FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Scotland

Use up to much ?

Jump to newest
 

By *he Glorious WestendOne OP   Man
over a year ago

Westend

If you sent a message to a couples page and you asked the question Use Up To Much ?

Does anyone know what that means ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hekaiserMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

No idea...

Same "wbu"...no fucking idea what that means!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Glorious WestendOne OP   Man
over a year ago

Westend

That means what about you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inUpGirlWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"If you sent a message to a couples page and you asked the question Use Up To Much ?

Does anyone know what that means ?"

Pretty sure it's just meant to mean, are you up to much?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Glorious WestendOne OP   Man
over a year ago

Westend

Correct

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ering SeaMan
over a year ago

Penicuik

Txt spk

Loathe it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inUpGirlWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Correct "

So I am confused if you knew why post it on the forum?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Glorious WestendOne OP   Man
over a year ago

Westend

Was just asking if people understood it or not ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Think the OP was trying to act all clever.

Of course folk would know what it means

Give folk a break.

Its a sex site not university challange.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow

Use up to much : excess use of hand sanitiser ? Excess use of toilet roll ? ( allowable in cases of excess sh*t ) .

Use up to much : often hated modern use of text speak ( usually by younger folk ) using less characters which is mostly of little use now as the amount of characters you can use in a message has increased .

Most couples I’ve read profiles of and seen posts about messages , prefer a message that’s to both of them stating what interest both parties Have in common and Is polite .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyhappyCouple
over a year ago

perth

"use", "yous" or "Uz" all irritate me.

When we get a "Use up to much?" type message I'm always tempted to give a very literal reply, "I've just finished scrubbing the toilet and now I'm about to go & empty the kitchen bin, then I have a pile of laundry to fold".

K

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ljamMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Phonetic of the demotic. Don't have a problem with it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edeWoman
over a year ago

the abyss

They may have taken you literally and thinking you asked them if they had used up too much of something? Since thats what you asked?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sm265Woman
over a year ago

Shangri-la

Not a couple, so don't claim to speak on their behalf, but I think it'd definitely depend on the context & whether it was part of an on going conversation. I can understand why there might be confusion though because a lot of people don't like/use text speak.

If that was an initial message, & that was all that it said, then I'm not sure it'd inspire a response.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andsCouple
over a year ago

Edin


"Not a couple, so don't claim to speak on their behalf, but I think it'd definitely depend on the context & whether it was part of an on going conversation. I can understand why there might be confusion though because a lot of people don't like/use text speak.

If that was an initial message, & that was all that it said, then I'm not sure it'd inspire a response. "

I agree, if this was the message I wouldn’t respond!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uboCouple
over a year ago

East kilbride

We just delete

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ah ye know.....they were obviously time wasters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzabelle and well hungCouple
over a year ago

Edinburgh.

I’m hopeless at spelling but, youse and things like that’s are an instant no no. If you are not willing to put some effort into communication, you are going to be a shit fuck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andsCouple
over a year ago

Edin


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards? "

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ifeandhubby400Couple
over a year ago

Arse hole of nowhere ,Scotland


"Think the OP was trying to act all clever.

Of course folk would know what it means

Give folk a break.

Its a sex site not university challange."
Ha ,ha spot on ,but i do hate iit at times cant lie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply. "

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I can make it out il reply.

Might take me a few tries at reading it but il try

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've got to know to some lovely, attractive, funny folk whose initial messages were a bit shite.

You never know some times unless you take a chance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Costa xxMan
over a year ago

stirling


"I've got to know to some lovely, attractive, funny folk whose initial messages were a bit shite.

You never know some times unless you take a chance."

Shite you say? Well thank you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apourisedMan
over a year ago

Lanarkshire


"Think the OP was trying to act all clever.

Of course folk would know what it means

Give folk a break.

Its a sex site not university challange."

Love it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If someone is too lazy to write full words and construct proper sentences, then I can only assume they would be too lazy in bed too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cunts be hating on rappers next for the rhymes.

Let it slide folks,Up start crows one pile a shite.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

"

So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cunts be hating on rappers next for the rhymes.

Let it slide folks,Up start crows one pile a shite. "

Well said bruv....haterz gonna hate...innit....Westside

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. . "

Not really

Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.

What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .

Not really

Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.

What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum. "

So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.

As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .

Not really

Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.

What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum.

So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.

As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated. "

Never swapped a message with you before. A couple of forum posts I’ve quoted and vice versa but only a handful at most and you have been blocked for months.

You may think being attracted to a certain type is shallow but you also said people should let their dogs shit in the house during the pandemic so I don’t think I’ll worry to much about it

Maybe I should be flattered you took such an interest in the profile but having been blocked for so long it seems slightly more than an interest. Tell the truth you have another profile to see all the people who have blocked you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?

It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.

It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.

It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances

So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .

Not really

Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.

What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum.

So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.

As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated.

Never swapped a message with you before. A couple of forum posts I’ve quoted and vice versa but only a handful at most and you have been blocked for months.

You may think being attracted to a certain type is shallow but you also said people should let their dogs shit in the house during the pandemic so I don’t think I’ll worry to much about it

Maybe I should be flattered you took such an interest in the profile but having been blocked for so long it seems slightly more than an interest. Tell the truth you have another profile to see all the people who have blocked you "

Haha , the dog shit thing was said before I knew these pandemic rule breakers had gardens lol. Just think how many lives would have been saved if everyone had stuck to the rules. Auld Cummings took pelters for testing his eyesight, Scotlands CMO resigned for a jolly to her second home and yet irresponsible dog owners carried on as normal, damn tooting let those dogs shit at home.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Tell the truth you have another profile to see all the people who have blocked you "

I already have a full time job so not enough time in the world for me to check out the number of people who have blocked me.

Alas to be popular .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *hav02Man
over a year ago

Glasgow/London


"If you sent a message to a couples page and you asked the question Use Up To Much ?

Does anyone know what that means ?"

Is that your winning opening line? .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top