Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" if the West finally wakes up and stops electing complete spunk trumpet war mongering so called liberals we'd be even better off. " If ever someone wants to know the perfect description of an Oxymoron | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think the US will attack Iran, or just encourage Saudi Arabia to attack?" Is there an election anywhere soon? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history..." Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Both Iran and Saudi Arabia have been allowed to get away with things and others have been scapegoated, and as long as the West is dependent on oil then they will continue to be allowed to get away with things." Just more reasons for us to concentrate on electric cars ect using alternative sources so we don’t have to rely on them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do" This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history..." Trump doesnt want a war in fact with an election coming he will do everything to avoid one.He stood on a mandate of not getting involved in any wars when he won and to change that stance would be political suicide. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history...Trump doesnt want a war in fact with an election coming he will do everything to avoid one.He stood on a mandate of not getting involved in any wars when he won and to change that stance would be political suicide. " He stood on a mandate of absolute nonsense. Of course he wants war. He works, as do all US presidents, directly for the oil, financial, and arms companies. War is extremely lucrative. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history...Trump doesnt want a war in fact with an election coming he will do everything to avoid one.He stood on a mandate of not getting involved in any wars when he won and to change that stance would be political suicide. He stood on a mandate of absolute nonsense. Of course he wants war. He works, as do all US presidents, directly for the oil, financial, and arms companies. War is extremely lucrative." Quite right, and he doesn't have anything else to campaign on. He's failed to deliver his other main campaign promises so why would he be bothered with ignoring this one? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think the US will attack Iran, or just encourage Saudi Arabia to attack?" One aspect nobody seems to be talking about much is how easy it was for Iran to cause so much damage in an attack against Saudi Arabia - a country equipped with the best kit and training the Western countries can sell it. It speaks to a level of military and intelligence unpreparedness bordering on incompetence. So, if there is - God forbid - a shooting war between Saudi Arabia and Iran; the US will, undoubtedly, involve itself to prevent a highly likely Saudi defeat. Let's hope cooler heads prevail. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting." If Benjy wins the Israeli election a air strike on Iran will be on the cards. The Corbynistas will go ape shit and anti-semitism will rock the Labour party again | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting. If Benjy wins the Israeli election a air strike on Iran will be on the cards. The Corbynistas will go ape shit and anti-semitism will rock the Labour party again" So you think there is a link between the US and Israel? Come on now....why would the Israelis want to be a proxy for the US? Read some history and you will discover that its all the fault of us and the french when we created arbitrary borders throughout the near and Middle East without taking any tribal or religious considerations into account. The anti semitism trope is tiresome. You might as well say why do so many jews vote conservative? And before you try and go all PC on me I have plenty of lovely jewish friends who actually dont like what Israel are doing either. My point is that you are just touting the same old hysterical bollocks that has been proven to be untrue. Corbyns biggest problem is that he doesn’t know how to do public relations and because he doesnt play the game with the press and keeps his cards close to his chest the press do everything in their power to undermine him. If you choose to follow that path too then more fool you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Iran needs flattening" Why? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More likely to do it themselves lets hope not it is a dangerous situation." Very... Ready to send our troops? I'm sure trompo won't be happy if we don't (this will be part of the great deal with the US). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think the US will attack Iran, or just encourage Saudi Arabia to attack?" I think that there are many people on all sides who are poking their enemies with red hot pokers. I also think that if any of this escalates, there is a very good chance that within a couple of hours or so the destruction which could be unleashed would be enough to turn planet Earth into planet Mars version 2. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting. If Benjy wins the Israeli election a air strike on Iran will be on the cards. The Corbynistas will go ape shit and anti-semitism will rock the Labour party again So you think there is a link between the US and Israel? Come on now....why would the Israelis want to be a proxy for the US? Read some history and you will discover that its all the fault of us and the french when we created arbitrary borders throughout the near and Middle East without taking any tribal or religious considerations into account. The anti semitism trope is tiresome. You might as well say why do so many jews vote conservative? And before you try and go all PC on me I have plenty of lovely jewish friends who actually dont like what Israel are doing either. My point is that you are just touting the same old hysterical bollocks that has been proven to be untrue. Corbyns biggest problem is that he doesn’t know how to do public relations and because he doesnt play the game with the press and keeps his cards close to his chest the press do everything in their power to undermine him. If you choose to follow that path too then more fool you. " . I know my history thank you very much and I know that the same people who failed to give the Palestinians a homeland at that time also buggered Ireland up. Easy enough to know why Israel will be a proxy for the US. Thanks for standing with them when the wall was built and for ignoring all UN resolutions condemning Israeli actions against the Palestinian people. Corbyn's biggest problem is his momentum brothers who hate anyone and everyone who do not follow their mode of thinking. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting. If Benjy wins the Israeli election a air strike on Iran will be on the cards. The Corbynistas will go ape shit and anti-semitism will rock the Labour party again So you think there is a link between the US and Israel? Come on now....why would the Israelis want to be a proxy for the US? Read some history and you will discover that its all the fault of us and the french when we created arbitrary borders throughout the near and Middle East without taking any tribal or religious considerations into account. The anti semitism trope is tiresome. You might as well say why do so many jews vote conservative? And before you try and go all PC on me I have plenty of lovely jewish friends who actually dont like what Israel are doing either. My point is that you are just touting the same old hysterical bollocks that has been proven to be untrue. Corbyns biggest problem is that he doesn’t know how to do public relations and because he doesnt play the game with the press and keeps his cards close to his chest the press do everything in their power to undermine him. If you choose to follow that path too then more fool you. . I know my history thank you very much and I know that the same people who failed to give the Palestinians a homeland at that time also buggered Ireland up. Easy enough to know why Israel will be a proxy for the US. Thanks for standing with them when the wall was built and for ignoring all UN resolutions condemning Israeli actions against the Palestinian people. Corbyn's biggest problem is his momentum brothers who hate anyone and everyone who do not follow their mode of thinking. " I was once given an explanation from a teacher about the whole middle east problem. It was very simplistic. Was the teacher in a simplistic manner, correct? Apparently, Britain (the UK, England etc) entered into World War 2 without being invaded. Britain (the UK, England etc) were hell bent on winning an argument they didn't start. In order to drum up support and stand a chance of winning, Britain (the UK, England etc) offered various middle eastern countries the opportunity to support Britain (the UK, England etc) by fighting against "the enemy". In return Britain (the UK, England etc) promised a slice of land (to call their own) to whichever country chose to fight in favour of Britain (the UK, England etc). Unfortunately, the offer proved to be a good one, and it turned out that Britain (the UK, England etc) had "won" the war. This presented a paradox to Britain (the UK, England etc) as multiple "countries" had helped Britain (the UK, England etc) to win the war. Multiple "countries" were therefore entitled to claim ownership of the small slice of land promised by Britain (the UK, England etc). But Britain (the UK, England etc) couldn't decide which of those "countries" to give the small slice of land to, the Britain (the UK, England etc) just threw their hands in the air and allowed all the claimant countries to fight over it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will the USA attack a country with nuclear weapons? With Trump in charge and him having given Saudi the say, I think so. Will the USA and Saudi win? I very much doubt it, the question is will anyone in the USA stop Trump before he starts a vanity (nuclear) war? I doubt it. I think the outcome is down to will Iran strike at Trump or his family and business? If they do then Trump will fold like a cheap suit, if not then CinC 'Bone-spurs' will be looking for any excuse to escalate. After all hard men who win wars win elections and get to rewrite history... Doubt Trump will but the Israelis could well do This. I think the USA will bankroll the Israelis, probably even provide support, but let them do all the hitting. If Benjy wins the Israeli election a air strike on Iran will be on the cards. The Corbynistas will go ape shit and anti-semitism will rock the Labour party again So you think there is a link between the US and Israel? Come on now....why would the Israelis want to be a proxy for the US? Read some history and you will discover that its all the fault of us and the french when we created arbitrary borders throughout the near and Middle East without taking any tribal or religious considerations into account. The anti semitism trope is tiresome. You might as well say why do so many jews vote conservative? And before you try and go all PC on me I have plenty of lovely jewish friends who actually dont like what Israel are doing either. My point is that you are just touting the same old hysterical bollocks that has been proven to be untrue. Corbyns biggest problem is that he doesn’t know how to do public relations and because he doesnt play the game with the press and keeps his cards close to his chest the press do everything in their power to undermine him. If you choose to follow that path too then more fool you. . I know my history thank you very much and I know that the same people who failed to give the Palestinians a homeland at that time also buggered Ireland up. Easy enough to know why Israel will be a proxy for the US. Thanks for standing with them when the wall was built and for ignoring all UN resolutions condemning Israeli actions against the Palestinian people. Corbyn's biggest problem is his momentum brothers who hate anyone and everyone who do not follow their mode of thinking. I was once given an explanation from a teacher about the whole middle east problem. It was very simplistic. Was the teacher in a simplistic manner, correct? Apparently, Britain (the UK, England etc) entered into World War 2 without being invaded. Britain (the UK, England etc) were hell bent on winning an argument they didn't start. In order to drum up support and stand a chance of winning, Britain (the UK, England etc) offered various middle eastern countries the opportunity to support Britain (the UK, England etc) by fighting against "the enemy". In return Britain (the UK, England etc) promised a slice of land (to call their own) to whichever country chose to fight in favour of Britain (the UK, England etc). Unfortunately, the offer proved to be a good one, and it turned out that Britain (the UK, England etc) had "won" the war. This presented a paradox to Britain (the UK, England etc) as multiple "countries" had helped Britain (the UK, England etc) to win the war. Multiple "countries" were therefore entitled to claim ownership of the small slice of land promised by Britain (the UK, England etc). But Britain (the UK, England etc) couldn't decide which of those "countries" to give the small slice of land to, the Britain (the UK, England etc) just threw their hands in the air and allowed all the claimant countries to fight over it." Try going back to 1916 and the Sykes-Picot agreement. The french and British divided up the Ottoman Empire by using straight lines on the map - colonialism at its finest! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Those Iranian cruise missiles and drones being shown by the Saudi’s on Sky News... Imagine the Iranians labelling their military hardware with Roman letters and numerals??? What the fuck????" I noticed that too... If one were really cynical one would be tempted to ask which US ships were in the area at the time they were launched? Or maybe look slightly further northeast at Israel and ask are they up to their old tricks, but Israel would have used Arabic script on the cases... LoL | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, I'm sure an invasion of Iran will be a picnic Trump won't go there. What he has done, however, is give the hard-liners in Iran the upper hand. The nuclear deal came about because the moderates held sway. The hard-liners said the US could not be trusted. In Iran, the hard-liners now have the upper hand. Trump walked away from it with no strategy. Now Iran progressively is reducing its commitment to it. Bolton got fired because he did not suck Trump's dick when Trump had a Kim moment and wanted talks. Sanctions or talks is Trump's only choice. Meanwhile, the alliances built up by Obama re Iran have evaporated. Netanyahu has been goading Trump to give Iran a bloody nose, not least to take attention away from the occupied territories. Trump started to distance himself from Netenyahu in the last few days. None of the choices facing him now are attractive, but that is a problem entirely of his own making. His loathing of anything with Obama's fingerprints on it appears to have blinded him to any rational strategic thinking on this issue." Thats what happens when you elect a racist sexist fuckwit to be your leader....I cant wait to see if Bojo will follow suit when we have the next GE | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think Tehran has seen if you have nukes you get more leverage. They need only to have observed what’s occurring with North Korea and the trump/Kim love in. If we assume nuclear weapons are a deterrent to war . Surely it’s a good enough deterrent for the USA and Russia to prevent war.Why not good enough for Iran . I wouldn’t be surprised if Iran demonstrated nuclear capabilities very soon in a test. The same modus operandi as the little North Korean guy. " Yes, except that Israel has stated it will never allow Iran to have Nukes. Therefore if Iran got close to producing or testing a Nuke, Israel would be doing a pre-emptive strike, don't know if that would be conventional or Nuke. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Israel views any neighbour developing nuclear weapons as an existential threat to Israel. However, it does not have the capability to launch a war against Iran. Iran's suspect sites are, not surprisingly, designed to survive conventional attack." If Israel thought that Iran was going to get Nukes and could not destroy them with conventional means what do you think they would use ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Israel views any neighbour developing nuclear weapons as an existential threat to Israel. However, it does not have the capability to launch a war against Iran. Iran's suspect sites are, not surprisingly, designed to survive conventional attack. If Israel thought that Iran was going to get Nukes and could not destroy them with conventional means what do you think they would use ? " It would be interesting to see what they would do given that the US invests so much money in Israel. Room for a little arm twisting if they get mad enough to do it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Israel views any neighbour developing nuclear weapons as an existential threat to Israel. However, it does not have the capability to launch a war against Iran. Iran's suspect sites are, not surprisingly, designed to survive conventional attack. If Israel thought that Iran was going to get Nukes and could not destroy them with conventional means what do you think they would use ? " The United States of America, through subterfuge, false flag attacks etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Israel views any neighbour developing nuclear weapons as an existential threat to Israel. However, it does not have the capability to launch a war against Iran. Iran's suspect sites are, not surprisingly, designed to survive conventional attack. If Israel thought that Iran was going to get Nukes and could not destroy them with conventional means what do you think they would use ? " The Ark of the Covenant dropped from Air Force One over Tehran with Trump as bomb aimer!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think the US will attack Iran, or just encourage Saudi Arabia to attack?" Why do that when they could just get ISIS, Taliban, Chechens, Mafia Godfathers, to do it for them and then blame it on anyone except America? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The fact is, if Israel was beginning to be overwhelmed in a war with another country, the US will more than level the playing field for them. This is a well known fact in US military circles. " Yep. They did it in 1973; partly to prevent the Israelis using their own nukes. If they ever actually do that, they'll make being anti-Semitic acceptable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |