Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?" This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk)." Where do you get your rose tinted spectacles from? Being a gambler, you know that you have to be prepared to lose everything - that is much more likely with Leave than Remain. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk). Where do you get your rose tinted spectacles from? Being a gambler, you know that you have to be prepared to lose everything - that is much more likely with Leave than Remain." Probably the same place you get your pessimism from. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk). Where do you get your rose tinted spectacles from? Being a gambler, you know that you have to be prepared to lose everything - that is much more likely with Leave than Remain.Probably the same place you get your pessimism from." Leave - odds of losing very high, odds of gaining very low - chance of a great return, but pretty unlikely. Remain - odds of losing pretty low, but odds of gaining reasonable - likelihood of a good return, but not massive. So from a gambling perspective you would go Remain as odds of gaining are higher (odds x return), but for a speculative bet you can afford to lose you’d go Leave. The thing is we can’t afford to lose this one... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading." Look how big a pickle we’ve got ourselves in just trying to settle the terms of the divorce. Our politicians can’t agree on anything. And you want to add trade talks? The trade negotiation will be 100 times more difficult than the withdrawal agreement, even more so if every MP wants to argue the cause of different sectors in their constituencies. It would have poisoned the exit process if, at the same time, we were haggling between ourselves and with our neighbours about which sectors need protection and which do not. In any event, the UK Government has declared unilateral tarrif disarmament, so what is there to discuss (other than the illegality of aspects of UK policy in relation to Ireland cross-border trade)? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk). Where do you get your rose tinted spectacles from? Being a gambler, you know that you have to be prepared to lose everything - that is much more likely with Leave than Remain.Probably the same place you get your pessimism from. Leave - odds of losing very high, odds of gaining very low - chance of a great return, but pretty unlikely. Remain - odds of losing pretty low, but odds of gaining reasonable - likelihood of a good return, but not massive. So from a gambling perspective you would go Remain as odds of gaining are higher (odds x return), but for a speculative bet you can afford to lose you’d go Leave. The thing is we can’t afford to lose this one..." They william hill odd or betfred?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk). Where do you get your rose tinted spectacles from? Being a gambler, you know that you have to be prepared to lose everything - that is much more likely with Leave than Remain.Probably the same place you get your pessimism from. Leave - odds of losing very high, odds of gaining very low - chance of a great return, but pretty unlikely. Remain - odds of losing pretty low, but odds of gaining reasonable - likelihood of a good return, but not massive. So from a gambling perspective you would go Remain as odds of gaining are higher (odds x return), but for a speculative bet you can afford to lose you’d go Leave. The thing is we can’t afford to lose this one...They william hill odd or betfred? "Are they both offshore companies these days? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading. Look how big a pickle we’ve got ourselves in just trying to settle the terms of the divorce. Our politicians can’t agree on anything. And you want to add trade talks? The trade negotiation will be 100 times more difficult than the withdrawal agreement, even more so if every MP wants to argue the cause of different sectors in their constituencies. It would have poisoned the exit process if, at the same time, we were haggling between ourselves and with our neighbours about which sectors need protection and which do not. In any event, the UK Government has declared unilateral tarrif disarmament, so what is there to discuss (other than the illegality of aspects of UK policy in relation to Ireland cross-border trade)? " My grandfather always said only bet what you can afford to lose.If you see brexit as a gamble you should of voted remain. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk)." But we already knew those were the rules before we started. The U.K. helped draft those very rules. We can’t now turn around and say it is unfair that the EU is sticking to them. We can’t negotiate our way out a paper bag right now. What on earth makes you think we could negotiate trade deals in parallel?! -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hypocrite Farage gave a vision to the British people how great it will be when they leave this hated Union, from which the UK is okay. Great Britain will negotiate a great deal with the Union. And so, the Union will not manage it without them and will beg them to stay in Britain .Lud believed and went to the referendum. The result surprised everyone, even Farage himself, who quickly left the "Brexit" ship (of course, like a rat) because he knew perfectly well that the negotiations would be a failure and political death for those who would negotiate. The same thing did Cameron.Farage returned to his post in the European Parliament and watched as May conducts negotiations. Those who were to support Teresa May in negotiations, seeing how the "Brexit" ship flows into the rocks, began to flee (Borys Johnson and others from support) .Teresa May is already a political corpse and the ship "Brexit", to the delight of other countries, rubs against rocks. the last question is whether this ship will break up on March 29 or June 30 or will it suddenly be all back?This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading.All we have is speculation and have not forgot the lies that were peddled what would happen if we dare to leave, none of which come true why would anyone believe the same liars now.Common sense tells you neither the uk or the eu want to stop trading and it will all be sorted when they actually get down to talking about it which cant happen until we leave(eu law not uk)." Anything to say about the actual point of the thread? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is only the withdrawal agreement who knows what trade deal will be done? this is because the eu refused to talk about a trade deal until the withdrawal was signed if they had conducted both at the same time everyone would know which direction we were heading. Look how big a pickle we’ve got ourselves in just trying to settle the terms of the divorce. Our politicians can’t agree on anything. And you want to add trade talks? The trade negotiation will be 100 times more difficult than the withdrawal agreement, even more so if every MP wants to argue the cause of different sectors in their constituencies. It would have poisoned the exit process if, at the same time, we were haggling between ourselves and with our neighbours about which sectors need protection and which do not. In any event, the UK Government has declared unilateral tarrif disarmament, so what is there to discuss (other than the illegality of aspects of UK policy in relation to Ireland cross-border trade)? My grandfather always said only bet what you can afford to lose.If you see brexit as a gamble you should of voted remain. "Then your grandad was a very wise man | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's rather strange....for nearly 3 years remainers have been saying that vote leave didn't have a plan." The plan was clearly nonsense as none of it has come to pass. There was also another leave campaign with all sorts of other ideas  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am." Well done then  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am." the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything " There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? " Who would campaign for it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it?" Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which leave campaign do you mean - there was more than one." thats a very good question... so do we condemn the "leave campaign" one that used the big bus red lie... and told people that the turks were coming!!!! ... or do we condemn the other "leave campaign" that used the billboard with the syrian refugees with "Breaking point" on it not telling people they last time we checked, syria wasn't part of the EU i know.... decisions decisions!!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which leave campaign do you mean - there was more than one." Apologies. Vote Leave. The official leave campaign. Not Leave Means Leave, the unofficial, official leave campaign | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it? Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. " So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it? Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?" sounds right to me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it? Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?sounds right to me." Tough one, MPs voted against No Deal, MPs voted against May’s deal, so it would need to include something else..., I know, Remain | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it? Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?sounds right to me." Naturally it does
Would the country be wrong if it changed its mind and voted to remain if it was on the paper?
That's a yws/no answer.
Bianryso easy for you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thankyou fabbers. 1 week to go and thanks to this one thread out of all the others I realize that Leave campaign was deeply flawed for this very reason. They sold the lie that there would be a cozy chat before article 50 was triggered and that there was no way that we would leave with no deal. Thank you for digging up this gem of information. Must admit like everyone else I did not bother to read any of the bullshit leaflets. I knew in my own heart what would be good for me and leaving most definitely was not it. Looks like I was right all along. The stupid thing is those ruddy MPs compounded the electorates mistake by triggering article 50 anyway. I feel so stupid and disappointed in myself. What an idiot I am.the whole thing was flawed even the remain campain what was the point in having the vote if we our vote clearly didnt mean anything There is a deal for a transition agreement before leaving. It's real. What's wrong with now asking if this is acceptable in a second referendum compared to the fantasy promises made during the campaign? Who would campaign for it? Whomsoever you like. Leave had two contradictory campaigns last time. I'm sure they could manage a few more this time around. So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?sounds right to me. Tough one, MPs voted against No Deal, MPs voted against May’s deal, so it would need to include something else..., I know, Remain "Remain seems more likely as the clock ticks. .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?sounds right to me. Tough one, MPs voted against No Deal, MPs voted against May’s deal, so it would need to include something else..., I know, Remain "how dare people have the sheer audacity to change their minds when presented with actual facts rather than just a blank cheque!!! tree hugging liberal hippy pinko guardian reading commie!!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So what would the question be? May's deal or No Deal?sounds right to me. Tough one, MPs voted against No Deal, MPs voted against May’s deal, so it would need to include something else..., I know, Remain
how dare people have the sheer audacity to change their minds when presented with actual facts rather than just a blank cheque!!!
tree hugging liberal hippy pinko guardian reading commie!!!!! "You called?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
