Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Embarrassing really considering our ancestors pre 1980 would all be considered Right Wing Extremists by today's standards. " Proves my point I am pre 1980 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Embarrassing really considering our ancestors pre 1980 would all be considered Right Wing Extremists by today's standards. " Our culture like all is malleable. You chance with it, or society opts to isolate you. Also really? Everything on that list was accepted 20 years ago? I'm not sure which circles you floated in? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Embarrassing really considering our ancestors pre 1980 would all be considered Right Wing Extremists by today's standards. Our culture like all is malleable. You chance with it, or society opts to isolate you. Also really? Everything on that list was accepted 20 years ago? I'm not sure which circles you floated in?" Working class northern circles. And who said everything on that list was acceptable 20 years ago? 20 years ago Political correctness was unheard of, patriotism was the reason my Great Grandad joined his friends to fight the Germans and his dad before him. Bore off with your virtue signalling bollocks. The point remains: White men, sorry "Right Wing Extremists" built the modern world. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you know anyone wo: * Talks about patriots * Labels opponents as traitors * Thinks political correctness is a left-wing or communist plot * Claims immigration is the cause of injustices among vulnerable groups * Adds "-istan" to British place names * Makes generalisations about Muslims and Jews * Use blatantly untrue references to immigrants, Judaism and Islam Look out for these people, says a leaflet issued to soldiers by the British Army, these are indicators and warnings of Extreme Right Wing (XRW) who should be reported to the Army , Warning Advisory and Reporting Point. The Army has confirmed the leaflet is genuine. Thumbs up to the British Army. I've seen a few posts on here that trigger those warning bells. " Is this the same British Army that recently had an incident where soldiers put up a picture of Jeremy Corbyn at the end of a live firing range, and used his face (image) as target practice? Or is naming a British place with "istan" on the end by a member of the public considered to be more extreme than that? I think a sense of context and perspective needs to be used in many of these things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you know anyone wo: * Talks about patriots * Labels opponents as traitors * Thinks political correctness is a left-wing or communist plot * Claims immigration is the cause of injustices among vulnerable groups * Adds "-istan" to British place names * Makes generalisations about Muslims and Jews * Use blatantly untrue references to immigrants, Judaism and Islam Look out for these people, says a leaflet issued to soldiers by the British Army, these are indicators and warnings of Extreme Right Wing (XRW) who should be reported to the Army , Warning Advisory and Reporting Point. The Army has confirmed the leaflet is genuine. Thumbs up to the British Army. I've seen a few posts on here that trigger those warning bells. " It is difficult to ascertain if this leaflet could be genuine. Patriots exist all over the world . I am sure that many ex soldiers who march on remembrance day consider themselves to be patriotic and a significant member ( based on the law of averages ) are more likely to be left wing than right wing. Based on this description of patriots the leaflet can safely be consigned to the dustbin. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The point remains: White men, sorry "Right Wing Extremists" built the modern world. " Yeah they did, off the back of slavery, exploitation and cruelty, what's your damn point apart from looking like a fucking idiot here? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being in some medieval shithole of a country for 6 months or so knowing that every fucker wants to cut your head off tends to colour your judgement of its inhabitants....,,and their friends." Training must be poor these days then. My peers are all very well balanced thank you very much (1980’s era) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Awww did I touch a nerve? You can't blame Whitey for being better at the game... " Nice to see you wear that Racism, sorry, "patriotism" on your sleeves. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being in some medieval shithole of a country for 6 months or so knowing that every fucker wants to cut your head off tends to colour your judgement of its inhabitants....,,and their friends." Don't sugar coat it But knowing a fair few former squaddies with tours in Iraq and Afghanistan that's the case even long after they've returned to civvie street. I guess they're RWEs now | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Awww did I touch a nerve? You can't blame Whitey for being better at the game... Nice to see you wear that Racism, sorry, "patriotism" on your sleeves. " I'm no Patriot, this country isn't worth dying for. Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery." They don't like the truth here you know! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. " So you're in favour of White Supremacy or actually think it's being wrongfully targeted? Go on, you may as well speak up now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. So you're in favour of White Supremacy or actually think it's being wrongfully targeted? Go on, you may as well speak up now. " White Supremacy is simply an excuse used by those on the Left to keep minorities in a constant state of victimhood otherwise the identity politics which the Left needs wouldn't work. For instance Asians and Jews in the USA for example typically score higher on average in IQ tests, earn more money on average and attend the top schools. Now if "White Supremacy" was real how on earth would this happen? It wouldn't unless you're going to come up with some bollocks. You never hear how Jewish Supremacy or Japanese Supremacy should be destroyed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You never hear how Jewish Supremacy or Japanese Supremacy should be destroyed. " Yeah, considering you're not even using the usual Patriotism spew, you just look like an idiot, a shame since you two look nice but whichever one of you is talking right now really needs to get clued up on things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you know anyone wo: * Talks about patriots * Labels opponents as traitors * Thinks political correctness is a left-wing or communist plot * Claims immigration is the cause of injustices among vulnerable groups * Adds "-istan" to British place names * Makes generalisations about Muslims and Jews * Use blatantly untrue references to immigrants, Judaism and Islam Look out for these people, says a leaflet issued to soldiers by the British Army, these are indicators and warnings of Extreme Right Wing (XRW) who should be reported to the Army , Warning Advisory and Reporting Point. The Army has confirmed the leaflet is genuine. Thumbs up to the British Army. I've seen a few posts on here that trigger those warning bells. " So now the army are going to judge people by their words, not their actions. Further proof that freedom of speech is just a fantasy here. Of course we are free to say anything we like, just as long as it’s not blah blah blah. We need tough soldiers, they are being sent overseas to fight people who are fanatics, but who are not a threat to us. They go to war against what is mostly Muslims, but even though see their comrades either shot, hit by rpms or blown to bits by land mines, they mustn’t say anything insulting about them. Who in their right mind would want to join up now? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you know anyone wo: * Talks about patriots * Labels opponents as traitors * Thinks political correctness is a left-wing or communist plot * Claims immigration is the cause of injustices among vulnerable groups * Adds "-istan" to British place names * Makes generalisations about Muslims and Jews * Use blatantly untrue references to immigrants, Judaism and Islam Look out for these people, says a leaflet issued to soldiers by the British Army, these are indicators and warnings of Extreme Right Wing (XRW) who should be reported to the Army , Warning Advisory and Reporting Point. The Army has confirmed the leaflet is genuine. Thumbs up to the British Army. I've seen a few posts on here that trigger those warning bells. So now the army are going to judge people by their words, not their actions. Further proof that freedom of speech is just a fantasy here. Of course we are free to say anything we like, just as long as it’s not blah blah blah. We need tough soldiers, they are being sent overseas to fight people who are fanatics, but who are not a threat to us. They go to war against what is mostly Muslims, but even though see their comrades either shot, hit by rpms or blown to bits by land mines, they mustn’t say anything insulting about them. Who in their right mind would want to join up now?" *rpgs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So now the army are going to judge people by their words, not their actions. Further proof that freedom of speech is just a fantasy here. Of course we are free to say anything we like, just as long as it’s not blah blah blah. " Oh god this bullshit again from the old racist, you DO have freedom of speech, notice how you can say your tripe here without being penalised? That's freedom, but other people other than yourself also have that freedom and can use that freedom to call out your dumb views, notice how you and another here already turned it on Muslims when that's not even the point of it, but oh no clearly it's those with the problem. Fuck sake mate, for a bloke who likes to call people "remoaners", etc, you sure half don't bloody constantly bitch and moan. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They hand out these leaflets to british soldiers?... even the ones fighting illegal wars in the middle east? I'm not sure of statistics or anything but i'm reasonably sure that the people who may or may not use the sort of language outlined in this pamflet have never fired a shot in anger at anyone of any skin colour, religion or whatever else.... neo nazis eh? " Quite a few cases lately of soldiers engaged in extremist behaviour. This is the Army trying to flush the poison from the barracks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is difficult to ascertain if this leaflet could be genuine. " The Army confirmed it was genuine to the Metro newspaper, which published the full leaflet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The point remains: White men, sorry "Right Wing Extremists" built the modern world. Yeah they did, off the back of slavery, exploitation and cruelty, what's your damn point apart from looking like a fucking idiot here? Awww did I touch a nerve? You can't blame Whitey for being better at the game... " The kinda attitude that AWARP and Army Intell are trying to spot and root out to stop it poisoning the barracks. You are a fit for XRW. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you know anyone wo: * Talks about patriots * Labels opponents as traitors * Thinks political correctness is a left-wing or communist plot * Claims immigration is the cause of injustices among vulnerable groups * Adds "-istan" to British place names * Makes generalisations about Muslims and Jews * Use blatantly untrue references to immigrants, Judaism and Islam Look out for these people, says a leaflet issued to soldiers by the British Army, these are indicators and warnings of Extreme Right Wing (XRW) who should be reported to the Army , Warning Advisory and Reporting Point. The Army has confirmed the leaflet is genuine. Thumbs up to the British Army. I've seen a few posts on here that trigger those warning bells. Is this the same British Army that recently had an incident where soldiers put up a picture of Jeremy Corbyn at the end of a live firing range, and used his face (image) as target practice? Or is naming a British place with "istan" on the end by a member of the public considered to be more extreme than that? I think a sense of context and perspective needs to be used in many of these things. " It wasn't a live firing range | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The point remains: White men, sorry "Right Wing Extremists" built the modern world. Yeah they did, off the back of slavery, exploitation and cruelty, what's your damn point apart from looking like a fucking idiot here? Awww did I touch a nerve? You can't blame Whitey for being better at the game... The kinda attitude that AWARP and Army Intell are trying to spot and root out to stop it poisoning the barracks. You are a fit for XRW." Cool. I love labels | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who has actually worn the uniform and served I don't see the issue with any public body wanting to send out a message that extremism of whatever kind is or acceptable.. When it gets down to people (and certain people have in the past been very lacking in their condemnation for the extremists of the right) ignoring the basics that extremism whomever the source is not wanted nor acceptable then we have an issue in society.. And we should not be critical that the powers that be are directing attention at it, we wouldn't well certainly the majority wouldn't object to the same powers that be protecting our children, elderly and or the vulnerable would we? Some fucking moron who thinks it's OK to attack others of whatever colour, religion etc for whatever reason they think validates that action is surely not a decent member of that society and the vast majority of this country rightly know this.. " Agreed, I am just surprised that the MoD and Joint Chiefs have confirmed the existence of the leaflet. In my day it was an open secret how racist the Guards were and that if you were dark skinned going into the army you really needed to join the Royal Green Jackets (think I have the right regiment) or one of the corps, because nearly everywhere else you would be discriminated against because of your skin colour. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"? Some fucking moron who thinks it's OK to attack others of whatever colour, religion etc for whatever reason they think validates that action is surely not a decent member of that society and the vast majority of this country rightly know this.. " . Absolutely and this includes left wing extremists and climate extremists. It's just a shame the left wing won't condemn there own. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just a shame the left wing won't condemn there own." They do, you're just using selective reasoning. Ironically it's a tactic used by the right on social media to track down dirt on big left wing names and reveal it so they'd face harsh actions, remember the James Gunn situation? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who has actually worn the uniform and served I don't see the issue with any public body wanting to send out a message that extremism of whatever kind is or acceptable.. When it gets down to people (and certain people have in the past been very lacking in their condemnation for the extremists of the right) ignoring the basics that extremism whomever the source is not wanted nor acceptable then we have an issue in society.. And we should not be critical that the powers that be are directing attention at it, we wouldn't well certainly the majority wouldn't object to the same powers that be protecting our children, elderly and or the vulnerable would we? Some fucking moron who thinks it's OK to attack others of whatever colour, religion etc for whatever reason they think validates that action is surely not a decent member of that society and the vast majority of this country rightly know this.. Agreed, I am just surprised that the MoD and Joint Chiefs have confirmed the existence of the leaflet. In my day it was an open secret how racist the Guards were and that if you were dark skinned going into the army you really needed to join the Royal Green Jackets (think I have the right regiment) or one of the corps, because nearly everywhere else you would be discriminated against because of your skin colour." Probably more so that nowadays such things are commonly acknowledged, whereas before there was a myth believed by the higher echelons that the military was above such things.. Which as you rightly point out was never the case and yes fully agree with your recollection of how it was.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"? Some fucking moron who thinks it's OK to attack others of whatever colour, religion etc for whatever reason they think validates that action is surely not a decent member of that society and the vast majority of this country rightly know this.. . Absolutely and this includes left wing extremists and climate extremists. It's just a shame the left wing won't condemn there own." Sorry but that's not accurate, yes there will be some on all sides that will never condemn their own but it's not true to say that the left won't condemn their own.. It's as equally wrong to say all on the right or all of one faith won't.. There have been numerous threads on here over the years and my perception is that there are a minority who struggle to fully condemn the far right and will look for any excuse such as mental health etc.. I have yet to see anyone of the left/centre left not condemn all extremism.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread makes me want to vomit as so many of you have sick wharped minds." Can you be more specific? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread makes me want to vomit as so many of you have sick wharped minds." Care to clarify, else it just looks like a random rant..? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just a shame the left wing won't condemn there own. They do, you're just using selective reasoning. Ironically it's a tactic used by the right on social media to track down dirt on big left wing names and reveal it so they'd face harsh actions, remember the James Gunn situation?" . You mean like the leftists did with sir Roger scruton? Or like the leftists did with Peter boghassians satirical dissing of modern leftist gender claptrap. There are extremists on both sides of the political divide. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not aware the Army has a problem with left-wing extremists. There is evidence it has a problem with right-wing extremists - recent court cases. " . That's because the far left hate the armed services, countries, borders and security. Where as the far right don't so there much more likely to join it. It's like saying you don't find many of the far right infiltrating gender studies in universities, that's the preserve of the far left. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You mean like the leftists did with sir Roger scruton? Or like the leftists did with Peter boghassians satirical dissing of modern leftist gender claptrap. There are extremists on both sides of the political divide." No I don't mean that, I mean the right using the lefts quick action to dismiss a person by finding said dirt and making it public so the left goes against the person who is "on their side". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"However you never see leaflets handed out in universities looking for suspected far left extremists trying to infiltrate. Probably because they've already taken it over like " Has there been recent examples of left extremist students being prosecuted? This seems to be the army reacting to an highlighted problem which has bit them rather than being proactive.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not aware the Army has a problem with left-wing extremists. There is evidence it has a problem with right-wing extremists - recent court cases. " The Army has always had problems with violent extremists (of all types). After all if your wet dream is to be able to kill all those you consider to be the 'enemy' well where better to get paid while learning how to kill... In the 70's and 80's the main threat was training NI extremists (of both sides), no doubt today it is Islamic fundamentalist and right wing nationalist extremists. The groups and causes change over time but the basic problem remains the same, and the armed forces have been aware of and combating it for at least the last 40 odd years to my knowledge. Unfortunately the problem is like canal water, constantly changing but changeless. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not aware the Army has a problem with left-wing extremists. There is evidence it has a problem with right-wing extremists - recent court cases. . That's because the far left hate the armed services, countries, borders and security. Where as the far right don't so there much more likely to join it. It's like saying you don't find many of the far right infiltrating gender studies in universities, that's the preserve of the far left." So the far left extremists...talk critically about gender at universities. Wow, truly scary stuff! The most extreme act by the left in this country in the last few years has been throwing milkshakes. By the right it was murdering an MP. Truly, both sides are as bad as each other | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You mean like the leftists did with sir Roger scruton? Or like the leftists did with Peter boghassians satirical dissing of modern leftist gender claptrap. There are extremists on both sides of the political divide. No I don't mean that, I mean the right using the lefts quick action to dismiss a person by finding said dirt and making it public so the left goes against the person who is "on their side"." . It seems the large majority of people in this country are being pulled apart by the tiny minority on both sides. I voted labour under Blair and Cameron under the Tories, I'm a centrist reluctant remainer who believes in democracy, law and order and freedom. Sadly not enough of us left. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery. They don't like the truth here you know! " ..but that doesn't dispute the fact that the British empire also prospered through slavery | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not aware the Army has a problem with left-wing extremists. There is evidence it has a problem with right-wing extremists - recent court cases. . That's because the far left hate the armed services, countries, borders and security. Where as the far right don't so there much more likely to join it. It's like saying you don't find many of the far right infiltrating gender studies in universities, that's the preserve of the far left. So the far left extremists...talk critically about gender at universities. Wow, truly scary stuff! The most extreme act by the left in this country in the last few years has been throwing milkshakes. By the right it was murdering an MP. Truly, both sides are as bad as each other " In a way, it's a good illusion of how Europe hasn't seen any far left extremists for a good long time. If the height of the communist threat is some liberal university lecturer talking about gender rights, then there's probably no real threat from the left, is there? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery. They don't like the truth here you know! ..but that doesn't dispute the fact that the British empire also prospered through slavery" Meaningless. You can't blame a people for being better at something that every group through out history has done while at the same time excusing the exact behaviour of others. And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery. They don't like the truth here you know! ..but that doesn't dispute the fact that the British empire also prospered through slavery Meaningless. You can't blame a people for being better at something that every group through out history has done while at the same time excusing the exact behaviour of others. And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. " Imagine being descended from slaves and having a problem with slavery. Political correctness gone mad, innit? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery. They don't like the truth here you know! ..but that doesn't dispute the fact that the British empire also prospered through slavery Meaningless. You can't blame a people for being better at something that every group through out history has done while at the same time excusing the exact behaviour of others. And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. " Wow, do you seriously believe that? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Imagine being descended from slaves and having a problem with slavery. Political correctness gone mad, innit? " Imagine having such a pea brain that you jump to emotionally charged response. Where did I say people who are descended from slavery can't have a problem with slavery? I didn't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Imagine being descended from slaves and having a problem with slavery. Political correctness gone mad, innit? Imagine having such a pea brain that you jump to emotionally charged response. Where did I say people who are descended from slavery can't have a problem with slavery? I didn't. " According to your logic we are all descended from slaves?? Correct?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Imagine being descended from slaves and having a problem with slavery. Political correctness gone mad, innit? Imagine having such a pea brain that you jump to emotionally charged response. Where did I say people who are descended from slavery can't have a problem with slavery? I didn't. " Triggered again, I see. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? " Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. " Your suggesting ‘white supremacy’ doesn’t exist, there was black slaves in America 150 years ago controlled by whites. There was segregation in America until the 1960s, apartheid in South Africa until the 1990s. Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. " Can you confirm what you mean by others failing? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. Your suggesting ‘white supremacy’ doesn’t exist, there was black slaves in America 150 years ago controlled by whites. There was segregation in America until the 1960s, apartheid in South Africa until the 1990s. Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? " You do realise slavery and human trafficking in pretty big in Eastern Europe? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Can you confirm what you mean by others failing? " European dominance since the industrial revolution is historical fact. Apart from China and Japan there's been no real competition until recently from any other group of people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. Your suggesting ‘white supremacy’ doesn’t exist, there was black slaves in America 150 years ago controlled by whites. There was segregation in America until the 1960s, apartheid in South Africa until the 1990s. Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? You do realise slavery and human trafficking in pretty big in Eastern Europe? " ‘Pretty big’ , is that the best you can come up with? And the vast majority are trafficked by white gangs ? Try again | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. " You are soo far off the mark it's beyond hilarious and delved into sadness, is THAT what you think White Supremacy is? Be serious here, do you think what you're saying is the White Supremacy people are going after? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. You are soo far off the mark it's beyond hilarious and delved into sadness, is THAT what you think White Supremacy is? Be serious here, do you think what you're saying is the White Supremacy people are going after?" They are poor victims of those nasty liberals and ethnics and should be protected. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? " I gave you an example, a real example of modern day slavery that is effecting Whites amongst others. Try again. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. You are soo far off the mark it's beyond hilarious and delved into sadness, is THAT what you think White Supremacy is? Be serious here, do you think what you're saying is the White Supremacy people are going after?" Explain to me what you think White Supremacy is? And I will try and answer. White supremacy is a racial theory in which the belief was that the White race is superior to every other race. I don't believe that to be true in the slightest. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is coming to the UK to mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day, yeah. Did you know the US forces that day were segregated by race - black people had their own division. The irony - the forces of "freedom" taking on the world's greatest white supremacist with an army segregated by race. Another classic "chip-on-my-shoulder" outburst from you....?! Correction, it is the U.S. PRESIDENT who shall be attending for the D-day anniversary celebrations, ya know..., the democratically elected person... Isn't that something to do with WW2...? Freedom and democracy...??!! Oh.... and we have come a LONG way since 1945, so, why would anyone have reason to quote "the irony" of how things were over SEVENTY years ago? You really do drag up some bilge, tha' knows, were you once bullied, I wonder??!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread makes me want to vomit as so many of you have sick wharped minds. Can you be more specific? " Yes will do so tomorrow,but basically it is that people sem t thing people are right wing if they think differently to them or visa versa and it is more complex than that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is coming to the UK to mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day, yeah. Did you know the US forces that day were segregated by race - black people had their own division. The irony - the forces of "freedom" taking on the world's greatest white supremacist with an army segregated by race. Another classic "chip-on-my-shoulder" outburst from you....?! Correction, it is the U.S. PRESIDENT who shall be attending for the D-day anniversary celebrations, ya know..., the democratically elected person... Isn't that something to do with WW2...? Freedom and democracy...??!! Oh.... and we have come a LONG way since 1945, so, why would anyone have reason to quote "the irony" of how things were over SEVENTY years ago? You really do drag up some bilge, tha' knows, were you once bullied, I wonder??!! " He is a bit of a ginger knob though isnt he - oh and he is up for impeachment when his term is up so a bit crook too! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. You are soo far off the mark it's beyond hilarious and delved into sadness, is THAT what you think White Supremacy is? Be serious here, do you think what you're saying is the White Supremacy people are going after? Explain to me what you think White Supremacy is? And I will try and answer. White supremacy is a racial theory in which the belief was that the White race is superior to every other race. I don't believe that to be true in the slightest. " So Hitler and the Nazi party didn’t exist it was all just a theory created by the far left?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread makes me want to vomit as so many of you have sick wharped minds. Can you be more specific? Yes will do so tomorrow,but basically it is that people sem t thing people are right wing if they think differently to them or visa versa and it is more complex than that" Your still being vague, why don’t you tell us what you really think?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is coming to the UK to mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day, yeah. Did you know the US forces that day were segregated by race - black people had their own division. The irony - the forces of "freedom" taking on the world's greatest white supremacist with an army segregated by race. Another classic "chip-on-my-shoulder" outburst from you....?! Correction, it is the U.S. PRESIDENT who shall be attending for the D-day anniversary celebrations, ya know..., the democratically elected person... Isn't that something to do with WW2...? Freedom and democracy...??!! Oh.... and we have come a LONG way since 1945, so, why would anyone have reason to quote "the irony" of how things were over SEVENTY years ago? You really do drag up some bilge, tha' knows, were you once bullied, I wonder??!! " What, Trump is not the US president? Well I never. If we have come such a long way from 75 years ago, why are reliving it all again next week. Or is it only the version of events you've watched in the cinema that you want to relive? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So Hitler and the Nazi party didn’t exist it was all just a theory created by the far left?? " Jesus fucking christ. The notion that White Supremacy is something that should be dismantled and destroyed in "White" nations is nothing more than an "us vs them" tactic employed by the hard left as a way to ensure that minority groups embrace identity politics. I'm not saying that White Supremacy has never existed, what I'm saying is that no nation today upholds White Supremacy as political ideology. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? I gave you an example, a real example of modern day slavery that is effecting Whites amongst others. Try again. " You didn’t, the people profiteering from these ‘slaves’ are also white. Give me an example where white people are being used as slaves by different ethnic groups. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So Hitler and the Nazi party didn’t exist it was all just a theory created by the far left?? Jesus fucking christ. The notion that White Supremacy is something that should be dismantled and destroyed in "White" nations is nothing more than an "us vs them" tactic employed by the hard left as a way to ensure that minority groups embrace identity politics. I'm not saying that White Supremacy has never existed, what I'm saying is that no nation today upholds White Supremacy as political ideology. " Why do you keep changing your opinion when you can’t answer a question? You said that white supremacy is a ‘theory’ created by the far left? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Why do you keep changing your opinion when you can’t answer a question? You said that white supremacy is a ‘theory’ created by the far left? " You've moved the goal posts regarding the slavery question. Surprise, surprise. Also I never said White Supremacy was a theory created by the Left. Learn to read. FFS | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Why do you keep changing your opinion when you can’t answer a question? You said that white supremacy is a ‘theory’ created by the far left? You've moved the goal posts regarding the slavery question. Surprise, surprise. Also I never said White Supremacy was a theory created by the Left. Learn to read. FFS" I can read and it is obvious what you are saying. You are trying to justify slavery by stating everyone else did it but ‘Whitey’ was better at it. You are trying to dismiss white supremacy as being a far left ‘theory’ . We can all see what type of person you are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can read and it is obvious what you are saying. You are trying to justify slavery by stating everyone else did it but ‘Whitey’ was better at it. You are trying to dismiss white supremacy as being a far left ‘theory’ . We can all see what type of person you are " Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha You poor little man... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can read and it is obvious what you are saying. You are trying to justify slavery by stating everyone else did it but ‘Whitey’ was better at it. You are trying to dismiss white supremacy as being a far left ‘theory’ . We can all see what type of person you are Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha You poor little man... " Your reply says it all, you can’t deny or even try and justify your views. We can all see what you are ? With education and an open mind I hope you eventually realise how deluded you are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your reply says it all, you can’t deny or even try and justify your views. We can all see what you are ? With education and an open mind I hope you eventually realise how deluded you are " Who's this mysterious "We" and why should I care what they think if you're the calibre of who "We" are? Seriously, I know who I am. My views, my politics, my friends and circle. But who are you? A nobody, with nothing to say other than what everyone else in this mysterious "We" says and thinks. It's easy to tell that just like a few others on here you lack any original thought and parrot the same nonsense but in a different way. Slavery bad, racism bad, White Supremacy bad. White man bad. It hurts your little brain when someone who doesn't think like you comes along. You recoil in fear and run along with the herd in hope that you wont be exposed for the charlatan you are. Weak willed and easily lead. This "We" is everything to you...fitting into a group which doesn't matter because when all is said and done you lack the ability to stand up for what you believe in without it. You asked for an example of slavery effecting Whites today, I gave you one. When I did this you then moved the goal posts and asked for a modern day example of Whites being enslaved by another ethnic group. You came up with this idea that I have some how said that White White Supremacy was a theory created by the Left? This is also not true. I actually gave the definition of White Supremacy further up in this thread. I know the political ideology and its roots in scientific racism. But yet you still can't seem to grasp what I have said even though I've explained my position twice. Give me an example of a nation or a government which continues to follow the political ideology that is White Supremacy in 2019. Pro tip, you can't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your reply says it all, you can’t deny or even try and justify your views. We can all see what you are ? With education and an open mind I hope you eventually realise how deluded you are Who's this mysterious "We" and why should I care what they think if you're the calibre of who "We" are? Seriously, I know who I am. My views, my politics, my friends and circle. But who are you? A nobody, with nothing to say other than what everyone else in this mysterious "We" says and thinks. It's easy to tell that just like a few others on here you lack any original thought and parrot the same nonsense but in a different way. Slavery bad, racism bad, White Supremacy bad. White man bad. It hurts your little brain when someone who doesn't think like you comes along. You recoil in fear and run along with the herd in hope that you wont be exposed for the charlatan you are. Weak willed and easily lead. This "We" is everything to you...fitting into a group which doesn't matter because when all is said and done you lack the ability to stand up for what you believe in without it. You asked for an example of slavery effecting Whites today, I gave you one. When I did this you then moved the goal posts and asked for a modern day example of Whites being enslaved by another ethnic group. You came up with this idea that I have some how said that White White Supremacy was a theory created by the Left? This is also not true. I actually gave the definition of White Supremacy further up in this thread. I know the political ideology and its roots in scientific racism. But yet you still can't seem to grasp what I have said even though I've explained my position twice. Give me an example of a nation or a government which continues to follow the political ideology that is White Supremacy in 2019. Pro tip, you can't " Stop digging. We get the picture (we being the people who read this) , you have made your point, we know ‘what’ you are . However I don’t know ‘who’ you are, I don’t care who you are, you are an irrelevance to me but you have pathetic and uneducated views that have to be challenged . Racism bad? Yes. Slavery bad? Yes. White supremacy bad? Yes. White man bad? Define a white man ? Luckily you and your outdated and moronic views are in the minority | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your reply says it all, you can’t deny or even try and justify your views. We can all see what you are ? With education and an open mind I hope you eventually realise how deluded you are Who's this mysterious "We" and why should I care what they think if you're the calibre of who "We" are? Seriously, I know who I am. My views, my politics, my friends and circle. But who are you? A nobody, with nothing to say other than what everyone else in this mysterious "We" says and thinks. It's easy to tell that just like a few others on here you lack any original thought and parrot the same nonsense but in a different way. Slavery bad, racism bad, White Supremacy bad. White man bad. It hurts your little brain when someone who doesn't think like you comes along. You recoil in fear and run along with the herd in hope that you wont be exposed for the charlatan you are. Weak willed and easily lead. This "We" is everything to you...fitting into a group which doesn't matter because when all is said and done you lack the ability to stand up for what you believe in without it. You asked for an example of slavery effecting Whites today, I gave you one. When I did this you then moved the goal posts and asked for a modern day example of Whites being enslaved by another ethnic group. You came up with this idea that I have some how said that White White Supremacy was a theory created by the Left? This is also not true. I actually gave the definition of White Supremacy further up in this thread. I know the political ideology and its roots in scientific racism. But yet you still can't seem to grasp what I have said even though I've explained my position twice. Give me an example of a nation or a government which continues to follow the political ideology that is White Supremacy in 2019. Pro tip, you can't " To answer you last question I need to educate you . "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socioeconomic system, in which white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, on both a collective and individual level.Does this happen? Yes all the time , and it will as long as morons like you exist | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" To answer you last question I need to educate you . "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socioeconomic system, in which white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, on both a collective and individual level.Does this happen? Yes all the time , and it will as long as morons like you exist " Shock horror White people in White countries having an advantage in their own nations. You're a fucking idiot. Chinese people in China have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling China that they should destroy Chineese Supremacy? The Japanese in Japan have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling Japan that they should destroy Japanese Supremacy? Indians in India have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling India that they should destroy Indian Supremacy? No, you aren't and why should you? It's a fucking stupid idea. Imagine thinking that minority status should give you an advantage or even an equal footing to those who through blood and sacrifice created the country they've called home for centuries. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" To answer you last question I need to educate you . "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socioeconomic system, in which white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, on both a collective and individual level.Does this happen? Yes all the time , and it will as long as morons like you exist Shock horror White people in White countries having an advantage in their own nations. You're a fucking idiot. Chinese people in China have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling China that they should destroy Chineese Supremacy? The Japanese in Japan have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling Japan that they should destroy Japanese Supremacy? Indians in India have an advantage in their own country. Are you telling India that they should destroy Indian Supremacy? No, you aren't and why should you? It's a fucking stupid idea. Imagine thinking that minority status should give you an advantage or even an equal footing to those who through blood and sacrifice created the country they've called home for centuries. " And there you have it. You just couldn’t help yourself. I have one question that might confuse your tiny little mind, describe to me a British person, the type of person of person who through blood and sacrifice created this country we call home? Have a think | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And there you have it. You just couldn’t help yourself. I have one question that might confuse your tiny little mind, describe to me a British person, the type of person of person who through blood and sacrifice created this country we call home? Have a think" White European. It's not hard and anyone who protests this clearly knows nothing about Britain or Europe. It's cute how you're trying to make me feel ashamed? Guilt? Bad? Because I don't subscribe to your way of thinking. It doesn't work. Racist, Nazi, Bigot...water off a ducks back my friend. I'm not bothered, I'm not here to fit in with the "group" I don't need your approval. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that one human is more supreme to the other . . . where does that come from? Did we bring it out the soup as fish? Or maybe when we learned how to hate? When do you think that was?" Tribalism has been around since the dawn of man. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people argue the competition drives the species forward. I'm not convinced. I just see dickheads. " They do say the weak fear the strong. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And there you have it. You just couldn’t help yourself. I have one question that might confuse your tiny little mind, describe to me a British person, the type of person of person who through blood and sacrifice created this country we call home? Have a think White European. It's not hard and anyone who protests this clearly knows nothing about Britain or Europe. It's cute how you're trying to make me feel ashamed? Guilt? Bad? Because I don't subscribe to your way of thinking. It doesn't work. Racist, Nazi, Bigot...water off a ducks back my friend. I'm not bothered, I'm not here to fit in with the "group" I don't need your approval. " You seem very angry, frustrated , frightened? I am hoping your just trying to be controversial to get some attention in your life ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You seem very angry, frustrated , frightened? I am hoping your just trying to be controversial to get some attention in your life ? " Angry? You do realise this is the internet? Frustrated about? And frightened of what? Smells like projection. Angry: because someone dares to think differently. Frustrated: because I'm not caving into your shrieks and cries. Frightened: because every day more people are turning towards the Right throughout Europe for answers to their questions. Don't worry mate...those pesky nazis under the bed aren't there just yet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people argue the competition drives the species forward. I'm not convinced. I just see dickheads. They do say the weak fear the strong. " This is all getting a bit stale. Your argument seems to revolve around your intellectual superiority over the people on here and the question has to be asked - given your self professed dismissing of these less intellectual and by inference inferior people who are trying to engage with you then what is the point of you taking part in the forums? I am a bit mystified by your role here unless you are either a narcissist or are using the forums to work out anger issues? Either way, you dont come across as very likeable but thats just my viewpoint. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You seem very angry, frustrated , frightened? I am hoping your just trying to be controversial to get some attention in your life ? Angry? You do realise this is the internet? Frustrated about? And frightened of what? Smells like projection. Angry: because someone dares to think differently. Frustrated: because I'm not caving into your shrieks and cries. Frightened: because every day more people are turning towards the Right throughout Europe for answers to their questions. Don't worry mate...those pesky nazis under the bed aren't there just yet. " Calm down my little friend, your getting upset .Your white supremacy views are due to insecurity , it is natural you feel threatened and afraid by other races , little men often feel inferior and become angry .Are you also getting frustrated that your on a sex site and can’t get anyone to meet you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You seem very angry, frustrated , frightened? I am hoping your just trying to be controversial to get some attention in your life ? Angry? You do realise this is the internet? Frustrated about? And frightened of what? Smells like projection. Angry: because someone dares to think differently. Frustrated: because I'm not caving into your shrieks and cries. Frightened: because every day more people are turning towards the Right throughout Europe for answers to their questions. Don't worry mate...those pesky nazis under the bed aren't there just yet. " If the Nazis do take over the world again I am afraid due to your sexuality you will be one of the first in the concentration camps, give that a bit of thought. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" intellectual superiority " Bow down plebs, no but in all seriousness it doesn't take an intellectual powerhouse to run circles around those who's only argument is to appeal to the more emotional amongst them. See Fabtastic hasn't actually refuted any of my points because he can't. Nothing he has said in the last 4 posts offer nothing but emotionally charged attacks on my character rather than the points I have made. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If the Nazis do take over the world again I am afraid due to your sexuality you will be one of the first in the concentration camps, give that a bit of thought. " Good job I'm not a nazi then isn't it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" intellectual superiority Bow down plebs, no but in all seriousness it doesn't take an intellectual powerhouse to run circles around those who's only argument is to appeal to the more emotional amongst them. See Fabtastic hasn't actually refuted any of my points because he can't. Nothing he has said in the last 4 posts offer nothing but emotionally charged attacks on my character rather than the points I have made. " Haha, I am just playing with you . Hopefully one day you will get to meet someone on here and you won’t be so angry | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If the Nazis do take over the world again I am afraid due to your sexuality you will be one of the first in the concentration camps, give that a bit of thought. Good job I'm not a nazi then isn't it " Who said you were? Have another read | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Haha, I am just playing with you . Hopefully one day you will get to meet someone on here and you won’t be so angry " It's pretty hard when you're upholding White Supremacy and planning the fourth Reich with your friends. Not got a lot of time really | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The moment you evoke "blood and soil" your either trolling or d*unk.Either way your fucked ,with that reference and your card is marked.Not that you should find a fuck to give .I hope to read about they need for "living space " soon. " Blut und Ehre! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wow, do you seriously believe that? Do I seriously believe what? We shouldn't punish the son for his fathers sins? Of course. You can't demonize a group based on their ancestors actions in a world which is so alien from ours. Every group of people since the dawn of man practiced slavery, waged war and created empires. You cannot attribute these traits to one group while allowing others a get out of jail free card simply because they weren't capable of reaching the heights we did. The diverse nature of Europe gave us an advantage. Yes acknowledge the the injustices but you can't continually use those as an excuse for others failings. Your suggesting ‘white supremacy’ doesn’t exist, there was black slaves in America 150 years ago controlled by whites. There was segregation in America until the 1960s, apartheid in South Africa until the 1990s. Can you give me any recent examples of white slavery? " White People are being enslaved even to this day, modern day slavery does exist. I’m not pointing my finger at any other racial group, it is a matter of people in difficulty being used by greasy bastards who want work done for nothing, and I’m certain that the self same people are enslaving black People too. It is a disgusting sign of the times, that people who live alone and have mental problems are disappearing, and years later are found working long hours for nothing on farms etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time." Was it a report published today? Or a rehash of a previous disputed argument. https://www.theguardian.com/news/reality-check/2015/dec/11/donald-trump-needs-check-facts-british-muslims-isis | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also the fact check relied on an out of date FOI request to increase the number of British Muslims in the British Army. At the time of the tweet and article (2015) there was only 445 not 550. 20 Muslims joined the British army in 2014 and 2015. Compare that to how many Muslims went and fought for ISIS during those years and you have a problem. " It's small numbers on all sides. I need to do some maths but it feels british muslims don't tend to sign up for any cause. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the article says its comparing a cumulative number versus a snap shot. Be interesting to see snap shot versus snap shot as I think the numbers would still tell a story without being miss leading. " I've given you the number of Britsh Muslims which joined the British Army in 2014 and 2015. 20 each year for the total number of 40. If 750 British Muslims joined ISIS between the 3 to 4 years as stated in the Guardian article then its save to say that if we were to average it out the numbers are shocking. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm ex forces. When I was in I met quite a few people who matched the leaflets description. But not as many as when I worked on building sites, not as many as when I drove HGVs for a living. Not as many as I do now fixing wealthy peoples luxury items. Not as many as I see in the Forum or online. I used to be proud to be British, but the Military Fed me a lot of lies. Our politicians sent me to war and risked my life and the lives of all my friends on a disgusting untruth. British people allowed that to happen through political stupidity and apathy. Iraqi and Afghan people didn't do that to me.. So unlike a few commenters above, I've no hatred directed at the "Locals". We had little to no choice about whether we fought them or not. Bar conscientiously objecting.. Something I wish I had done, but was too young and lacking confidence to do for real. I'm not saying these listed points don't exist in the Forces, they do, it needs rooting out. It's just its representative of the wider society in this country and white British are not the sole perpetrators of the crime. One that needs correction at an earlier stage in our development. I like that were beginning to change our attitudes, albeit very slowly. Someone mentioned above.. I'm not a patriot.. This country isn't worth dying for. Sadly, I feel the exact same way. " I'm sorry to hear that, and thank you for what you've contributed. Thoughtfulness us not often a thing here. Of course, real patriots don't need to proclaim that they are. You haven't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time." That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. So you're in favour of White Supremacy or actually think it's being wrongfully targeted? Go on, you may as well speak up now. White Supremacy is simply an excuse used by those on the Left to keep minorities in a constant state of victimhood otherwise the identity politics which the Left needs wouldn't work. For instance Asians and Jews in the USA for example typically score higher on average in IQ tests, earn more money on average and attend the top schools. Now if "White Supremacy" was real how on earth would this happen? It wouldn't unless you're going to come up with some bollocks. You never hear how Jewish Supremacy or Japanese Supremacy should be destroyed. " I knew that there was something familiar about your theories. Your arguments are in here: Angela Saini Superior: The Return of Race Science We can hear them on this episode of Start the Week https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00055m9 You are a racist. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. So you're in favour of White Supremacy or actually think it's being wrongfully targeted? Go on, you may as well speak up now. White Supremacy is simply an excuse used by those on the Left to keep minorities in a constant state of victimhood otherwise the identity politics which the Left needs wouldn't work. For instance Asians and Jews in the USA for example typically score higher on average in IQ tests, earn more money on average and attend the top schools. Now if "White Supremacy" was real how on earth would this happen? It wouldn't unless you're going to come up with some bollocks. You never hear how Jewish Supremacy or Japanese Supremacy should be destroyed. I knew that there was something familiar about your theories. Your arguments are in here: Angela Saini Superior: The Return of Race Science We can hear them on this episode of Start the Week https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00055m9 You are a racist." It took you awhile but I knew it was coming. As I said earlier the truth hurts those that fear the truth. As for your accusation of Racism...and? The term racist isn't the equivalent of garlic to a vampire. Either dispute the points I have made otherwise run along. There's a good boy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Racist? I'd like to think its just realism. There's a reason why "White Supremacy" must be destroyed. So you're in favour of White Supremacy or actually think it's being wrongfully targeted? Go on, you may as well speak up now. White Supremacy is simply an excuse used by those on the Left to keep minorities in a constant state of victimhood otherwise the identity politics which the Left needs wouldn't work. For instance Asians and Jews in the USA for example typically score higher on average in IQ tests, earn more money on average and attend the top schools. Now if "White Supremacy" was real how on earth would this happen? It wouldn't unless you're going to come up with some bollocks. You never hear how Jewish Supremacy or Japanese Supremacy should be destroyed. I knew that there was something familiar about your theories. Your arguments are in here: Angela Saini Superior: The Return of Race Science We can hear them on this episode of Start the Week https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00055m9 You are a racist. It took you awhile but I knew it was coming. As I said earlier the truth hurts those that fear the truth. As for your accusation of Racism...and? The term racist isn't the equivalent of garlic to a vampire. Either dispute the points I have made otherwise run along. There's a good boy. " You can indulge your second hand racism in your neo-Nazi speaking book club | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're welcome to come along any time. We usually meet on the 14th day of each month at 8.08. #OkayHandSignal " I'll be honest, I'm surprised you're still allowed on here, I guess FAB is cool with racism now, people have been banned in the past for much less. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t think people should be banned. It’s like the mad man on the bus. It’s best to know where he is so you know where to sit." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're welcome to come along any time. We usually meet on the 14th day of each month at 8.08. #OkayHandSignal I'll be honest, I'm surprised you're still allowed on here, I guess FAB is cool with racism now, people have been banned in the past for much less." . How do you know what people have been banned for?. Are you just assuming what you personally have been banned for and comparing it?. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time. That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries." . I've no doubt some racism exists in the armed forces however that really can't explain the extremely low numbers of Muslim take-up. English born African ethnicity take-up is far far higher. There actually far more likely to go into employment with "family" though and that might explain it, more likely to be higher educated could be another reason and sadly according to polling far less likely to be integrated and "feel English" is another. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also the fact check relied on an out of date FOI request to increase the number of British Muslims in the British Army. At the time of the tweet and article (2015) there was only 445 not 550. 20 Muslims joined the British army in 2014 and 2015. Compare that to how many Muslims went and fought for ISIS during those years and you have a problem. It's small numbers on all sides. I need to do some maths but it feels british muslims don't tend to sign up for any cause. " . So your saying there's differences culturally amongst English born Muslims and other English born people?. Sounds a bit far right | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'll be honest, I'm surprised you're still allowed on here, I guess FAB is cool with racism now, people have been banned in the past for much less." Give me an example of where I have said anything which amounts to Racism under the law? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And by the way ...., I just noticed the word ‘slavery’ used ..... the largest slaving organisation the world has ever seen were known as the ‘Barbery slavers’. They were predominantly muslim and operated throughout the mediterranean and throughout north africa. They traded with ‘western’ organisations such as UK and US to provide the manpower for the cotton fields, farms etc of the new found Americas. Sadly, their trade continues to this day in the form of people trafficking and slavery. They don't like the truth here you know! ..but that doesn't dispute the fact that the British empire also prospered through slavery Meaningless. You can't blame a people for being better at something that every group through out history has done while at the same time excusing the exact behaviour of others. And that is exactly what those who seek to destroy "White Supremacy" do. " I'm not excusing the behaviour of others, quite the opposite, I'm addressing the posters who appear to be excusing British slave traders on the basis others did it too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I came across some stats published by the Ministry of Defence about diversity in the regular forces ( some 144,000 full-time personnel). As of October 1, 2018: 7.6 per cent were BAME 2.5 per cent of officers were BAME On religion: Christian 69.4 per cent No religion 27.7 per cent Hindu 0.9 per cent Other 0.7 per cent Buddhist 0.6 per cent Muslim 0.4 per cent Sikh 0.1 per cent Judaism 0.1 per cent" . Seems to be roughly representative except the Muslim one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're welcome to come along any time. We usually meet on the 14th day of each month at 8.08. #OkayHandSignal I'll be honest, I'm surprised you're still allowed on here, I guess FAB is cool with racism now, people have been banned in the past for much less." He isn’t racist. He is just a frightened, confused , insecure man who spends to long online and says controversial things on here to get attention he doesn’t get anywhere else. Laugh at him, he is funny | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seems to be roughly representative except the Muslim one." Not really. Christians have a disproportionate presence. The last survey found 43 per cent of the population identified as Christian. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seems to be roughly representative except the Muslim one. Not really. Christians have a disproportionate presence. The last survey found 43 per cent of the population identified as Christian." . That's why I said roughly 43 percent of the population defines as Christian and 69% of recruits are Christians and the only one that isn't roughly correct is Muslim. 6% of the population yet 0.4% of recruits. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time. That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries.. I've no doubt some racism exists in the armed forces however that really can't explain the extremely low numbers of Muslim take-up. English born African ethnicity take-up is far far higher. There actually far more likely to go into employment with "family" though and that might explain it, more likely to be higher educated could be another reason and sadly according to polling far less likely to be integrated and "feel English" is another." Here is a good reason why. We've been interfering in the Middle East since The Medieval Times. Up to the Break up of the Ottoman Empire.. through to the present day. Stir the nest in North Africa, central Asia and Eastern Europe. Why would any Muslim want to join our army? When all we seem to be doing is destroying their countries. Taking their resources and then leaving them to rot. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time. That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries.. I've no doubt some racism exists in the armed forces however that really can't explain the extremely low numbers of Muslim take-up. English born African ethnicity take-up is far far higher. There actually far more likely to go into employment with "family" though and that might explain it, more likely to be higher educated could be another reason and sadly according to polling far less likely to be integrated and "feel English" is another. Here is a good reason why. We've been interfering in the Middle East since The Medieval Times. Up to the Break up of the Ottoman Empire.. through to the present day. Stir the nest in North Africa, central Asia and Eastern Europe. Why would any Muslim want to join our army? When all we seem to be doing is destroying their countries. Taking their resources and then leaving them to rot. " That's exposed an unintentional bias in your thinking. The UK is their country. At least as much if not more do than the country that their parents or grandparents were born. So what is making them not consider joining? Perhaps exactly what you said but because these wars have, for some reason, ended up as wars "against Muslims" rather than run of the mill geopolitical posturing and a scramble for resources. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time. That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries.. I've no doubt some racism exists in the armed forces however that really can't explain the extremely low numbers of Muslim take-up. English born African ethnicity take-up is far far higher. There actually far more likely to go into employment with "family" though and that might explain it, more likely to be higher educated could be another reason and sadly according to polling far less likely to be integrated and "feel English" is another. Here is a good reason why. We've been interfering in the Middle East since The Medieval Times. Up to the Break up of the Ottoman Empire.. through to the present day. Stir the nest in North Africa, central Asia and Eastern Europe. Why would any Muslim want to join our army? When all we seem to be doing is destroying their countries. Taking their resources and then leaving them to rot. That's exposed an unintentional bias in your thinking. The UK is their country. At least as much if not more do than the country that their parents or grandparents were born. So what is making them not consider joining? Perhaps exactly what you said but because these wars have, for some reason, ended up as wars "against Muslims" rather than run of the mill geopolitical posturing and a scramble for resources." Because its predominantly been against Islamic nations and people. They see themselves as a Family in Islam. You hurt one, you hurt all. You heal one, you heal all. A faith that speaks to many the world over. What does our politics say about us? Is it really representative of a majority? Or just standard economy/power driven slaughter of innocents to feed the rich? Tale as old as time. You've no idea what bias I hold, I've not even started yet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Army could have saved a lot effort by just asking a couple of questions.... Are you a racist ? Yes / No Are you a Nazi ? Yes / No Those who answered Yes, will make excellent recruits. Those who answered No, are obviously do-gooding lefties who seek to undermine this country with their liberal progressive pc agenda.... " Maybe one day the same questions will be asked of the police force... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly I read today a rather more worrying statistic, there was more British Muslims that went willing to fight for Isis than that are willing to fight for the British armed forces. At this rate the British military may have to consider the recruitment of mercenaries in another 30 years time. That's because the perception of racism in the armed forces is very marked. It's not just Muslims. Note what willwill said. Most British troops from other ethnicities are drawn from Commonwealth countries.. I've no doubt some racism exists in the armed forces however that really can't explain the extremely low numbers of Muslim take-up. English born African ethnicity take-up is far far higher. There actually far more likely to go into employment with "family" though and that might explain it, more likely to be higher educated could be another reason and sadly according to polling far less likely to be integrated and "feel English" is another. Here is a good reason why. We've been interfering in the Middle East since The Medieval Times. Up to the Break up of the Ottoman Empire.. through to the present day. Stir the nest in North Africa, central Asia and Eastern Europe. Why would any Muslim want to join our army? When all we seem to be doing is destroying their countries. Taking their resources and then leaving them to rot. That's exposed an unintentional bias in your thinking. The UK is their country. At least as much if not more do than the country that their parents or grandparents were born. So what is making them not consider joining? Perhaps exactly what you said but because these wars have, for some reason, ended up as wars "against Muslims" rather than run of the mill geopolitical posturing and a scramble for resources. Because its predominantly been against Islamic nations and people. They see themselves as a Family in Islam. You hurt one, you hurt all. You heal one, you heal all. A faith that speaks to many the world over. What does our politics say about us? Is it really representative of a majority? Or just standard economy/power driven slaughter of innocents to feed the rich? Tale as old as time. You've no idea what bias I hold, I've not even started yet. " . That's because that's the countries that have been predominantly at war with each other for the last 50 years while everybody else has gone the other way and also there being run as Islamic dictatorships. Were dammed if we join in and dammed if we don't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |