Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. " He also has sufficient power that the Queen does as he says. And that is frankly a potentially an abusive power which can not be over ruled by anyone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Take it you don't like him much then" For me, he is as warmly welcome as a fanny fart under the duvet cover on the coldest night of the year with British Gas and Nuclear electric power on strike. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Take it you don't like him much then For me, he is as warmly welcome as a fanny fart under the duvet cover on the coldest night of the year with British Gas and Nuclear electric power on strike." So the best option available then  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Take it you don't like him much then For me, he is as warmly welcome as a fanny fart under the duvet cover on the coldest night of the year with British Gas and Nuclear electric power on strike. So the best option available then "There is NOT a best option available. I was bullied at school, so I know when I am beat. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. " Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment." I watched the whole thing and I don’t think you might be be a little incorrect there!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment." Those that brought Jo Cox up (mostly women MPs) brought it up in a relevant context in that they said that the language being used by Johnson and others was the sort of language that had encouraged her murderer to take the action he did and that they were scared. They may have been correct, they may have been wrong but either way Johnson response to their personal worries and fears for their own safety was totally inappropriate. Further to that his comment that the best way to show respect Jo Cox's memory was to get BREXIT done, when she was a well known ANTI-BREXITER Remainer was totally disrespectful to her memory and what she stood for. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment. Those that brought Jo Cox up (mostly women MPs) brought it up in a relevant context in that they said that the language being used by Johnson and others was the sort of language that had encouraged her murderer to take the action he did and that they were scared. They may have been correct, they may have been wrong but either way Johnson response to their personal worries and fears for their own safety was totally inappropriate. Further to that his comment that the best way to show respect Jo Cox's memory was to get BREXIT done, when she was a well known ANTI-BREXITER Remainer was totally disrespectful to her memory and what she stood for. " Ohhh don't bring the truth into this, it does not fit their narrative | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment. Those that brought Jo Cox up (mostly women MPs) brought it up in a relevant context in that they said that the language being used by Johnson and others was the sort of language that had encouraged her murderer to take the action he did and that they were scared. They may have been correct, they may have been wrong but either way Johnson response to their personal worries and fears for their own safety was totally inappropriate. Further to that his comment that the best way to show respect Jo Cox's memory was to get BREXIT done, when she was a well known ANTI-BREXITER Remainer was totally disrespectful to her memory and what she stood for. Ohhh don't bring the truth into this, it does not fit their narrative " And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment. Those that brought Jo Cox up (mostly women MPs) brought it up in a relevant context in that they said that the language being used by Johnson and others was the sort of language that had encouraged her murderer to take the action he did and that they were scared. They may have been correct, they may have been wrong but either way Johnson response to their personal worries and fears for their own safety was totally inappropriate. Further to that his comment that the best way to show respect Jo Cox's memory was to get BREXIT done, when she was a well known ANTI-BREXITER Remainer was totally disrespectful to her memory and what she stood for. Ohhh don't bring the truth into this, it does not fit their narrative And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring " Ha, perfect example of never ever being able to confront the truth and instead indulges in whataboutary to avoid it  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Did you watch it all or just the news clips?A labour mp brought up jo cox not boris and he was simply answering her point it wasnt him bringing her up on the spur of the moment. Those that brought Jo Cox up (mostly women MPs) brought it up in a relevant context in that they said that the language being used by Johnson and others was the sort of language that had encouraged her murderer to take the action he did and that they were scared. They may have been correct, they may have been wrong but either way Johnson response to their personal worries and fears for their own safety was totally inappropriate. Further to that his comment that the best way to show respect Jo Cox's memory was to get BREXIT done, when she was a well known ANTI-BREXITER Remainer was totally disrespectful to her memory and what she stood for. Ohhh don't bring the truth into this, it does not fit their narrative And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring Ha, perfect example of never ever being able to confront the truth and instead indulges in whataboutary to avoid it "The whataboutary was done a few days after the commons bust up ... Cheap political point scoring, and no better than Johnson | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. " Extremely biased,Jo Cox should never have been mentioned in the first place,the original point was insulting to her | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Extremely biased,Jo Cox should never have been mentioned in the first place,the original point was insulting to her" Exactly my point if the shield in the hoc had not been brought up boris would not have mentioned her,but as usual with the remainers he is the villain. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Exactly my point if the shield in the hoc had not been brought up boris would not have mentioned her,but as usual with the remainers he is the villain. " It's the use that's the problem, not the fact that she was mentioned. It'd be like saying you're a firm remainer, love the EU, etc, because you simply post here! Doesn't that sound daft? Of course it does, now imagine you get murdered for your views, your name gets brought up as an example of violence, and then your name is used to promote the thing you were against and what got you killed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's the prime minister or public servant of any description that the country should never have. He's untrustworthy, seems to disrespect the sovereignty of parliament, self-interested only and appears to live in a moral vacuum. His office and he draws attention away from hos serious failings by attempting to direct attention elsewhere. His repugnant comment upon Jo Cox on the spur of the moment, truly highlights his odious character. That he fails to want to show any hesitancy to do anything but abuse, whilst not showing regret, should be a serious warning upon how dangerous he is. Extremely biased,Jo Cox should never have been mentioned in the first place,the original point was insulting to herExactly my point if the shield in the hoc had not been brought up boris would not have mentioned her,but as usual with the remainers he is the villain. " The fact you use the term Remainers when nobody has even stated what there views are in brexit says everything. I voted for brexit so does the fact i think boris is a buffoon and seriously dangerous to this country now automatically make me a "remainer"? An idiot for voting for brexit in the first place and believing a word that came out of boris or farages mouths maybe alright. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnson has now politicised the Judiciary and is complaining the Police are politically are out to get him....with his insightnent in his language. Is this the Primemister this country needs at this time. " Not the prime minister we need at this moment in time. We need a unifier not a divider. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnson has now politicised the Judiciary and is complaining the Police are politically are out to get him....with his insightnent in his language. Is this the Primemister this country needs at this time. Not the prime minister we need at this moment in time. We need a unifier not a divider." We need a man to take us out of the EU and settle this once and for all.The main body of parliament does not want to leave and has fought dirty for three years.As soon as Brexit polititions through Johnson fight back with vigour and force and get down to there level,remoaners start to complain,well you give out shit you get shit back,you cannot fight an army with evil intent with feather dusters.Democracy must prevail | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring " okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% " Perfectly put but the Boris apologisers will be along soon enough to throw their whataboutary | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% " Bercow: “nothing disorderly has been said “ and “ If I see that there is disorderly behaviour I will rule accordingly, and if I hear disorderly words I will rule them out of order” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% Bercow: “nothing disorderly has been said “ and “ If I see that there is disorderly behaviour I will rule accordingly, and if I hear disorderly words I will rule them out of order”" Instead of constantly quoting other random people why don't you give us your own opinion? Irrespective of what Bercow said what is your opinion of Fabios post that Boris is inciting the 52% and belittling the 48% in what he's saying publicly and that's not how to rule the 100%? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnson has now politicised the Judiciary and is complaining the Police are politically are out to get him....with his insightnent in his language. Is this the Primemister this country needs at this time. Not the prime minister we need at this moment in time. We need a unifier not a divider.We need a man to take us out of the EU and settle this once and for all.The main body of parliament does not want to leave and has fought dirty for three years.As soon as Brexit polititions through Johnson fight back with vigour and force and get down to there level,remoaners start to complain,well you give out shit you get shit back,you cannot fight an army with evil intent with feather dusters.Democracy must prevail" This does not settle anything. This is just the start of decades of decades of division and recrimination. We have all lost but you still seem to think that there is an easy solution. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% Bercow: “nothing disorderly has been said “ and “ If I see that there is disorderly behaviour I will rule accordingly, and if I hear disorderly words I will rule them out of order” Instead of constantly quoting other random people why don't you give us your own opinion? Irrespective of what Bercow said what is your opinion of Fabios post that Boris is inciting the 52% and belittling the 48% in what he's saying publicly and that's not how to rule the 100%? " I don’t think there was anything wrong with the language used in the HoC | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% " He is right though,they are all wanting o stay in the EU not democratic,as I have said fight fire with fire it is about time | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And Jeremy Corbins video released yesterday, using footage of jo cox and the message - Johnson Does not care about violence on our streets Cheap Political point scoring okay... let me use this as an example.... when johnson did that "press thing" in front of the police standing there... he said he would rather "die in a ditch" then go an ask for the brexit extension... then a few days later... 2 different mp's get death threats referencing "die in a ditch" then when he went to northern ireland, a journo there asking him if it is right to use such phrases when people there were literaly "dying in ditches" during the troubles..... brilliant question.... johnson mumbled something and refused to answer.... so yes.... language does matter..... using words like "traitor" and "surrender" isn't being a PM for the 100%.... its stoking up the 52% and belittling the 48% He is right though,they are all wanting o stay in the EU not democratic,as I have said fight fire with fire it is about time" No. The reason that we are still in right now is because of the Brexiteers voted against the transition agreement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
