Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. " No it doesn’t  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. " You lost. Get over it. Trying to overturn the will of the people. You're a traitor and hate democracy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. " Labour 'claim' that convicted vote rigger Tariq Mahmood was not involved in the Peterborough by election campaign.....even though he was photographed out on the doorsteps shaking hands with Jeremy Corbyn and Lisa Forbes. Tariq Mahmood was also seen by multiple eye witnesses and photographed at the count in Peterborough last Thursday night wearing a red Labour rosette. Tariq Mahmood had previously served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for voter fraud after being found guilty of postal vote rigging. Local Conservatives claimed that Tariq Mahmood was front and centre of the Labour party campaign in the Peterborough by election following Fiona Onasanya's dismissal for criminal conviction for Perverting the course of Justice over speeding offences. Former Conservative MP for Peterorough, Stewart Jackson said, "Tariq Mahmood should not be involved in politics at all. He has a criminal record for voter fraud and the fact that he is so close to the Labour campaign speaks volumes about the rottenness of the current Labour party." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7120267/Labours-election-victory-marred-claims-convicted-vote-rigger-centre-campaign.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. You lost. Get over it. Trying to overturn the will of the people. You're a traitor and hate democracy. " Indeed   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. " A) No it isn't B) No it doesn't Glad I could help. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. Labour 'claim' that convicted vote rigger Tariq Mahmood was not involved in the Peterborough by election campaign.....even though he was photographed out on the doorsteps shaking hands with Jeremy Corbyn and Lisa Forbes. Tariq Mahmood was also seen by multiple eye witnesses and photographed at the count in Peterborough last Thursday night wearing a red Labour rosette. Tariq Mahmood had previously served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for voter fraud after being found guilty of postal vote rigging. Local Conservatives claimed that Tariq Mahmood was front and centre of the Labour party campaign in the Peterborough by election following Fiona Onasanya's dismissal for criminal conviction for Perverting the course of Justice over speeding offences. Former Conservative MP for Peterorough, Stewart Jackson said, "Tariq Mahmood should not be involved in politics at all. He has a criminal record for voter fraud and the fact that he is so close to the Labour campaign speaks volumes about the rottenness of the current Labour party." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7120267/Labours-election-victory-marred-claims-convicted-vote-rigger-centre-campaign.html" Hi.Thanks for taking the time to write a more informative post than mine. Your effort is much appreciated . It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. A prison sentence for electorate fraud is not even an opinion, it is a hard fact that no one can argue against . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. Labour 'claim' that convicted vote rigger Tariq Mahmood was not involved in the Peterborough by election campaign.....even though he was photographed out on the doorsteps shaking hands with Jeremy Corbyn and Lisa Forbes. Tariq Mahmood was also seen by multiple eye witnesses and photographed at the count in Peterborough last Thursday night wearing a red Labour rosette. Tariq Mahmood had previously served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for voter fraud after being found guilty of postal vote rigging. Local Conservatives claimed that Tariq Mahmood was front and centre of the Labour party campaign in the Peterborough by election following Fiona Onasanya's dismissal for criminal conviction for Perverting the course of Justice over speeding offences. Former Conservative MP for Peterorough, Stewart Jackson said, "Tariq Mahmood should not be involved in politics at all. He has a criminal record for voter fraud and the fact that he is so close to the Labour campaign speaks volumes about the rottenness of the current Labour party." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7120267/Labours-election-victory-marred-claims-convicted-vote-rigger-centre-campaign.html Hi.Thanks for taking the time to write a more informative post than mine. Your effort is much appreciated . It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. A prison sentence for electorate fraud is not even an opinion, it is a hard fact that no one can argue against . " He only sees the 'facts' that suit his agenda, he ignores the fact that two previously expelled for racism brexit party officials were still involved in the Peterborough campaign.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. " That begs the question then what's your excuse for never doing so | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. That begs the question then what's your excuse for never doing so "Hahahaha  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters?" Off to the Gulag with him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters?" One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. " To assume that no one suffered any harm in relation to class a drug use is naive beyond belief.. So if it was a spent conviction it's a one story yes? Maybe you should do your public duty as a loyal acolyte of the mail and lodge a formal complaint? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. " I don't think it was wise to mix with someine like this. But unless he was not allowed to help, or there is any evidence of vote fixing, the resukt is legit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. Labour 'claim' that convicted vote rigger Tariq Mahmood was not involved in the Peterborough by election campaign.....even though he was photographed out on the doorsteps shaking hands with Jeremy Corbyn and Lisa Forbes. Tariq Mahmood was also seen by multiple eye witnesses and photographed at the count in Peterborough last Thursday night wearing a red Labour rosette. Tariq Mahmood had previously served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for voter fraud after being found guilty of postal vote rigging. Local Conservatives claimed that Tariq Mahmood was front and centre of the Labour party campaign in the Peterborough by election following Fiona Onasanya's dismissal for criminal conviction for Perverting the course of Justice over speeding offences. Former Conservative MP for Peterorough, Stewart Jackson said, "Tariq Mahmood should not be involved in politics at all. He has a criminal record for voter fraud and the fact that he is so close to the Labour campaign speaks volumes about the rottenness of the current Labour party." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7120267/Labours-election-victory-marred-claims-convicted-vote-rigger-centre-campaign.html Hi.Thanks for taking the time to write a more informative post than mine. Your effort is much appreciated . It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. A prison sentence for electorate fraud is not even an opinion, it is a hard fact that no one can argue against . " Sorry. I can't take seriously any post as uses "Daily Mail" and "Facts" in conjunction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. " One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. " A very strange comment to post. I assume it is the type of comment which an internet warrior posts . You would be unlikely to say that to someone's face in real life. The post was specifically commenting on the very rare occasions on which Michael Gove used cocaine . The dangers of drug use would be the top of of another post . You would have no idea of my opinions on drug dealers or for that matter whether I had had to deal with those who misused drugs in real life. The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway." What evidence do you have it was "extremely isolated". He says he took it when he was a working journalist. He went on strike in his days as a reporter at the Press and Journal in Aberdeen - the strike lasted a year - so he'd have plenty of time on his hands. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. A very strange comment to post. I assume it is the type of comment which an internet warrior posts . You would be unlikely to say that to someone's face in real life. The post was specifically commenting on the very rare occasions on which Michael Gove used cocaine . The dangers of drug use would be the top of of another post . You would have no idea of my opinions on drug dealers or for that matter whether I had had to deal with those who misused drugs in real life. The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway." To be honest I've never met anyone face to face that comes out with such stupid comments like you're infamous for but I don't think I'd quiver at the thought of telling someone they we're out of touch with reality in a conversation such as this. It's the likes of the Goves of this world that drives the demand for drug production and you don't have the slightest inclination whatsoever as to the path that the drugs have gone through to get here. But keep yourself in your little ignorant bubble if it so pleases you, it matters neither here nor there what anyone thinks of you on here really, which for you is probably a good thing for you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. A very strange comment to post. I assume it is the type of comment which an internet warrior posts . You would be unlikely to say that to someone's face in real life. The post was specifically commenting on the very rare occasions on which Michael Gove used cocaine . The dangers of drug use would be the top of of another post . You would have no idea of my opinions on drug dealers or for that matter whether I had had to deal with those who misused drugs in real life. The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway. To be honest I've never met anyone face to face that comes out with such stupid comments like you're infamous for but I don't think I'd quiver at the thought of telling someone they we're out of touch with reality in a conversation such as this. It's the likes of the Goves of this world that drives the demand for drug production and you don't have the slightest inclination whatsoever as to the path that the drugs have gone through to get here. But keep yourself in your little ignorant bubble if it so pleases you, it matters neither here nor there what anyone thinks of you on here really, which for you is probably a good thing for you "Maybe time for a reality check . Gove used it on a few occasions . I do not think that anyone would consider that his use drove demand for it. Luckily the feedback that matters to me is that which is received in real life. Anyone can type anything that they like whilst hidden behind the anonymity of a keyboard. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway. What evidence do you have it was "extremely isolated". He says he took it when he was a working journalist. He went on strike in his days as a reporter at the Press and Journal in Aberdeen - the strike lasted a year - so he'd have plenty of time on his hands. " Hi. I do not think that I will be spending too much of my time investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago . Maybe time for a reality check. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is interesting to see that ex local Labour branch secretary served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for his part in a scheme to fabricate votes for a Peterborough council election. Local Conservatives have claimed Mahmood pictured sporting a red rosette at the by election count was a driving force behind Labour's campaign to capture the Asian vote. Labour however claim that he was not involved in the campaign. Full details are in one of today's Sunday newspapers . It does throw in doubt the validity of the result. Labour 'claim' that convicted vote rigger Tariq Mahmood was not involved in the Peterborough by election campaign.....even though he was photographed out on the doorsteps shaking hands with Jeremy Corbyn and Lisa Forbes. Tariq Mahmood was also seen by multiple eye witnesses and photographed at the count in Peterborough last Thursday night wearing a red Labour rosette. Tariq Mahmood had previously served a 15 month prison sentence in 2008 for voter fraud after being found guilty of postal vote rigging. Local Conservatives claimed that Tariq Mahmood was front and centre of the Labour party campaign in the Peterborough by election following Fiona Onasanya's dismissal for criminal conviction for Perverting the course of Justice over speeding offences. Former Conservative MP for Peterorough, Stewart Jackson said, "Tariq Mahmood should not be involved in politics at all. He has a criminal record for voter fraud and the fact that he is so close to the Labour campaign speaks volumes about the rottenness of the current Labour party." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7120267/Labours-election-victory-marred-claims-convicted-vote-rigger-centre-campaign.html Hi.Thanks for taking the time to write a more informative post than mine. Your effort is much appreciated . It is great to see a poster who ensures that members see all the facts. A prison sentence for electorate fraud is not even an opinion, it is a hard fact that no one can argue against . " To be fair, almost any post in this section is more informed, better balanced and more factual than your odd contributions. Btw, the same newspaper was claiming that the Labour win was all down to postal votes....so some bloke who was at a polling station, of which there were many in the city, would seem to be the usual conspiracy theory tosh. Happy to help | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. A very strange comment to post. I assume it is the type of comment which an internet warrior posts . You would be unlikely to say that to someone's face in real life. The post was specifically commenting on the very rare occasions on which Michael Gove used cocaine . The dangers of drug use would be the top of of another post . You would have no idea of my opinions on drug dealers or for that matter whether I had had to deal with those who misused drugs in real life. The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway. To be honest I've never met anyone face to face that comes out with such stupid comments like you're infamous for but I don't think I'd quiver at the thought of telling someone they we're out of touch with reality in a conversation such as this. It's the likes of the Goves of this world that drives the demand for drug production and you don't have the slightest inclination whatsoever as to the path that the drugs have gone through to get here. But keep yourself in your little ignorant bubble if it so pleases you, it matters neither here nor there what anyone thinks of you on here really, which for you is probably a good thing for you Maybe time for a reality check . Gove used it on a few occasions . I do not think that anyone would consider that his use drove demand for it.
Luckily the feedback that matters to me is that which is received in real life. Anyone can type anything that they like whilst hidden behind the anonymity of a keyboard. "Is there a usage threshold at which point the use of Class A drugs has an impact all the way along the supply chain? Just asking for a friend.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi. I do not think that I will be spending too much of my time investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago . Maybe time for a reality check." Okay. You just make stuff up. Case closed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So past crimes should invalidate results. Hmmmm. Where to begin. Gove, confessing he should have been sentenced to jail time for class 1 drug abuse. How's that for starters? One slight problem with your theory. Election fraud is an extremelly serious crime and the gentleman concerned served a 15 month prison sentence. Michael Gove may have tried a drug on a few occasions but no one suffered any harm as a result of it. It is hardly drug abuse unless he had to go robbing people to get a fix. The convicted criminal in Petrborough deprived quite a few people of the right to vote. When they went to the polling station to cast their vote they were already recorded as having voted . While the crime may be spent , the fact remains that he is still a member of the Labour party and was tasked with encouraging a particular section of the population to vote Labour. One slight problem with your theory Pat. Many many people die and lives destroyed in getting the drugs from source to Goves nostrils. Your lack of understanding real life situations is truly staggering. A very strange comment to post. I assume it is the type of comment which an internet warrior posts . You would be unlikely to say that to someone's face in real life. The post was specifically commenting on the very rare occasions on which Michael Gove used cocaine . The dangers of drug use would be the top of of another post . You would have no idea of my opinions on drug dealers or for that matter whether I had had to deal with those who misused drugs in real life. The extremely isolated use by Michael Gove will not have hurt another. The substance would have already been in the country anyway. To be honest I've never met anyone face to face that comes out with such stupid comments like you're infamous for but I don't think I'd quiver at the thought of telling someone they we're out of touch with reality in a conversation such as this. It's the likes of the Goves of this world that drives the demand for drug production and you don't have the slightest inclination whatsoever as to the path that the drugs have gone through to get here. But keep yourself in your little ignorant bubble if it so pleases you, it matters neither here nor there what anyone thinks of you on here really, which for you is probably a good thing for you Maybe time for a reality check . Gove used it on a few occasions . I do not think that anyone would consider that his use drove demand for it.
Luckily the feedback that matters to me is that which is received in real life. Anyone can type anything that they like whilst hidden behind the anonymity of a keyboard.
Is there a usage threshold at which point the use of Class A drugs has an impact all the way along the supply chain? Just asking for a friend...."Are you taking about 2019 or twenty years ago. I am sure that you can work the answer out for yourself . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi. I do not think that I will be spending too much of my time investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago . Maybe time for a reality check. Okay. You just make stuff up. Case closed. " I do not think many ( if any ) members of the population would be spending too much of their lives investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago. Most rational people just accept that he is a very talented politician. The opinion of the majority of the public is good enough for me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi. I do not think that I will be spending too much of my time investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago . Maybe time for a reality check. Okay. You just make stuff up. Case closed. " As he does with most of his claims on here.. The majority are for Wto terms, lies.. The BP's European election vote means there's a mandate for no deal, lies and piss poor maths.. Sheer idiocy.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hi. I do not think that I will be spending too much of my time investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago . Maybe time for a reality check. Okay. You just make stuff up. Case closed. I do not think many ( if any ) members of the population would be spending too much of their lives investigating what Michael Gove did twenty years ago. Most rational people just accept that he is a very talented politician. The opinion of the majority of the public is good enough for me. " What Gove did 20 years ago has no baring on his political position in my view, that's one aspect I agree with you on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Postal ballots apparently. National average of postal votes during a GE run approx 21%..the Peterboro BE there were approx 28%. Doubtful if the investigation will find anything untoward. Rumours aboud that people were selling their votes for a tenner. Go to the booth, take a pic of your paper (illegal apparently), take your phone to the geezer/geezerette and show the pic for payment. Again....difficult to see if anything will come out of that investigation either. What's a tenner worth in russian currency? "There are also reports of upto 1000 Brexit party ballot papers being burned, but i guess we will have to wait for the official police investigation to reach its conclusion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
