FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

And after Trump ordering attack

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I actually laughed at this......his properties seemingly threatened with attack. It’s a shrewd move- doesn’t actually have to be carried out but hit Trump personally in the pocket and he’ll back off.

Obviously, I sincerely hope it doesn’t come to an attack but the thought of POTUS and the meltdown he’s going to have makes me smile. I am bad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

He'll probably have increased his insurance cover, especially if taxpayers are covering it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Iran has made it clear that their gripe is not with US citizens, rather than with Trump, personally and have put a huge bounty on his head and threatened and published addresses of, all his properties. If they then have fewer people going there, it will bleed him dry. Again. But this time there should be no return.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evil_u_knowMan
over a year ago

city

Well Iran has nothing else to do.

Europe invited Iran to talk, but europe cant gurantee Iran safe passage through Iraq to get to the EU.

If I was Iran I would consider nuking Israel and bombing the iranian oil fields.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

The Iranians are claiming to have already hacked a US site. They captioned Trump getting punched in the face

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-51008811

Whilst not linked to Iran, a US drone was shot down in Somalia by al-Shabab a couple of days ago. 1 man from the US military and 2 contractors were either killed or wounded.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/05/al-shabaab-attack-us-military-base-kenya

I think Trumpy has backed himself into a corner with this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Trumps doing a grand job of uniting nations, Iran & Iraq are probably now more united than for a long time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avagliamMan
over a year ago

London


"I actually laughed at this......his properties seemingly threatened with attack. It’s a shrewd move- doesn’t actually have to be carried out but hit Trump personally in the pocket and he’ll back off.

Obviously, I sincerely hope it doesn’t come to an attack but the thought of POTUS and the meltdown he’s going to have makes me smile. I am bad."

Iran should also consider going after potus' tax returns... and show it to the world!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I’m sure if they can, they will. It seems about targeting the man, rather than the nation, which is savvy. It shows they understand his motivations in this, and the one thing that concerns him the most- his ego.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Imagine Trump ordering in the whole Military in response to Iran paying off a joyrider to do wheelies on every 18th hole he owns

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The recording of Trump accusing Obama that he'll start a war with Iran to aid his re-election is quite apt lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just saw a clip where Melania Trump was asked what her new years resolution was...

"Peace on the world" was the answer..... (not a resolution unless she actually meant to say "Shit on the world piece by piece")

Ironic... just a bit...

Trump's response is "You can't say it out loud" (also confused by a resolution and a birthday wish) but then no thought Trump ever has should be said out loud.... or tweeted...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So the Iranian General is invited to Iraq by the US to act as a peace envoy to reduce tensions in the middle east then they Murder him America deserves everything it's going to receive from Iran

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the Iranian General is invited to Iraq by the US to act as a peace envoy to reduce tensions in the middle east then they Murder him America deserves everything it's going to receive from Iran "

What can you say... apparently Trump initially didn't sanction the hit but then missed a putt on the 18th hole.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exyCouple999Couple
over a year ago

South Bucks


"Well Iran has nothing else to do.

Europe invited Iran to talk, but europe cant gurantee Iran safe passage through Iraq to get to the EU.

If I was Iran I would consider nuking Israel and bombing the iranian oil fields. "

That's nice of you ! xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well Iran has nothing else to do.

Europe invited Iran to talk, but europe cant gurantee Iran safe passage through Iraq to get to the EU.

If I was Iran I would consider nuking Israel and bombing the iranian oil fields.

That's nice of you ! xx"

If I was Iran I would drop doggy do on the greens at Trump's favourite golf course. But I think that's a bit over the top and he would probably go straight to nuclear over that...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

uS troops are under attack from Iran now...and so it begins.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *infonyCouple
over a year ago

Halifax

I say boom boom boom let me hear u say wayo!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I say boom boom boom let me hear u say wayo!"

Wayo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evil_u_knowMan
over a year ago

city


"That's nice of you ! xx"

Nice or not, I predicted exactly what would happen, Iran have said they are targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia and threw in the Emirates too.

They also said they will attack on American soil if the US responds and Secret Service agents with machine guns have taken to the streets around the white house to secure it.

The only thing I cant predict is if the US will now attack the cultural targets, because thats a war crime and the army should say no, even if ordered to do so. But they are american so I cant predict.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If they didn’t attack the US embassy this wouldn’t have happened, anyway, it doesn’t look very good for Iran now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sianMancMan
over a year ago

Manchester

What a sad sad taste this world is in

Nations still go against what their people want and use propaganda to justify their state terrorism and we the people let it pass because our leaders said its our special relationship.

Just because people on the other side of the world look different speak different and perhaps eat different doesn't mean they are automatically the devil's.

The very few who were against the Iraq war were correct. We have alot to worry about if the majority of our fellow citizens easily believe the news agenda or politicians and lack critical thinking skills.

No wonder Brexit won the vote.

I pray we all could all have peace with each other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andlingswingersCouple
over a year ago

Woodbridge


"Just saw a clip where Melania Trump was asked what her new years resolution was...

"Peace on the world" was the answer..... (not a resolution ).."

Au contraire, mon frere.

I have a growing suspicion that Melanoma isn't quite as dumb as she looks. One of her husband's favourite things was

(It is alleged, m'lud) being peed on.

Which makes his "you can't say it out loud" rather less of the non-sequitur it appeared to be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andlingswingersCouple
over a year ago

Woodbridge


"What a sad sad taste this world is in

Nations still go against what their people want and use propaganda to justify their state terrorism and we the people let it pass because our leaders said its our special relationship.

Just because people on the other side of the world look different speak different and perhaps eat different doesn't mean they are automatically the devil's.

The very few who were against the Iraq war were correct. We have alot to worry about if the majority of our fellow citizens easily believe the news agenda or politicians and lack critical thinking skills.

No wonder Brexit won the vote.

I pray we all could all have peace with each other."

Amen to that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vesham cplCouple
over a year ago

Evesham


"What a sad sad taste this world is in

Nations still go against what their people want and use propaganda to justify their state terrorism and we the people let it pass because our leaders said its our special relationship.

Just because people on the other side of the world look different speak different and perhaps eat different doesn't mean they are automatically the devil's.

The very few who were against the Iraq war were correct. We have alot to worry about if the majority of our fellow citizens easily believe the news agenda or politicians and lack critical thinking skills.

No wonder Brexit won the vote.

I pray we all could all have peace with each other.

Amen to that."

Fully agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickeyandmouseCouple
over a year ago

nr Alicante

If abusing the power of the office is not sufficient to remove Trump; as is likely, the Republicans will close ranks.

How about WW 3.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Google "malignant narcissist" and discover a very good description of Trump.

I imagine the powers that be in Iran recognise this, hence their declared response is designed merely to save face rather than hurt or provoke.

The latter will come later, and be delivered in a manner that enables "plausible deniability" of Iranian culpability.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an For YouMan
over a year ago

belfast/holywood

I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate. "

Or if Iran does not retaliate Trump will have to do something to make it look like they did and frame them 911/Bin Laden style.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If abusing the power of the office is not sufficient to remove Trump; as is likely, the Republicans will close ranks.

How about WW 3."

You'd think so but Rand Paul (Republican) has very publicly criticized Trump saying after tearing up an agreement, placing an embargo, an assassinsting a general someone would have to be "braindead" to expect Iran to come back to the negotiating table. Basically calling Trump and Pompeo braindead.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rand-paul-rails-against-trump-over-soleimani-strike-says-i-hate-this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate. "

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-criticizes-conservatives-for-pushing-iran-conflict-2020-1

"He accused intelligence officials of seeking to smear Trump as a Russian spy and brought up the faulty intelligence that was used to justify the war with Iraq in 2003."

This is not "fake news" from the left. This is a right wing Trumper on Fox News say WMDs were bad intel.

You're pretty much on your own on this one. Weird dreams???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an For YouMan
over a year ago

belfast/holywood


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-criticizes-conservatives-for-pushing-iran-conflict-2020-1

"He accused intelligence officials of seeking to smear Trump as a Russian spy and brought up the faulty intelligence that was used to justify the war with Iraq in 2003."

This is not "fake news" from the left. This is a right wing Trumper on Fox News say WMDs were bad intel.

You're pretty much on your own on this one. Weird dreams???"

Iraq had WMD for many years up to the late 1980s proven by their proven use against Kurds in northern Iraq and earlier during the Iran -Iraq war.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-criticizes-conservatives-for-pushing-iran-conflict-2020-1

"He accused intelligence officials of seeking to smear Trump as a Russian spy and brought up the faulty intelligence that was used to justify the war with Iraq in 2003."

This is not "fake news" from the left. This is a right wing Trumper on Fox News say WMDs were bad intel.

You're pretty much on your own on this one. Weird dreams???

Iraq had WMD for many years up to the late 1980s proven by their proven use against Kurds in northern Iraq and earlier during the Iran -Iraq war. "

If anyone had found WMDs when Iraq was invaded they would have been on display on the front page of every newspaper in the world. Embarrassingly America declared war on a country based on bad intel, but conveniently made a lot of money for Bush. Even the Americans, INCLUDING the right wing admit it was bad intel and the war on Iraq was unjustified.

How many Kurds were killed by WMDs? I'm getting 50 000 at most.

In Rwamda 800 000 Tsutsi and moderate Hutus were murdered while the world sat and watched.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an For YouMan
over a year ago

belfast/holywood


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-criticizes-conservatives-for-pushing-iran-conflict-2020-1

"He accused intelligence officials of seeking to smear Trump as a Russian spy and brought up the faulty intelligence that was used to justify the war with Iraq in 2003."

This is not "fake news" from the left. This is a right wing Trumper on Fox News say WMDs were bad intel.

You're pretty much on your own on this one. Weird dreams???

Iraq had WMD for many years up to the late 1980s proven by their proven use against Kurds in northern Iraq and earlier during the Iran -Iraq war.

If anyone had found WMDs when Iraq was invaded they would have been on display on the front page of every newspaper in the world. Embarrassingly America declared war on a country based on bad intel, but conveniently made a lot of money for Bush. Even the Americans, INCLUDING the right wing admit it was bad intel and the war on Iraq was unjustified.

How many Kurds were killed by WMDs? I'm getting 50 000 at most.

In Rwamda 800 000 Tsutsi and moderate Hutus were murdered while the world sat and watched."

50,000 at most . Not many then lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-criticizes-conservatives-for-pushing-iran-conflict-2020-1

"He accused intelligence officials of seeking to smear Trump as a Russian spy and brought up the faulty intelligence that was used to justify the war with Iraq in 2003."

This is not "fake news" from the left. This is a right wing Trumper on Fox News say WMDs were bad intel.

You're pretty much on your own on this one. Weird dreams???

Iraq had WMD for many years up to the late 1980s proven by their proven use against Kurds in northern Iraq and earlier during the Iran -Iraq war.

If anyone had found WMDs when Iraq was invaded they would have been on display on the front page of every newspaper in the world. Embarrassingly America declared war on a country based on bad intel, but conveniently made a lot of money for Bush. Even the Americans, INCLUDING the right wing admit it was bad intel and the war on Iraq was unjustified.

How many Kurds were killed by WMDs? I'm getting 50 000 at most.

In Rwamda 800 000 Tsutsi and moderate Hutus were murdered while the world sat and watched.

50,000 at most . Not many then lol"

The most I could find was 8000 in a single attack. Roughly the same as the final death toll of 911 supposedly caused by people without even a firearm.

I'm not saying the 50 000 lives didn't matter. I'm saying that 16 times as many people were killed in Rwanda without a WMD. Why did America not intervene? If Rwanda was an oil rich nation do you think America would have stood by or 'brought democracy' to their nation?

One day in the early 80s I stood in mu back garden and watched Hawker Hunter aircraft firing at targets on the ground. These were civilians. There were so many dead that the mortuaries good not handle the load of corpses and families were called to identify bodies stored in refrigerated rail cars. Mugabe's Red Brigade were then responsible for 20 000 deaths in Matabeleland many of whom were tortured to death. The leader of that Red Brigade is the current PM of Zimbabwe. We are talking about terrorists who committed the most awful crimes against humanity and are celebrated by our government.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an For YouMan
over a year ago

belfast/holywood


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate. "

Say no more. Iran just announced they are to continue missiles attacks on US bases in Iraq . The other day was just the first wave. Stand by.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evil_u_knowMan
over a year ago

city

These countries sometimes need a stricter hand in control, if they dont have it groups like ISIS pop up.

Sometimes this strict hand results in a muslim world more to our liking, sometimes its not really how we like things.

The only thing between the warlords fighting ISIS and the ones who served Sadam is that we agree ISIS need to go. We will never share sadams view that a village that tried to kill him needed to go.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I note several images in the media of the missiles on the ground, inside the bases. Unexploded. No warheads?. Saving face. For Iranian consumption?. 80 US forces reported dead by Iranian state TV. Trump just needs to sit on his hands and do nothing. Iran or their controlled militias will not be able to contain themselves before launching further attacks . If US forces are then killed , then Trump will have no option but to retaliate.

Or if Iran does not retaliate Trump will have to do something to make it look like they did and frame them 911/Bin Laden style."

Very possible

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If anyone had found WMDs when Iraq was invaded they would have been on display on the front page of every newspaper in the world.

How many Kurds were killed by WMDs?

I'm getting 50 000 at most.

"

The 1st & 3rd comments rather contradict each other lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Iraq had had WMD's and had used them but the job should of been finished during Gulf War 1 and not let Saddam off for a few years then go back in to finish the job

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an For YouMan
over a year ago

belfast/holywood

Gas gas gas !

IA drills

Ring a bell anyone?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

The only WMD found in Iraq were buried components of chemical weapons, traced to suppliers in the US, UK, Spain and Netherlands.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 09/01/20 17:13:39]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The only WMD found in Iraq were buried components of chemical weapons, traced to suppliers in the US, UK, Spain and Netherlands. "

What.?. wait a minute.. we supplied components for weapons of mass destruction to Iraq so they could could gas Kurds and Iranians..

Then we invaded them because they had WMDS ..

Sheesh and we’re the good guys ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Yep. It came out in some military chief's testimony to congress after the war.

The only evidence of WMD ever found in Iraq was items sold by US and Europe to Saddam.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top