Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Waste of good milkshake if you ask me...especially when there are lumps of concrete just lying around.... fyi...milkshake IS a foreign beverage...invented in Chicago apparently" Well I learned something good today. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . " to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit " Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"An assault is an assault regardless who it's committed on. In my opinion the person who perpetrated this act should be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. I've absolutely no time for Tommy R or his ilk but I have even less time for people who choose to use violence to show their opposition. We don't need to lower ourselves to Tommy's standards in order to defeat him." Chucking a milkshake on someone is comparable to promoting violence and race hate. In the video, Tommy R and some of his henchmen get a round of punches in on the kid before he escapes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"An assault is an assault regardless who it's committed on. In my opinion the person who perpetrated this act should be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. I've absolutely no time for Tommy R or his ilk but I have even less time for people who choose to use violence to show their opposition. We don't need to lower ourselves to Tommy's standards in order to defeat him. Chucking a milkshake on someone is comparable to promoting violence and race hate. In the video, Tommy R and some of his henchmen get a round of punches in on the kid before he escapes. " Forget about who Tommy R is and what he stands for. The guy assaulted him; to me that's unacceptable. A far better approach would be the one taken by the woman with the pram earlier in the day who told him in no uncertain terms that he was talking shit and that she didn't want anything to do with him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. "of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"An assault is an assault regardless who it's committed on. In my opinion the person who perpetrated this act should be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. I've absolutely no time for Tommy R or his ilk but I have even less time for people who choose to use violence to show their opposition. We don't need to lower ourselves to Tommy's standards in order to defeat him. Chucking a milkshake on someone is comparable to promoting violence and race hate. In the video, Tommy R and some of his henchmen get a round of punches in on the kid before he escapes. Forget about who Tommy R is and what he stands for. The guy assaulted him; to me that's unacceptable. A far better approach would be the one taken by the woman with the pram earlier in the day who told him in no uncertain terms that he was talking shit and that she didn't want anything to do with him. " Totally agree with you, violence is never the right answer  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it "Its going to be the tommy Robinson milkshake challenge.I can see it being a thing.Hes going to need more security or an umbrella. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it
Its going to be the tommy Robinson milkshake challenge.I can see it being a thing.Hes going to need more security or an umbrella."nar he will milk it lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it
Its going to be the tommy Robinson milkshake challenge.I can see it being a thing.Hes going to need more security or an umbrella.nar he will milk it lol "For every last drop of publicity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it
Its going to be the tommy Robinson milkshake challenge.I can see it being a thing.Hes going to need more security or an umbrella.nar he will milk it lol
For every last drop of publicity."yep and it won’t cost him s penny | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Second time apparently.Tommy got some solid punches in by the looks of things. itll play well to the electorate and his fans here . to be fair bob you would of got some punch’s in aswell and so would I and anyone who says they wouldn’t are full of shit Yeah of course I would .It won't do him any harm seen swinging punches .I am looking forward to the next milkshake incident caught on camera. Maybe chocolate next time. of corse it won’t do him any harm that’s the irony of it
Its going to be the tommy Robinson milkshake challenge.I can see it being a thing.Hes going to need more security or an umbrella.nar he will milk it lol "Top quality pun | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. " Who gives a shit he is a big nothing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Waste of good milkshake if you ask me...especially when there are lumps of concrete just lying around.... fyi...milkshake IS a foreign beverage...invented in Chicago apparently" I thought it was a rich arab that drills for milk | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Forget about who Tommy R is and what he stands for. The guy assaulted him; to me that's unacceptable. A far better approach would be the one taken by the woman with the pram earlier in the day who told him in no uncertain terms that he was talking shit and that she didn't want anything to do with him. " Pelting disliked politicians with rotten fruit, eggs and soaking them in cold water and the contents of chamber pots at the hustings and while campaigning for election has been a part of UK politics for hundreds of years. In fact it has been pointed to over generations as a sign of exactly how healthy our political system is. Funny how over the last 25/30 or so years as many become more and more disaffected with our politicians and they in turn have become more openly nothing more than self promoters for sale to the highest bidder this tradition has become criminalised. Even funnier how a politician and his henchmen are able to attack someone for throwing a milkshake and somehow they are the victims. But hey, this is just my opinion and it counts for nothing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"An assault is an assault regardless who it's committed on. In my opinion the person who perpetrated this act should be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. I've absolutely no time for Tommy R or his ilk but I have even less time for people who choose to use violence to show their opposition. We don't need to lower ourselves to Tommy's standards in order to defeat him. Chucking a milkshake on someone is comparable to promoting violence and race hate. In the video, Tommy R and some of his henchmen get a round of punches in on the kid before he escapes. Forget about who Tommy R is and what he stands for. The guy assaulted him; to me that's unacceptable. A far better approach would be the one taken by the woman with the pram earlier in the day who told him in no uncertain terms that he was talking shit and that she didn't want anything to do with him. " This.. Yaxley Robinson or whatever he's called thrives on the gutter elements so assaulting him albeit with a milkshake only allows him to play the victim and react with other more direct violence.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ??" Not at all, the demographic that reads that paper will do so given their politics are more in his direction where as the same poll conducted with guardian or independent readers would suggest disagree with him.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ??" Sun reader demographic mainly being trash? Well I never! Next you'll tell me Daily Mail hate the "poor" too   | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ?? Not at all, the demographic that reads that paper will do so given their politics are more in his direction where as the same poll conducted with guardian or independent readers would suggest disagree with him.. " That's not true. The Sun detest Tommy and warped the story, saying he is a vile fascist thug, but I get your point  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ??" Because his politics are the politics of hate and intolerance. This is a swingers site. The two do not sit well beside each other. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ?? Because his politics are the politics of hate and intolerance. This is a swingers site. The two do not sit well beside each other." Then why a thread about him , on a swingers site ?? Just seems a strange topic | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ?? Because his politics are the politics of hate and intolerance. This is a swingers site. The two do not sit well beside each other. Then why a thread about him , on a swingers site ?? Just seems a strange topic " But then why have a Politics forum? Perhaps its just a way of keeping the mad bad and dangerous away from the rest of the filthy fuckers? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ?? Not at all, the demographic that reads that paper will do so given their politics are more in his direction where as the same poll conducted with guardian or independent readers would suggest disagree with him.. That's not true. The Sun detest Tommy and warped the story, saying he is a vile fascist thug, but I get your point "Saying he's a vile fascist thug is by no means misrepresentation, unusual for them to tell the truth but they're spot on if that's how they describe him.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This story was on the Suns Facebook page this morning , and over 1.5k comments , I'd say 99% supported Tommy . Yet on here everyone detests him , very strange ?? Because his politics are the politics of hate and intolerance. This is a swingers site. The two do not sit well beside each other. Then why a thread about him , on a swingers site ?? Just seems a strange topic " Not at all, given some of the classics over the years politics is quite a vanilla topic.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. " Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. " You mentioned the milk shake guys ethnicity three times. Why was that relevant to your speculation around what happened? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Tommy’s Milkshake brings all the kids to the yard. " Yeah skunk flavour  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. " In today's issue of "shit that didn't happen".... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Tommy’s Milkshake brings all the kids to the yard. Yeah skunk flavour "That would be a Bhang lassi . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"An assault is an assault regardless who it's committed on. In my opinion the person who perpetrated this act should be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. I've absolutely no time for Tommy R or his ilk but I have even less time for people who choose to use violence to show their opposition. We don't need to lower ourselves to Tommy's standards in order to defeat him. Chucking a milkshake on someone is comparable to promoting violence and race hate. In the video, Tommy R and some of his henchmen get a round of punches in on the kid before he escapes. Forget about who Tommy R is and what he stands for. The guy assaulted him; to me that's unacceptable. A far better approach would be the one taken by the woman with the pram earlier in the day who told him in no uncertain terms that he was talking shit and that she didn't want anything to do with him. " There is no place for expressing your political anger this way. There is even less justification for punching back in reaction... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. You mentioned the milk shake guys ethnicity three times. Why was that relevant to your speculation around what happened?" Yep I was wondering about that too. Maybe another yaxley-lennon fanboy? I watched the footage and it did seem like an argument that degenerated into thuggish behaviour but yaxley-lennon was provocatively stepping into mr milkshakes personal space while his “minders” circled around. It was hardly a no fault situation, unlike the egging of Jeremy Corbyn who was sitting down when he was attacked. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. " Well said. I , too actually bothered to watch the whole video , not the doctored media video ( as per usual) . Not only did the cop not arrest the guy, the same guy kept goading and filming Tommy well after the incident , even with the police still there , because he knew they wouldnt arrest him. And then the video of the attacker in a taxi afterwards where hes laughing about it . But apparently " he dropped the milkshake accidentally " yeah yeah you twat  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. Well said. I , too actually bothered to watch the whole video , not the doctored media video ( as per usual) . Not only did the cop not arrest the guy, the same guy kept goading and filming Tommy well after the incident , even with the police still there , because he knew they wouldnt arrest him. And then the video of the attacker in a taxi afterwards where hes laughing about it . But apparently " he dropped the milkshake accidentally " yeah yeah you twat "Yaxley-lennon is a provocateur and the worst thing about this is that you actually seem to be saying he is an innocent victim. I think the police acted with restraint and thus prevented the situation from escalating. Play with fire and you are going to get burnt os milkshaked! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Links to the "right" vid pls! " I dont know how to do links on here , but it's on TheRebel.Media on Esra Levantes show on YouTube | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. Well said. I , too actually bothered to watch the whole video , not the doctored media video ( as per usual) . Not only did the cop not arrest the guy, the same guy kept goading and filming Tommy well after the incident , even with the police still there , because he knew they wouldnt arrest him. And then the video of the attacker in a taxi afterwards where hes laughing about it . But apparently " he dropped the milkshake accidentally " yeah yeah you twat
Yaxley-lennon is a provocateur and the worst thing about this is that you actually seem to be saying he is an innocent victim. I think the police acted with restraint and thus prevented the situation from escalating. Play with fire and you are going to get burnt os milkshaked! "So what about the 2 women who were assaulted by the same guy a few minutes earlier , and as they asked the policewoman to arrest the guy , they just drove off and ignored them . One rule for one I'm afraid | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. Well said. I , too actually bothered to watch the whole video , not the doctored media video ( as per usual) . Not only did the cop not arrest the guy, the same guy kept goading and filming Tommy well after the incident , even with the police still there , because he knew they wouldnt arrest him. And then the video of the attacker in a taxi afterwards where hes laughing about it . But apparently " he dropped the milkshake accidentally " yeah yeah you twat
Yaxley-lennon is a provocateur and the worst thing about this is that you actually seem to be saying he is an innocent victim. I think the police acted with restraint and thus prevented the situation from escalating. Play with fire and you are going to get burnt os milkshaked! So what about the 2 women who were assaulted by the same guy a few minutes earlier , and as they asked the policewoman to arrest the guy , they just drove off and ignored them . One rule for one I'm afraid "Assaulted or verbally abused? Theres a world of difference! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. Thats a gross misinterpretation of what happened. The footage is all online on Youtube. The asian guy who attacked Tommy Robinson with a milkshake had earlier in the day also attacked (physically assaulted) 2 women in Warrington town centre. What did the 2 women do to deserve being attacked? They had apparently spoken up for Tommy Robinson. Police failed to arrest the asian guy when the 2 women had made official complaint and the asian guy had continued to loiter around before he attacked Tommy Robinson. The asian guy is a thug who should face the full force of the law, its astonishing that the police failed to act. Its also funny to see the double standards and hypocrisy from some people like Ian Dunt and Kevin Maguire, who had condemned the fact Jeremy Corbyn was egged a few weeks ago but then celebrated Tommy Robinson having a milkshake thrown at him. Well said. I , too actually bothered to watch the whole video , not the doctored media video ( as per usual) . Not only did the cop not arrest the guy, the same guy kept goading and filming Tommy well after the incident , even with the police still there , because he knew they wouldnt arrest him. And then the video of the attacker in a taxi afterwards where hes laughing about it . But apparently " he dropped the milkshake accidentally " yeah yeah you twat "So race hate + violence = okay. Confronting race hate + chucking a milkshake on a violent racist = not okay? Just making sure I understand your point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. " "Slipped"? If he's the guy in the video I saw, it was no slip, it was a deliberate act. I dislike Robinson, but violence is not the way to deal with him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"'Speaking to Asian Image, Mahmud said he had been left shaken by the incident. He added: “I was in Warrington for a meeting and afterwards was on my way home. I had to pass this group of people. “He [Robinson] just kept talking to me. I kept moving location. I was the only Asian guy there. I said to him I do not wish to speak to you on or off camera. I just got annoyed with him. A milkshake ‘slipped’ out of my hand. “I had no intention of doing anything or reacting in any way. But he kept talking. I feel a bit shaken up and shocked to be honest.”' Sounds like Yaxley-Lemon was hassling someone and they had a go back at him. Seems fair enough to me. "Slipped"? If he's the guy in the video I saw, it was no slip, it was a deliberate act. I dislike Robinson, but violence is not the way to deal with him." If that is "violence" then so is a snowball fight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. " Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. " Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. " Standing up to a racist thug who's getting in your face trying to intimidate you ISN'T good light? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. " Maybe UKIP will sack Tommy following the same logic - I wish! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. " Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. " What he did whilst not excusing it has nothing to do with his employer, where did you glean that piece of information from if I may ask? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute ." How did he bring them into disrepute? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? " No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. " You do understand he wasn't at work, or wearing the company apparel or that he even shouted the name of the company when he chucked the milkshake? The basics of employment law and policies within contracts pertaining to what is acceptable behaviors outside the workplace do of course in some jobs cover what is off duty etc but not sure a call centre would have such.. That his employment has been looked into and is now being used by people on social media snacks of petty retribution by the likes of Robinson and his supporters and is a bit sickening.. Your reference to other types of criminal activities even for you is pathetic.. It's not like he had some knitting needles is it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully." Just to be clear. Tommy Robinson isn’t a politician. He’s just some bloke who likes to promote race hate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. " Good thing Tommy ain't a crim | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
, who’d knew that dairy based products were his weakness! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. " This is quite a spectacular level of nonsense. How is what he did associated with his employment? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Apparently tommy is afraid of milkshakes now , who’d knew that dairy based products were his weakness!"Tommy in intolerance shocker! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Apparently tommy is afraid of milkshakes now , who’d knew that dairy based products were his weakness!Tommy in intolerance shocker! "Lactose intolerant tommy!
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully." You're 41, you're acting like this is new? Politicians have had stuff throw at them for years, just recently in Australia there was the Egg boy incident, or how about many years back when John Prescott was egged and he flew into a rage. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully. You're 41, you're acting like this is new? Politicians have had stuff throw at them for years, just recently in Australia there was the Egg boy incident, or how about many years back when John Prescott was egged and he flew into a rage. "It was the only time that John Precott rose in my estimate. The guy egged him and got a spanking for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. " Keep repeating it and eventually you'll believe Tommy Ten-names is a victim of race-hate. Copyright: Joseph Goebbels | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. You do understand he wasn't at work, or wearing the company apparel or that he even shouted the name of the company when he chucked the milkshake? The basics of employment law and policies within contracts pertaining to what is acceptable behaviors outside the workplace do of course in some jobs cover what is off duty etc but not sure a call centre would have such.. That his employment has been looked into and is now being used by people on social media snacks of petty retribution by the likes of Robinson and his supporters and is a bit sickening.. Your reference to other types of criminal activities even for you is pathetic.. It's not like he had some knitting needles is it? " Hi. I am only using a correlation that the police use so I am surprised that you think it is pathetic. From memory the police found that those who park in disabled bays are more likely to commit other crimes and that those who commit petty crime are more likely to progress to more serious crimes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. " Indeed, it makes me shudder with dread at the thought. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. You do understand he wasn't at work, or wearing the company apparel or that he even shouted the name of the company when he chucked the milkshake? The basics of employment law and policies within contracts pertaining to what is acceptable behaviors outside the workplace do of course in some jobs cover what is off duty etc but not sure a call centre would have such.. That his employment has been looked into and is now being used by people on social media snacks of petty retribution by the likes of Robinson and his supporters and is a bit sickening.. Your reference to other types of criminal activities even for you is pathetic.. It's not like he had some knitting needles is it? Hi. I am only using a correlation that the police use so I am surprised that you think it is pathetic. From memory the police found that those who park in disabled bays are more likely to commit other crimes and that those who commit petty crime are more likely to progress to more serious crimes. " Your evading my earlier question as to just how you have concluded that he brought his employer into disrepute? Pretty crime correlation yes but parking in disabled bays, get a grip Pat your twisting your analogies.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time ." Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time ." You’ll be steering well clear of Tommy Robinson using your logic, given his criminal background & propensity to violence? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? " I guess that you do not have to make any assessment of either the commercial risk or risk to others of people in real life. This is the criteria which I have always used and see no need to change it. Luckily the feedback or comments which you receive on these forums is irrelevant, what is crucial is that which you receive in real life . If I have the choice between making decisions based on your comments and those which I receive in real life you can guess whose feedback I would prefer to accept. The feedback in real life is live real time and quantifiable. Anyone who is bored can knock words into a keyboard . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The feedback in real life is live real time and quantifiable. Anyone who is bored can knock words into a keyboard ." How is the words uttered by someone face to face to another more quantifiable than the written word being read instead of hearing it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time ." Where does that rank Tommy Ten Names on your list of villains? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Hero to many on here. Ultra nazi Tommy Robinson got a strawberry milkshake dumped on his head by someone while out canvassing for more racists to vote for him in the European elections. Nice. hakr Shame it wasn’t a mango lassie, or some other foreign beverage. Like it or not it is a criminal offence to throw a milk shake at someone and can hardly be considered to be the actions of a responsible person. Hopefully his employers ( I believe he works in a call centre) will now sack him. He hardly shows his employer in a good light by behaving in this manner. Hws hardly bringing disrepute onto them if you don't even know their name. Seems a bit OTT IMO. Has the guy been prosecuted? I don't recall a similar clamour for sackings with other newsworthy cases. Any reputable employer is hardly going to tolerate anyone throwing a milk shake over someone. Most employment contracts have a clause not to bring the company into disrepute . How did he bring them into disrepute? No reasonable person can claim that throwing a milk shake over someone is reasonable or acceptable. Why would any employer accept this type of criminal behaviour. ? If someone is prepared to commit this type of criminal act , it makes you wonder what other type of criminal activity they may be prepared to engage in. You do understand he wasn't at work, or wearing the company apparel or that he even shouted the name of the company when he chucked the milkshake? The basics of employment law and policies within contracts pertaining to what is acceptable behaviors outside the workplace do of course in some jobs cover what is off duty etc but not sure a call centre would have such.. That his employment has been looked into and is now being used by people on social media snacks of petty retribution by the likes of Robinson and his supporters and is a bit sickening.. Your reference to other types of criminal activities even for you is pathetic.. It's not like he had some knitting needles is it? Hi. I am only using a correlation that the police use so I am surprised that you think it is pathetic. From memory the police found that those who park in disabled bays are more likely to commit other crimes and that those who commit petty crime are more likely to progress to more serious crimes. Your evading my earlier question as to just how you have concluded that he brought his employer into disrepute? Pretty crime correlation yes but parking in disabled bays, get a grip Pat your twisting your analogies.. " Hi. There is an error in my post so thank you for bringing in to my attention. I should have stated parking in disabled bays illegally and without a permit. These type of people are more likely to commit other crimes. My apologies for the error and hope that no one who uses the bays legally was offended. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? " As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully. You're 41, you're acting like this is new? Politicians have had stuff throw at them for years, just recently in Australia there was the Egg boy incident, or how about many years back when John Prescott was egged and he flew into a rage. ". The act isn't new, the moral and legal ability to do so clearly is though. Corbyns attacker was given a month in prison and roundly condemned. This attacker has been held up as doing the right thing and was let off by the police with a lift to the train station. This is a classic case of why the regressive left always eats itself in the long run, it has no moral objections on point of principle because in reality it has no principles, everything is tolerated providing it's in the name of the lefts agenda. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" This is a classic case of why the regressive left always eats itself in the long run, it has no moral objections on point of principle because in reality it has no principles, everything is tolerated providing it's in the name of the lefts agenda." The "lefts agenda" of not sitting their and accepting verbal abuse whilst a racist thug with his goons is getting in your face about why your people are the problem and need to be kicked out of the country? As for the other stuff, the right have been doing that for years to get where they are, why is it an issue when the other team tries it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully. You're 41, you're acting like this is new? Politicians have had stuff throw at them for years, just recently in Australia there was the Egg boy incident, or how about many years back when John Prescott was egged and he flew into a rage. .
The act isn't new, the moral and legal ability to do so clearly is though.
Corbyns attacker was given a month in prison and roundly condemned.
This attacker has been held up as doing the right thing and was let off by the police with a lift to the train station.
This is a classic case of why the regressive left always eats itself in the long run, it has no moral objections on point of principle because in reality it has no principles, everything is tolerated providing it's in the name of the lefts agenda."People tend to justify the means when it's more alligned to their ends Which is why left leaning posters feel more comfortable ae defining the milkshake. And right leaning are ignoring the subsequent punches (proportionate? Hmm) and seem to be on a witch hunt. Drinks are thrown every weekend. Yet I wonder if people are calling out for sackings? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this." You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. " I don't know why you engage, to be honest. Its obvious from the posts he/she/it isn't worth engaging with. Either a troll, having a good chuckle at people losing their shit over the preposterous stuff they post, or has cognition issues. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" This is a classic case of why the regressive left always eats itself in the long run, it has no moral objections on point of principle because in reality it has no principles, everything is tolerated providing it's in the name of the lefts agenda. The "lefts agenda" of not sitting their and accepting verbal abuse whilst a racist thug with his goons is getting in your face about why your people are the problem and need to be kicked out of the country? As for the other stuff, the right have been doing that for years to get where they are, why is it an issue when the other team tries it? ". If the other team did it I'd be against it on a point of principle that everybody has the right to run for election free from violence and political intimidation. Anna soubrey has the right to give interviews and walk from parliament without being jostled by protesters, Jeremy Corbyn has the right, people running for the communist party or the green party and even the BNP have the right. You don't have to respect what they say but you do have to respect their right to say it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. " Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. " Bullshit.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. " Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. " Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. " Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. " Similar to your fantasy about the majority of people now want to leave on Wto terms? Which you have chosen once again to duck the question of just where you found it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. " Which is why I'd always want to look at the source data. Rather than take anyone's word on it. IMO no person is so reliable id take their word as fact. Even Hawkins and Einstein needed peer reviews. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. " Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. Which is why I'd always want to look at the source data. Rather than take anyone's word on it. IMO no person is so reliable id take their word as fact. Even Hawkins and Einstein needed peer reviews. " An that is why I never post source data as people can simply look it up themselves. It makes the posting of source data a bit pointless. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. Which is why I'd always want to look at the source data. Rather than take anyone's word on it. IMO no person is so reliable id take their word as fact. Even Hawkins and Einstein needed peer reviews. An that is why I never post source data as people can simply look it up themselves. It makes the posting of source data a bit pointless. " I dont have time to search down why someone has a pov they say they do. For all I know the source doesn't exist and someone is just shooting from the hip. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. " My point which you seem to have clarified is simply that your claims to not listen to others opinions now is hypocrisy given you have done so before.. People with an open mind can and do change their opinions regardless of the delivery method or source, its a pretty ignorant statement to make or telling to say in your opinion no one has changed theirs.. Which you have done so yourself, how else have you learnt in your life if not by that innate principle or do you know all..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. My point which you seem to have clarified is simply that your claims to not listen to others opinions now is hypocrisy given you have done so before.. People with an open mind can and do change their opinions regardless of the delivery method or source, its a pretty ignorant statement to make or telling to say in your opinion no one has changed theirs.. Which you have done so yourself, how else have you learnt in your life if not by that innate principle or do you know all..? " With an audience of about ten to twenty members I cannot see many people changing their opinions by what they read on here . In real life an information feed will come from a wide variety of sources. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. Which is why I'd always want to look at the source data. Rather than take anyone's word on it. IMO no person is so reliable id take their word as fact. Even Hawkins and Einstein needed peer reviews. An that is why I never post source data as people can simply look it up themselves. It makes the posting of source data a bit pointless. " "I refuse to reference my evidenceless bullshit" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. " So why are you posting if you have such a low opinion of the forum? From the way you describe your motivation I would have thought you have better things to do? But perhaps you are just making it all up? After all if you cannot provide sources or links to reference them then the only conclusion one can draw is that they don't exist and you are a fantasist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. So why are you posting if you have such a low opinion of the forum? From the way you describe your motivation I would have thought you have better things to do? But perhaps you are just making it all up? After all if you cannot provide sources or links to reference them then the only conclusion one can draw is that they don't exist and you are a fantasist. "I never said that I had a low opinion of it , what I said was that it was unlikely that anyone would use it as a source of information. In real life I do not ask for sources or links - where necessary I will look them up myself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . Suppose its similar to those who constantly talk twaddle and refuse to clarify or confirm the basis of their postings, eventually most people will make the correlation that they don't have a clue what they are talking about? As far as I am aware these forums exist in order to allow people to express an opinion . If someone wants a detailed analysis of the facts they are probably on the wrong site or have too much spare time on their hands. Back up does not really help as people only provide that who which suits their case and in any event why would anyone want to do it on a site such as this. You probably don’t even see the irony in your own post - I bet it goes right over your head. You put-down the opinions, suggestions and arguments of others as being irrelevant because “no one takes a site like this seriously” - other than when it is an argument that you support. And yet, you are becoming a prolific user (again) making your own arguments and suggestions on this site as to why (in this instance) a guy should lose his job or be charged with assault. If you are happy to voice an opinion “on a site like this” why would others not want to have an opinion or challenge a contrary one? The attempts to discredit others from disagreeing with your opinion because “no-one takes a site like this seriously” is a little contradictory when you are using the very same site to make your argument. Everyone can post any opinion that they wish on this site and my post never suggested otherwise. It would be a strange world if everyone had the same opinion. What I found odd was that a poster who never expresses any original opinions but constantly spends time criticiding other posters should ask for back up to an opinion. This site might be useful to pass idle time if waiting for a train or plane, no rational person is going to use it as a source of information. Anyone who is an expert on a topic in real life is hardly going to spend their spare time posting about it on here. Bullshit.. Hi. I would like to think that I can spend my spare time in a more constructive manner than posting comments like you have just made. It is very easy to type the comments which you have just made onto a keyboard- in real life you would not dare make such comments to a persons face. Your funny Pat.. When you have in the past asked for opinions on which boiler to install or which washing machine was best for a property what we're you asking for given you place no stead by anyone's opinion but your own on here..? Oh and yes I have done and would do.. Hi. You must spend a lot of time trawling my posts to be able to comment on that level of detail. Most people consider other people's opinions , hence the reason for asking the questions. Most of the replies received were both informative and helpfull and in turn I would like to think that the advice that I have given other members helped them as well. Quite a few have written expressions of thanks . The politics forum seems to attract an entirely different type of person. It is always interesting to see other people's opinions though I am certain that no one has changed their opinions as a result of anything written on these forums. The politics forum hardly attracts an audience that represents all sections of society. So why are you posting if you have such a low opinion of the forum? From the way you describe your motivation I would have thought you have better things to do? But perhaps you are just making it all up? After all if you cannot provide sources or links to reference them then the only conclusion one can draw is that they don't exist and you are a fantasist. I never said that I had a low opinion of it , what I said was that it was unlikely that anyone would use it as a source of information. In real life I do not ask for sources or links - where necessary I will look them up myself. "So why do you bother posting? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I always use any information available to assess both the commercial risk and the safety factor to others of decisions which I make . I have used the correlation between petty crime and other crimes for a very long time . You’ll be steering well clear of Tommy Robinson using your logic, given his criminal background & propensity to violence? "Hey T&T, you never responded! I wonder why... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Of course evertonw is allowed an opinion. But imo not being able to back it up and pass it away as gut feel is intellectual snowflakism. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. Or it might be that the source of your information is so reliable that you do not need any information to back it up. In real life you are involved in continuous feedback loop. That is hardly the case on this site. There are also members on here posting facts and figures which they do not understand and have the base information completely wrong. Which is why I'd always want to look at the source data. Rather than take anyone's word on it. IMO no person is so reliable id take their word as fact. Even Hawkins and Einstein needed peer reviews. An that is why I never post source data as people can simply look it up themselves. It makes the posting of source data a bit pointless. " Especially when true source data dismantles your argument | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"At least we've been shown the way forward. Let's just pelt all politicans we don't like with anything we feel like throwing at them. I mean we've been given the green light morally and lawfully. You're 41, you're acting like this is new? Politicians have had stuff throw at them for years, just recently in Australia there was the Egg boy incident, or how about many years back when John Prescott was egged and he flew into a rage.
It was the only time that John Precott rose in my estimate. The guy egged him and got a spanking for it."Reminds me of when he appeared on Top Gear he joked that Tony Blair asked him what happened? His reply was “well you told me to go out and connect with the voters” | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I hear there is a crowd funded page that donates milkshakes to those who wish to give a kipper a shake. LoL" The only shake I would like to give robinson is by the neck | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I hear there is a crowd funded page that donates milkshakes to those who wish to give a kipper a shake. LoL The only shake I would like to give robinson is by the neck "carry on spanking your monkey | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. " Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess. "However you read it, he’s still an obnoxious wanker so arguing the merits of his “joke” isn’t going to make me feel any sympathy for him and before anyone craps on about lefty liberals and pc, i thought what danny baker did was pretty cuntish too! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
However you read it, he’s still an obnoxious wanker so arguing the merits of his “joke” isn’t going to make me feel any sympathy for him and before anyone craps on about lefty liberals and pc, i thought what danny baker did was pretty cuntish too!"It's always good to see who defends Aragon of Azkaban .They betray their affiliations more than they wish. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You lay down with dogs bruv you get up with fleas .Look at me I hugged a few trees voted green now I'm one of those stinky bell ends with dreads eating lentils and wearing itchy clothes. Stay woke. "that doesn't answer the question bob! Who was betrayed more that they wish? Honestly bob...you're pretty good at this stuff. I just wondered what it meant! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’ll send you down a food parcel bob lol that will be a first the north doing charity work for the south lol" Cheers dude but due to being a green voter you'll have send it by sail boat otherwise the stinky bell ends get labelled hypocrites and everything must be abled to be recycle and no palm oil or I go to green hell where neo cons torture us with whataboutery quotes and vegan poetry . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
However you read it, he’s still an obnoxious wanker so arguing the merits of his “joke” isn’t going to make me feel any sympathy for him and before anyone craps on about lefty liberals and pc, i thought what danny baker did was pretty cuntish too!
It's always good to see who defends Aragon of Azkaban .They betray their affiliations more than they wish. "Awww bless, Carl isn't right wing enough for me sunshine. Uncle Adolf...now there's a leader of men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’ll send you down a food parcel bob lol that will be a first the north doing charity work for the south lol Cheers dude but due to being a green voter you'll have send it by sail boat otherwise the stinky bell ends get labelled hypocrites and everything must be abled to be recycle and no palm oil or I go to green hell where neo cons torture us with whataboutery quotes and vegan poetry . "come to think of it yr the one with the boat so get out and catch some fish bob but stay in Uk waters don’t wanting you scrapping with the pesky French lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’ll send you down a food parcel bob lol that will be a first the north doing charity work for the south lol Cheers dude but due to being a green voter you'll have send it by sail boat otherwise the stinky bell ends get labelled hypocrites and everything must be abled to be recycle and no palm oil or I go to green hell where neo cons torture us with whataboutery quotes and vegan poetry . come to think of it yr the one with the boat so get out and catch some fish bob but stay in Uk waters don’t wanting you scrapping with the pesky French lol"The" jammy dodger" is ship shape and prepared all ready for the season.Not been out in her so far this year.Im a fair weather fisherman.The needles is as far as she will go .So no frogs to bother the British bass fishermen. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess. "First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her. Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her. Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great. If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’ll send you down a food parcel bob lol that will be a first the north doing charity work for the south lol Cheers dude but due to being a green voter you'll have send it by sail boat otherwise the stinky bell ends get labelled hypocrites and everything must be abled to be recycle and no palm oil or I go to green hell where neo cons torture us with whataboutery quotes and vegan poetry . come to think of it yr the one with the boat so get out and catch some fish bob but stay in Uk waters don’t wanting you scrapping with the pesky French lol"You can Fish French waters You just got to pay for the right to do so. They forgot to last time Doh ! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. "I wouldn't even r@pe her or you. Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke. Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
"Its not funny though is it and you make yourself look as bad as he is by defending that shit! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
"Remember he also said he would r@pe her. Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff. It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Its not funny though is it and you make yourself look as bad as he is by defending that shit!"Cry more? Jokes are jokes. Sargon has over a 100k followers that find his jokes and his commentary funny. Just because you get your panties in a twist doesn't take away from the fact that thousands took it for what it was; a joke. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Remember he also said he would r@pe her.
Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff.
It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong. "Where's the laughing emotion when you need it. Seriously you sound insecure...who hurt you?
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Its not funny though is it and you make yourself look as bad as he is by defending that shit!
Cry more? Jokes are jokes. Sargon has over a 100k followers that find his jokes and his commentary funny.
Just because you get your panties in a twist doesn't take away from the fact that thousands took it for what it was; a joke.
"You’ve missed the point. It wasn’t a joke, he was trying to intimidate and degrade another human being. The main take away from this, is what you think is acceptable and funny. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Remember he also said he would r@pe her.
Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff.
It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong.
Where's the laughing emotion when you need it. Seriously you sound insecure...who hurt you?
"Are you suggesting I should be hurt or r@ped. A moment ago you said you wouldn’t r@pe me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Remember he also said he would r@pe her.
Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff.
It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong.
Where's the laughing emotion when you need it. Seriously you sound insecure...who hurt you?
Are you suggesting I should be hurt or r@ped. A moment ago you said you wouldn’t r@pe me. "Sorry, wouldn’t even r@pe me. The word “even” implies that under different circumstances, you would. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Remember he also said he would r@pe her.
Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff.
It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong.
Where's the laughing emotion when you need it. Seriously you sound insecure...who hurt you?
Are you suggesting I should be hurt or r@ped. A moment ago you said you wouldn’t r@pe me. "Oh deary me...have you taken your meds today?
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"#splashthefash is taking off. The pro-rape UKIP candidate got two or three milkshakes dumped on him today. Saying I wouldn't -rape some one is Pro-Rape now? Hilarious, words are violence too I guess.
First he said he wouldn’t even r@pe her. Implying if she was better looking he would r@pe her.
Then he said with the right encouragement he would r@pe her.
Whichever statement you pick, he doesn’t look great.
If your more concerned with someone getting milkshake on their hair than someone degrading women by saying they’re not worth of him r@ping them, or than someone saying he would r@pe her with enough encouragement. Then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
I wouldn't even r@pe her or you.
Doesn't mean I would r@pe anyone else and you're deluded if you think that the comment was anything other than a joke.
Also one is a crime (assault) and the other is a joke.
Remember he also said he would r@pe her.
Makes me very sad that people like you are so full of anger and hate that you think r@pe threats and jokes are acceptable and you will defend a race hate party politician to the bitter end presumably because you agree with him on either the race hate or on the r@pe stuff.
It’s just genuinely sad to think we live in a world where people get so twisted and angry and lose all sense of perspective on what’s right and what’s wrong.
Where's the laughing emotion when you need it. Seriously you sound insecure...who hurt you?
Are you suggesting I should be hurt or r@ped. A moment ago you said you wouldn’t r@pe me.
Sorry, wouldn’t even r@pe me.
The word “even” implies that under different circumstances, you would. "What is your obsession with being or not being r@ped? A fetish or fantasy of some kind. Bore off | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable." Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. " Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you?" No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right. "Wow that’s some leap from me not enjoying how you’re thinking that you wouldn’t even r@pe me to accusing me of being the type to falsely accuse other people. Sure any woman who doesn’t want to be sexually assaulted is always making up shit right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right. "You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
Wow that’s some leap from me not enjoying how you’re thinking that you wouldn’t even r@pe me to accusing me of being the type to falsely accuse other people.
Sure any woman who doesn’t want to be sexually assaulted is always making up shit right?"For one reason or another I am suggesting you consciously or sub consciously believe that your gender some how makes you a victim to the point that you take jokes literally to heart and you can't even have an online discussion with a stranger on the internet without feeling under threat because of said mentality. Who's talking about other women? I'm talking to you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life"I don't care about your feelings White Knight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life
I don't care about your feelings White Knight. "Not a white knight here - cheap jibe by the way - just sticking up for the natural order of things where you call out people when they are trolling | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
Wow that’s some leap from me not enjoying how you’re thinking that you wouldn’t even r@pe me to accusing me of being the type to falsely accuse other people.
Sure any woman who doesn’t want to be sexually assaulted is always making up shit right?
For one reason or another I am suggesting you consciously or sub consciously believe that your gender some how makes you a victim to the point that you take jokes literally to heart and you can't even have an online discussion with a stranger on the internet without feeling under threat because of said mentality.
Who's talking about other women? I'm talking to you. "I can confirm two things for you. 1. None of your assumptions about me are not even remotely close. 2. Your “jokes”, about how you wouldn’t even r@pe me. They’re not funny. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
Wow that’s some leap from me not enjoying how you’re thinking that you wouldn’t even r@pe me to accusing me of being the type to falsely accuse other people.
Sure any woman who doesn’t want to be sexually assaulted is always making up shit right?
For one reason or another I am suggesting you consciously or sub consciously believe that your gender some how makes you a victim to the point that you take jokes literally to heart and you can't even have an online discussion with a stranger on the internet without feeling under threat because of said mentality.
Who's talking about other women? I'm talking to you.
I can confirm two things for you.
1. None of your assumptions about me are not even remotely close.
2. Your “jokes”, about how you wouldn’t even r@pe me. They’re not funny."1) I don't care. I'm having fun. 2) I direct you to Sargons second reply. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life
I don't care about your feelings White Knight.
Not a white knight here - cheap jibe by the way - just sticking up for the natural order of things where you call out people when they are trolling "She's not going to sleep with you dude. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life
I don't care about your feelings White Knight.
Not a white knight here - cheap jibe by the way - just sticking up for the natural order of things where you call out people when they are trolling
She's not going to sleep with you dude. "Maybe you better slime your way back under that rock you appeared from sleazeball | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life
I don't care about your feelings White Knight.
Not a white knight here - cheap jibe by the way - just sticking up for the natural order of things where you call out people when they are trolling
She's not going to sleep with you dude.
Maybe you better slime your way back under that rock you appeared from sleazeball"Awww, man on internet says mean words. Sticks & Stones Bro | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The amount of low quality insults and the amount of thought you’ve put into r@ping me or not. Is making me feel uncomfortable. Awww bless...victim mentality at it's finest. Are you suggesting that I should be happy about not being worthy of being r@ped by you? No, I'm suggesting you're the type to falsely accuse someone of r@pe because they looked at you funny. Words are violence, am I right.
You need to back off now you nasty piece of work - man up and accept that what you are saying is unpleasant and offensive and has no place in modern life
I don't care about your feelings White Knight.
Not a white knight here - cheap jibe by the way - just sticking up for the natural order of things where you call out people when they are trolling
She's not going to sleep with you dude.
Maybe you better slime your way back under that rock you appeared from sleazeball
Awww, man on internet says mean words. Sticks & Stones Bro "Child | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"As this thread was originally about Tommy Robinson, what do we all think about yesterday's court verdict that he must stand trial again for contempt of court??" 100% agree with the decision. If the CPS believe they have a solid case then he should be held accountable like everyone else. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
