Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was actually 4 youths, not 3. Sentencing of the other youth is in a fortnight. They broke into a school, drank a bottle of vodka, played football and then trashed the exhibits. They were each given a 12 month referral order, which is the maximum that the Judge could give them. The £500 compensation order was given to each set of parents, maybe to remind them of their responsibilities. " So who pays for replacing or repairing the £30k of damage they caused? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was actually 4 youths, not 3. Sentencing of the other youth is in a fortnight. They broke into a school, drank a bottle of vodka, played football and then trashed the exhibits. They were each given a 12 month referral order, which is the maximum that the Judge could give them. The £500 compensation order was given to each set of parents, maybe to remind them of their responsibilities. " So, the message is that children can cause £30,000 of damage whilst it only costs them £1,500. Even Mr Ashley doesn't have that kind of profit mark up. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was actually 4 youths, not 3. Sentencing of the other youth is in a fortnight. They broke into a school, drank a bottle of vodka, played football and then trashed the exhibits. They were each given a 12 month referral order, which is the maximum that the Judge could give them. The £500 compensation order was given to each set of parents, maybe to remind them of their responsibilities. So who pays for replacing or repairing the £30k of damage they caused?" It seems that the victims get given £1,500 towards the £30,000. They just have to suck up a loss of £28,500 I guess. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust?" Keerching .Thats gonna pay for some nice little trains. Looks like winning to me...I’m pleased everyone got what they deserved. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust? Keerching .Thats gonna pay for some nice little trains. Looks like winning to me...I’m pleased everyone got what they deserved." The parents pay a paltry sum and the delinquents continue being arseholes... The money is there but the models need time and skill and effort to rebuild. Money can5 buy everything | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust? Keerching .Thats gonna pay for some nice little trains. Looks like winning to me...I’m pleased everyone got what they deserved. The parents pay a paltry sum and the delinquents continue being arseholes... The money is there but the models need time and skill and effort to rebuild. Money can5 buy everything " Agree. They should have given them community service helping repair and rebuild the damage with the people who built it initially. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust?" The unjust bit is the accused/guilty don't have the full amount to pay themselves. . . You cause £30K damage and justice is to repay £1500? That's not justice for the victims | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust? The unjust bit is the accused/guilty don't have the full amount to pay themselves. . . You cause £30K damage and justice is to repay £1500? That's not justice for the victims " Its not justice at all if its the parents who are paying. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure I understand this. The railway people now possess £108,500 towards the £30k cost of repairs. The culprits have been convicted. What is unjust? The unjust bit is the accused/guilty don't have the full amount to pay themselves. . . You cause £30K damage and justice is to repay £1500? That's not justice for the victims Its not justice at all if its the parents who are paying." Parents should be responsible for their children up to age 18. . . That includes their children's actions. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Model Railway Society, whose property was damaged, are going to use surplus donated money to assist youth groups and projects. " Good idea Let’s look at why this happened and try and prevent it happening again. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Model Railway Society, whose property was damaged, are going to use surplus donated money to assist youth groups and projects. Good idea Let’s look at why this happened and try and prevent it happening again. " It's very simple, the parents of the children failed to ensure that their children were wrapped up snug and sound in bed. But the adults responsible for the children reckon that they are irresponsible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |