FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Scotland

Would you take your Submissive for a walk..

Jump to newest
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh

On the back of the,"Would you flash in public" thread which is quite rightly was shot down for lack of consent etc.etc.

I had a thought.

If you wanted to spice up a walk would you take your Submissive for a walk, Collar and lead and all.

Even perhaps dressed for the occasion with A little non offensive fetish outfit etc.

There nothing I see is a consent issue.

However open to discussion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't think there's any need for people to flaunt their sexual dynamic in public like that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abrina59TV/TS
over a year ago

moved to cuckold land

Would be amazing be taken for walk like that by a mistress

If only

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietbloke67Man
over a year ago

outside your bedroom window ;-)

Would it be amazing to for the children your walking past?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the back of the,"Would you flash in public" thread which is quite rightly was shot down for lack of consent etc.etc.

I had a thought.

If you wanted to spice up a walk would you take your Submissive for a walk, Collar and lead and all.

Even perhaps dressed for the occasion with A little non offensive fetish outfit etc.

There nothing I see is a consent issue.

However open to discussion."

I saw an article no so long ago a guy was doin that in Glasgow think it was in the record....

Was this year

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"I don't think there's any need for people to flaunt their sexual dynamic in public like that "

See that is the typical social prospective. Not having a go. But an expected answer.

If a submissive walked behind their dominant with the head bowed down. Nobody would bat an eyelid.

Add a collar and lead it is deemed as sexual.

It is not sexual... people walk dogs on leads. What is the difference.

A latex clad figure walks into the supermarket to get shopping.

Not sexual. But I'll bet the pervert comments would run wild!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oss and SuzieCouple
over a year ago

Porthmadog

We often go to our local bar in Spain with Suzie in her collar. Does that count?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

It is not sexual... people walk dogs on leads. What is the difference.

"

The difference is people aren't dogs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *jonesMan
over a year ago

Plymouth


"

It is not sexual... people walk dogs on leads. What is the difference.

The difference is people aren't dogs"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would it be amazing to for the children your walking past?"

This.

In a nightclub, pub or all adult environment, I couldn't really care less....assuming consent as you've said.

However on a trip to the supermarket with the kids? No....and though they're only primary school age we're very open with them. But it's not an explanation I would be happy trying to give them at this stage.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *esparate danMan
over a year ago

glasgow


"

It is not sexual... people walk dogs on leads. What is the difference.

The difference is people aren't dogs"

You sure about that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/05/20 09:04:01]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

It is not sexual... people walk dogs on leads. What is the difference.

The difference is people aren't dogs

You sure about that? "

Some are pedigree. Some are mutts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the back of the,"Would you flash in public" thread which is quite rightly was shot down for lack of consent etc.etc.

I had a thought.

If you wanted to spice up a walk would you take your Submissive for a walk, Collar and lead and all.

Even perhaps dressed for the occasion with A little non offensive fetish outfit etc.

There nothing I see is a consent issue.

However open to discussion.

I saw an article no so long ago a guy was doin that in Glasgow think it was in the record....

Was this year "

It was, it also turned out he was on the register

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *esparate danMan
over a year ago

glasgow


"

It was, it also turned out he was on the register"

For a dog licence ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh

If you will have noticed I have specifically made this topic non gender related.

Example. Everybody wears shiny leggings or trousers . Faux leather, vinyl, whatever. So you exchange the material to latex.

What is the difference.

A goth rock person wearing chains, a Collar, Shit loads of make up and fetish driven materials.

It makes adults squirm.

Kids dinnay give a shit!

They think, "oh kewl super hero" etc etc.

So back to the lead and collar thing.

It is sexual or do adults sexuslise it???

My rambling may not make sense, but hopefully you get my meaning..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"We often go to our local bar in Spain with Suzie in her collar. Does that count?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty "

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk...."

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead "

Well she might have blown away otherwise so a sensible precaution!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead

Well she might have blown away otherwise so a sensible precaution!"

That is a great reason to give if I ever get pulled by the police, thanks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead

Well she might have blown away otherwise so a sensible precaution!

That is a great reason to give if I ever get pulled by the police, thanks "

If you’re from same household you’ll be fine lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead

Well she might have blown away otherwise so a sensible precaution!

That is a great reason to give if I ever get pulled by the police, thanks

If you’re from same household you’ll be fine lol"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty "

So because it is a human with a collar and a lead it is sexual.

But anything else it is not.

I know goths that wear a collar and lead as part of an outfit. Not sexual. A friend takes the lead in hand. It now becomes sexual.

That's what you are saying, basically.

Anyone could walk around with a large wooden spoon in their hand all day. It's a wooden spoon but to some its s cheap impact play paddle!!! Probably more sexual..

If a male crossdresser decides to dress in tarty clothing, make up wig and go for a walk and shopping trip.

Were does that lie?

No difference to a basic woman on a Saturday night in the pubs clubs.

But because it is a male dressed as a tarty woman. Is that sexual?

People would say the woman are dressed sexually.

But woman should be able to feel like they can dress however they choice without being judged.

It is only sexualized because of the preconception and preconditioning of others.

I suppose the key to it is all social acceptance as what is perceived as "normal behaviour".

But we are all different. It's what makes up human.

It's the preconditioning of the group mentality that determines what is perceived as sexual or not..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

So because it is a human with a collar and a lead it is sexual.

But anything else it is not.

I know goths that wear a collar and lead as part of an outfit. Not sexual. A friend takes the lead in hand. It now becomes sexual.

That's what you are saying, basically.

Anyone could walk around with a large wooden spoon in their hand all day. It's a wooden spoon but to some its s cheap impact play paddle!!! Probably more sexual..

If a male crossdresser decides to dress in tarty clothing, make up wig and go for a walk and shopping trip.

Were does that lie?

No difference to a basic woman on a Saturday night in the pubs clubs.

But because it is a male dressed as a tarty woman. Is that sexual?

People would say the woman are dressed sexually.

But woman should be able to feel like they can dress however they choice without being judged.

It is only sexualized because of the preconception and preconditioning of others.

I suppose the key to it is all social acceptance as what is perceived as "normal behaviour".

But we are all different. It's what makes up human.

It's the preconditioning of the group mentality that determines what is perceived as sexual or not..

"

OP, you yourself refer to "spicing up" a normal walk in your original post. Therefore I took it that it would have some sexual intent and kick for you. So hardly surprising if others see it in a sexual way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh


" OP, you yourself refer to "spicing up" a normal walk in your original post. Therefore I took it that it would have some sexual intent and kick for you. So hardly surprising if others see it in a sexual way."

See said I had a thought...

To quote the post," If you wanted to spice up a walk would you take your Submissive for a walk, Collar and lead and all."

And I asked about whether others would think their was a consent issues.

I put the onus on the post reader.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd say my problem with it is that's it's a dom thing.

Someone either male or female being superior.dosnt sit well with me.

Whatever floats your boat but keep it in the confines of your own home or sex club.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/05/20 18:03:08]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not saying it is a sex act, but it hints at the power dynamic in regards to the relationship overall. The general public don't need that in their face

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh

To be fair. I am enjoying the debate...

Give or take the comical posts here and there, It's actually been pretty fairly represented between all groups.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ltKittyWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow

I think there's too many ways to look at this.

The issues with public displays of d/s dynamics (primarily focusing on the full leash/outfit part) I don't believe it's fair because bystanders may not consent to seeing things like that and their consent should also be taken into account, everyone's should.

I think less obvious displays (walking behind an individual, keeping their eyes down, carrying bags etc) is different because it doesn't draw attention, it's less likely to be met with aversion because in all honestly, walking behind a person is something you'd shrug off in comparison to someone being walked on a leash, not everyone likes kink and that's okay and kinky people should be allowed to be themselves, because that's also okay.

I'm a sub and whilst public displays are fine within reason, I don't personally engage in obvious bdsm practices such as being walked on a leash unless it was a more private setting (at home, at a club etc)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ringles0510Woman
over a year ago

Central Borders

There's a time and a place for people to act out on their fetishes. Public parks on a nice sunny day, or city centres aren't the right time and place x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atex and Kink OP   Couple
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"I think there's too many ways to look at this.

The issues with public displays of d/s dynamics (primarily focusing on the full leash/outfit part) I don't believe it's fair because bystanders may not consent to seeing things like that and their consent should also be taken into account, everyone's should.

I think less obvious displays (walking behind an individual, keeping their eyes down, carrying bags etc) is different because it doesn't draw attention, it's less likely to be met with aversion because in all honestly, walking behind a person is something you'd shrug off in comparison to someone being walked on a leash, not everyone likes kink and that's okay and kinky people should be allowed to be themselves, because that's also okay.

I'm a sub and whilst public displays are fine within reason, I don't personally engage in obvious bdsm practices such as being walked on a leash unless it was a more private setting (at home, at a club etc) "

This very much falls in line with a conference we attended. One of the talks was, " don't scare the nillas", in which they discussed introduction of bdsm into normal society without scaring the everyday folk.

A permanent symbol of ownership can be in any shape and form, it does necessarily need to be a collar and lead....

I suppose what angle I was looking at was the context of the items, how they were used and if it was a consent violation to others.

And the whole rub to this is that you could wear the most hideous coloured t-shirt with offensive wording on it. That is just a much a consent issue as someone wearing a collar and lead!!

There is no line in the sand regarding consent. Only a perception and preconditioned line or what the masses have been told.

Unfortunately consent is a rather bigger issue in its simplest form to a FAB female's message inbox and the unsolicited dick pics a plenty...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmixtapeCouple
over a year ago

middle earth

My limit on public displays like that are discreet playing. So things like the use of Bluetooth vibes, a handcuff with a short chain, walking behind me, carrying my things etc. I wouldn't do a full collar and leash unless it was an adult only kink/sex space. Not everyone is down for kink, and thats ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

A permanent symbol of ownership can be in any shape and form, it does necessarily need to be a collar and

"

.....like a wedding ring?

Always knew there was a more deep seated root I never wanted one. I'd be a shite sub!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

So because it is a human with a collar and a lead it is sexual.

But anything else it is not.

I know goths that wear a collar and lead as part of an outfit. Not sexual. A friend takes the lead in hand. It now becomes sexual.

That's what you are saying, basically.

Anyone could walk around with a large wooden spoon in their hand all day. It's a wooden spoon but to some its s cheap impact play paddle!!! Probably more sexual..

If a male crossdresser decides to dress in tarty clothing, make up wig and go for a walk and shopping trip.

Were does that lie?

No difference to a basic woman on a Saturday night in the pubs clubs.

But because it is a male dressed as a tarty woman. Is that sexual?

People would say the woman are dressed sexually.

But woman should be able to feel like they can dress however they choice without being judged.

It is only sexualized because of the preconception and preconditioning of others.

I suppose the key to it is all social acceptance as what is perceived as "normal behaviour".

But we are all different. It's what makes up human.

It's the preconditioning of the group mentality that determines what is perceived as sexual or not..

"

You kind of answer your own point here i think

Even if its not intended to be sexual, social conditioning and perception will give it a sexual connotation , a wooden spoon is most commonly seen in a kitchen , latex and a collar and lead are most commonly seen as part of a sexual fetish

Yes there might be outliers but as adults we have a responsibility to be aware of what the most generally accepted connotations would be and if that is sexual then we have to realise it is inappropriate in public

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nottygirlWoman
over a year ago

Glasgowshire


"It's not the same as seeing a sex act in public

But it's still a way of giving an indication of your sexual predilections to the outside world

And I don't see why people need to do that, particularly in a way that is gonna attract attention because of it's novelty

Attention seekers.

Hold on I’ll just takr my dildo out for a walk....

I'm just back from a walk with my blow up doll, I got some funny looks but I'm thinking that's just because she was on a lead

Well she might have blown away otherwise so a sensible precaution!

That is a great reason to give if I ever get pulled by the police, thanks

If you’re from same household you’ll be fine lol"

This has me in kinks!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top