Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If Farage or your favoured leader, had fought the legal action in the Supreme Court, with yesterdays results, instead of Gina Miller, what differences would there be in yours, the media and public perceptions?" The BBC would be foaming at the mouth, for a start! The public would be saying "Good old Nigel, taking on the elite and winning." But our "unbiassed" Judiciary would never agree with anything Nigel proposed, would they? After all, they are the most elite of the elitists, with the most to lose if people power really took off. Time to make Judges submit to election every 5 years, say. If they don't do their job neutrally - or hand out pathetic sentences to criminals - then we can throw them out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If Farage or your favoured leader, had fought the legal action in the Supreme Court, with yesterdays results, instead of Gina Miller, what differences would there be in yours, the media and public perceptions? The BBC would be foaming at the mouth, for a start! The public would be saying "Good old Nigel, taking on the elite and winning." But our "unbiassed" Judiciary would never agree with anything Nigel proposed, would they? After all, they are the most elite of the elitists, with the most to lose if people power really took off. Time to make Judges submit to election every 5 years, say. If they don't do their job neutrally - or hand out pathetic sentences to criminals - then we can throw them out. " Nigel Farage is the elite. Nigel Farage supports the verdict of the Supreme Court. After all, prorogation was nothing to do with Brexit, right? How are judges running for office going to encourage neutrality? That is gibberish. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If Farage or your favoured leader, had fought the legal action in the Supreme Court, with yesterdays results, instead of Gina Miller, what differences would there be in yours, the media and public perceptions? The BBC would be foaming at the mouth, for a start! The public would be saying "Good old Nigel, taking on the elite and winning." But our "unbiassed" Judiciary would never agree with anything Nigel proposed, would they? After all, they are the most elite of the elitists, with the most to lose if people power really took off. Time to make Judges submit to election every 5 years, say. If they don't do their job neutrally - or hand out pathetic sentences to criminals - then we can throw them out. " You are rattled?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Time to make Judges submit to election every 5 years, say. If they don't do their job neutrally - or hand out pathetic sentences to criminals - then we can throw them out. " Politicians sitting as judges? Are you mad? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system " Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other" Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system " yet those in brussels wont fix that system...why is that?? ah yea they All Have there snouts in the trough lol love how remainers and leavers are biased towatds there own..u di realise there all there to make there own lives better before anything else.same the world over | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely." No , because traditionally voters vote for parties rather than individuals which is why it was unfortunate that the Libs didn't have the courage of their convictions and demand PR | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely." And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed?" It is the Conservative MPs who stopped the UK from leaving on March 29. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? It is the Conservative MPs who stopped the UK from leaving on March 29." Who are now deselected but because our electoral system is flawed are still claiming their expenses out of the coffers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed?" The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak." I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. " Actually, fewer Conservatives were re-elected. "The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government..." Their position was not supported by the population. It lost support. You understand what "lost votes" and "minority means". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. Actually, fewer Conservatives were re-elected. "The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government..." Their position was not supported by the population. It lost support. You understand what "lost votes" and "minority means"." I do indeed. Thank you for being condescending. You do understand that the conservatives are still the party with most MPs despite expelling 21 MPs and others leaving to change parties despite being elected for that party? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. Actually, fewer Conservatives were re-elected. "The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government..." Their position was not supported by the population. It lost support. You understand what "lost votes" and "minority means". I do indeed. Thank you for being condescending. You do understand that the conservatives are still the party with most MPs despite expelling 21 MPs and others leaving to change parties despite being elected for that party?" Their Brexit policy was not supported when put to the people. It has less support now from its own MPs. If you continue to argue furiously that black is white then mockery is all that is left. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. Actually, fewer Conservatives were re-elected. "The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government..." Their position was not supported by the population. It lost support. You understand what "lost votes" and "minority means". I do indeed. Thank you for being condescending. You do understand that the conservatives are still the party with most MPs despite expelling 21 MPs and others leaving to change parties despite being elected for that party? Their Brexit policy was not supported when put to the people. It has less support now from its own MPs. If you continue to argue furiously that black is white then mockery is all that is left." Thank you for demonstrating the issues with the system we have | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Farage is a cu*t who is making an absolute fortune sitting there not voting on anything taking the piss out of the system Farage is an odious toad, but the ones taking the piss out of the system are those that aren't representative of the views of their constituents. Look at Birmingham Yardley for an excellent example where 60% voted one way but their MP still supports the other Given that the MP was elected by the same voters AFTER the referendum, I fail to see your point. If it was that important to them, rather than you, they would have returned someone else, surely. And if this is actually the case, a conservative government that supports leaving was re-elected meaning another referendum isn't needed? The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government with a confidence and supply pact with the DUP in exchange for £1bn that previously didn't exist. The votes moved in exactly the opposite direction to your claim. Up is down. Left is right. The new reality of doublespeak. I didn't claim any movement of votes, read again. All I said was that the conservatives were re-elected, which they were. Actually, fewer Conservatives were re-elected. "The Conservative party moved from having a majority to forming a minority government..." Their position was not supported by the population. It lost support. You understand what "lost votes" and "minority means". I do indeed. Thank you for being condescending. You do understand that the conservatives are still the party with most MPs despite expelling 21 MPs and others leaving to change parties despite being elected for that party? Their Brexit policy was not supported when put to the people. It has less support now from its own MPs. If you continue to argue furiously that black is white then mockery is all that is left. Thank you for demonstrating the issues with the system we have" Issues with the system? The issue is not being able to find a sensible strategy because there was a referendum with an unspecified outcome. Q: Do you want to pay no tax but have the same services? A: Yes. Now get it done. What's your solution? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |