FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Scotland

making prostitution against the law

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

whats your take on this latest campaign ?

Whilst i am against the non controlled 'street' side of this age old proffesion i see no harm whatso ever in massage parlours / saunas

My work has saw my visit a few of these establishments over the years and i have been impressed and pleasantley surprised by all aspects , from how genuine and friendly the girls are to the high levels of hygiene .

i must say i have never used the services on offer ( even at the discounted rates i have been offered )

But it would be a shame to shut these places down and drive it back onto the streets and underground again

Thoughts ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Once you accept that people will always pay for sex regardless of their upbringing, I can't think of any reason to outlaw prostitution.

Providing safe areas or licensed premises for this type of work, alongside ample education on the risks, and a continued rollout of sexual health clinics, is the way forward, IMHO.

Maybe not in Glasgow, though. The council are a bunch of prudes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ll4funandMan
over a year ago

all over

I follow your logic ok but then I'd fall into the 'not in my back yard' brigade, and can't really fault anyone else thinking the same. So how you gonna designate these areas if the residents don't want them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess


"Once you accept that people will always pay for sex regardless of their upbringing, I can't think of any reason to outlaw prostitution.

Providing safe areas or licensed premises for this type of work, alongside ample education on the risks, and a continued rollout of sexual health clinics, is the way forward, IMHO.

Maybe not in Glasgow, though. The council are a bunch of prudes."

Glasgow City Council are reflecting the views of their electorate and the advice of the polis.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Glasgow City Council are reflecting the views of their electorate and the advice of the polis. "

Possibly. Does it then follow that the electorate and the police are a bunch of prudes? Also, possibly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess


"Glasgow City Council are reflecting the views of their electorate and the advice of the polis.

Possibly. Does it then follow that the electorate and the police are a bunch of prudes? Also, possibly."

Possibly but not all of us. Elected members take into account the views of their electorate at surgeries and the recently resurrected community council meetings. You can hardly blame them for keeping the punters sweet.

Then there's the elephant in the room in the shape of the influence exerted by the Catholic church. That's not to suggest the Presbyterian (and other) churches ain't against prostitution - there's no doubt they are - merely a reflection of the power Mario Conti and his chums still have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Possibly but not all of us. Elected members take into account the views of their electorate at surgeries and the recently resurrected community council meetings. You can hardly blame them for keeping the punters sweet."

It's a tough one to call, though. How many people are going to go to a regular surgery and ask for -more- prostitution in their area? (So to speak.)

Example: I take a completely liberal view. I don't care if it happens outside my flat. When the topic comes up, I tend to advocate less restriction and greater education. This position does not compel me to go along to a surgery to make a point, because it's not something I want the council to fix for me as soon as possible.

Negativity toward prostitution visible at regular surgeries is likely to be primarily NIMBYism. Which is a shame. If there were an actual focussed forum in which all opinions were welcomed, then I'd go. But I'm unlikely to go along to a surgery and ask that prostitution regulation be loosened.

This, in my view, is not what surgeries are for.

So, your point makes me wonder if regulation is influenced too heavily by negative, reactionary knee-jerking around the problem?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess

I'd hazard a guess that councillors work on the assumption that everyone who doesn't get in touch actively supporting prostitution is against it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'd hazard a guess that councillors work on the assumption that everyone who doesn't get in touch actively supporting prostitution is against it."

You understand that this is a flawed assumption, right? Based on the apparent contentiousness of the issue and the inherent NIMBYism.

There's a more altruistic stance here. Decisions could be heavily influenced by research and statistics, possibly leading to a fairer set of rules.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As an aside, my councillor's response rate with regards to personal communication is exactly 0%. I do not feel compelled to get in touch if I do not know that my messages are being read.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess

Yes, it's flawed but it's safe ground. Councillors ain't interested in 'a fairer set of rules'; they're interested in getting re-elected and the recent introduction of multi-member wards makes that more difficult than ever before.

You're in Pertyck, right? Try writing to Aileen suggesting brothels on Byres Road or whore-houses on White Street and see what response you get.

What has surprised me is the extent to which the 'girls in a flat' scene has prospered relatively unhindered by the cops although I gather from conversation with the Divisional Commander (recently retired) that it was on her hit list.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess


"As an aside, my councillor's response rate with regards to personal communication is exactly 0%. I do not feel compelled to get in touch if I do not know that my messages are being read."

Email. You have four of them now. Play them off against each other. Make them earn your vote next time. It works a treat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I guess the question you have to ask is, why does the retired divisional commander perceive there to be a problem? -Is- there a problem?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Email. You have four of them now. Play them off against each other. Make them earn your vote next time. It works a treat."

Of course, email. There is no other way! Actually I'm thinking it's my MP who has a 0% response rate. My councillors when I stayed over in Ibrox were top-notch, apart from whoever the Labour representative was, who wouldn't respond. I haven't tried while I've been in Partick.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess

I believe the issue was raised in response to complaints forwarded by... yes, you've guessed it, councillors.

Some of the problems sounded pretty bad. Punters would appear when the girls were out or busy and press all the entryphone buzzers to gain access. This would also happen in the middle of the night when some bevvied-up punter had the horn and thought he'd 'just pop round'.

Residents and their kids would be accosted entering and leaving the close.

Punters would be found queueing on the stair and so on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess


"

Of course, email. There is no other way! Actually I'm thinking it's my MP who has a 0% response rate. My councillors when I stayed over in Ibrox were top-notch, apart from whoever the Labour representative was, who wouldn't respond. I haven't tried while I've been in Partick."

I don't know anything about the south side. I avoid going there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Now -that's- an issue, yes. It's unacceptable that people be disturbed in their own home.

But then what of the people who want to use sex as a form of income? And those who want to pay for sex? There are three parties in this equation (sex "workers", sex "customers", and the otherwise accosted or irritated).

I wonder if there are similar problems to those you mention around known brothels. If not, then is the solution to allow more of them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess


"......

I wonder if there are similar problems to those you mention around known brothels. If not, then is the solution to allow more of them?"

I guess that depends on the location. There's a couple of brothels thinly disguised as massage parlours been running quite happily for years on the fringes of the city centre. I don't know what complaints, if any, are received about them but they're stil open.

Then there's the one, now closed, in the Park area (which, as you'll be aware is slowly being reclaimed for housing after years of being offices). The building next door was converted into flats and sold to people who, when they'd come to view, couldn't have missed the massage parlour sign on the building next door.

As soon as they were esconced in their new homes thay began a campaign to get the place shut for resale values. fear it would affect resale values.

Why aren't there more? I suppose if demand was there then there would be more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why aren't there more? I suppose if demand was there then there would be more."

Possibly. But then it's presumably easier to rent a flat and run your own operation via the web these days than it is to open and manage a walk-in brothel...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

keep it legal and regulated and put tax on it! might bring down the price of petrol lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

think considering it's "oldest profession in the world" its not going to go away ... if you take a look back think the earliest known prostitutes were around in BC times.. so best to accept it and make it safe ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" so best to accept it and make it safe ..."

Yep i agree with that , allow brothels in areas that will cause minimum disruption and not offend any of the general public .

Ensure they meet with required health and hygiene standards and the jobs a good un ,

But as said it is far easier to run a business from a flat and via the web , that and the street girls is the main problem i think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"keep it legal and regulated and put tax on it! might bring down the price of petrol lol"

prostitutes in Amsterdam even have pension plans now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i think it should definately be legalised once it has been explored correctly as in location rules etc etc and as someone said taxed appropriately!

the oldest profession as it is known will always be around and if it can be done more safely to the girls/men and customers then it should be done!

but as per usual some idiot in his wee gilded tower will morally object whilst probably got a few tucked away!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Should have an area in every big city that has legal hoars like amsterdam. Tax them and make money off them.

It would save the streets being littered with junkies out looking to make a few buck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As a GENERAL rule I'd say legalise it - Would protect the girls to provide a monitored, 'safe' service

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lackbird186Man
over a year ago

west glasgow

girls on the street have a problem and its the weirdos it is safer for them to get in to a sauna or the like ,then they can do as in amsterdam or anywhere in europe. safe -medical checks-pension - ect.

but to change it a bit

think of some one with a disability they might not be able to get female company normally and find the company of a girl from a parlour or agency the easiest way or if you are into a kink that your partner is not then a pro will satisfy that need and they will not treat you as an odd ball.

there are alot of reasons to legalise it and there are enough buisness parks where they can have brothels ,safe that they are away from children and the like . so like most on here i would say legalise it then it can be monitored not controled .

I would like to see a court case where a girl takes a council to court for withholding her right to work in a job she wants to do .

whitter over

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *eclan_and_AimeeCouple
over a year ago

dunblane, stirling

I once knew a girl in glasgow who said she done a roaring trade!

In fact if she had another pair of legs she would have opened in Edinburgh too!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top