Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not great at English history. Blame my teachers for that lol However what's the point of having head of state ie the queen if she isn't actually in obvious open power (assuming she isn't covertly running the show that is). We have a prime minister and supposed democracy so what is her and her families point exactly? Ps: not trying to push a anti royal agenda merely wondering why she and her family are still about and where better to ask than amongst a bunch of free shagging swingers lmao" Not pushing anti royal agenda whats the point of your post then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not great at English history. Blame my teachers for that lol However what's the point of having head of state ie the queen if she isn't actually in obvious open power (assuming she isn't covertly running the show that is). We have a prime minister and supposed democracy so what is her and her families point exactly? Ps: not trying to push a anti royal agenda merely wondering why she and her family are still about and where better to ask than amongst a bunch of free shagging swingers lmao" Google is your friend | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not great at English history. Blame my teachers for that lol However what's the point of having head of state ie the queen if she isn't actually in obvious open power (assuming she isn't covertly running the show that is). We have a prime minister and supposed democracy so what is her and her families point exactly? Ps: not trying to push a anti royal agenda merely wondering why she and her family are still about and where better to ask than amongst a bunch of free shagging swingers lmao" It's quite a long story, but the upshot is, Parliament keeps Royalty from being too powerful and vice versa. In theory. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not great at English history. Blame my teachers for that lol However what's the point of having head of state ie the queen if she isn't actually in obvious open power (assuming she isn't covertly running the show that is). We have a prime minister and supposed democracy so what is her and her families point exactly? Ps: not trying to push a anti royal agenda merely wondering why she and her family are still about and where better to ask than amongst a bunch of free shagging swingers lmao It's quite a long story, but the upshot is, Parliament keeps Royalty from being too powerful and vice versa. In theory." Exactly in theory and thanks for actually paying attention and answering the question lol Just wanted to see what thoughts all had on this as that's what we're all led to believe following from cromwells victory in the civil war but I personally wonder at the virtue of what we're told and if that's what is truly what we're lead to believe. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not great at English history. Blame my teachers for that lol However what's the point of having head of state ie the queen if she isn't actually in obvious open power (assuming she isn't covertly running the show that is). We have a prime minister and supposed democracy so what is her and her families point exactly? Ps: not trying to push a anti royal agenda merely wondering why she and her family are still about and where better to ask than amongst a bunch of free shagging swingers lmao It's quite a long story, but the upshot is, Parliament keeps Royalty from being too powerful and vice versa. In theory. Exactly in theory and thanks for actually paying attention and answering the question lol Just wanted to see what thoughts all had on this as that's what we're all led to believe following from cromwells victory in the civil war but I personally wonder at the virtue of what we're told and if that's what is truly what we're lead to believe." It's written in law. But has only been tested on a a very small number of occasions. Even then the rule of law triumphed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |