FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

LT General Riley and others. EU taking control of the UK's defences and inteligence. A catastrophic

Jump to newest
 

By *uck-Rogers OP   Man
over a year ago

Tarka trail

I seen this on youtude.

LT General Riley says. EU taking control of the uk's defences and intelligence, Would be a catastrophic risk.

What are your thoughts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district

Well, apart from us, France is the only EU country to spend NATO's recommended 2% of GDP on defence, so the EU really want us to defend them, while most EU nations spend their money on themselves.

We're in NATO. End of. There's no justification for an EU-wide Army, Navy or Air Force. Yes, standardise the kit where possible and co-operate but we don't want some German, French or Belgian general deploying our armed forces around, thanks.

In a generation or two, they'll be fighting one another again, as they have all throughout history. Next time we should just let them get on with it, as we should have done in WW1.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"we don't want some German, French or Belgian general deploying our armed forces around, thanks.

"

Clearly you don't know how NATO works.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"I seen this on youtude.

LT General Riley says. EU taking control of the uk's defences and intelligence, Would be a catastrophic risk.

What are your thoughts."

my thoughts are that since the UK actually has a legally recognised opt out on Defence issues.... that whoever is putting this out is trying to scare people....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evil_u_knowMan
over a year ago

city

I dont think any non Nato country expects defence from Russia from the UK.

Most of them just dont see Russia as a threat, and think the that America and UK make them a threat to justify spending.

Saying that.

UK is a five eyes country. Everyone knows this. They co-operate fully with CIA, and whatever the CIA says then Mi5, and Mi6 and British intelligence try make happen.

This is why UK went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and France said no. France is not a five eye country, UK is. UK had to.

So what would be different for the UK if they switched from Five Eyes to an EU system? well they could skip all the wars America is trying to start, could back away from Iran, could focus on building a system that protects the UK and not American interests.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I dont think any non Nato country expects defence from Russia from the UK.

Most of them just dont see Russia as a threat, and think the that America and UK make them a threat to justify spending.

Saying that.

UK is a five eyes country. Everyone knows this. They co-operate fully with CIA, and whatever the CIA says then Mi5, and Mi6 and British intelligence try make happen.

This is why UK went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and France said no. France is not a five eye country, UK is. UK had to.

So what would be different for the UK if they switched from Five Eyes to an EU system? well they could skip all the wars America is trying to start, could back away from Iran, could focus on building a system that protects the UK and not American interests."

Don't try talking common sense, they don't like it because it doesn't fit their narrative

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hetalkingstoveMan
over a year ago

London


"I dont think any non Nato country expects defence from Russia from the UK.

Most of them just dont see Russia as a threat, and think the that America and UK make them a threat to justify spending.

Saying that.

UK is a five eyes country. Everyone knows this. They co-operate fully with CIA, and whatever the CIA says then Mi5, and Mi6 and British intelligence try make happen.

This is why UK went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and France said no. France is not a five eye country, UK is. UK had to.

So what would be different for the UK if they switched from Five Eyes to an EU system? well they could skip all the wars America is trying to start, could back away from Iran, could focus on building a system that protects the UK and not American interests.

Don't try talking common sense, they don't like it because it doesn't fit their narrative "

Indeed. For Brexiteers, the questionable perception that Brussels tells us what to do is far, far worse than the reality that America tells us what to do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"I seen this on youtude.

LT General Riley says. EU taking control of the uk's defences and intelligence, Would be a catastrophic risk.

What are your thoughts."

Aliens landing on our planet and taking control of everyone's mind would be a catastrophic risk.

What are your thoughts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9bottMan
over a year ago

chester

[Removed by poster at 23/09/19 07:45:43]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9bottMan
over a year ago

chester

[Removed by poster at 23/09/19 07:46:47]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietbloke67Man
over a year ago

outside your bedroom window ;-)

I watched a guy tell me the world was flat and that we have been invaded by martians on youtube.

Personally I'd seek a better form of news broadcaster

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"I seen this on youtude.

LT General Riley says. EU taking control of the uk's defences and intelligence, Would be a catastrophic risk.

What are your thoughts."

Agree 100% but worse would be the current excuse for the labour party taking over this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top