FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Labour and the Russians

Jump to newest
 

By *an For You OP   Man
over a year ago

belfast/ Holywood

So surprise surprise , Reddit has discovered that British government documents that ended up in Corbyns hands came from his Russian pals. With reddit closing down dozens of accounts linked to Russian interference. Well well well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury / Lee on solent

I see Corbyn as the victim here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

If these are the HMG documents marked "Official - Sensitive", and they have been procured from the British state by Russian operatives, there's a more fundamental issue to be addressed than political point scoring.

How did the Russians get documents with a security marking intended to protect them from disclosure?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

The intelligence committee report ought to shed some light on Russian interference in UK politics. But it is being withheld by the Conservative Party for reasons that appear to be party interest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London

As far as I understand it, the information is correct, but the Russians may have procured or distributed it.

So, there is Russian interference in the UK elections. Regardless they still stir doubt.

The Tories are still up for opening the NHS up for US companies to profit. Profit out means less efficient spending on treatments.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool

If the documents are true and says the opposite to what boris johnstone has been saying.

Then who cares who released the documents.

Just like the documents that was released on Hilary clinton, they was all true.

Which gives the voting public more clarity.

If what ever gets released is all truth then no matter who is doing the releasing (russians, wiki leaks, santa claus it doesn't matter), we should be thankful someone is exposing truth at the end of the day.

The only thing i would class as interfering in election is if somone was exposing fake documents or lies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

If the NHS papers are simply minutes of meetings between UK and US trade reps, would it be reasonable to conclude they would be in the possession of both US and UK governments?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone but an idiot would realise that the USA is after access to more of the NHS for consumables and drug sales.

We all remember trump standing there beside may in full view of the worlds press and stated that of corse the NHS is and would be part of any negotiations between the states and the U.K.

He stated that everything including the NHS is on the table so all of this bullshit that bojo keeps coming out denying it is just that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Yes, US pharma has been telling its shareholders for a few years now that it is working in the UK to persuade the powers that be to open up the healthcare market to US corporations.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

And it is counter-intuitive to think that a PM who lies about everything else only tells the truth when it comes to the NHS.

Save the NHS!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury / Lee on solent

https://youtu.be/ITCX2mDiFzE

It's rife

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What you mean say is

Some stuff got published on Reddit

Tjat labour then read & printed off.

Nice try

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"What you mean say is

Some stuff got published on Reddit

Tjat labour then read & printed off.

Nice try"

You know where Labour received it from?

Are the government denying that the transcripts are genuine?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"I see Corbyn as the victim here."
Taken for a fool that he is

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury / Lee on solent


"I see Corbyn as the victim here.Taken for a fool that he is"

Yep.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"I see Corbyn as the victim here.Taken for a fool that he is"

Are the government denying that the transcripts are genuine, or are they launching an investigation into how they were leaked?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Are you saying the documents were fake?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Maybe Johnson should release that report then? I mean, Corbyn's guilty? So he has nothing to hide?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Turns out special advisers - Tory Party apparatchiks working for Ministers - were using personal Gmail accounts to conduct Government business.

The .gov system is a lot more secure, and comes with the cyber security of GCHQ.

Why were they using less secure, personal email accounts to conduct Government business?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top