FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Parliament

Jump to newest
 

By *andyPhucker OP   Man
over a year ago

normandy france

Sorry but really ? Parliament today surly it’s illegal??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Politics forum?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Sorry but really ? Parliament today surly it’s illegal?? "
How can it be illegal when it happens before every queens speech?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 28/08/19 22:19:01]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

"

It also sets bad legal precedents potentially allowing future governments to use this as a method for avoiding parliamentary scrutiny for more nefarious legislation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

"

Leavers only want Parliamentary sovereignty when it suits them and when it doesn't their happy with partial dictatorship to push their narrative until Parliamentary sovereignty suits them again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

It also sets bad legal precedents potentially allowing future governments to use this as a method for avoiding parliamentary scrutiny for more nefarious legislation"
It does not set a precedent for that its already been done before.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

It also sets bad legal precedents potentially allowing future governments to use this as a method for avoiding parliamentary scrutiny for more nefarious legislationIt does not set a precedent for that its already been done before."

Wrong.

It has never been dine for more than 3 weeks (boris is suggesting 5 weeks)

It has also never been dine at a time of such national upheaval when parliament was as indecisive as it is currently.

Therefore the precedent gets set that future PM's can use this as a tool to go around parliament.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Amber Rudd: “The most extraordinary idea I’ve ever heard.”

Sajid Javid: "You can't just shut down parliament."

Matt Hancock: "The end of the Conservative Party as a serious party of government."

Michael Gove: “It would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy.”

Nicky Morgan: “Clearly a mad idea.”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"It is the true purpose that is open to legal challenge.

No-one, except the most slavish follower of the Brexit cult, believes the reason being given.

If it is deemed the true purpose is to thwart the lawful exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty - you know, that thing Brexiteers made a song and dance about in 2016 - then it becomes an abuse of the power.

It also sets bad legal precedents potentially allowing future governments to use this as a method for avoiding parliamentary scrutiny for more nefarious legislationIt does not set a precedent for that its already been done before.

Wrong.

It has never been dine for more than 3 weeks (boris is suggesting 5 weeks)

It has also never been dine at a time of such national upheaval when parliament was as indecisive as it is currently.

Therefore the precedent gets set that future PM's can use this as a tool to go around parliament. "
the reality is that because of party confeences he is only closing it for four days,is it worth it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyPhucker OP   Man
over a year ago

normandy france

It’s a tad worrying as I move to France recently

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *V-AliceTV/TS
over a year ago

Ayr


"Sorry but really ? Parliament today surly it’s illegal?? "

It is legal. And don't call me Shirley.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It could be shut for 1appropriately timed day, if the real reason matched the claim. Even that should make anyone question the judgement of the PM, when the biggest change for generations is underway and when his party has spent 3 years without success to get a negotiated deal passed by parliament. This alone ought to make it very apparent that he is incompetent. Of course, the reality is that they are telling lies and deceiving the electorate as well as - presumably - the Queen.

It is gross misuse of power and a dereliction of duty by failing to secure the best interests of the country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ony 2016Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield /derby cinemas


"Amber Rudd: “The most extraordinary idea I’ve ever heard.”

Sajid Javid: "You can't just shut down parliament."

Matt Hancock: "The end of the Conservative Party as a serious party of government."

Michael Gove: “It would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy.”

Nicky Morgan: “Clearly a mad idea.”

"
. " I am not attracted to antiquated devices like proroguing parliament " ........ Boris Johnson

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ony 2016Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield /derby cinemas


"Amber Rudd: “The most extraordinary idea I’ve ever heard.”

Sajid Javid: "You can't just shut down parliament."

Matt Hancock: "The end of the Conservative Party as a serious party of government."

Michael Gove: “It would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy.”

Nicky Morgan: “Clearly a mad idea.”

. " I am not attracted to antiquated devices like proroguing parliament " ........ Boris Johnson "
. "You can't deliver democracy by trashing democracy , we are not electing a dictator for our country " ...... Said Javid ....... Who said this during the Tory leadership campaign , Javid is now in The Cabinet as Chancellor .. Will he do the honourable thing and resign from government ????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top