FabSwingers.com forum: What is May on.

By *rench letter OP Couple
over a year ago

Chorley,

Why can she just get it in her thick head her deal is dead. And just get on with other ways of solving it by the indicative votes. And see which one has got the most support.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

if shes nit got it into her head by now what maes you think she ever will she ignores her own party so shes not going to listen to any one else.think the word your looking for is control freak

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

"Why can she just get it in her thick head her deal is dead. And just get on with other ways of solving it by the indicative votes. And see which one has got the most support. "

Why can't the house see a party were elected on a mandate. The house is doing it's best to overturn that mandate.

The mandate is to offer a route in exiting the EU. The options are WTO or a negotiated outcome.

MP's are doing their best in absolving themselves of responsibility of voting Tory or voting no-deal when any other deal has not been explored or any future Europe has been explored.

MP's are now asking for more time to debate amendments when they should know which way and exactly why they are voting against a deal.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

She's mainly interested in keeping the conservative party alive and preferably in power - the brexit stuff just happens to be a bit of a troublesome hassle, that was particularly likely to get the conservatives to self-combust.

She's not particularly competent, she's not really a negotiator or interested in collaborative effort: some of the traits that are really fairly necessary, should gaining widespread buy-in to major changes be needed. Her rigidity reflects those limitations as well as her continued insistence to plough on, almost as if nothing has happened or changed.

It is Theresa May who made the UK get so close to the end of March, without an agreement. She worked in isolation, not collaboratively with other parties or parliament. She delayed the vote a month, from December until Jan, when it wasn't likely to win. And now that some flexibility would still be likely to help, alongside working with others, she's just doing what she always has done.

She went to the EU leaders last week. They asked her what her plan B was - several times - she didn't tell them. She's not had one - she didn't really have a plan A for much of the time, as she insisted on launchhing Article 50, before she'd got the conservatives to agree upon what their brexit was, alongside a plan to achieve it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *avidnsa69Man
over a year ago

Essex

"Why can she just get it in her thick head her deal is dead. And just get on with other ways of solving it by the indicative votes. And see which one has got the most support.

Why can't the house see a party were elected on a mandate. The house is doing it's best to overturn that mandate.

The mandate is to offer a route in exiting the EU. The options are WTO or a negotiated outcome.

MP's are doing their best in absolving themselves of responsibility of voting Tory or voting no-deal when any other deal has not been explored or any future Europe has been explored.

MP's are now asking for more time to debate amendments when they should know which way and exactly why they are voting against a deal. "

We wouldnt be in this mess if May had done this bit at the start rather than the end. She's a moron

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Why can she just get it in her thick head her deal is dead. And just get on with other ways of solving it by the indicative votes. And see which one has got the most support. "

Her entire political reputation rests on brexit, she has been a one policy prime minister, she is now trapped. She will go down in history as the PM who destroyed the country in order to keep the tory pary together.

Junker was right, there is a special place in hell reserved in hell for her.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Cardiff

"And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave? "

Yes, finally we are seeing a bit of sense creep in

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

"And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave?

Yes, finally we are seeing a bit of sense creep in

Options being - 2nd referendum, revoke, extend indefinite to find other options .. that is if is considered binding?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Cardiff

"And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave?

Yes, finally we are seeing a bit of sense creep in

Options being - 2nd referendum, revoke, extend indefinite to find other options .. that is if is considered binding? "

My preference is Revoke and then try to get some consensus about what we really want Britain to be. I’d be ok with another Referendum, but I’d like it to be legally binding this time with cheats and liars locked up if they try to fool people again

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

"And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave?

Yes, finally we are seeing a bit of sense creep in

Options being - 2nd referendum, revoke, extend indefinite to find other options .. that is if is considered binding?

I think Revoke is the only sane choice too now, as all time has been spent on the conservatives trying to agree what they want and there being no effective time remaining to do anything that truly reflects anything of merit.

Once evoked, the government needs to straighten itself up and determine how it can govern, if it can. As a second priority, following the results of that, it needs to decide what the government wants for its EU stance. I'd prefer Brexit dropped but see the case for a general election or referendum with a fixed minimum percentage required for acceptance of government re-submitting or otherwise not.

It's tough as May is now leader in name only and her party are in disarray

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London

The transition agreement is perfectly credible.

More so as we get closer to the deadline if no other option comes to light.

It's still crappy and the real work hasn't even started.

It's still far worse than the deal we have

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London

This is an interesting read on what could have been:

https://www.ft.com/content/5f3df8bc-4c03-11e9-bde6-79eaea5acb64

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

Here's a thought for the day. Did Corbyns speech last night sound anything like Johnson and Goves when they unexpectedly won the Brexit vote.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

She's definitely not on the "Disco Biscuits" if her "dancing" is anything to go by , lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

"And so parliament rescues Brexit. Anyone think they'll find a way out of it before we leave? "
The problem is can you get a majority of the house to back a single idea,I guess not,this is the problem

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Cardiff

Borrowed time...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread