Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anybody watch it? How come the Dems can't find a half sane halfwit to run to at least challenge trump, they must have scoured the mental institutions really hard to find that bunch." the problem at the moment is where i like choice, at the moment there is too much choice and at this stage they don't tget the time to really shine ... to qualify for the next set of debates the threshold is much much higher i reckon you are going to be looking at 8-9 people tops... I expect a lot of the candidates to drop out in the next few weeks... last night was very "policy heavy" which i think was not a bad thing..... i think tonight is to be more attacking each other... i still have 8 months till i vote in the primaries... but i have have narrowed it down to about 3 i am really interested in... I think because i live here... medicare for all isn't the controversial topic, because what they are basically talking about is having a sort of "NHS"..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? " i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Imagine trying to evict him from the White House if he loses. He'll barricade himself in and spit dummies in every direction. " They find out where he was and what he was wearing the night before he was elected potus. Drug him and reset the scene. When he wakes up tell him it was all a dream  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! " Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic "Is he not allowed to attack people ? Even if they are attack worthy, just because the colour of their skin ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? " I think she is. I quite like bernie sanders, not sure if he's age is a problem. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic
Is he not allowed to attack people ? Even if they are attack worthy, just because the colour of their skin ? "If their race is purely incidental | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic
Is he not allowed to attack people ? Even if they are attack worthy, just because the colour of their skin ?
If their race is purely incidental"Well their race is never brought up when he attacks white people so don’t see why it is an issue really | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic
Is he not allowed to attack people ? Even if they are attack worthy, just because the colour of their skin ?
If their race is purely incidental
Well their race is never brought up when he attacks white people so don’t see why it is an issue really "If incidental they're white.. No. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's your thoughts on trump _abio? You think he'll get another term in office? i think there are scenario's where the dem could win the popular vote by over 5 million, but trump wins the electoral college... remember clinton won the popular vote by 3 mil.. and she was polarising... this election is going to be won in "big 10" country... the midwest.... trump won michigan by 10,000... Wisconsin by 17,000 and pennsylania by 45,000 16 college votes in michigan, 10 in wisconsin, 20 in penn clinton wins those 3... she wins the election.... republicans hadn't won those 3 states in a generation, pennsylvania to republicans is like texas to dems.... as its the one state they think they can win but never did..... in the midterms... trump got crushed in all 3 of those states, because the people who stayed at home in 16 (especially in detroit and milwaukee) came out in 18.... it depends on who ends up defending where... come back and ask me in 6 months...... because i think what trump is trying to do by keeping on attacking black folks is surpressing the vote.... but if black people get pissed off and come out in obama like numbers... trump is done! Thanks. Pretty sleazy way to get re elected if thats his tactic
Is he not allowed to attack people ? Even if they are attack worthy, just because the colour of their skin ?
If their race is purely incidental
Well their race is never brought up when he attacks white people so don’t see why it is an issue really
If incidental they're white.. No. "Cool I’m sure he will be fine then | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? " tulsi is an interesting one... very much to the left like bernie, but she is actually way more of a hawk than a dove on syria and iran... plus she had some very iffy views in the past on LGBT issues.... she has basically been squeezed out of the progressive lane by Sanders and Warren... could absolutely see her ending up being someones "sec of defense" in the next democratic led administration | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I heard in the debates were moderators cutting off the candidates before they had time to make or answer points." Think the only winner was Trump really | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sign me up to the Yang Gang. He saw the whole pantomime for what it was. Shame he’s not got a chance. " Yang's cool. Glad to see he wants to atleast shift the discussion to job losses and automation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? tulsi is an interesting one... very much to the left like bernie, but she is actually way more of a hawk than a dove on syria and iran... plus she had some very iffy views in the past on LGBT issues.... she has basically been squeezed out of the progressive lane by Sanders and Warren... could absolutely see her ending up being someones "sec of defense" in the next democratic led administration " I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it." When did being a hawk become bad? To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. The question is do hawks make good leaders, not are they good or bad. I like neutral leaders who build administrations that balance political doves and hawks who each have competent professional staff (diplomats and military) to guide them. I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? tulsi is an interesting one... very much to the left like bernie, but she is actually way more of a hawk than a dove on syria and iran... plus she had some very iffy views in the past on LGBT issues.... she has basically been squeezed out of the progressive lane by Sanders and Warren... could absolutely see her ending up being someones "sec of defense" in the next democratic led administration I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it." Don’t be silly, I think the dems tactics of everything in the world is free, get rid of cars and planes, socialism, open borders ,8 and a half month abortions and calling everyone a racist is doing fine | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it. When did being a hawk become bad? To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. The question is do hawks make good leaders, not are they good or bad. I like neutral leaders who build administrations that balance political doves and hawks who each have competent professional staff (diplomats and military) to guide them. I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power." So basically your saying in every government/administration you need a hitler as a strong influence?? Well that’s controversial and certainly not for me sorry | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So basically your saying in every government/administration you need a hitler as a strong influence?? Well that’s controversial and certainly not for me sorry" OMG! How wrong can anyone be, both in you reading of what I have said and in what you claim to be your preferred government/administration. One thing history teaches us is that states that are lead and guided by pacifists quickly become provinces of other states. Just as states that are lead and guided by warmongers are never stable. The trick is to have neutral leaders who can use and control both hawks and doves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So basically your saying in every government/administration you need a hitler as a strong influence?? Well that’s controversial and certainly not for me sorry OMG! How wrong can anyone be, both in you reading of what I have said and in what you claim to be your preferred government/administration. One thing history teaches us is that states that are lead and guided by pacifists quickly become provinces of other states. Just as states that are lead and guided by warmongers are never stable. The trick is to have neutral leaders who can use and control both hawks and doves." And I quote “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ YOUR example of a hawk was hitler Urrrrrmmm ok hitler lover get a room | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And I quote “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ YOUR example of a hawk was hitler Urrrrrmmm ok hitler lover get a room " Shame you are unable to understand a simple sentence. I said: I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power. The example was perfect, one was a militarist leader who destroyed Germany and most of Europe, the other a pacifist leader who nearly caused the destruction of the UK because he was unwilling to stand up to the first. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And I quote “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ YOUR example of a hawk was hitler Urrrrrmmm ok hitler lover get a room Shame you are unable to understand a simple sentence. I said: I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power. The example was perfect, one was a militarist leader who destroyed Germany and most of Europe, the other a pacifist leader who nearly caused the destruction of the UK because he was unwilling to stand up to the first. " Please let me know,, did you say ??? “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ ??? Was YOUR example of a hawk hitler ??? 2 questions for you buddy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And I quote “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ YOUR example of a hawk was hitler Urrrrrmmm ok hitler lover get a room Shame you are unable to understand a simple sentence. I said: I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power. The example was perfect, one was a militarist leader who destroyed Germany and most of Europe, the other a pacifist leader who nearly caused the destruction of the UK because he was unwilling to stand up to the first. Please let me know,, did you say ??? “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ ??? Was YOUR example of a hawk hitler ??? 2 questions for you buddy " I think the point was that it's good to have someone with a militaristic viewpoint in a position of INFLUENCE, but not actually bloody running the show. Or yes, there is a distinct possibility of them sacking all steadying voices, surrounding themselves with an echo chamber of similar viewpoints, overriding all dissent and heading towards totalitarian control. Putin. Mao. Kim. Franco. Stalin. And yes the ultimate example Hitler. On the other hand whenever there is a totally lovey dovey absolute pacifist governing body, it quickly gets wiped out by the first internal or external threat. I can't even think of any examples, probably because they didn't survive long enough to get into the history books. Long term effective and successful government that serves the people instead of squashing them, only happens when it includes a balance of hawkish (but not bloody lunatic) and doveish voices. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And I quote “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ YOUR example of a hawk was hitler Urrrrrmmm ok hitler lover get a room Shame you are unable to understand a simple sentence. I said: I believe problems arise when leaders are doves (Chamberlain) or hawks (Hitler) because both will reject any advice/warnings that do not conform to their beliefs about the use of power. The example was perfect, one was a militarist leader who destroyed Germany and most of Europe, the other a pacifist leader who nearly caused the destruction of the UK because he was unwilling to stand up to the first. Please let me know,, did you say ??? “ To run an effective government/administration you need at least 1 hawk in a position of strong influence. “ ??? Was YOUR example of a hawk hitler ??? 2 questions for you buddy I think the point was that it's good to have someone with a militaristic viewpoint in a position of INFLUENCE, but not actually bloody running the show. Or yes, there is a distinct possibility of them sacking all steadying voices, surrounding themselves with an echo chamber of similar viewpoints, overriding all dissent and heading towards totalitarian control. Putin. Mao. Kim. Franco. Stalin. And yes the ultimate example Hitler. On the other hand whenever there is a totally lovey dovey absolute pacifist governing body, it quickly gets wiped out by the first internal or external threat. I can't even think of any examples, probably because they didn't survive long enough to get into the history books. Long term effective and successful government that serves the people instead of squashing them, only happens when it includes a balance of hawkish (but not bloody lunatic) and doveish voices. " So you also think there is a place for hitler to have a position of INFLUENCE with in government??? Wow So trump no, but Hitler yes ??? You 2 are something else, count me out of that can’t see how anyone can condone someone or use as a positive example someone who killed millions | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You 2 are something else, count me out of that can’t see how anyone can condone someone or use as a positive example someone who killed millions " Guess you also feel the same way about Churchill. After all he casually left at least a million Indians to starve in the Bengal famine of 1943 because he was unwilling to open rice stores or divert any materials earmarked for the war effort to feed the Indian population effected by the drought that hit India. You will no doubt be even harsher in your condemnation of Robert Peel who killed off around 1 million Irish Catholics (around 25% of the Irish population) and causing the same number to emigrate to the USA. Or do you consider those 2 hawks great British patriots and therefore above your scorn? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Don’t be silly, I think the dems tactics of everything in the world is free, get rid of cars and planes, socialism, open borders ,8 and a half month abortions and calling everyone a racist is doing fine " well done the welsh guy!!!! almost all the alt-right talking points rounded up in one point.... and actually. very little of it true... the late term abortion thing is a myth... it would actually be the same term limits that are here in the UK open borders isn't true... they are just getting again the trump administration to adhere to the same international standards... like the UK for example everything in the world being free... you mean like education (which is in most western nations.. and is in scotland, norther ireland and wales).. and healthcare (you mean like... erm... the NHS!) getting rid of cars and planes.... you mean like signing up to agreements like the paris climate change agreement... and setting targets like the uk of getting rid of diesel cars by 2040.... and as for the racist stuff.... i let what he says speak for itself... you might not believe its racists.... but if the racists think you are racist, and you are speaking to them... then you have a problem p.s.... yes its racist! you aren't the intended target, i am! you can make all the excuses you want... but when you ever get "go home" spoken to you with venom... then you might understand..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? tulsi is an interesting one... very much to the left like bernie, but she is actually way more of a hawk than a dove on syria and iran... plus she had some very iffy views in the past on LGBT issues.... she has basically been squeezed out of the progressive lane by Sanders and Warren... could absolutely see her ending up being someones "sec of defense" in the next democratic led administration I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it. Don’t be silly, I think the dems tactics of everything in the world is free, get rid of cars and planes, socialism, open borders ,8 and a half month abortions and calling everyone a racist is doing fine " Can you name me 6 dem politicians who all conform to those exact policy ideas? Otherwise you might just be playing the collectivistic game. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Don’t be silly, I think the dems tactics of everything in the world is free, get rid of cars and planes, socialism, open borders ,8 and a half month abortions and calling everyone a racist is doing fine well done the welsh guy!!!! almost all the alt-right talking points rounded up in one point.... and actually. very little of it true... the late term abortion thing is a myth... it would actually be the same term limits that are here in the UK open borders isn't true... they are just getting again the trump administration to adhere to the same international standards... like the UK for example everything in the world being free... you mean like education (which is in most western nations.. and is in scotland, norther ireland and wales).. and healthcare (you mean like... erm... the NHS!) getting rid of cars and planes.... you mean like signing up to agreements like the paris climate change agreement... and setting targets like the uk of getting rid of diesel cars by 2040.... and as for the racist stuff.... i let what he says speak for itself... you might not believe its racists.... but if the racists think you are racist, and you are speaking to them... then you have a problem p.s.... yes its racist! you aren't the intended target, i am! you can make all the excuses you want... but when you ever get "go home" spoken to you with venom... then you might understand..... " Lol it’s laughable those comments, that’s dems in a nutshell, And sorry remind me the tweet that trump aimed at you ? Or how your the intended target ,, mate it’s a joke can’t simply label someone a racist because you don’t like them , that’s almost worse And what email had venom Do you mean the email that said “ come back “ lol Nazis above but you focus on trying to make out trump is a bad person | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is tulsi gabbard still going and is she a serious contender? tulsi is an interesting one... very much to the left like bernie, but she is actually way more of a hawk than a dove on syria and iran... plus she had some very iffy views in the past on LGBT issues.... she has basically been squeezed out of the progressive lane by Sanders and Warren... could absolutely see her ending up being someones "sec of defense" in the next democratic led administration I know being a Hawk is bad and all, especially if you're a bit all gun blazing over it, but strategically would it not be good to get her to the top job. I mean American's seem overly patriotic about their military. She'd kind of give the Dems a bigger monopoly on the patriot card. I don't like this as a strategy, but the Rights plays people's emotions well, might be time to use their own game play against them. Or at least negate it. Don’t be silly, I think the dems tactics of everything in the world is free, get rid of cars and planes, socialism, open borders ,8 and a half month abortions and calling everyone a racist is doing fine " . Actually they want abortion legalised at birth | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth "Please do give some evidence for that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. "Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something Or stick to fb it’s up to you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you "So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha."Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you "Is this the Kathy Tran bill? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it"Translation: "I heard an alt-right talking point about Democrats and abortion and didn't bother to check whether it was true, I guess I'll just blather about facebook instead" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it"the abortion thing..... that the right like to keep talking about... lets get some facts straight... it was one state... virginia... Under current Virginia law, third-trimester abortions are only permitted if the risk to the mother's life is "substantial and irremediable" - language that Democrats wanted removed. The Democratic bill sought to allow for late-term abortions if the mother's physical or mental safety were at risk . the bill failed to make it out of committee stage...... so...... care to tell everyone what alabama did with regard to abortion law..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it
Translation:
"I heard an alt-right talking point about Democrats and abortion and didn't bother to check whether it was true, I guess I'll just blather about facebook instead""Plenty of articles and videos to look at if can just log off fb and have a look mate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it
Translation:
"I heard an alt-right talking point about Democrats and abortion and didn't bother to check whether it was true, I guess I'll just blather about facebook instead"
Plenty of articles and videos to look at if can just log off fb and have a look mate"Sigh. OK little buddy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. ". https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E Gov Ralph northam The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby. It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
"There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. ". You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth. And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it). That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it
Translation:
"I heard an alt-right talking point about Democrats and abortion and didn't bother to check whether it was true, I guess I'll just blather about facebook instead"
Plenty of articles and videos to look at if can just log off fb and have a look mate
Sigh. OK little buddy. "Failure to prepare is preparing to fail Don’t be so lazy do so research sweet cheeks, you might learn something x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that.
Google is your friend mate, can’t get all your information from word of mouth or fb, never know might learn something
Or stick to fb it’s up to you
So you don't have any evidence then. Gotcha.
Can’t do everything for you sorry, simple internet search mate, but to be fair you probably didn’t know as doubt fb talked about it
the abortion thing..... that the right like to keep talking about... lets get some facts straight...
it was one state... virginia...
Under current Virginia law, third-trimester abortions are only permitted if the risk to the mother's life is "substantial and irremediable" - language that Democrats wanted removed.
The Democratic bill sought to allow for late-term abortions if the mother's physical or mental safety were at risk .
the bill failed to make it out of committee stage......
so...... care to tell everyone what alabama did with regard to abortion law....."Ok so your saying democrats aren’t against late term abortion, please look into the following and see what they think: Beto O’Rourke Cory Booker Steve Bullock Pete Buttigieg Julian Castro John Delaney Kristen Gillibrand Any Klobuchar Bernie Sanders Barack Obama In 2003 said, he suggested that the government should not restrict late-term abortion at all. And I quote The issue of late-term abortion is certainly not a made-up issue. There are more late-term abortions than gun homicides committed annually in the United States. And according to a 2013 study, conducted by professors at the University of California, San Francisco, “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Just last month, BuzzFeed News profiled a healthy woman who aborted her healthy baby at 21 weeks, mere days before the child was old enough to survive outside the womb. You’re welcome | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power."You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. ". You seen unable to be proved wrong. Man up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up."You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this. The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up.
You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this.
The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies.
"Does seem that quite a lot of democrat presidential candidates don’t seem to be against third trimester abortions mind ? And not for the mothers health for example Yes unfortunately you may need to look into this sorry. I know it’s not something you like doing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think many people need to step back and look at the anti abortion ('pro life' as they like to call themselves) movement with a very critical eye. Let me point out some inconsistencies in the movement: Also pro capital punishment for children. Also anti single payer (government supplied health care) and therefore pro babies and mothers dying because they cant afford neonatal healthcare. Also pro removal of state and federal welfare programs, so pro starving the poor. When one looks at the anti-abortion movement in the round it is clear they are not pro life at all, and what they really are is pro males having total control of women's reproduction, just like Islamic fundamentalists. They are in fact dark age Puritan Christians and need to be consigned to history rather than supported." What would your mate hitler done ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What would your mate hitler done ?" And blocked... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What would your mate hitler done ? And blocked..." Stand by your words my friend, you said it own it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Ok so your saying democrats aren’t against late term abortion, please look into the following and see what they think: Beto O’Rourke Cory Booker Steve Bullock Pete Buttigieg Julian Castro John Delaney Kristen Gillibrand Any Klobuchar Bernie Sanders Barack Obama In 2003 said, he suggested that the government should not restrict late-term abortion at all. And I quote The issue of late-term abortion is certainly not a made-up issue. There are more late-term abortions than gun homicides committed annually in the United States. And according to a 2013 study, conducted by professors at the University of California, San Francisco, “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Just last month, BuzzFeed News profiled a healthy woman who aborted her healthy baby at 21 weeks, mere days before the child was old enough to survive outside the womb. You’re welcome " actually... you'll find that all there positions is not to more abortion laws from there it is currently set... which is why people turn around and look at the likes of alabama, missouri, mississippi, ohio and other republican lead state administrations to get round Roe vs Wade.... so yeah... if you are going to lie.... own the lie! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up.
You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this.
The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies.
Does seem that quite a lot of democrat presidential candidates don’t seem to be against third trimester abortions mind ? And not for the mothers health for example
Yes unfortunately you may need to look into this sorry. I know it’s not something you like doing "You're talking absolute drivel as usual. It's absolutely about the mother's health. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up.
You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this.
The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies.
Does seem that quite a lot of democrat presidential candidates don’t seem to be against third trimester abortions mind ? And not for the mothers health for example
Yes unfortunately you may need to look into this sorry. I know it’s not something you like doing
You're talking absolute drivel as usual. It's absolutely about the mother's health. "Not if you know what stance they have on third trimester abortion, but guess you haven’t looked into that lol No surprise there then, please fb tell me what to think lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Ok so your saying democrats aren’t against late term abortion, please look into the following and see what they think: Beto O’Rourke Cory Booker Steve Bullock Pete Buttigieg Julian Castro John Delaney Kristen Gillibrand Any Klobuchar Bernie Sanders Barack Obama In 2003 said, he suggested that the government should not restrict late-term abortion at all. And I quote The issue of late-term abortion is certainly not a made-up issue. There are more late-term abortions than gun homicides committed annually in the United States. And according to a 2013 study, conducted by professors at the University of California, San Francisco, “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Just last month, BuzzFeed News profiled a healthy woman who aborted her healthy baby at 21 weeks, mere days before the child was old enough to survive outside the womb. You’re welcome actually... you'll find that all there positions is not to more abortion laws from there it is currently set... which is why people turn around and look at the likes of alabama, missouri, mississippi, ohio and other republican lead state administrations to get round Roe vs Wade.... so yeah... if you are going to lie.... own the lie! "Mate it’s completely fine to admit you haven’t looked into these DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES stance on third trimester abortion, that’s cool It’s takes a lot of time to find the info it’s cool. Well it dosent really I’m just trying to give you an out, and no it’s not about the well fair of the mother either. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up.
You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this.
The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies.
Does seem that quite a lot of democrat presidential candidates don’t seem to be against third trimester abortions mind ? And not for the mothers health for example
Yes unfortunately you may need to look into this sorry. I know it’s not something you like doing
You're talking absolute drivel as usual. It's absolutely about the mother's health.
Not if you know what stance they have on third trimester abortion, but guess you haven’t looked into that lol
No surprise there then, please fb tell me what to think lol"You in every single post: "I'm right but I can't state any facts or evidence to back up my claims, so I'll just go on about Facebook instead" My 2 year old niece could put up a better level of debate. I think we're done here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually they want abortion legalised at birth
Please do give some evidence for that. .
https://youtu.be/_xD8cPgcZ3E
Gov Ralph northam
The baby will be born, the baby could be resuscitated and then a decision will be made between the mother and the physician on killing said baby.
It's progress baby, well unless you're a baby
There were some confused comments from Northam, but what you write there is not what the bill in question says. .
You seemed confused, I wrote they want to see abortion legalised at birth.
And there is a democratic governor actually saying that (many others have also said it).
That's the progressives end game if they ever achieve power.
You seem dishonest. That is not the Democrat party position. You're taking some unclear comments and stretching them outside of what the facts say. .
You seen unable to be proved wrong.
Man up.
You haven't proved anything other than that there was stoked up controversy and confusion about this.
The part of the bill concerning third trimester abortions was about reducing the number of doctors required to certify it, and allowing abortions in the case of threat to the mother's health - which we have in this country also. You should probably get on to the UK government and ask why they're killing so many babies.
Does seem that quite a lot of democrat presidential candidates don’t seem to be against third trimester abortions mind ? And not for the mothers health for example
Yes unfortunately you may need to look into this sorry. I know it’s not something you like doing
You're talking absolute drivel as usual. It's absolutely about the mother's health.
Not if you know what stance they have on third trimester abortion, but guess you haven’t looked into that lol
No surprise there then, please fb tell me what to think lol
You in every single post:
"I'm right but I can't state any facts or evidence to back up my claims, so I'll just go on about Facebook instead"
My 2 year old niece could put up a better level of debate.
I think we're done here. "Really ? Wow your not very good at this are you ? Sorry mate but I look at the research, if I put it down on here what every article I read it would would take to long to quote all sources. ( none of them are fb by the way sorry ) If you look at the thread you can see the names I’ve mentioned, surely you can scroll up at least Maybe I gave you to much credit of being able to look at both sides and research, so I’m sorry that’s my fault. Maybe type in the names and look at there stance on third trimester abortion. Lazy is not the word Open your eyes and heart, yes the world is shit some of the time but it’s also beautiful also, don’t let hate win Good luck sweet cheeks x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Ok so your saying democrats aren’t against late term abortion, please look into the following and see what they think: Beto O’Rourke Cory Booker Steve Bullock Pete Buttigieg Julian Castro John Delaney Kristen Gillibrand Any Klobuchar Bernie Sanders Barack Obama In 2003 said, he suggested that the government should not restrict late-term abortion at all. And I quote The issue of late-term abortion is certainly not a made-up issue. There are more late-term abortions than gun homicides committed annually in the United States. And according to a 2013 study, conducted by professors at the University of California, San Francisco, “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Just last month, BuzzFeed News profiled a healthy woman who aborted her healthy baby at 21 weeks, mere days before the child was old enough to survive outside the womb. You’re welcome actually... you'll find that all there positions is not to more abortion laws from there it is currently set... which is why people turn around and look at the likes of alabama, missouri, mississippi, ohio and other republican lead state administrations to get round Roe vs Wade.... so yeah... if you are going to lie.... own the lie!
Mate it’s completely fine to admit you haven’t looked into these DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES stance on third trimester abortion, that’s cool
It’s takes a lot of time to find the info it’s cool. Well it dosent really I’m just trying to give you an out, and no it’s not about the well fair of the mother either."so which ones of those candidates have said they would change the position from what is currently held under roe vs wade... legitimate news source please... and not one of your alt right websites... look.. you can continue to press the lies... i'll just keep calling you out on them! you talked shit so far... then added another pile.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Ok so your saying democrats aren’t against late term abortion, please look into the following and see what they think: Beto O’Rourke Cory Booker Steve Bullock Pete Buttigieg Julian Castro John Delaney Kristen Gillibrand Any Klobuchar Bernie Sanders Barack Obama In 2003 said, he suggested that the government should not restrict late-term abortion at all. And I quote The issue of late-term abortion is certainly not a made-up issue. There are more late-term abortions than gun homicides committed annually in the United States. And according to a 2013 study, conducted by professors at the University of California, San Francisco, “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Just last month, BuzzFeed News profiled a healthy woman who aborted her healthy baby at 21 weeks, mere days before the child was old enough to survive outside the womb. You’re welcome actually... you'll find that all there positions is not to more abortion laws from there it is currently set... which is why people turn around and look at the likes of alabama, missouri, mississippi, ohio and other republican lead state administrations to get round Roe vs Wade.... so yeah... if you are going to lie.... own the lie!
Mate it’s completely fine to admit you haven’t looked into these DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES stance on third trimester abortion, that’s cool
It’s takes a lot of time to find the info it’s cool. Well it dosent really I’m just trying to give you an out, and no it’s not about the well fair of the mother either.
so which ones of those candidates have said they would change the position from what is currently held under roe vs wade...
legitimate news source please... and not one of your alt right websites...
look.. you can continue to press the lies... i'll just keep calling you out on them!
you talked shit so far... then added another pile....
"Lol so you admit you haven’t looked for yourself, I’m laughing but to be fair not really surprised as you seem to get almost everything wrong So I’ve got to post a link for everyone I’ve mentioned lol that would be wayyyyy to many links I will help you out mr lazy, type in the name and add late term abortion after it, click search and go through the results, may take a little searching as won’t always be link 1 or 2 but it’s there. Took me a long time to do it but as you see I haven’t put down every democrat presidential candidate as not all of them have this stance. It’s called research and thinking for yourself Good luck buddy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
so again... please supply legitimate news sources that the position of ANY democratic candidate is to move from the position of where "Roe vs Wade" currently lies...... thank you... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why should i be the one to look.... you are the one making the allegations, you should be the one to produce the proof to substaniate your claims... I am turn around an say... the sky is green, and if you asked me for proof and i was to say "well look it up for yourself" i'd look silly... I know that none of the candidiates have moved for the situation that they see the law under roe vs wade as settled law... and they would not change it.... you are saying that is not true... so i am asking you for proof... if you were so cock-sure you could prove it, you'd have had the links up by now....
so again... please supply legitimate news sources that the position of ANY democratic candidate is to move from the position of where "Roe vs Wade" currently lies...... thank you..."Ok wow what an interesting hour searching the Internet I’ve had ( no porn I may add ) As honestly I didn’t know about roe v Wade, so I had a look at what it was and how it worked. I then can see that we were both right that yes the dems stand by roe v wade but that does include late term abortions I looked more into it Then looked at planned parenthood and who they were and seen how much they fund the dems ,,, and it’s a hell of a lot, a lot lot ,, also they are tax exempt https://www.factcheck.org/2018/05/planned-parenthood-2/ So then ok is there a link to this and how the dems candidates “ current stance “ on abortion O good god yes there was ,, shit there was and seems like all is not what it seems and why they all sing off the same hymn sheet Please read the link below, all of it, the start is very dry and all about stats but good god does it open up ,,,,, shit https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/435624-2020-dems-stances-abortion-unjust-and-ignorant%3famp Please refer to some of the following: The senators who are now running for president Beto O’Rourke and sex selective abortions Kampala Harris hypocrisy John Delaney,,, just wow Cory Booker, opposes the Partial-Birth abortion ban act ( that is definitely worth looking up ) https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.nationalreview.com/corner/cory-booker-lies-about-his-abortion-extremism-marjorie-dannenfelser/amp/ So yes they all support late term abortion and roe v wade but fucking hell we can now see why due to there funding and we can see what they really believe in behind close doors | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"see... here is the position of every single candidate that has said they were running for president in 2020.... in one handy article.... https://www.vox.com/2019/6/22/18693279/abortion-rights-2020-democrats-hyde-amendment-roe and the thing you are criticising... the weird thing is that the UK abortion law allows for termination at the same point as US law.... So when you have a "go" remember that the UK doesn't hold the power of moral authority here... and as for planned parenthood... just how much did you really look into them, because they are the Biggest provider of ALL sorts of womens repoductive and health services in the US, they don't just deal with abortion advice... they is just a small part of what they do.... they basically do everything women related the NHS takes care off... from cancer, to IVF, to menopause, gynocology, maternity services ect ect ect and they get zero federal funding.... so it weird that men get federal funding for things like... lets say ED and Viagra, but women don't.... or is that just "men looking out for men!" " As I said we were both correct, but what is quite clear is before most put their name into the presidential candidate hat they had very very different views on abortion. But of course to be a dem candidate they had to change “ their views “ to fit in with planned parenthood who is a huge donator to the party So yes to the camera they say the same but really that’s not what they think So Beto was happy to have a babies aborted if it wasn’t the sex they wanted along with Harris and Warren John Delaney loosening abortion rights after vids came about of planned parenthood harvesting and sellings body parts of aborted babies And the senators now candidates who voted against Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. This act would would have ensured babies that survive abortions are given appropriate medical care. Let’s not forget Cory Booker who told Planned Parenthood that he "oppose[s] the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act," signaling his support for the (currently illegal) practice of killing children as they are born. I guess your happy with all the above yeah ?? Does seem that money talks and for a few mill you can make the dems say what you like | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Does seem that money talks and for a few mill you can make the dems say what you like " I don't like what you are insinuating... but i'll let it slide... just because if i was to replace "dems" withs "republicans"...... and "planned parenthood" with "NRA"..... this would be a truer relationship would it not? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Does seem that money talks and for a few mill you can make the dems say what you like I don't like what you are insinuating... but i'll let it slide... just because if i was to replace "dems" withs "republicans"...... and "planned parenthood" with "NRA"..... this would be a truer relationship would it not?" Yeeeeesssss woo hoo change the subject lol, well I guess that’s over with then, better luck next time Let it slide lol , I’m just want to know if these are the kind of people you support ? Yes I’m fully aware of the NRA and the republicans but as I’m Welsh US politics makes no difference to me I’m neither for dems, reps, trump or any of the candidates it makes no difference to my life I only stick up for people who are being unfairly treated or lied about, that would include you also . But as you unfairly bash trump I’m happy to prove you wrong every time or point out the bad things and facts that you seen to defend and hold dear To be fair you could say I’m helping you to be a better person | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not changing that all... just showing you two can play the game you are playing.... and since you like to spout right wing diatribes that aren't true.... i'll tell you the same thing i told centy, as i told peacehaven, and i tell anyone who like to twist facts.... if you site "bs".... i'll call you out on it... pure and simple... so rather than come out with alt-right/right wing/fox news talking points you parrot..... if you come out with an actually individual thought rather than just going all over the map, and you can argue that rational though with source... then converse... but if you just spout shit that isn't true... i'll come at you harder than a wall of bricks.... "Lol so you’ve completely let go of your abortion debate loss then lol Play the game I’m playing ? I haven’t changed the subject once, mate your looking a little silly now dude Right wing lol I would call out and embarrass people who lie about anything including lies about you, the left or anything, like I’ve embarrassed you Fox News and giving you facts and sauces ??? What about the 3 I gave you earlier none of them were from Fox ,, your so bad at this lol Harder than a wall of bricks lol you sound like a typical leftist fairy, don’t make me laugh We have debated a few times and every single time I’ve proved you wrong with fact or exposed you beliefs ,, every time you suddenly go quiet or like this time you look really silly If it’s ok can I refer to you as Mr CNN as you sound like don lemon | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not changing that all... just showing you two can play the game you are playing.... and since you like to spout right wing diatribes that aren't true.... i'll tell you the same thing i told centy, as i told peacehaven, and i tell anyone who like to twist facts.... if you site "bs".... i'll call you out on it... pure and simple... so rather than come out with alt-right/right wing/fox news talking points you parrot..... if you come out with an actually individual thought rather than just going all over the map, and you can argue that rational though with source... then converse... but if you just spout shit that isn't true... i'll come at you harder than a wall of bricks....
Lol so you’ve completely let go of your abortion debate loss then lol
Play the game I’m playing ? I haven’t changed the subject once, mate your looking a little silly now dude
Right wing lol I would call out and embarrass people who lie about anything including lies about you, the left or anything, like I’ve embarrassed you
Fox News and giving you facts and sauces ??? What about the 3 I gave you earlier none of them were from Fox ,, your so bad at this lol
Harder than a wall of bricks lol you sound like a typical leftist fairy, don’t make me laugh
We have debated a few times and every single time I’ve proved you wrong with fact or exposed you beliefs ,, every time you suddenly go quiet or like this time you look really silly
If it’s ok can I refer to you as Mr CNN as you sound like don lemon "I think he's just got bored of owning you. Many of us feel the same  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not changing that all... just showing you two can play the game you are playing.... and since you like to spout right wing diatribes that aren't true.... i'll tell you the same thing i told centy, as i told peacehaven, and i tell anyone who like to twist facts.... if you site "bs".... i'll call you out on it... pure and simple... so rather than come out with alt-right/right wing/fox news talking points you parrot..... if you come out with an actually individual thought rather than just going all over the map, and you can argue that rational though with source... then converse... but if you just spout shit that isn't true... i'll come at you harder than a wall of bricks....
Lol so you’ve completely let go of your abortion debate loss then lol
Play the game I’m playing ? I haven’t changed the subject once, mate your looking a little silly now dude
Right wing lol I would call out and embarrass people who lie about anything including lies about you, the left or anything, like I’ve embarrassed you
Fox News and giving you facts and sauces ??? What about the 3 I gave you earlier none of them were from Fox ,, your so bad at this lol
Harder than a wall of bricks lol you sound like a typical leftist fairy, don’t make me laugh
We have debated a few times and every single time I’ve proved you wrong with fact or exposed you beliefs ,, every time you suddenly go quiet or like this time you look really silly
If it’s ok can I refer to you as Mr CNN as you sound like don lemon
I think he's just got bored of owning you. Many of us feel the same "Aww bless ,, you 2 would get on great both slander people, can’t back it up or provide any facts Love not hate guys | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if you want to know how quickly this is going to whittle down... the next debate is on ABC in september... to qualify for that you must get at least 2% in 4 national polls and have at least 130,000 unique people contribute to your campaign.. so far only 7 people have hit this, it has to be done by the end of August... Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Pete Butigieg, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Beto o'rouke you are going to see a lot of people being "persauded" to drop out if they aren't on that stage... for example Hickenlooper because he would have a very good chance of unseating the republican in the Colorado Senate Race, Beto for the same reason possibly challenging in the Texas Senate race" just a quick update.... thought i'd bring it back to the actual topic in hand rather than the "hijack".... Amy Klobachar and Andrew Yang (cue the yang gang) have now qualified for the next debates bringing the field up to 9..... the others have 3 weeks left to reach the qualifying criteria...... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if you want to know how quickly this is going to whittle down... the next debate is on ABC in september... to qualify for that you must get at least 2% in 4 national polls and have at least 130,000 unique people contribute to your campaign.. so far only 7 people have hit this, it has to be done by the end of August... Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Pete Butigieg, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Beto o'rouke you are going to see a lot of people being "persauded" to drop out if they aren't on that stage... for example Hickenlooper because he would have a very good chance of unseating the republican in the Colorado Senate Race, Beto for the same reason possibly challenging in the Texas Senate race just a quick update.... thought i'd bring it back to the actual topic in hand rather than the "hijack".... Amy Klobachar and Andrew Yang (cue the yang gang) have now qualified for the next debates bringing the field up to 9..... the others have 3 weeks left to reach the qualifying criteria......" Who’s your money on the get the nomination and why Mr Lemon ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's as rigged this time round as it was last time, only the ones who got hijacked are now doing the hijacking. Sanders team was tech savvy millennials and they've branched out with the help of big donors into the mob business.... There gonna make you an offer you can't refuse "Personally I’m looking forward to the hoax they come up this time when trump wins again ,, the Russian collusion one was brilliant | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
