking place but it’s still worthy of a sensationalist headline

Pathetic

So from the information offered here, it's far from a "pathetic" exposè, but in fact a very legitimate piece of journalism uncovering the illegal use of a home which needs to be put to a more purposeful use.

And you're complaining about this?

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r humanMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

After eight club is club not flats never as been

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So again....if you were there during the raid what would happen? They did say no criminality....so just the red face?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horstrollMan
over a year ago

Caprona


"So again....if you were there during the raid what would happen? They did say no criminality....so just the red face?"

If you were really unlucky the photographer taking pics may image search online

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So again....if you were there during the raid what would happen? They did say no criminality....so just the red face?

If you were really unlucky the photographer taking pics may image search online "

Going by the photos on the webpage, the photographer was using a long lens from inside a vehicle, a reasonable distance away, so none of those leaving after the raid will have been aware. Good job the Sunday Mail isn't into bl@ckm@il.

https://g.co/kgs/kthpDv

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Good job the Sunday Mail isn't into black-mail."

I wouldn't make that assumption.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andy_FraserTV/TS
over a year ago

Edinburgh

The thing to remember is that this was published by The Sunday Mail, who would happily run a half-page article about how Morrisons Scones have went up 5p and got smaller by 2g since 2012, and that it's shocking that your scone with jam and cream will cost you more.

They ran a double-page story almost 20 years ago about a seamstress that was catering to TV's and that it was evil. Did it stop her woring, or folks going to her? Nope.

Like others have said, this guy will get thrown out that flat, and it's doubtful that any other places listed as residences will accept him as a tenant.

Mandy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Good job the Sunday Mail isn't into black-mail.

I wouldn't make that assumption. "

I was only using that as a lead in to the video clip.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mberbCouple
over a year ago

Lothians


"So its not a brothel then?"

2 or more females makes it a brothel the fact they are taking £40 at the door. Dont tell me the females are happy for Steve to make £2000 a week on them lol.

Answer to the after eight and CJ's you will find they are registered business's and they have a sex licence. its prostitution end off.

We see stuff in the form all the time people slagging ladies on here using a certain escort site but the shoe box is ok. lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley

Shoebox is not in a privately owned fiat. The flat is rented from Glasgow Housing Association. I think they may take this further as you’re not supposed to run a business from it and you are meant to be living in it.

Recently an AirBnB was busted as a brothel near the Clyde. I only knew about it as Fab friends live above it and they didn’t know anything about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And cjs is any different?

Payment is taken to walk through the door as is after 8?

It's up to any individual to choose to pay their money and go?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley


"After eight club is club not flats never as been "

It’s still based within a larger building. It’s not an isolated venue like CJ’s.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Where it says no criminality took place appears to refer to the sex acts.

As I said before, there is the breach the tenancy agreement, possiblie fraudulent claims for housing benefit and council tax relief, and I think HMRC might want to talk to the owner about his "£2,000" per week income from the Shoebox, regarding tax evasion.

Three of those four issues would definitely be classed as criminality.

As for the women involved, HMRC might be interested in their earnings too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mberbCouple
over a year ago

Lothians


"And cjs is any different?

Payment is taken to walk through the door as is after 8?

It's up to any individual to choose to pay their money and go?"

The short and curlies is CJ's and the after eight club are registered business's paying their dues to the tax man so they are really pissed off that the Shoebox is paying their dues to the taxman ie Gangsters(the government) so Stevie better have books for what he has been earning for the taxman! Happy Shoeboxing Stevie!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I love the fact that the journalist will be sitting hoovering

up all the information on this thread for a prospective follow up piece.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now "

My money (all declared to the taxman) is on disgruntled neighbours going to the police and the press.

Even if the place was to shut today for good, there will still be people turning up looking for it, and making life a misery for the next tenant. My daughter had a similar scenario in her last flat, as the previous tenant had been dealing, and she was getting buzzed on the intercom all hours by his customers. She had to move within a couple of months again thanks to that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r humanMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

Think need more swingers club in Scotland not lest any no think any piss off about shoebox open up more the merry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I love the fact that the journalist will be sitting hoovering

up all the information on this thread for a prospective follow up piece. "

I'm pretty sure they will have visited CJ's and After 8 undercover already, and will know all they need to know as it is. Who knows, some of you might have met them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Think need more swingers club in Scotland not lest any no think any piss off about shoebox open up more the merry "

Can you translate that please?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mberbCouple
over a year ago

Lothians


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now "

Its not a swinging club its a Flat! And the only Vendetta will be the HMRC wanting what they are due or he will get jailed. Only stating Facts! We know people who have refused to go to this venue due to not wanting to be pimped and it not being a registered business and before anyone jumps on the bandwagon here you can go online and see who is registered and who is not. The fact the shoebox was so openly advertised without being registered is total stupidity on his part.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I love the fact that the journalist will be sitting hoovering

up all the information on this thread for a prospective follow up piece.

I'm pretty sure they will have visited CJ's and After 8 undercover already, and will know all they need to know as it is. Who knows, some of you might have met them."

Of course they will have, but look at all this extra free information they are getting. Any good journalist will be all over this.

They may even be contributing to the thread to keep the well topped up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now

Its not a swinging club its a Flat! And the only Vendetta will be the HMRC wanting what they are due or he will get jailed. Only stating Facts! We know people who have refused to go to this venue due to not wanting to be pimped and it not being a registered business and before anyone jumps on the bandwagon here you can go online and see who is registered and who is not. The fact the shoebox was so openly advertised without being registered is total stupidity on his part. "
by using the guys name and using the word him all the time it sure does come across as personal?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It says on the article that men paid money there is no mention of woman paying money. I booked a while ago for me and moon-light and I can confirm woman pay as well! so was this a different kind of event they raided or was the journalist clueless ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mberbCouple
over a year ago

Lothians


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now

Its not a swinging club its a Flat! And the only Vendetta will be the HMRC wanting what they are due or he will get jailed. Only stating Facts! We know people who have refused to go to this venue due to not wanting to be pimped and it not being a registered business and before anyone jumps on the bandwagon here you can go online and see who is registered and who is not. The fact the shoebox was so openly advertised without being registered is total stupidity on his part. by using the guys name and using the word him all the time it sure does come across as personal?"

Considering the article is about Him.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/housing-association-property-raided-cops-11925095

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now

Its not a swinging club its a Flat! And the only Vendetta will be the HMRC wanting what they are due or he will get jailed. Only stating Facts! We know people who have refused to go to this venue due to not wanting to be pimped and it not being a registered business and before anyone jumps on the bandwagon here you can go online and see who is registered and who is not. The fact the shoebox was so openly advertised without being registered is total stupidity on his part. by using the guys name and using the word him all the time it sure does come across as personal?"

No, it is simply that he is the guy that runs it. Or fronts it, possibly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mberbCouple
over a year ago

Lothians


"Ahhh so it's looks like it's a vendetta?

Christ jealousy of a swinging club?

Heard it all now

Its not a swinging club its a Flat! And the only Vendetta will be the HMRC wanting what they are due or he will get jailed. Only stating Facts! We know people who have refused to go to this venue due to not wanting to be pimped and it not being a registered business and before anyone jumps on the bandwagon here you can go online and see who is registered and who is not. The fact the shoebox was so openly advertised without being registered is total stupidity on his part. by using the guys name and using the word him all the time it sure does come across as personal?

No, it is simply that he is the guy that runs it. Or fronts it, possibly. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’ve been to Cjs as the police left and as it’s a registered business they come (before parties or during the day) every now and again to check the place is within regulations. In Cjs, after8 and any club in England I’ve been to you pay you entrance fee and no play is guaranteed in the shoebox and some other parties your paying money and there will be hostesses so some may think they are entitled to sex with these ladies. But then the some will assume the same if they are invited to a private party in a couples house and are asked to pay a contribution. It seems to me it’s really a case of the shoebox’s location that’s the issue not the acts taking place as anyone who’s lived in a flat with a neighbour who has a lot of traffic knows the inconvenience it can cause.

Musicmaid x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lets hope from the money he made the right people got their share

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ringles0510Woman
over a year ago

Central Borders


"It says on the article that men paid money there is no mention of woman paying money. I booked a while ago for me and moon-light and I can confirm woman pay as well! so was this a different kind of event they raided or was the journalist clueless ? "

It means you're a prostitute, if you've been there being female. According to their "investigator" anyway. Clueless sums it up nicely, with some added self fabricated nonsense to make the story a bit more exciting for the readers. Can't believe the amount of rubbish that paper comes out with

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wits happening not read papers today as yet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"It says on the article that men paid money there is no mention of woman paying money. I booked a while ago for me and moon-light and I can confirm woman pay as well! so was this a different kind of event they raided or was the journalist clueless ?

It means you're a prostitute, if you've been there being female. According to their "investigator" anyway. Clueless sums it up nicely, with some added self fabricated nonsense to make the story a bit more exciting for the readers. Can't believe the amount of rubbish that paper comes out with "

Or from some of the bitter folk on here!

Is a strange one

Is it a brothel? - No

Are folk paying the guy (Stevie) for sex - No

Otherwise plod would have had a great time, shutting the place down, taking names and reporting folk to the PF

It is a guy allowing a place (that me may rent or not) for folk to come along (and maybe have sex or not) for a contribution.

Does that constitute a business? Debatable

He provides drinks, nibbles (in some way), safe-keeping of clothes, towels (that hopefully get washed) and a safe environment where like-minded people can enjoy themselves.

Does that mean every fabber who invites folk round for a contribution based party is in business?

Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Had it been a privately owned property would the sensationalism be any different?

I’ve been there a few times. I’ve spoken to the “greedy girls” who play there. I don’t know what - if any - share they get of the contributions. I’ve not had sex with either

Invariably, I’ve ended up playing with women or couples who have also paid their contribution and had a great time.

Wasn’t aware it had gotten so busy that security was employed for folk’s safety. Don’t think that’s a bad thing

I don’t doubt that CJs and After 8 are registered venues - don’t know what that entails but is none of my business

I recall CJ being “exposed” previously and also a lad who spent a fortune opening a club in Fox Street never being allowed to trade

Swingers need places to go. Why ridicule a guy who gave us one

Don’t all want to spending fortunes in hotels or standing in fields!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilkand2Couple
over a year ago

edinburgh

Definitely not a flat. It actually used to be a 'massage' parlour

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"Definitely not a flat. It actually used to be a 'massage' parlour "

A house in a block of 8 is a flat!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Which paper is it in

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded blossomCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Which paper is it in "

Check the daily record website for it

John

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I recollect a conversation where he said he owned the flat but I could have picked that up wrong

At the end of the day we all make choices to choose where we go and what we do as swingers

It might float some folks boat and it may not others but that’s life

If we all were the same life would be a tad boring if you don’t like the sound of the shoebox then don’t go -simple

Life is a rainbow .............yes I’m a bit chilled today lol !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never heard of its existence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth

Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

The fact that the police have deemed it not to be a brothel will have put a few members' nose out of joint as it goes against there agenda against the place lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lol turf wars at its best

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting "

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

Feel the seethe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk

What is it the “Box” haters are upset about?

It’s not the CJs clique that go?

It has not been classified as a brother or illegal?

That there may be some money to be made? Easy to replicate if that upset

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

I've not attended the shoebox and chances are I never will now as understandably the organiser will be keeping a low profile but I have no qualms paying an entrance fee. I have however paid deposit for socials organised by the clique on here and not been informed of details etc

To continually hound the guy for providing a service, deemed not be illegal by the police is very off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exinthesunWoman
over a year ago

far far away


"Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?"

Who cares? Possibly one of the 1,000’s of people that are being deprived of a social house because this selfish prick has taken one out of the stock to run a knocking shop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh


"Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Who cares? Possibly one of the 1,000’s of people that are being deprived of a social house because this selfish prick has taken one out of the stock to run a knocking shop.

"

Except the police have deemed it not to be a knock in shop

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

"

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r humanMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

This happin to cj years ago guess what there survived Still go strong think shoebox rise again as well

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It says on the article that men paid money there is no mention of woman paying money. I booked a while ago for me and moon-light and I can confirm woman pay as well! so was this a different kind of event they raided or was the journalist clueless ?

It means you're a prostitute, if you've been there being female. According to their "investigator" anyway. Clueless sums it up nicely, with some added self fabricated nonsense to make the story a bit more exciting for the readers. Can't believe the amount of rubbish that paper comes out with

Or from some of the bitter folk on here!

Is a strange one

Is it a brothel? - No

Are folk paying the guy (Stevie) for sex - No

Otherwise plod would have had a great time, shutting the place down, taking names and reporting folk to the PF

It is a guy allowing a place (that me may rent or not) for folk to come along (and maybe have sex or not) for a contribution.

Does that constitute a business? Debatable

He provides drinks, nibbles (in some way), safe-keeping of clothes, towels (that hopefully get washed) and a safe environment where like-minded people can enjoy themselves.

Does that mean every fabber who invites folk round for a contribution based party is in business?

Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Had it been a privately owned property would the sensationalism be any different?

I’ve been there a few times. I’ve spoken to the “greedy girls” who play there. I don’t know what - if any - share they get of the contributions. I’ve not had sex with either

Invariably, I’ve ended up playing with women or couples who have also paid their contribution and had a great time.

Wasn’t aware it had gotten so busy that security was employed for folk’s safety. Don’t think that’s a bad thing

I don’t doubt that CJs and After 8 are registered venues - don’t know what that entails but is none of my business

I recall CJ being “exposed” previously and also a lad who spent a fortune opening a club in Fox Street never being allowed to trade

Swingers need places to go. Why ridicule a guy who gave us one

Don’t all want to spending fortunes in hotels or standing in fields!"

You try doing what he's doing, and you'll find out who cares, and about what.

Just because people enjoy the service, doesn't make it legal, right and proper.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Although no criminality I wouldn’t be happy with this next door to me, different with clubs being out the way from families etc but I personally wouldn’t put up with a flat being used for sex parties most days etc. I’m sure people coming and going won’t give two monkeys about families etc living next door

John "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I honestly cannot fathom why solo many are getting hot n bothered

If you don't like it..dont go?

Simples

As the comment about the housemillions of folk let out their "cooncil"houses

Get over it!!

If the police arnt knocking on his door or even if they are for that matter it's non of our business.

Ps...cjs used to run from a flat also...big deal it happens.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh

[Removed by poster at 28/01/18 17:37:38]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh


"I honestly cannot fathom why solo many are getting hot n bothered

If you don't like it..dont go?

Simples

As the comment about the housemillions of folk let out their "cooncil"houses

Get over it!!

If the police arnt knocking on his door or even if they are for that matter it's non of our business.

Ps...cjs used to run from a flat also...big deal it happens."

It's seen as competition which many will feel is a threat

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week."

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I suppose its hard for anyone to make a comment about the club if they have never been. Its best just to say your view of what you think of it being raided, if you have never been.

I don't like it being raided but there musta been a complaint from someone for it to have been put under the attention of the police. With the papers finding out they are obviously gonna try and make it into a news worthy story

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *litter and GrumpCouple
over a year ago

glasgow

I read the article and personally it doesn’t make sense. The fact they have already said that people pay to go and that the girls are working then that would make it illegal. therefore it obviously couldn’t be proved the girls are paid if The police stated there was nothing illegal.

You would think the journalist would have checked out the law on it before publishing the article because as far as I am aware it is not illegal to buy or sell sex unless it is outdoors. It is only illegal indoors if there is more than one paid person as it is then classed as an illegal brothel

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What is it the “Box” haters are upset about?

It’s not the CJs clique that go?

It has not been classified as a brother or illegal?

That there may be some money to be made? Easy to replicate if that upset"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

doesn't anyone see the funny side of this I laughed as soon as I read it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course. "

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *esparate danMan
over a year ago

glasgow

Whats old mother hubbard to do now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eefyBangerMan
over a year ago

edinburgh


"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies."

You've obviously not read the article. The police are happy that no illegal activity has taken place

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you "

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"It says on the article that men paid money there is no mention of woman paying money. I booked a while ago for me and moon-light and I can confirm woman pay as well! so was this a different kind of event they raided or was the journalist clueless ?

It means you're a prostitute, if you've been there being female. According to their "investigator" anyway. Clueless sums it up nicely, with some added self fabricated nonsense to make the story a bit more exciting for the readers. Can't believe the amount of rubbish that paper comes out with

Or from some of the bitter folk on here!

Is a strange one

Is it a brothel? - No

Are folk paying the guy (Stevie) for sex - No

Otherwise plod would have had a great time, shutting the place down, taking names and reporting folk to the PF

It is a guy allowing a place (that me may rent or not) for folk to come along (and maybe have sex or not) for a contribution.

Does that constitute a business? Debatable

He provides drinks, nibbles (in some way), safe-keeping of clothes, towels (that hopefully get washed) and a safe environment where like-minded people can enjoy themselves.

Does that mean every fabber who invites folk round for a contribution based party is in business?

Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Had it been a privately owned property would the sensationalism be any different?

I’ve been there a few times. I’ve spoken to the “greedy girls” who play there. I don’t know what - if any - share they get of the contributions. I’ve not had sex with either

Invariably, I’ve ended up playing with women or couples who have also paid their contribution and had a great time.

Wasn’t aware it had gotten so busy that security was employed for folk’s safety. Don’t think that’s a bad thing

I don’t doubt that CJs and After 8 are registered venues - don’t know what that entails but is none of my business

I recall CJ being “exposed” previously and also a lad who spent a fortune opening a club in Fox Street never being allowed to trade

Swingers need places to go. Why ridicule a guy who gave us one

Don’t all want to spending fortunes in hotels or standing in fields!

You try doing what he's doing, and you'll find out who cares, and about what.

Just because people enjoy the service, doesn't make it legal, right and proper."

Who has said it is either illegal, wrong or improper?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm still laughing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Who cares? Possibly one of the 1,000’s of people that are being deprived of a social house because this selfish prick has taken one out of the stock to run a knocking shop.

"

And therein lies the solution to the Glasgow Homelessness problem. Crucify him! FFS!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exinthesunWoman
over a year ago

far far away


"Is he in breach of a tenancy agreement? Really? Who cares?

Who cares? Possibly one of the 1,000’s of people that are being deprived of a social house because this selfish prick has taken one out of the stock to run a knocking shop.

And therein lies the solution to the Glasgow Homelessness problem. Crucify him! FFS!"

Where exactly did I say that? Learn to read and comprehend what is written.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm pretty sure the girls that were there were getting a share each of the 40 quid that was spent. I wouldnt like a bunch of hookers working in my stree, unless they were good looking hookers but I have a feeling the girls at the shoebox would have been hideous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies.

You've obviously not read the article. The police are happy that no illegal activity has taken place"

And you haven't read the whole thread, or you'd see that there is the possibility of prosecution on matters not related to sex. Try not to be so selective in what you take in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ola cubesMan
over a year ago

coatbridge

Reading the bollocky drivel its clear shoebox is guilty as sin....... or folk are making things up like the newspapers everything stated within this thread have been leveled at every club in scotland (yup inc the paid prostitutes at venues) in scotland the club scene suffers from the fanboy/girl attacking anything thats not their fav club.folk want to level taxation at shoebox. Lol I bet the rest are as guilty but that cant be said about the fav clubs folk get all up in arms about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ok question

What makes this any different from say pipeworks?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought the pipeworks was a gay sauna

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought the pipeworks was a gay sauna "

Yeah. But as far as im aware it shares alot of similarities?

Pay at door

No gaurantee play

Sex does happen

Im not saying it is...just putting the question out there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There’s no way enough space all those undercover cops to fit in!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies.

You've obviously not read the article. The police are happy that no illegal activity has taken place

And you haven't read the whole thread, or you'd see that there is the possibility of prosecution on matters not related to sex. Try not to be so selective in what you take in."

Prosecution in relation to what?

Allowing people to have sex in your house - not criminal

Taking contributions for a party - not criminal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies.

You've obviously not read the article. The police are happy that no illegal activity has taken place

And you haven't read the whole thread, or you'd see that there is the possibility of prosecution on matters not related to sex. Try not to be so selective in what you take in.

Prosecution in relation to what?

Allowing people to have sex in your house - not criminal

Taking contributions for a party - not criminal

"

They mean the hmrc part and tax and housing agreements

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horstrollMan
over a year ago

Caprona


"

You try doing what this guy was doing, and see how you get on.

I am not a hater if anything or anyone, and have never been to CJ's, and I'm not in a clique, if one actually exists. I have no axe to grind with anyone doing anything legal. The authorities will grind their own axes with anyone doing anything that isn't legal.

Those trying to defend the shoebox will find it is indefensible, and they'll have to find other (legal) ways to get their jollies.

You've obviously not read the article. The police are happy that no illegal activity has taken place

And you haven't read the whole thread, or you'd see that there is the possibility of prosecution on matters not related to sex. Try not to be so selective in what you take in.

Prosecution in relation to what?

Allowing people to have sex in your house - not criminal

Taking contributions for a party - not criminal

They mean the hmrc part and tax and housing agreements"

"Tis impossible to be sure of anything but Death and Taxes"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I live in a block of flats, I have visited cjs and after 8. I'm sorry but if there was an illegal sex club set up in my block then I'd sure as hell report the place!

If I'm correct then they have 3 permanent ladies at shoebox. Expensive to attend 3 days a week isn't it for a single female?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I live in a block of flats, I have visited cjs and after 8. I'm sorry but if there was an illegal sex club set up in my block then I'd sure as hell report the place!

If I'm correct then they have 3 permanent ladies at shoebox. Expensive to attend 3 days a week isn't it for a single female? "

Imo expensive full stop haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This weeks sundy mail? Any screenshots

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This weeks sundy mail? Any screenshots"

Check the website dailyrecord

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley


"I'm pretty sure the girls that were there were getting a share each of the 40 quid that was spent. I wouldnt like a bunch of hookers working in my stree, unless they were good looking hookers but I have a feeling the girls at the shoebox would have been hideous. "

That’s an awful thing to say. Why would they be hideous?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eADevilCouple
over a year ago

Blantyre


"I'm pretty sure the girls that were there were getting a share each of the 40 quid that was spent. I wouldnt like a bunch of hookers working in my stree, unless they were good looking hookers but I have a feeling the girls at the shoebox would have been hideous.

That’s an awful thing to say. Why would they be hideous? "

What makes you so sure the girls are getting paid ?

Could it be these girls actually like sex or like lineups as thats thier choice of fun , what options did you tick on your fab profile.

And i agree with Falcon , what right do you have to slate women you dont even know ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm pretty sure the girls that were there were getting a share each of the 40 quid that was spent. I wouldnt like a bunch of hookers working in my stree, unless they were good looking hookers but I have a feeling the girls at the shoebox would have been hideous. "

Well the last time I was there which was a few years ago now the ladies were far from hideous .............

Some of the men? Well let’s just say not to my taste ..........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cottybhoyMan
over a year ago

falkirk


"I'm pretty sure the girls that were there were getting a share each of the 40 quid that was spent. I wouldnt like a bunch of hookers working in my stree, unless they were good looking hookers but I have a feeling the girls at the shoebox would have been hideous.

Well the last time I was there which was a few years ago now the ladies were far from hideous .............

Some of the men? Well let’s just say not to my taste .........."

The girls have always been lovely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xplorer13Man
over a year ago

glenrothes

On meets today it has always been two girls offering a party, no bloke at all. I saw contributions asked but fuck never thought for a minute it would be £40! That must be a buffet with caviar and truffles. I thought the chics were just greedy girls, at £40 now I know they are lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The main problem I see is he’s renting the flat from the housing association and living somewhere else . The association will evict him so they can give the flat to someone that needs a place to stay . "

If this is the case, then rightly so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This thread makes me laugh. What happened to innocent till proven guilty. Your all fabricating stuff about something you know nothing about.

How do you know if he's just renting the flat? He could have bought it. You don't know.

How do you know if its registered?

How do you know about what he pays in taxes?

None of you know the poor guy and what he's going through?

If only everyone was as squeeky clean as everyone on this site.

Why we all here if it wasn't involving sex?

Give the guy a break!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In the eyes of the law it’s not illegal to be paid for sex, to advertise (prostitute) you’re wanting paid for sex is illegal, if you’re asking for a contribution towards expenses - rent, electricity, cleaning, condoms, food and drink etc that’s perfectly legal and there’s no guarantee of sex either so it’s just like paying into any club that charges on the door

Applying for a social housing property when you have no intention of living in it is in breach of tenancy and for many can be seen as morally wrong

Neighbours particularly those with children may have fears about safety etc understandable not knowing who’s coming or going but from what I understand the timings of the parties are when children would mostly be at school and not privy to anything

Personally I say each to their own, who are we to sit in judgement

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This thread makes me laugh. What happened to innocent till proven guilty. Your all fabricating stuff about something you know nothing about.

How do you know if he's just renting the flat? He could have bought it. You don't know.

How do you know if its registered?

How do you know about what he pays in taxes?

None of you know the poor guy and what he's going through?

If only everyone was as squeeky clean as everyone on this site.

Why we all here if it wasn't involving sex?

Give the guy a break!

"

I said;

If this is the case, then rightly so

do you have a problem with that comment?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded blossomCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

A lot of people seem to know an awful lot about this guy... only thing that would concern me would be maybe the noise and all the coming and going. Someone said kids would be at school, ye if they are of school age... people do have younger kids.

As for being registered and pay in taxes, who actually knows for sure n who cares, I’m sure if he’s not he won’t be he first or last person to earn money on the side.

I for one don’t believe everything I read in the papers n I’m sure a lot of you are the same

K x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well said Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luebell888Woman
over a year ago

Glasgowish

Sex is and always will be a human need. Can you imagine going without sex for the rest of your life?. Therefore i take my hat off to these ladies for providing their services. I have spoken to many men who have been the shoebox on a regular basis and enjoyed their visits. The housing issue is a different issue which i cant comment on but i do hope the girls get something sorted and continue to do what they do well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exicolaMan
over a year ago

West Lothian

£40 for a cola and some cocktail sticks is pricey like.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sex is and always will be a human need. Can you imagine going without sex for the rest of your life?. Therefore i take my hat off to these ladies for providing their services. I have spoken to many men who have been the shoebox on a regular basis and enjoyed their visits. The housing issue is a different issue which i cant comment on but i do hope the girls get something sorted and continue to do what they do well."
well said bluebell xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rgoodnbadMan
over a year ago

greenock

I see that they're advertising todays meet.

Doesn't seem to have put them off. Stick it to the man

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obertELeeMan
over a year ago

Montrose

Lest be honest here. Greedy girls events made it a knocking shop.After 8 don't have girls on tap it's a club for swingers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lasgowlatexMan
over a year ago

glasgow

In my mind its all double standards

The paper that ran with the story comes across as self righteous and holier than thou with this article but they will not think twice about salaciously commenting on some female celebrity wearing something revealing and printing a quarter page photo of the said celebrity.

Whether the story is indeed a story is another matter. Yes it was a sex party in a private residence. The fact that the residence is rented from GHA housing stock may suggest that it is in the public interest. If there was no contribution made to gain admittance then I don't think legally the search warrant would have been issued. It is because a contribution to gain admittance is widely known that the warrant was issued. The fact that the hacks were there tell us more about the relationship between the police and the press involving confidentiality than anything else.

The irony is that this crusade by the hacks to safeguard our morals could be better served if they directed their lenses at the drug dealers that operate in this city. I wont hold my breath for that one as its far easier to expose a small group of consenting individuals looking for a good time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

"

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap! "

For taking a day, I'd have hoped for a better comeback. But as you said, you're "personally not that bothered" about the whole thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap!

For taking a day, I'd have hoped for a better comeback. But as you said, you're "personally not that bothered" about the whole thing. "

correct 'i'm not that bothered' hence why this was the first of Me picking up on the threads 'outstanding' developments, I had plants to water and other important stuff to contend with. This was the first of Me looking back over the thread, but then again It's not me that's the troll x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap!

For taking a day, I'd have hoped for a better comeback. But as you said, you're "personally not that bothered" about the whole thing.

correct 'i'm not that bothered' hence why this was the first of Me picking up on the threads 'outstanding' developments, I had plants to water and other important stuff to contend with. This was the first of Me looking back over the thread, but then again It's not me that's the troll x"

More a smurph

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oanne_MacTV/TS
over a year ago

Perth


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap!

For taking a day, I'd have hoped for a better comeback. But as you said, you're "personally not that bothered" about the whole thing.

correct 'i'm not that bothered' hence why this was the first of Me picking up on the threads 'outstanding' developments, I had plants to water and other important stuff to contend with. This was the first of Me looking back over the thread, but then again It's not me that's the troll x

More a smurph "

aye... and who are you?... "garglewell"? x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im not convinced about the 2K a week.

Thats 50 punters at £40 a pop, from what i hear its tiny, does it really turn over 50 folk a week? Presumably woman pay less as well, so it'll be a more than 50 turnover to make 2K i think thats more sensationalism reporting

Three parties per week with a 12 guests per party at £40 per head = £1440.

No so sensationalist or wide of the mark.

Fair enough. I didnt realise there was 3 parties a week.

It says so in the article you labelled, "sensationalist".

Unless you never actually bothered to read it, of course.

No i didnt read it, i was sent some screenshots on whatsapp by another fabber, i read them...

I want bothered enough to go search out the article, as i got the gyst. The shoebox was raided, not personally that bothered. Dont go, dont intend to... have no issue with the place or anyone who goes... when you corrected me i said fair enough i didnt realise...

I do hope thats clear enough for you

Yes sir! "Sensationalistly" clear.

3 parties a week with 12 guests paying £40 equals £1440.. less the fact women pay less and its strongly alleged actually get a cut doesn't add up to £2000.... just saying like

Trip Trap!

For taking a day, I'd have hoped for a better comeback. But as you said, you're "personally not that bothered" about the whole thing.

correct 'i'm not that bothered' hence why this was the first of Me picking up on the threads 'outstanding' developments, I had plants to water and other important stuff to contend with. This was the first of Me looking back over the thread, but then again It's not me that's the troll x"

No, one thing you're not, is a troll.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 29/01/18 23:16:01]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Going back to OP original statement.

It's not really pathetic, it's a human interest story. You may see this as liberated adults doing what they are perfectly entitled to do in privacy but others less forward in their thinking will think it's a bunch of skanks being shagged rotten by a queue of sad dirty old /young men.

Public opinion has still got a long way to go.....

No offence: just saying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Doesn't surprise.me.in the least that a story concerning the Shoebox has been in the papers - these so called 'scandals' are always considered newsworthy items. What surprises.me is that it wasn't in the papers months ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lest be honest here. Greedy girls events made it a knocking shop.After 8 don't have girls on tap it's a club for swingers. "

How does that equate with greedy girls events in other clubs? (Devils' Advocate time)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luebell888Woman
over a year ago

Glasgowish


"Lest be honest here. Greedy girls events made it a knocking shop.After 8 don't have girls on tap it's a club for swingers.

How does that equate with greedy girls events in other clubs? (Devils' Advocate time)"
yeah i was wondering the same. Greedy girls do it for fun and not for money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lest be honest here. Greedy girls events made it a knocking shop.After 8 don't have girls on tap it's a club for swingers.

How does that equate with greedy girls events in other clubs? (Devils' Advocate time) yeah i was wondering the same. Greedy girls do it for fun and not for money."

I assume that GG's at other places don't pay admission, and don't get a cut of the door takings. IF, and I do stress IF, they do at the shoebox, then it does come back to the tax issue, and nothing else.

On a side note, I hope for the sake of the GHA cleaning crew that goes in after he's evicted, that the flat has laminate flooring. I wouldn't like to lifting sticky carpets out of there...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can just picture Oldie But Goodie going when she reads that last post!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top