Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... " I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. " You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy?" Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media?" Did you apply the check list that I indicated to your sources of information? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Did you apply the check list that I indicated to your sources of information? " I gotta start batting my eyes more in these political debates. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Did you apply the check list that I indicated to your sources of information? I gotta start batting my eyes more in these political debates. " Excellent point. What's your opinion on the propogation of false data and disbelief in man made climate change? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Did you apply the check list that I indicated to your sources of information? I gotta start batting my eyes more in these political debates. Excellent point. What's your opinion on the propogation of false data and disbelief in man made climate change? " Remember I work for Aerospace. I talk to the scientists who collect that data. They say that the climate changes are being understated and that there is no doubt whatsoever that the effects are man made. But what does a scientist with multiple PhDs know of these things? Pffft! With you on that one. Remember the 'scientific study' that showed breakfast was the most important meal of the day? Sponsored by Kellogg's. Remember those studies that stated that smoking cigarettes was actually good for you? Sponsored by big tobacco. It's easier yo believe there's nothing wrong than to do something and sacrifice. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Did you apply the check list that I indicated to your sources of information? I gotta start batting my eyes more in these political debates. Excellent point. What's your opinion on the propogation of false data and disbelief in man made climate change? Remember I work for Aerospace. I talk to the scientists who collect that data. They say that the climate changes are being understated and that there is no doubt whatsoever that the effects are man made. But what does a scientist with multiple PhDs know of these things? Pffft! With you on that one. Remember the 'scientific study' that showed breakfast was the most important meal of the day? Sponsored by Kellogg's. Remember those studies that stated that smoking cigarettes was actually good for you? Sponsored by big tobacco. It's easier yo believe there's nothing wrong than to do something and sacrifice. " Indeed, remember when the UN said it was broke, then went on to say how countries should contribute more money in the fight against climate change.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media?" Or skip the mass media and Corbyns mad brother. And go directly the the published scientific articles. There is complete scientific consensus. Learn. Understand. And then stop believing in conspiracy theories published by the fossil fuel industry. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Or skip the mass media and Corbyns mad brother. And go directly the the published scientific articles. There is complete scientific consensus. Learn. Understand. And then stop believing in conspiracy theories published by the fossil fuel industry. " so corbyn,s brother is mad because he doesnt believe what you do? ive heard it all now.Did you ever read his article in the guardian? a bit of an eye opener. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Or skip the mass media and Corbyns mad brother. And go directly the the published scientific articles. There is complete scientific consensus. Learn. Understand. And then stop believing in conspiracy theories published by the fossil fuel industry. so corbyn,s brother is mad because he doesnt believe what you do? ive heard it all now.Did you ever read his article in the guardian? a bit of an eye opener. " Okay. Let's try to get this over once more. I do not "believe" anything to do with scientific method and science based knowledge. I understand (the climate part), and when you have knowledge and understanding, belief isn't required. Belief and faith is what you have in the absence of knowledge and understanding. So you believe that science isn't real. That's fine. The only way to cure ignorance on a given subject is to learn about it. You have chosen not to learn about it. Also fine. But then you all out attack people who have do have some understanding. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Or skip the mass media and Corbyns mad brother. And go directly the the published scientific articles. There is complete scientific consensus. Learn. Understand. And then stop believing in conspiracy theories published by the fossil fuel industry. so corbyn,s brother is mad because he doesnt believe what you do? ive heard it all now.Did you ever read his article in the guardian? a bit of an eye opener. Okay. Let's try to get this over once more. I do not "believe" anything to do with scientific method and science based knowledge. I understand (the climate part), and when you have knowledge and understanding, belief isn't required. Belief and faith is what you have in the absence of knowledge and understanding. So you believe that science isn't real. That's fine. The only way to cure ignorance on a given subject is to learn about it. You have chosen not to learn about it. Also fine. But then you all out attack people who have do have some understanding. " You do not believe in science based knowledge but you understand the climate???????? care to expand on this are you the messiah. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many people believe lies, but they won't believe facts. We are living in strange and disturbing times... I blame man made climate change, which is definitely real because the BBC told me. You make such coherent arguments against man-made climate change. Especially those YouTube clips from "people" . There are lots of sources that support the conclusions on climate change including automotive companies, the aviation industry and the oil industry. Who's responsible for this conspiracy? Why not ask Jeremy Corbyn's brother? Piers. After all he's actually in a position to educate you. or would you rather believe mass media? Or skip the mass media and Corbyns mad brother. And go directly the the published scientific articles. There is complete scientific consensus. Learn. Understand. And then stop believing in conspiracy theories published by the fossil fuel industry. so corbyn,s brother is mad because he doesnt believe what you do? ive heard it all now.Did you ever read his article in the guardian? a bit of an eye opener. Okay. Let's try to get this over once more. I do not "believe" anything to do with scientific method and science based knowledge. I understand (the climate part), and when you have knowledge and understanding, belief isn't required. Belief and faith is what you have in the absence of knowledge and understanding. So you believe that science isn't real. That's fine. The only way to cure ignorance on a given subject is to learn about it. You have chosen not to learn about it. Also fine. But then you all out attack people who have do have some understanding. You do not believe in science based knowledge but you understand the climate???????? care to expand on this are you the messiah." I tried to explain the difference between "belief" and "understanding". I'm assuming you do know the difference but are choosing to argue for the sake of it. Which is getting boring really quickly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories." "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" " ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Piers Corbyn is an astrophysicist and Director of WeatherAction long range (months and years ahead) forecasts. He has a First class degree in Physics from Imperial College and an MSc in Astrophysics from Queen Mary College. He has published numerous peer-reviewed academic papers ranging from meteorology to cosmology and galaxy formation and has presented at many international conferences. The mainstream media peddle the claim that 97% of (climate) scientists believe in man-made Global-Warming and that, therefore, there is no debate to be had on the subject. This is false and irrelevant. To get the 97% figure, they basically counted people who had mentioned Climate-Change in an abstract or heading of a scientific paper. Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. Stop lapping up the propaganda. Educate yourself. " Lol. So now people who are educated about a subject need to educate themselves. Meanwhile people ignorant about the subject should be the voices of reason. This encapsulates everything wrong in the world today. Feel free to believe one maniac over every scientist (who hasn't been employed by the fossil fuels industry) who has studied climate change. And just stop for a moment. If climate change isn't real. No one is making any money from pretending it is with this epic world wide conspiracy. If climate change is real and influenced by human actions. Then the fossil fuels industry stands to lose shit loads of money. If you choose to remain ignorant. That's fine. If you choose to learn about th subject, that would be better. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. " You're very naive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. " What's next? Cocaine is good for you. After a scientific study sponsored by a drug cartel? The Amazon which produces 20% of the earth's oxygen has been reduced in size by 20%. There were 77 000 fires in that area last year alone. Something like a 70% increase year on year. There are 9 tipping points of major concern that are all simultaneously getting to danger level. When they start running away some of them will escalate others so it will have a domino effect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. " He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"God bless all those who gave the gift of cancer to millions for the purpose of finding a cure for cancer. The road to cancer Is truly paved with good intentions . Amen to that .. " come on bob you are better than that lots of cancers are nothing to do with smoking and you know it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"God bless all those who gave the gift of cancer to millions for the purpose of finding a cure for cancer. The road to cancer Is truly paved with good intentions . Amen to that .. come on bob you are better than that lots of cancers are nothing to do with smoking and you know it." Should of gone to spec savers matey.. Context ,context and context.., | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"God bless all those who gave the gift of cancer to millions for the purpose of finding a cure for cancer. The road to cancer Is truly paved with good intentions . Amen to that .. come on bob you are better than that lots of cancers are nothing to do with smoking and you know it. Should of gone to spec savers matey.. Context ,context and context.., " sorry mate lost me now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"God bless all those who gave the gift of cancer to millions for the purpose of finding a cure for cancer. The road to cancer Is truly paved with good intentions . Amen to that .. come on bob you are better than that lots of cancers are nothing to do with smoking and you know it. Should of gone to spec savers matey.. Context ,context and context.., sorry mate lost me now. " Leave a trail of bread crumbs you’ll find your way back.. In the meantime when did the tobacco industry know smoking causes cancer and what was their response. When did the fossil fuel industry know about climate change and what was their response .. Answers on a postcard will be thrown in the bin... I suggest you complete this homework on the weekend. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent." Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. " Pics or it never happened! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! " I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy." My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. " The man's just speaking for himself. I have a bit of troll on the loo fetish Cummon Clem show us the goods! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. " I am delighted you think so. I'd be alarmed if you thought else. However, thankfully, we will never know eachother, so you will never know if your articulated misconception about me is wrong or not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. I am delighted you think so. I'd be alarmed if you thought else. However, thankfully, we will never know eachother, so you will never know if your articulated misconception about me is wrong or not." Awwww that's so sweet. I'm so glad we can all still be friends | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. I am delighted you think so. I'd be alarmed if you thought else. However, thankfully, we will never know eachother, so you will never know if your articulated misconception about me is wrong or not. Awwww that's so sweet. I'm so glad we can all still be friends " I was talking to the other guy. But sure, me and you can be friends. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. I am delighted you think so. I'd be alarmed if you thought else. However, thankfully, we will never know eachother, so you will never know if your articulated misconception about me is wrong or not. Awwww that's so sweet. I'm so glad we can all still be friends I was talking to the other guy. But sure, me and you can be friends." I know but I want us ALL to be friends. Clems a nice guy you've just got to get to know him. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. "Legates is a senior scientist of the Marshall Institute, a research fellow with the Independent Institute, and an adjunct scholar of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, all of which have received funding from ExxonMobil" ... the same company that invented the lithium battery. thank goodness for oil money, otherwise there wouldn't be any for research. Just like British American tobacco's contribution of millions into cancer research. You're very naive. He's not naive. He knows full well. He just mistakes being articulate for being intelligent. Im not sure you qualify for either. But you do amuse me while I'm on the loo. Pics or it never happened! I can live the rest of my life without seeing a photo of a troll on the loo, and be very happy. My only real concern is that you're this obnoxious in real life. I guess at least you're genuine. I am delighted you think so. I'd be alarmed if you thought else. However, thankfully, we will never know eachother, so you will never know if your articulated misconception about me is wrong or not. Awwww that's so sweet. I'm so glad we can all still be friends I was talking to the other guy. But sure, me and you can be friends. I know but I want us ALL to be friends. Clems a nice guy you've just got to get to know him. " Wait a minute..... Haha. Any way I can fact check your claim? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Piers Corbyn is an astrophysicist and Director of WeatherAction long range (months and years ahead) forecasts. He has a First class degree in Physics from Imperial College and an MSc in Astrophysics from Queen Mary College. He has published numerous peer-reviewed academic papers ranging from meteorology to cosmology and galaxy formation and has presented at many international conferences. The mainstream media peddle the claim that 97% of (climate) scientists believe in man-made Global-Warming and that, therefore, there is no debate to be had on the subject. This is false and irrelevant. To get the 97% figure, they basically counted people who had mentioned Climate-Change in an abstract or heading of a scientific paper. Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. Stop lapping up the propaganda. Educate yourself. " No. That's not how the 97% statistic was derived. Have you read any of the macro study papers or just the summaries and YouTube videos? The absolutely most pessimistic reading of the data is 80% consensus on man made climate change. So patently false and a conspiracy. Have you applied the Full fact methodology to your data? Could you perhaps point us to your most credible source? You know, the peer reviewed study. Who stands to gain from this conspiracy by the way? You haven't answered? Is this mysterious group more or less well funded than the entire fossil fuel industry? Rather than vagueness, how about specifics? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Piers Corbyn is an astrophysicist and Director of WeatherAction long range (months and years ahead) forecasts. He has a First class degree in Physics from Imperial College and an MSc in Astrophysics from Queen Mary College. He has published numerous peer-reviewed academic papers ranging from meteorology to cosmology and galaxy formation and has presented at many international conferences. The mainstream media peddle the claim that 97% of (climate) scientists believe in man-made Global-Warming and that, therefore, there is no debate to be had on the subject. This is false and irrelevant. To get the 97% figure, they basically counted people who had mentioned Climate-Change in an abstract or heading of a scientific paper. Dr Legates has reviewed the work and shows that, in fact, only 0.3% of the papers claim that ‘man had caused most post-1950 warming’. Nonetheless, science isn’t about consensus, it is about facts; and no Global-Warming Inquisition is going to prevent him exposing their nonsensical theories. Stop lapping up the propaganda. Educate yourself. No. That's not how the 97% statistic was derived. Have you read any of the macro study papers or just the summaries and YouTube videos? The absolutely most pessimistic reading of the data is 80% consensus on man made climate change. So patently false and a conspiracy. Have you applied the Full fact methodology to your data? Could you perhaps point us to your most credible source? You know, the peer reviewed study. Who stands to gain from this conspiracy by the way? You haven't answered? Is this mysterious group more or less well funded than the entire fossil fuel industry? Rather than vagueness, how about specifics?" Good questions, but conspiracy wonks don't care about facts or applying rigour to their fantasies, they just want the little jolt of dopamine they get from feeling they're smarter than everyone else. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |