FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Why do you trust Johnson?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. "

But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

i wont be voting but im guessing why peeps prefer boris to jezza is boris has always been a cunt and dont really try to hide the fact he is a cunt and people like that abput him. jezza on the other hand is trying to be all things to all ppl and people realise this also he a cunt just like boris except jezza is trying to convince people he isnt.if you are votin the trick is to decide who is the least of a cunt for you personaly

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"i wont be voting but im guessing why peeps prefer boris to jezza is boris has always been a cunt and dont really try to hide the fact he is a cunt and people like that abput him. jezza on the other hand is trying to be all things to all ppl and people realise this also he a cunt just like boris except jezza is trying to convince people he isnt.if you are votin the trick is to decide who is the least of a cunt for you personaly"

Do you trust Johnson to tell the truth, though? That was the original question. I'm wondering if anybody will come on here and say they do at this point.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. "

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ild_oatsMan
over a year ago

the land of saints & sinners

I wonder how anyone can morally justify supporting someone who is a known liar and a cheat.

He has been caught out lying on many occasions not only as a politician but also as a journalist.

I guess it says more about the moral compass of his supporters than it does of him.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

"

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *V-AliceTV/TS
over a year ago

Ayr


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

It's not a question of trust. It's people choosing the leader they feel will best act in their interests.

They don't give a shit if he's a liar, as long as he's making things better for them - usually by fucking other people over. It's what they would do themselves.

If people knowingly vote for him (or any other politician) even though they're aware he won't act in their interests; that's just stupidity and self-harm.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?"

No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you!

If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?

It's not a question of trust. It's people choosing the leader they feel will best act in their interests.

They don't give a shit if he's a liar, as long as he's making things better for them - usually by fucking other people over. It's what they would do themselves.

If people knowingly vote for him (or any other politician) even though they're aware he won't act in their interests; that's just stupidity and self-harm."

I could have asked if people believed he'd act in their best interests. I ended up asking if people believed he'd be truthful about anything. I guess I did that as I was curious if anybody would defend Johnson in that area.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?

No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you!

If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned. "

I never lie, obviously.

Joking aside, I think there's a huge difference between the lies we all tell and lies from people in power that will potentially harm a huge proportion of this country. I suppose that's why I raised his track record and asked if people trust Johnson not to lie.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. "

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?

No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you!

If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned.

I never lie, obviously.

Joking aside, I think there's a huge difference between the lies we all tell and lies from people in power that will potentially harm a huge proportion of this country. I suppose that's why I raised his track record and asked if people trust Johnson not to lie."

Well you’ll find out before Christmas. Enjoy yourself.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Does anybody believe the words that come out of Johnson's mouth, given his track record? As far as I can tell, even Johnson fans haven't defended him in that area so far.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anybody believe the words that come out of Johnson's mouth, given his track record? As far as I can tell, even Johnson fans haven't defended him in that area so far."

Have you spoken in person to all Jonson’s fans? And did you ascertain they were telling you the truth when they told you that? Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Does anybody believe the words that come out of Johnson's mouth, given his track record? As far as I can tell, even Johnson fans haven't defended him in that area so far.

Have you spoken in person to all Jonson’s fans? And did you ascertain they were telling you the truth when they told you that? Lol"

I'm asking a simple quesion right here. Any of Johnson's fans are welcome to reply here if they wish.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

"

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though."

"Scruffy bastard" ?

Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

"Scruffy bastard" ?

Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either."

I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hetalkingstoveMan
over a year ago

London


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

"Scruffy bastard" ?

Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either.

I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser "

Yeah because after years of being on here i no longer meet and only use this site for the forums so have no need to have my picture on here.

Its people like you why the country is fucked.

Voting for someome because they know how to use a comb and not liking someone because they dont shave and heard from media he met with terrorists.

Lets just ignore any policies or how a person or goverment had behaved for the past god knows how many years.

Pathetic.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?

The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do. "

I worry you might be right there.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iverpool LoverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?

The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do.

I worry you might be right there. "

Unfortunately he is.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

"Scruffy bastard" ?

Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either.

I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser

Yeah because after years of being on here i no longer meet and only use this site for the forums so have no need to have my picture on here.

Its people like you why the country is fucked.

Voting for someome because they know how to use a comb and not liking someone because they dont shave and heard from media he met with terrorists.

Lets just ignore any policies or how a person or goverment had behaved for the past god knows how many years.

Pathetic.

"

What’s pathetic is you’re distinct inability to read a thread and form a logical argument based on all responses. Stop being so angry scouser!

Note you’ve also hidden your profile now too

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation."

Not according to the IRA

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA "

What was he doing Frisky?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

"

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?"

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA

What was he doing Frisky?"

She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

"

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them "

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

"

Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin. "

The god delusion is a good read..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA

What was he doing Frisky?

She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser "

Yep same old same old again - the trouble is I think some of the narcissistic lot on here get their pleasure from appearing more intelligent in their own eyes through following a mantra of selfishness which they think equates to success

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin. "

Are justifying conservative selfishness from a evolutionary perspective.

Is that your moral justification for it.

As that fits neatly with the quote that started this conversation.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA "

On the Sophy Ridge show he said “I condemn all the bombing by both the loyalists and the IRA.”

So do you prefer to get your bollocks from IRA sources then?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin.

The god delusion is a good read.."

Not quite what I asked you though is it. I expect delusion is something you’re very familiar with none the less.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I read this the other day and for me it rings true.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness?

I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?

I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA.

And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them

Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...

Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin.

Are justifying conservative selfishness from a evolutionary perspective.

Is that your moral justification for it.

As that fits neatly with the quote that started this conversation. "

Oh you were excited enough to reply twice, I missed this one, I expected it’s something you’re used to though! Again, answer my question! Providing a new question to one you can’t answer won’t work. We’ll come back to this though

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though."

A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol"

I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you

She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA

What was he doing Frisky?"

He was just a supporter, not part of the peace process at all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA "

Why? What has he done for the IRA? Keep your answer to know facts as I know you like to tell lies

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA

What was he doing Frisky?

He was just a supporter, not part of the peace process at all."

Evidence please? Define ‘supporter ‘

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed.

Question.

Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ?

Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad?

We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had.

If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same.

This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change.

If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried.

Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on.

Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity.

I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls.

I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah.

I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies.

His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time.

But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon.

You’ve answered your own question, your words:

‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’

That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time!

Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true?

What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides.

Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation.

Not according to the IRA

What was he doing Frisky?

She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser "

Of course, and an antisemite, there is plenty of data on all that from all manner of sources. I have no idea what video you're referring to, but I have a feeling if it was Christ himself on video telling you the truth about Jezza's totally unsuitable attitudes you would not believe it anyway, you are obviously a True Believer.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes

My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside.

I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside.

I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party."

Yup, I'd never vote Tory while Boris is PM. It's one thing voting for a manifesto and then that manifesto not been fully accomplished and voting for a manifesto from a serial compulsive lier.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Liar even

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *teveuk77Man
over a year ago

uk


"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside.

I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party."

Care to elaborate on the things you like that Johnson is saying the things you don't like that Corbyn is saying?

Perhaps some examples?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ild_oatsMan
over a year ago

the land of saints & sinners

The simple truth is that you can’t...

He even lied to and let down the ditch....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside.

I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party.

Care to elaborate on the things you like that Johnson is saying the things you don't like that Corbyn is saying?

Perhaps some examples?

"

Not really on this thread because this is about trust in Johnson, but there's plenty of time between now and the 12th December.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry

In the Economist Dec 2018: Boris was judged to be the politician who has done most to let down his party and country.

"In a big field, there was one outstanding candidate. He failed miserably as foreign secretary. He sniped at Mrs May while in Cabinet. He has agitated against her deal from the backbenches and in his lucrative newspaper column without presenting a real alternative. A demagogue not a statesman, he is the most irresponsible politician the country has seen for many years. Step forward, Boris Johnson!"

FFS He cannot even be honest about the number of children he has.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


" not part of the peace process at all."

Read Mo Mowlam's autobiography and you'll discover your view is incorrect.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol

I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you

She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit "

Exactly my point, why would I vote for the Tories, for a few elitists personified by greedy selfish party lead by a liar who'll lign their pockets?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

No other choice

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *exyCouple999Couple
over a year ago

South Bucks


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

Could you name a politician that has never lied about anything ? Seriously !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/11/19 22:15:29]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No other choice"

Farage

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order.

Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap.

Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though.

A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol

I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you

She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit "

Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?

Could you name a politician that has never lied about anything ? Seriously !"

Is that your defence of Johnson? Find me a politician that has never lied?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *teveuk77Man
over a year ago

uk


"No other choice"

Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK

If Boris told me it was Monday I'd have to check the calendar.

Known in my house as "Bluster and Bollocks" Johnson

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

Refresh my memory please. What were the two occasions he was sacked for lying?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK

This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK

Some stuff here too:

https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/times-boris-johnson-flat-lied-277588

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Unlike Corbyn he didn’t spend his younger days with the likes of Gerry Adams and co

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No other choice

Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him. "
..........Absolute Boll#cks !!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No other choice

Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him. ..........Absolute Boll#cks !!!!"

Come on then let’s get the “facts” to back that statement up!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It's been a long thread by now. Yet as far as I can tell, not one person has said they believe anything Boris says. Everybody on every side seems to acknowledge he's an untrustworthy liar.

On that basis alone, I find it bizarre that anybody would vote for him.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper."

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "

You just aren’t really up to it are you! Come back when you have some facts at hand instead of blustering! Your posturing of intellectual and moral superiority is just shallow nonsense!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet "

Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet

Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know "

Come back when you csn say something sensible

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

You just aren’t really up to it are you! Come back when you have some facts at hand instead of blustering! Your posturing of intellectual and moral superiority is just shallow nonsense!"

I asked for the facts, learn to read boy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

"

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing "

Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again.

Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing "

And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.

To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Yes, he was sacked by his newspaper for lying. And he was sacked by Michael Howard after lying about an affair.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet

Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know

Come back when you csn say something sensible "

It’s a legitimate question, you’re clearly annoyed at a Conservative government being in power. What that tells you is, more people voted for them than did for the likes of Steptoe and Son! So if you got yourself a permanent address, and with it, a voting right, you might be able to help Steptoe get into power. I’m sure he’d really appreciate your vote lol. That’s sensible advice lass.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again.

Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked."

And yet he’s still in power pmsl!

Will you change your usernames and deny any knowledge of these posts when Steptoe (Corbyn) gives the UK a decent Xmas present and resigns because he got his arse kicked in the election?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again.

Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked.

And yet he’s still in power pmsl!

Will you change your usernames and deny any knowledge of these posts when Steptoe (Corbyn) gives the UK a decent Xmas present and resigns because he got his arse kicked in the election? "

Things are looking bad when you have to retreat to petty name calling dont you think?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "

Sacked for fabrication a front page story

Sacked after being asked if he had an affair, Boris said no, he wasn't believed so he was sacked

That'stthe twice

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

I am going with the Apprentice format in choosing the next government.

Boris, you’ve buggered up the country and your team for the past ten years have consistently caused trouble to the UK as a whole.

For that reason YOU’RE FIRED!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never trust a Tory bottom line

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don’t care if Johnson lies

He is funny, entertaining and is a do’er.

He is the only leader who will pursue the outcome of the referendum.

He has hit many brick walls since becoming PM but at least he continues to pursue the outcome he promised to deliver

All MPs who voted were elected on a leave manifest but blocked it should be ashamed of themselves

Those who swap parties after being voted in should have lost their seats and stood again for election. I vote for a party not a person, they shouldn’t be allowed to swap parties. Where would we be if a PM did that!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country "

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated. "

The only thing about Boris Johnson that should be underestimated is his ability to lie to get his own way

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated. "

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia. Unless you endorse those views of course. Why should policy matter if you're quick witted and charming.

Hitler was also very charismatic, would you support him because of his personal appeal?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Things are looking bad when you have to retreat to petty name calling dont you think?"

I’d say they’re looking bad for your sense of humour, or lack there of. Have a look at Steptoe, and tell me there’s no resemblance

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country "

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Never trust a Tory bottom line "

A lot do; it’s why they’re in power

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth "

Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth "

That all it takes for you? Thats enough to say thats my guy. a divisive racist who abuses office for personal gain? Is that your values?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia. "

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

The only thing about Boris Johnson that should be underestimated is his ability to lie to get his own way"

Steptoe lies - nearly all of them do nowadays it seems.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth

Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works! "

And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth

Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works!

And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want "

Null and void I’ve the FM I want

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison."

Ker-ching

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth

Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works!

And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want

Null and void I’ve the FM I want "

Steptoe cheer leaders have a null and void expanse between their ears at times.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison."

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison."

Who’s in power though? It isn’t Steptoe. Whatever my beliefs or poison are, let it not concern you, because one things for sure, yours aren’t making any difference to driving this country forward because most people won’t listen to you

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison."

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rx1Couple
over a year ago

North Devon-ish


"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch.

But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?"

They all lie, just different degrees of lies. That is why they are all politicians. Cannot see why any party even campaignt..If they will do something if they get elected, why didn’t they do it when they had power.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "

It’s easier for people to jump on the train of sheep, proverbially joining the masses. They’re guaranteed support that way, whether their argument holds water or not. Still, on a positive note, at least they behave exactly like the one they want in No.10. Gotta give ‘em that!

I’ll be giving BoJo / his colleague my cross too. Not that he needs it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "

As far as I can tell, everything Doggone just referenced is true. If only Johnson could be as truthful as Doggone.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again. "

You refute ones argument dear, not them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again. "

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved. "

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided."

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

"

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing. So finding his remarks about President Obama or black people racist is due to extreme liberal political correctness.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

"

And adding nicely to that, those so called 12 justices weren’t voted in by you or I either! Do you call that fair and democratic? Or do you choose to use those words for when it suits you?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing. "

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t care if Johnson lies

He is funny, entertaining and is a do’er.

He is the only leader who will pursue the outcome of the referendum.

He has hit many brick walls since becoming PM but at least he continues to pursue the outcome he promised to deliver

All MPs who voted were elected on a leave manifest but blocked it should be ashamed of themselves

Those who swap parties after being voted in should have lost their seats and stood again for election. I vote for a party not a person, they shouldn’t be allowed to swap parties. Where would we be if a PM did that!"

If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No other choice

Farage "

Wasted vote like voting lib dems.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No other choice

Farage

Wasted vote like voting lib dems."

Agree. Contrary to popular belief on here, we’re not massive BoJo cheer leaders, just choosing the least damaged of apples.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.

To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.

"

True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson People would have a field day.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying."

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch"

See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.

And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch

See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.

And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. "

Said by a legal and constitutional expert I presume

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.

To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.

True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson People would have a field day."

Whoa there cowboy! You just added another lie to this little right wing wank fest - if you have a reliable source name it or rein your neck in - the forum police will get you if you tell enough lies and spread hatred without any justification - believe me theres plenty of Brexit and Boris cheerleaders who have gone unlos before you joined the party!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The state of this mudslinging excuse for a debate thread, shows everything that's wrong with the country and shows just how divided and bitter everyone is. We are fucked.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This should cover it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html

Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper.

He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it

He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.

He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing

And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.

To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.

True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson People would have a field day.

Whoa there cowboy! You just added another lie to this little right wing wank fest - if you have a reliable source name it or rein your neck in - the forum police will get you if you tell enough lies and spread hatred without any justification - believe me theres plenty of Brexit and Boris cheerleaders who have gone unlos before you joined the party!"

And there we have it, admission that if the left rlement don't like what you say they get you banned. Not surprising, the left us the least tolerant of others views.

Back on point, no lies. Corbyn was involved in an abuse cover up scandal. It was Labour MPs who outed him, not Tory ones. But in your mind that must be ok.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The state of this mudslinging excuse for a debate thread, shows everything that's wrong with the country and shows just how divided and bitter everyone is. We are fucked."

Yep

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch"

Probably because he said he’d ‘rather be’ and not ‘will be’. If you must insist on quoting, at least do it properly and actually read and digest the material first ffs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK

Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them.

Why do you trust Johnson?

My answer to redress the balance. I don't.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them.

Why do you trust Johnson?

My answer to redress the balance. I don't."

Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs!

Why do you trust Johnson?

Your answer: You don’t!

Love it!

And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all?

Mini high fives, you’re ace.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK


"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them.

Why do you trust Johnson?

My answer to redress the balance. I don't.

Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs!

Why do you trust Johnson?

Your answer: You don’t!

Love it!

And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all?

Mini high fives, you’re ace.

"

I will let the Tories talk

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them.

Why do you trust Johnson?

My answer to redress the balance. I don't.

Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs!

Why do you trust Johnson?

Your answer: You don’t!

Love it!

And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all?

Mini high fives, you’re ace.

I will let the Tories talk"

Better to listen to a nice s’Tory than someone who Labours a pointless marxist view eh

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch

See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.

And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. "

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

A ruling against your preferred position is not bias. I'm very sad for you, but that is not bias.

Why are you saying that it wasn't their place to rule that Parliament has supremacy according to constitutional law?

What is your basis to footer this opinion?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

People can't defend the indefensible.

However, they will believe a liar if they tell them the lies that they want to hear.

Strange but true.

Cognitive dissonance.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ULL not bullyMan
over a year ago

Kings Heath

I don’t believe Boris Johnson is the issue here, he is a symptom of our politics today. We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. Our politicians are no longer held up as Pillars virtue honesty and integrity within their communities! They are being shown up to be selfish self serving and disconnected from the ‘real world’ as being proved in USA at the moment!

when we have the most powerful leader on the planet lying on a daily basis, promoting hate speech and racism, it normalises the behaviour for others to follow!

The only real check we have now on politicians are the press! How, through their investigative reporters are outing this behaviour and bringing it to the publics attention! I seriously think people dont even care about weather he is a liar or not! We are in a personality contest not an election! And people like him!

Not me i may add lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

"

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch

See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.

And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. "

"not their place to make the ruling"

What do you think their role is then?

-Matt

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!"

A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg.

-Matt

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!

A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg.

-Matt"

Oh he's great value, I love his wit.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!

A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg.

-Matt

Oh he's great value, I love his wit."

I guess you have the privilege to see it as that.

-Matt

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country

Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.

Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.

He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.

So, pick your poison.

He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,

Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.

Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.

Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.

Lied to the Queen.

Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.

The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading

He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)

I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.

Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.

So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.

Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.

Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.

Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.

I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.

If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.

The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.

Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.

Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'

He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch

See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.

And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned.

"not their place to make the ruling"

What do you think their role is then?

-Matt"

Ask Blair, they were one of his machiavellian schemes.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!

A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg.

-Matt

Oh he's great value, I love his wit.

I guess you have the privilege to see it as that.

-Matt"

Lol, privilege? What, to have a sense of humour? Thanks.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. "

Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!"

Hey I promote a positive message, you can breathe me in anytime

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is.

I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK


"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them.

Why do you trust Johnson?

My answer to redress the balance. I don't.

Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs!

Why do you trust Johnson?

Your answer: You don’t!

Love it!

And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all?

Mini high fives, you’re ace.

I will let the Tories talk

Better to listen to a nice s’Tory than someone who Labours a pointless marxist view eh "

Marx made some excellent observations. Unfortunately capitalism enslaved us all

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK


"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is.

I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments. "

Dark colours suit my shape more

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is.

I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments.

Dark colours suit my shape more "

Typical bloody darker. Don't you know lighter colours are the only sane choice? And I hear those who wear dark colours secretly think they hear voices from aliens in their heads. And they snore in code!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK


"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is.

I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments.

Dark colours suit my shape more

Typical bloody darker. Don't you know lighter colours are the only sane choice? And I hear those who wear dark colours secretly think they hear voices from aliens in their heads. And they snore in code!"

Damn I've been rumbled!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elloIntrigueMan
over a year ago

North West UK

Its true I tell you!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is.

I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments. "

Speaking of yourself in the third person is as twisted and tortuous as one can be, but carry on; you’ll get to tell your mates you started a thread and someone gave it time of day

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

"

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders? "

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us! "

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all? "

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate! "

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable "

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress "

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans.

He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?"

My apologies for the diversion, bit nobody was answering you anyway

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks? "

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!"

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy? "

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport? "

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

"

Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here."

...

So if Boris won’t get Brexit done, who will?

Sure as hell won’t be the teeny Lib Dem party

Or the ‘no fecking clue what to do’ Labour Party

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *taceyDoesAllMissusWontTV/TS
over a year ago

Worcester Park

[Removed by poster at 06/11/19 05:18:58]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

"

On the contrary cherie - if a High Court Judgement is not biased, I like it.

You think mocking the PM and crowing about ruling against him is appropriate for the President of the Supreme Court? I expect way higher standards, total impartiality, and total allegiance to the UK, not a conflict of interest with any foreign power.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?"

Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?

Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!"

Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

On the contrary cherie - if a High Court Judgement is not biased, I like it.

You think mocking the PM and crowing about ruling against him is appropriate for the President of the Supreme Court? I expect way higher standards, total impartiality, and total allegiance to the UK, not a conflict of interest with any foreign power.

"

And yet to expect higher standards of our PM and expect them to not deliberately break the law and then try to lie about it... is somehow not something that concerns you?

-Matt

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
over a year ago

Stockport

If the ministers of state break the law, and are allowed to, then the law does not exist any more. It is a fundamental principle of the law that the same rules apply from the lowest of the low to the highest of the high.

As for the members of the supreme court - indeed any judge - their allegiance is not to the UK, it is to the law of the UK. Which is a very different thing in these strange days when we have the ministers of the UK openly acting to circumvent the law of the UK.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here.

...

So if Boris won’t get Brexit done, who will?

Sure as hell won’t be the teeny Lib Dem party

Or the ‘no fecking clue what to do’ Labour Party"

If you want a ‘proper ‘ Brexit then you will have to vote Brexit Ltd,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?

Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!

Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport? "

They probably listen to me as much as they listen to you dearie! Maybe I just have a higher appreciation of the futility of picking personal fights

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I find this an interesting assertion.

"The biased Supreme Court".

What's your evidence for it?

Their known bias and their biased statements.

"A ruling against your preferred position is not bias."

Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless.

I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter.

What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples.

"Their biased statements". Such as?

You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?

You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.

The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.

Every single sitting judge.

I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".

What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?

Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?

Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!

Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?

Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?

Have you any useful thoughts at all?

Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl

So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!

Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?

Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?

Do I give a toss?

Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?

You are risable

Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.

Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress

I just don't know do I?

What do you think my opinion should be?

Is Boris Johnson a liar?

Is the Supreme Court biased?

Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?

Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?

Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!

Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!

Oh sweetie

What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?

I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?

How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?

Night, night.

Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.

It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.

Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?

Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!

Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport?

They probably listen to me as much as they listen to you dearie! Maybe I just have a higher appreciation of the futility of picking personal fights "

Maybe? Still unsure then. You waded into this one all on your own little guy

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top