Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Scotland |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" .... on the bright side he might get an endorsement deal out of daz now " I believe that offer was made to get the blood out of the shirt he wore the night of the Clutha. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not at all, dont try to put words in mouth. ......" So do you condemn or condone this assault on Jim Murphy? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs it was an egg " So do you condemn or condone this assault on Jim Murphy? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known." his head prob scrambled at the mo | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Onny, has been attacked by an angry seagull in Fife. The seagull shat on his arm from a great height. . . His condition is not yet known. kind of what ur saying - not condoning the egg but adding his condition is not yet known is making it out as if he has been beaten to a pulp by a pack of angry apes." lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Onny, has been attacked by an angry seagull in Fife. The seagull shat on his arm from a great height. . . His condition is not yet known. kind of what ur saying - not condoning the egg but adding his condition is not yet known is making it out as if he has been beaten to a pulp by a pack of angry apes." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known." Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once again the yes voters bully the no voters," right. Stay there. Missus have git some eggs. For you Naked if you like | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. his head prob scrambled at the mo " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg!" pmsl | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg!" The fact it's 'an egg' makes it OK? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg! The fact it's 'an egg' makes it OK?" I'm no saying that it's justifiable but when you say things like "his condition is not yet known" makes it sound like a serious assault. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg! The fact it's 'an egg' makes it OK? I'm no saying that it's justifiable but when you say things like "his condition is not yet known" makes it sound like a serious assault. " At the time I wrote the OP, that was an accurate statement. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...... The last wee shred of respect I held for you just evaporated. " That won't keep me awake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg! The fact it's 'an egg' makes it OK? I'm no saying that it's justifiable but when you say things like "his condition is not yet known" makes it sound like a serious assault. At the time I wrote the OP, that was an accurate statement." your talking mince _nny, i had already read the story on the bbc website before you created this thread. pathetic. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. Get a grip ya trumpet you're making it out like he has been kicked up and down the street, it's an egg! The fact it's 'an egg' makes it OK? I'm no saying that it's justifiable but when you say things like "his condition is not yet known" makes it sound like a serious assault. At the time I wrote the OP, that was an accurate statement." If you knew that it was an egg 'attack' at the time of the OP then you did know his condition: absolutely fine. A little eggy, perhaps, but otherwise fine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...... The last wee shred of respect I held for you just evaporated. That won't keep me awake." At least I now know the smart to the question you ran greeting to the admins about. Both. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs it was an egg This made me giggle " Shelley or Iain? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs it was an egg This made me giggle Shelley or Iain? " shelley sorry forgot my smiley winky eyes .. 2 spanks you owe me lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs it was an egg This made me giggle Shelley or Iain? shelley sorry forgot my smiley winky eyes .. 2 spanks you owe me lol " Gies a winch and let's liven this thread up.....I'll even let you TALK (that's all) about strap ons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ffs it was an egg This made me giggle Shelley or Iain? shelley sorry forgot my smiley winky eyes .. 2 spanks you owe me lol Gies a winch and let's liven this thread up.....I'll even let you TALK (that's all) about strap ons " do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Onny eggs-aggerate ... I mean exaggerate... ...surely no! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha " DEAL!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!" works as a good lube I'm sure | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure " Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! " you said DEAL I have loads of witnesses | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! you said DEAL I have loads of witnesses " Yup, I seen it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! you said DEAL I have loads of witnesses Yup, I seen it! " Ssshhhhh you, I thought you said I was alright and now yer backing Shelley up to rip me a new arseholes. Scrubbed you are!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! you said DEAL I have loads of witnesses Yup, I seen it! Ssshhhhh you, I thought you said I was alright and now yer backing Shelley up to rip me a new arseholes. Scrubbed you are!! " When I seen there was gonna be a strap on involved I had to get in on it!! I'll happily sit and watch | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In other breaking news Humpty Dumpty cannot be put back together again" pmsl... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There me be more to this than you think, maybe another party is trying to poach him lol " lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! " Tut tut you playing with fire again lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Police Scotland have advised Jim Murphy to suspend his speaking tour as they cannot guarantee his safety. Free speech in a Separate Scotland? Only if the Nat thugs like what you're saying." Jeez man, give it up. You're acting like people might give a shit! Look, Murphy chose to do this tour, knowing full well he'd be doing it in areas where tensions about the debate are running high and by doing what he's doing in public he'd be goading people into a reaction. No one on here is condoning throwing things at any one but christ, it's an egg! Police Scotland have (probably gladly) advised him to cancel the rest of the tour as they can't believe what a massive waste of their time and resources this eejit has been! regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, this tour was a dumb idea and he knew it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In other breaking news Humpty Dumpty cannot be put back together again" lol lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Look, Murphy chose to do this tour, knowing full well he'd be doing it in areas where tensions about the debate are running high and by doing what he's doing in public he'd be goading people into a reaction. " Can't stand Jim Murphy as a politician and he's hardly the first one to have an egg thrown at him but I disagree with the above. Political campaigning isn't goading people, it's the democratic process at work. And areas where opinions are close are those where the majority of campaigning has traditionally gone on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Look, Murphy chose to do this tour, knowing full well he'd be doing it in areas where tensions about the debate are running high and by doing what he's doing in public he'd be goading people into a reaction. Can't stand Jim Murphy as a politician and he's hardly the first one to have an egg thrown at him but I disagree with the above. Political campaigning isn't goading people, it's the democratic process at work. And areas where opinions are close are those where the majority of campaigning has traditionally gone on." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Political campaigning isn't goading people, it's the democratic process at work. And areas where opinions are close are those where the majority of campaigning has traditionally gone on." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"do I get to rub egg yolk over your ass ?? Hahaha DEAL!!!!works as a good lube I'm sure Nooooooooooooooo you got me to agree to that under false pretences!! you said DEAL I have loads of witnesses Yup, I seen it! Ssshhhhh you, I thought you said I was alright and now yer backing Shelley up to rip me a new arseholes. Scrubbed you are!! " lmfao and she knowz the reach round nd squeeze trick btw ozzie | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was it a HARD boiled egg?" think it was scrammbled woth cheese n fafa beans | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"lmfao and she knowz the reach round nd squeeze trick btw ozzie " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Look, Murphy chose to do this tour, knowing full well he'd be doing it in areas where tensions about the debate are running high and by doing what he's doing in public he'd be goading people into a reaction. Can't stand Jim Murphy as a politician and he's hardly the first one to have an egg thrown at him but I disagree with the above. Political campaigning isn't goading people, it's the democratic process at work. And areas where opinions are close are those where the majority of campaigning has traditionally gone on." The Nats don't approve of political campaigning or of free speech and will resort to violence to have their way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was an assault legally. If he makes a complaint to the police then it will be investigated. All those that make light of the incident would be the first to complain if it happened to them. Thuggery has no place in the political system. The last time thuggery and intimidation was condoned on this scale by a political organisation was when they wore brown shirts. Is this the sort of Scotland we all want?" It's the sort of Scotland the SNP want. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA." you and bob seem bitter wee men not all yes voters support snp quite alot are ex labour voters who dont like the way the have turned right wing and forgot their socialist values . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA." can u prove that _nny ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ?" What would you accept as proof? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof?" any sort of link between them meetings ect? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Debate has hit a new low.....Onny, you always take a certain stance ( which is fine) ......but come on big man have you been drinking.... I feel embarrassed for you, for some of the spite filled drivel you are now peddling !!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The Nats don't approve of political campaigning or of free speech and will resort to violence to have their way." What utter tripe. I'm a Nationalist and have never resorted to violence and thuggery in any way. As a staunch trade unionist in my day, I stood up for those who couldn't, never in a violent way and feel freedom of speech is vital. This behaviour happens in ALL walks of life. Targeting the Nats is naive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. you and bob seem bitter wee men not all yes voters support snp quite alot are ex labour voters who dont like the way the have turned right wing and forgot their socialist values ." I agree. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well known that snp were regarded as the scots tories. Now they are a good idea ? Keep adding to the confusion though." "Well known that snp were regarded as the scots tories. Now they are a good idea ? Keep adding to the confusion though." Well known that the Labour Party and supporting press ( Daily Record & others) keep on pushing this line , to discourage SNP vote.....and this is from a disaffected ex Labour Party activist..... Spin Doctors don't care about: the policies, the truth, the issues or the voters.....they just want to discredit the other guy.....and who suffers the electorate .....the best thing about the referendum is that is has got ordinary people talking about politics !!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You accurately currently have a coalition government. Conservatives and Lib dems. Has more clout calling them simply Tories ? Used to be a simple case of. Dont like the Conservative agenda....next election vote Labour instead. But no, lets try Independance. Why ? Because you Think...you kinda Think its worth a go. All politicians promise so much and ditch most promises....but gid auld Alex is goin to do all he says ? Marvelous....hell why was he not PM sooner ?" Well to answer your pithy comment about Alex Salmond not being PM .....it's because middle England won't vote for him........whoever Middle England votes for tends to get in !!!! So it sort of says that whatever way we vote in Scotland we will have an administration selects for us by Middle England !!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well known that snp were regarded as the scots tories. Now they are a good idea ? Keep adding to the confusion though." In 1979 yes, when Labour shifted the goal posts at the referendum. No what parties the red Tories? And wearing it proud? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Middle england have people peeved with government policy. Various areas of england have the same struggles and frustrations with government too. If we had an election tommorow it would'nt be a conservative coalition winning it. So....yes vote wins and Alex is boss a wee while? Then who ? We pick a fantasic forward thinking leader of Scotland,,,its interesting certainly." The vote isn't for Alex Salmond or the SNP it's to decide whether we want Scotland to be independent or not. That's what I'm voting for. People seem to forget this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So, you reckon that sort of thuggery is acceptable?" surely you mean eggceptable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There has been no mention that the person who threw an egg at him was a yes voter or a yes supporter. Just saying" Murphy said it on Radio Scots newsdrive last night. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brilliant....go it alone and suddenly there will be no Royal navy. It be like dads army on a wee tug boat for a navy." There are none here just now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just on that alone, defence. Get rid of trident, ok, but the royal air force ? What ? Its ok, stay and defend us up in lossiemouth etc,,, i know we aint part of britain now guys but stay please? " Not sure I even understand what you're saying there? You're implying (I think) that the RAF would remain in Lossiemouth? If so that's not he case. Through the asset split we would retain Lossiemouth as a jet base, along with some aircraft, and would reopen Leuchars also as a mixed military base. So it's not a 'see ya but stay' situation. I will concede the guy with the earpiece, re earlier post, wasn't the 'egger'. Done a bit of 'dipping' around this mornjng and although almost his doppelgänger it is actually a shaddow cabinet security guy. The rest of my post still stands though. Set up if ever there was one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well known that snp were regarded as the scots tories. Now they are a good idea ? Keep adding to the confusion though." Well known that labour were once a left of centre party! A long time ago now though! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof? any sort of link between them meetings ect?" still waiting on your proof _nny | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof? any sort of link between them meetings ect? still waiting on your proof _nny" Sorry. Sleep intervened. Read up on Adam Busby. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof? any sort of link between them meetings ect? still waiting on your proof _nny Sorry. Sleep intervened. Read up on Adam Busby." Im forced to agree with _nny in regards Adam Busby, a horrid individual. As is his son Adam Busby Jnr who was convicted in 2009 of sending suspect packages to various people including Alex Salmond. hmmm SNLA targeting the SNP, clearly they are in cahoots with each other. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known." bringing the thread back to its original purpose, the horrendous attack on an MP. George Galloway was hospitalised yesterday after a serious assault, puts the whole egg throwing (as unacceptable as it is) into perspective. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof? any sort of link between them meetings ect? still waiting on your proof _nny Sorry. Sleep intervened. Read up on Adam Busby." as i thought no proof | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known." A career in journalism has been sorely missed here, just consider the story.... Cheryl Cole has a wardrobe malfunction, and he boob pops out... Headline in the Onny press Cheryl gets her titts oot and says whose up fer a shag then | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can't wait till after the vote and the bickering can be toned down to the usual political nonsense. " Don't kid yourself. As I've said before - the Nats are bad losers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was always a link between the SNP, the SNLA and PIRA. can u prove that _nny ? What would you accept as proof? any sort of link between them meetings ect? still waiting on your proof _nny Sorry. Sleep intervened. Read up on Adam Busby. as i thought no proof " I refer you to bino's post (above). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jim Murphy, hero of the Clutha tragedy, has been attacked by YES supporters at a public meeting in Fife. His condition is not yet known. bringing the thread back to its original purpose, the horrendous attack on an MP. George Galloway was hospitalised yesterday after a serious assault, puts the whole egg throwing (as unacceptable as it is) into perspective." Agreed totally | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone asked for proof previously of a link between the SNP and Nazi Germany. Before anyone else starts throwing names around I'm not a bitter wee man but a concerned citizen who only has the interests of this country at heart and hate to see the divisions that this referendum has caused. In May 1941, during World War II, Arthur Donaldson a leading SNP member at the time and later SNP leader from 1960-1969 was arrested by police who allegedly suspected him and a number of other SNP figures, of “subversive activities”, due to their support for the Scottish Neutrality League. Donaldson intended to set up a puppet government akin to that of Vidkun Quisling (of Norway) in the event of a Nazi invasion. According to papers released by MI5, which led raids against many Scottish nationalists, “subversive literature” and a “large cache of weapons” were found in their possession. According to an MI5 file on Donaldson released in November 2005 he was arrested because the MI5 believed him to be a “Nazi sympathiser”, and that he hoped to become part of a “puppet government” set up by the Nazis after they occupied Britain. Taken from official record: “During a long conversation, Donaldson gave great praise to Germany saying that England would be completely crushed by the early spring; the Government would leave the country and that England’s position would be absolutely hopeless, as poverty and famine would be their only reward for declaring war on Germany.†“Scotland on the other hand had great possibilities. We must, he declared, be able to show the German Government that we are organised and that we have a clear cut policy for the betterment of Scotland; that we have tried our best to persuade the English Government that we want Scottish Independence and that we are not in with them in this war.†“If we can do that you can be sure that Germany will give us every possible assistance in our early struggle. The time is not yet ripe for us to start a virile campaign against England, but when fire and confusion is at its height in England, we can start in earnest.†" first it was snp links to snla and pira now the nazis u and _nny are really scraping the barrel in your desperation to discredite the snp | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone asked for proof previously of a link between the SNP and Nazi Germany. Before anyone else starts throwing names around I'm not a bitter wee man but a concerned citizen who only has the interests of this country at heart and hate to see the divisions that this referendum has caused. In May 1941, during World War II, Arthur Donaldson a leading SNP member at the time and later SNP leader from 1960-1969 was arrested by police who allegedly suspected him and a number of other SNP figures, of “subversive activities”, due to their support for the Scottish Neutrality League. Donaldson intended to set up a puppet government akin to that of Vidkun Quisling (of Norway) in the event of a Nazi invasion. According to papers released by MI5, which led raids against many Scottish nationalists, “subversive literature” and a “large cache of weapons” were found in their possession. According to an MI5 file on Donaldson released in November 2005 he was arrested because the MI5 believed him to be a “Nazi sympathiser”, and that he hoped to become part of a “puppet government” set up by the Nazis after they occupied Britain. Taken from official record: “During a long conversation, Donaldson gave great praise to Germany saying that England would be completely crushed by the early spring; the Government would leave the country and that England’s position would be absolutely hopeless, as poverty and famine would be their only reward for declaring war on Germany.†“Scotland on the other hand had great possibilities. We must, he declared, be able to show the German Government that we are organised and that we have a clear cut policy for the betterment of Scotland; that we have tried our best to persuade the English Government that we want Scottish Independence and that we are not in with them in this war.†“If we can do that you can be sure that Germany will give us every possible assistance in our early struggle. The time is not yet ripe for us to start a virile campaign against England, but when fire and confusion is at its height in England, we can start in earnest.†first it was snp links to snla and pira now the nazis u and _nny are really scraping the barrel in your desperation to discredite the snp " You can't argue with facts. At the time the SNP were proud of their links with paramilitary organisations. Re discredit. Check Ekin1's claim that Murphy was with a hooker the night of the Clutha tragedy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This referendum has split the nation more than any other general election ever could. Truth and facts are the first things to be forgotten as sound bites and personalities make the foreground. Even the most hardened Yes person must admit the Alex Salmond isn't answering basic questions because he honestly doesn't know the answer. The most basic problem is no one actually knows what they are voting for. The SNP published a white paper which is as much use as a letter to Santa as all it is is a wish list. If there is a Yes vote only then do the negotiations start and what happends if the terms are unacceptable? No one knows the answer to that one. John Swinney says that if he doesn't get his own way then he won't accept scotland's share of the national debt. I would imaging that the UK goverment would then hold back assets to cover that debt and so the negotiations could drag on for years, throw in a General election in May 2015 and a Scottish election a year later and the whole lot becomes a legal mess. " I just hope they don't hold back my pension !!!! as that is an asset the RUK can claw back !!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This referendum has split the nation more than any other general election ever could. Truth and facts are the first things to be forgotten as sound bites and personalities make the foreground. Even the most hardened Yes person must admit the Alex Salmond isn't answering basic questions because he honestly doesn't know the answer. The most basic problem is no one actually knows what they are voting for. The SNP published a white paper which is as much use as a letter to Santa as all it is is a wish list. If there is a Yes vote only then do the negotiations start and what happends if the terms are unacceptable? No one knows the answer to that one. John Swinney says that if he doesn't get his own way then he won't accept scotland's share of the national debt. I would imaging that the UK goverment would then hold back assets to cover that debt and so the negotiations could drag on for years, throw in a General election in May 2015 and a Scottish election a year later and the whole lot becomes a legal mess. I just hope they don't hold back my pension !!!! as that is an asset the RUK can claw back !!!!" Sorry man, that's utter rubbish. That is NOT and asset. If you've paid into a pension in the UK, up until the day of Independence, it will be paid the same as if we were part of the union. Paid by the UK government as it would always have been as that's who you've paid it to. People all over the world have moved after retirement and still get/ will be getting theirs. There is no change there. This has been reinforced by WM throughout the campaign. I'd be interested to hear if you have been told this by a Bettertogether source. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"................ .......... theirs. There is no change there. This has been reinforced by WM throughout the campaign. I'd be interested to hear if you have been told this by a Bettertogether source." WM? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Westminster " Ah. Thanks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Love the way there's the attempt to use historical supposed links to this or that to discredit the SNP/ Alex Salmond. From links with the Nazis to his obvious involvement to the holocaust and being seen on the grassy knoll when JFK was assassinated. Worries me more that Tony Blair and successive British governments follow the good old USA into battle on totally humanitarian wars, albeit in a country with huge oil reserves. Never seen or heard of them trying to overthrow Mad dog Mugabe, mmmm perhaps they don't have anything we need Tony plays with George, Barrak plays with Davie, Eddie plays with anyone that lets him in the game. Nigel he's the bully that's gonna take them all. If he gets his way all Non Brits against the wall... not a place I'd wanna live in It's a massive yes vote " I'm sorry I can't comment on the aforementioned post aas when I saw your profile I just kept thinking blackberries and that look on your face when you came mmmmm Mwah | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This referendum has split the nation more than any other general election ever could. Truth and facts are the first things to be forgotten as sound bites and personalities make the foreground. Even the most hardened Yes person must admit the Alex Salmond isn't answering basic questions because he honestly doesn't know the answer. The most basic problem is no one actually knows what they are voting for. The SNP published a white paper which is as much use as a letter to Santa as all it is is a wish list. If there is a Yes vote only then do the negotiations start and what happends if the terms are unacceptable? No one knows the answer to that one. John Swinney says that if he doesn't get his own way then he won't accept scotland's share of the national debt. I would imaging that the UK goverment would then hold back assets to cover that debt and so the negotiations could drag on for years, throw in a General election in May 2015 and a Scottish election a year later and the whole lot becomes a legal mess. " Im perfectly happy with the answers ive been given from the Yes camp. There is an element of faith involved as well. But nobody can predict the future so its impossible for all answers to be answered. Just like the better campaign cant answer any questions on the future of Scotland under Westminster rule. Were told we will get extra powers but nobody knows what they will be or how in-depth those powers will be because its all dependent on who rules Westminster. the white paper is a wish list? Of course it is. But its also a bit more than that. Its what team scotland will use for a basis in negotiations in the event of a Yes vote. And the direction that the Scottish Government will take an independent Scotland in if the Yes vote passes. And what exactly have the better together campaign given for their version of the white paper? A few very short leaflets from each of the parties that are all incredibly vague? I will take the 649 pages in the white paper over those few vague leaflets any day. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This referendum has split the nation more than any other general election ever could. Truth and facts are the first things to be forgotten as sound bites and personalities make the foreground. Even the most hardened Yes person must admit the Alex Salmond isn't answering basic questions because he honestly doesn't know the answer. The most basic problem is no one actually knows what they are voting for. The SNP published a white paper which is as much use as a letter to Santa as all it is is a wish list. If there is a Yes vote only then do the negotiations start and what happends if the terms are unacceptable? No one knows the answer to that one. John Swinney says that if he doesn't get his own way then he won't accept scotland's share of the national debt. I would imaging that the UK goverment would then hold back assets to cover that debt and so the negotiations could drag on for years, throw in a General election in May 2015 and a Scottish election a year later and the whole lot becomes a legal mess. I just hope they don't hold back my pension !!!! as that is an asset the RUK can claw back !!!! Sorry man, that's utter rubbish. That is NOT and asset. If you've paid into a pension in the UK, up until the day of Independence, it will be paid the same as if we were part of the union. Paid by the UK government as it would always have been as that's who you've paid it to. People all over the world have moved after retirement and still get/ will be getting theirs. There is no change there. This has been reinforced by WM throughout the campaign. I'd be interested to hear if you have been told this by a Bettertogether source." I am sure my pension will be paid but that was all decided before the threat was made to dump the debt. I read everything and make my own mind up about things and don't rely on the propaganda of either camp. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Indeed, they could well have centuries more of being ruled from london by the likes of posh davie and his mates " An independant Scotland gets a CU with rUK so fiscal policy still run from London. Want to join the EU again assuming you can get all 27 members to agree then the chances are that you will need to join the Euro so fiscal policy remains in Brussels. Neither option is independance in the accepted sense and which one would you rather have? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with the naysayers' arguments is that they are all manufactured and based on fear, smear and call for hard facts when only judgements can be made. These people are implacably opposed to self-determination, either because they have swallowed the propaganda of fear, they are among the wealthiest individuals and corporations and fear the prospect of a more equitable society, or because they are part of the unionist political classes and their camp followers, who fear greater democracy and a consequent diminution of their power. It is the people of Scotland vs the vested interests - and the people will not be denied, now that they have been offered the first ever chance to vote for Scotland's renewal as an independent nation. After 300+ years, the shotgun marriage is about to end in divorce. The terms will be negotiated and the heavens will definitely not collapse upon us." No voters just like Yes voters are as proud and concerned about the countrys future, Scotlands future ! I see the Yes banners of some houses known to be in the wealthiest streets in my town, so that generalisation cuts no ice. People voting No are feardies? Maybe they are as forward thinking and intelligent as any Yes voter. And the wee 300 years history lesson, lovely it fair stirs the emotions so it does, not really relevant in 2014 though is it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with the naysayers' arguments is that they are all manufactured and based on fear, smear and call for hard facts when only judgements can be made. These people are implacably opposed to self-determination, either because they have swallowed the propaganda of fear, they are among the wealthiest individuals and corporations and fear the prospect of a more equitable society, or because they are part of the unionist political classes and their camp followers, who fear greater democracy and a consequent diminution of their power. It is the people of Scotland vs the vested interests - and the people will not be denied, now that they have been offered the first ever chance to vote for Scotland's renewal as an independent nation. After 300+ years, the shotgun marriage is about to end in divorce. The terms will be negotiated and the heavens will definitely not collapse upon us." This is one of the dumbest generalisations I've read yet, written by someone who clearly _iews himself as better that those who want to vote No. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with the naysayers' arguments is that they are all manufactured and based on fear, smear and call for hard facts when only judgements can be made. These people are implacably opposed to self-determination, either because they have swallowed the propaganda of fear, they are among the wealthiest individuals and corporations and fear the prospect of a more equitable society, or because they are part of the unionist political classes and their camp followers, who fear greater democracy and a consequent diminution of their power. It is the people of Scotland vs the vested interests - and the people will not be denied, now that they have been offered the first ever chance to vote for Scotland's renewal as an independent nation. After 300+ years, the shotgun marriage is about to end in divorce. The terms will be negotiated and the heavens will definitely not collapse upon us." Neighbour said she was voting NO to one of the Yes campaign door steppers. 25 minutes later she was still being harangued - so loudly you could hear it down the street. You call the No campaign fear mongers. Look at the current Yes fear campaigns that are running. 1. Only Yes to save the NHS. Ffs, the SNP have spent £390 million on private health providers. The Scottish NHS budget is fully devolved and has not been cut. The NHS budget has grown. 2. Scotland doesn't get the government it votes for. Erm, 56% of the votes cast in the last scottish elections went to parties NOT in government. In simple terms the majority of Scotland didn't get the government it voted for... 3. UKIP will get you! Jesus, this is a protest party.They don't have a seat in parliament and have a tendency to shoot themselves, politically, in the foot. 4. Smear - do you think the abuse thrown by the Yes campaign at Westminster by Mr Salmond and others will be forgotten should there be a yes vote? Do you really think they will forget the "thieves", "tory posh boys" etc and bend over backwards to accommodate the wishes of Mr Salmond? Just to remind the revisionists - 1979, the snp laid a motion of no confidence in the then Labour government. This passed 311 - 310, with the 11 Snp MP's voting with the Thatcher ran tory party. At the subsequent general election. Scotland returned 44 labour, 22 conservative, 3 liberal an 2 snp MP's. 2 MP's = the same number as pandas currently in Edinburgh. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thing about generalisations is - they are generally true. Question the motivation - where are the naysayers coming from? Where is the commitment to democracy? Where is the commitment to lifting our fellow citizens out of poverty? (labour had a hegemony in Scotland for decades and has totally failed) The people of Scotland rioted against the 1707 sell-out by the political elite and the landowners, but the will of the people was trampled. This is only the first opportunity in three centuries for the people of Scotland to reclaim their status and to reject the coalition of the unwilling. If you are happy with the status quo faux-democracy of the UK, so be it. Some of us want something better. " I think we all want something better, but that's the exact problem with the Yes campaign. Give us facts, substantiate your claims, show us how and where it's going to be better. The Yes campaign has been too politicised, we all know that politicians would promise you anything to get your vote. We've had the usual lack of substance, all sound bites and 'pie in the sky'. Along with a load of downright lying! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just to remind the revisionists - 1979, the snp laid a motion of no confidence in the then Labour government. This passed 311 - 310, with the 11 Snp MP's voting with the Thatcher ran tory party." Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. You're a labour activist, aren't you? And therefore a true revisionist! The SNP did not vote FOR the tories.... they voted to bring down an incompetent government which, like every labour government, left the country bankrupted and in chaos, with rubbish on the street and the dead unburied. But, shall we remind everyone why the SNP voted to bring down the dreadful Callaghan administration? What can we say about a parcel o'rogues party which subverts democracy for its own self-interest? The people of Scotland voted in favour of devolution but Scottish labour's 40% fix (sorry, "amendment") proved that the labour party in Scotland - with the complicity and acquiescence of its unionist fellow-travellers, was prepared to deny democracy to the people they were elected to represent. How should we describe such people, do you think? Do tell. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just to remind the revisionists - 1979, the snp laid a motion of no confidence in the then Labour government. This passed 311 - 310, with the 11 Snp MP's voting with the Thatcher ran tory party. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. You're a labour activist, aren't you? And therefore a true revisionist! The SNP did not vote FOR the tories.... they voted to bring down an incompetent government which, like every labour government, left the country bankrupted and in chaos, with rubbish on the street and the dead unburied. But, shall we remind everyone why the SNP voted to bring down the dreadful Callaghan administration? What can we say about a parcel o'rogues party which subverts democracy for its own self-interest? The people of Scotland voted in favour of devolution but Scottish labour's 40% fix (sorry, "amendment") proved that the labour party in Scotland - with the complicity and acquiescence of its unionist fellow-travellers, was prepared to deny democracy to the people they were elected to represent. How should we describe such people, do you think? Do tell." I'm not anyone's activist. Typical Nat ploy.. J ' accuse, j ' accuse! What next, Uncle jock, quizling, traitor or "not a true scot"? If the union is so bad why do you want to keep the pound? Currency union? DVLA? Tax office? Passport Office? Etc. So the 40% thing wasn't good and the incumbent labour government was poor. Surely the Nats could have waited for the government to implode instead of getting into bed with the tories... nah we wouldn't vote wi them would we? As for denying democracy - 44% of the total vote is not a mandate. Hands up who voted for A single state police force (some with guns openly on the waist)? State guardians for our kids?("parents only have a role in their upbringing") The pending death of corroboration. Oh and as for a fairer society, why did they vote against raising the tax threshold to 10K? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just to remind the revisionists - 1979, the snp laid a motion of no confidence in the then Labour government. This passed 311 - 310, with the 11 Snp MP's voting with the Thatcher ran tory party. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. You're a labour activist, aren't you? And therefore a true revisionist! The SNP did not vote FOR the tories.... they voted to bring down an incompetent government which, like every labour government, left the country bankrupted and in chaos, with rubbish on the street and the dead unburied. But, shall we remind everyone why the SNP voted to bring down the dreadful Callaghan administration? What can we say about a parcel o'rogues party which subverts democracy for its own self-interest? The people of Scotland voted in favour of devolution but Scottish labour's 40% fix (sorry, "amendment") proved that the labour party in Scotland - with the complicity and acquiescence of its unionist fellow-travellers, was prepared to deny democracy to the people they were elected to represent. How should we describe such people, do you think? Do tell. I'm not anyone's activist. Typical Nat ploy.. J ' accuse, j ' accuse! What next, Uncle jock, quizling, traitor or "not a true scot"? If the union is so bad why do you want to keep the pound? Currency union? DVLA? Tax office? Passport Office? Etc. So the 40% thing wasn't good and the incumbent labour government was poor. Surely the Nats could have waited for the government to implode instead of getting into bed with the tories... nah we wouldn't vote wi them would we? As for denying democracy - 44% of the total vote is not a mandate. Hands up who voted for A single state police force (some with guns openly on the waist)? State guardians for our kids?("parents only have a role in their upbringing") The pending death of corroboration. Oh and as for a fairer society, why did they vote against raising the tax threshold to 10K? " It is perfectly reasonable to assume that anyone who would raise the labour revisionist distortion of the truth over the 1979 denial of democracy would be a labour activist as that is part of their distorted vision of the world. One does not expect that of anyone who is prepared to debate objectively. The very fact that you would support such a position, or use it as part of your argument, brings me back to the question of motivation. The SNP position in 1979 was entirely understandable and despatched a rabid dog of a government which was tearing the country to pieces. You would wish to have prolonged that misery? DVLA etc, sharing (and paying for!) certain bureaucratic functions is a different issue from political independence. It is in the interests of both rUK and Scotland to continue such arrangements. As for the other points, there are many in the YES campaign who are very uncomfortable with certain aspects of the SNP's amendments to the justice system, but to conflate SNP policy with the single-issue YES campaign is disingenuous. Before this thread becomes overheated, I shall depart, with one question.... Would you agree or disagree that a party (labour) which is prepared to subvert democracy for its own ends is abhorrent, indecent and unworthy of the trust of the electorate? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"..... The SNP position in 1979 was entirely understandable and despatched a rabid dog of a government which was tearing the country to pieces. You would wish to have prolonged that misery? ..... " Even if that were true ( it isn't) you prefer all those years of Thatcher misery ?????? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Before this thread becomes overheated, I shall depart, with one question.... Would you agree or disagree that a party (labour) which is prepared to subvert democracy for its own ends is abhorrent, indecent and unworthy of the trust of the electorate? " Ah, it's now "trust", "subvert democracy" etc. You have an SNP driven white paper at the very heart of the Yes campaign. We seldom hear from anyone other than the 3 S's, so we must "trust" what they say? A party with less than 50% of the vote or to put it another way 22% of the electoral register. If the Yes campaign was so open and apolitical, then surely it should have been Blair Jenkins debating with Alistair Darling? I personally think that all politicians are only in it for themselves. Snouts in the trough of public funding. Even blessed Saint eck stands accused! £54k on "fripperies" £250 tartan troo's £600 of "food bills" Oh, you do realise that the white paper is "aspirational" Aka a wish list. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ..... If the Yes campaign was so open and apolitical, then surely it should have been Blair Jenkins debating with Alistair Darling? ..... " Is should have been Canavan v Darling. Chair v Chair. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |