FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Jamaica deportation

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

So we have a "Labour law" that states serious foreign born criminals that serve over a year in prison here are to be deported to their country of origin after their sentence.

We then have that prick of a twat David Lammy who just so happens to be a Labour tosser shouting the odds in Parliament sagging off the Tories about a law his own party brought in, tosser.

We then have all these Liberal idiots campaigning to keep these vile individuals here but this is the question...

Would we have all these Liberal idiots wanting to keep these deportable pieces of scum here if we replaced the black Jamaicans with brown foreign born Muslim terror criminals?

I wonder.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

or white russian gangsters?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Foreign citizens who've done serious crimes should be deported regardless of their skin colour.

The safety of UK citizens is paramount.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

I’m a proud immigrant to this country and I believe I should abide by the laws of the country.

If I committed a SERIOUS crime then I should be deported with due legal process.

Some of those kept at the detention centre didn’t receive that and quite rightly stayed behind.

It’s a touchy subject because of the Windrush disgrace so it has to be spot on legally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m a proud immigrant to this country and I believe I should abide by the laws of the country.

If I committed a SERIOUS crime then I should be deported with due legal process.

Some of those kept at the detention centre didn’t receive that and quite rightly stayed behind.

It’s a touchy subject because of the Windrush disgrace so it has to be spot on legally. "
well said I agree with sending them back but let's make it water tight so no come back and seriously if you'd been here that long and still not applied for British passport to late now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

If my Mum had taken me to Jamaica as a kid, I then grow up and then decide to sell drugs & murder people, and the Jamaican government then decides to send me back to the UK. That would be my own stupid fault, wouldn't it?

How on Earth is this such a controversial matter?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

Why have we not deported Rolf Harris?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Why have we not deported Rolf Harris?"

Most probably because he's got British citizenship

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"If my Mum had taken me to Jamaica as a kid, I then grow up and then decide to sell drugs & murder people, and the Jamaican government then decides to send me back to the UK. That would be my own stupid fault, wouldn't it?

How on Earth is this such a controversial matter? "

I'm really not sure to be honest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns."

actually.... you might want to revise that statement...

the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs

the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......

no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.

actually.... you might want to revise that statement...

the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs

the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......

no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)

"

The real reason why some of them were not deported was because of a legal condition. The ones locked in a place in Heathrow did not have mobile network connectivity. They argued that accused should have all means of legal representation before getting deported and they couldn't get it because of this issue. Some of them gave out statements that their crimes were just possession. But all of them were sentenced for more than a year for something worse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why have we not deported Rolf Harris?

Most probably because he's got British citizenship "
.

There's always one that tries to make out it's about racism!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.

actually.... you might want to revise that statement...

the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs

the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......

no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)

"
You have to be in possession of rather a lot to be sentenced for over a year.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is from the release website taking about offences for possession of drugs.

You are most likely to get a fine at court fordrug possession (sometimes you will also get a discharge) if it is a first offence, or it has been a long time since your last conviction. ... It is possible to go to prison for a few weeks or months for simple possession.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let's no kid ourselves about what these bunch of foreign criminals were up to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Let's no kid ourselves about what these bunch of foreign criminals were up to."

and we only know of what they did that they were jailed for, no idea what else the scum have done up till being caught.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Let's no kid ourselves about what these bunch of foreign criminals were up to.

and we only know of what they did that they were jailed for, no idea what else the scum have done up till being caught. "
.

Knife crime, sexual assault, r@pe, murder oh and 3 months worth of cocaine but we just couldn't prove you were dealing .

I've no sympathy for them at all, you make your own bed in life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
over a year ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.

actually.... you might want to revise that statement...

the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs

the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......

no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)

"

Sorry Fabio but that just isn't correct.

Of the ones not deported one was convicted (got off) with manslaughter for knifing a guy to death outside a pub, and another served a 12 year sentence for **ping a 17 year old girl and abducting and sexually assaulting a 15 year old.

If they are not violent criminals then I don't know who are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ess n BenCouple
over a year ago

Didcot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.

actually.... you might want to revise that statement...

the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs

the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......

no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)

Sorry Fabio but that just isn't correct.

Of the ones not deported one was convicted (got off) with manslaughter for knifing a guy to death outside a pub, and another served a 12 year sentence for **ping a 17 year old girl and abducting and sexually assaulting a 15 year old.

If they are not violent criminals then I don't know who are.

"

You and your reasoned argument!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top