Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All of them, labour need to call no confidence and let the people kick them out." your avin a laugh labour dont want to ho anywhere near a GE ots only corbyn and his fanboys and girls who think he would win.my opinion for what its worth is labour and the cons as we have known tjem are finished will split into a far left and far right partys and the blaritrs and cuddly torys will team up | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All of them, labour need to call no confidence and let the people kick them out. your avin a laugh labour dont want to ho anywhere near a GE ots only corbyn and his fanboys and girls who think he would win.my opinion for what its worth is labour and the cons as we have known tjem are finished will split into a far left and far right partys and the blaritrs and cuddly torys will team up" . Great. Should we send out the bat signal to the middle East  .
That's the only draw back, the far left and far right will fuck this country over and the middle lot will fuck all the other countries over.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All of them, labour need to call no confidence and let the people kick them out. your avin a laugh labour dont want to ho anywhere near a GE ots only corbyn and his fanboys and girls who think he would win.my opinion for what its worth is labour and the cons as we have known tjem are finished will split into a far left and far right partys and the blaritrs and cuddly torys will team up" Whichever way people vote in a GE, Labour stand a good chance of getting in. It'll be doubtful the opposition parties will ever gain majority over the labour seats so Labour will be in by a minority government. Unless people are voting Brexit or Tory people will be voting Labour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so whos head goes on the spike for this clusterfuck today.... Johnson? Geoffrey cox? Nikki De Costa? Dominic Cummings? Jacob Rees Mogg? Robert Buckland?" It'd be good to look into the future and know who will be the 4th Tory PM. It hasn't gone well for him and I can't see how he can last. Thing is the Torys voted him in and May out, they knew what he was like, a careerist at best and plebiscite (to quote Jonathan Haslam today) at worst. How the Tory MP's can defend their decisions to put him into office given his conduct prior is a question in itself, though how a new cabinet is to be installed and spun for the good of the country, will no doubt tear the Torys apart - as everyone said it would. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so whos head goes on the spike for this clusterfuck today.... Johnson? Geoffrey cox? Nikki De Costa? Dominic Cummings? Jacob Rees Mogg? Robert Buckland?" No one's apparently. Shameless. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We better add the 3 High Court Justices to the list then because they ruled against Mrs Miller as well. Intriguingly they actually are the three most senior judges in England and Wales but the High Court is outranked by the Supreme Court. " They did not think that it was justiciable because there is no precedent on the subject. New interpretation of law is only created by the Supreme Court. You knew that of course. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They did not think that it was justiciable because there is no precedent on the subject." I guess fighting a civil war and chopping the head off a king to settle the matter of the limits of Royal Prerogative is not enough precedent for the PM, AG and you then. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They did not think that it was justiciable because there is no precedent on the subject. I guess fighting a civil war and chopping the head off a king to settle the matter of the limits of Royal Prerogative is not enough precedent for the PM, AG and you then. "The English Parliament was abolished in 1707. It does not set precedent for the UK Parliament. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
