FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Profit in Syrian camps

Jump to newest
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon

Just been on the news about the camps in Syria where the "refugees" from the last IS stronghold are fleeing to.

Apparently there are 65,000 there, and its costing "at least 1 million" to feed them PER DAY.

That's around £15.34 each.... per day.

Really?

I think someone is making a mint out of these people, someone needs to tell the Aid agencies that there are cheaper options... I'm glad I stopped giving to charity if this I how they help themselves... erm, I mean the poor refugees.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon

And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bandjam91Couple
over a year ago

London


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches."

Do you think there's a handy wholesaler round the corner?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

Do you think there's a handy wholesaler round the corner?

"

Charities get a lot of food donated direct by huge food companies.

For free.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches."

You can't compare the camps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

You can't compare the camps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money.. "

It bothers me because so much good could be done with that money, and someone is lining their own pockets with it instead.

The same thing happened in Africa.

The money raised around the world is enough to have turned the whole place around, but instead much of it got syphoned off into crooked government departments over there.

FYI, my sister and BiL were at one point quite high up in a charity, both left because of the waste, mis-management and fraud that went on, a lot of it quite blatant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

You can't compare the camps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money..

It bothers me because so much good could be done with that money, and someone is lining their own pockets with it instead.

The same thing happened in Africa.

The money raised around the world is enough to have turned the whole place around, but instead much of it got syphoned off into crooked government departments over there.

FYI, my sister and BiL were at one point quite high up in a charity, both left because of the waste, mis-management and fraud that went on, a lot of it quite blatant."

It's not just in that sector though..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London

There is no source for this figure so, meh.

We tend to get clean drinking water out of a tap in UK hospitals.

Do you think that's how it works in a refugee camp?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"There is no source for this figure so, meh.

We tend to get clean drinking water out of a tap in UK hospitals.

Do you think that's how it works in a refugee camp? "

Unless you were unlucky enough to be a patient in Stafford hospital during the Labour government of 1997-2010, then you'd have to resort to drinking dirty water out of flower vases on wards.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"There is no source for this figure so, meh.

We tend to get clean drinking water out of a tap in UK hospitals.

Do you think that's how it works in a refugee camp?

Unless you were unlucky enough to be a patient in Stafford hospital during the Labour government of 1997-2010, then you'd have to resort to drinking dirty water out of flower vases on wards. "

OK.

What's your point wihh respect to the cost of providing aid to refugees?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

You can't compare the camps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money..

It bothers me because so much good could be done with that money, and someone is lining their own pockets with it instead.

The same thing happened in Africa.

The money raised around the world is enough to have turned the whole place around, but instead much of it got syphoned off into crooked government departments over there.

FYI, my sister and BiL were at one point quite high up in a charity, both left because of the waste, mis-management and fraud that went on, a lot of it quite blatant."

Well if your sister and brother-in-law were high up in a charity and saw waste, mismanagement and fraud, and all they did was left, then they're vicariously responsible for those crimes unless they whistleblew.

There will obviously be some waste in charities, as in any sector, but if fraud is seen then it has to be reported.

Obviously feeding and resourcing a refugee camp in the middle of a war-zone is massively different than making some school dinners, and to make any comparison is absurd. That cost must include all the logistics, security, health issues etc etc etc.

We can't just send them some Pret sandwiches in the post!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just been on the news about the camps in Syria where the "refugees" from the last IS stronghold are fleeing to.

Apparently there are 65,000 there, and its costing "at least 1 million" to feed them PER DAY.

That's around £15.34 each.... per day.

Really?

I think someone is making a mint out of these people, someone needs to tell the Aid agencies that there are cheaper options... I'm glad I stopped giving to charity if this I how they help themselves... erm, I mean the poor refugees. "

An interesting post and thank you for bringing it to our attention.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just been on the news about the camps in Syria where the "refugees" from the last IS stronghold are fleeing to.

Apparently there are 65,000 there, and its costing "at least 1 million" to feed them PER DAY.

That's around £15.34 each.... per day.

Really?

I think someone is making a mint out of these people, someone needs to tell the Aid agencies that there are cheaper options... I'm glad I stopped giving to charity if this I how they help themselves... erm, I mean the poor refugees. An interesting post and thank you for bringing it to our attention. "

You find this isolated piece of information interesting without any thought for context or how much it costs to run a refugee camp?

Bizarre.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect."

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

You can't compare the ciamps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money..

It bothers me because so much good could be done with that money, and someone is lining their own pockets with it instead.

The same thing happened in Africa.

The money raised around the world is enough to have turned the whole place around, but instead much of it got syphoned off into crooked government departments over there.

FYI, my sister and BiL were at one point quite high up in a charity, both left because of the waste, mis-management and fraud that went on, a lot of it quite blatant.

Well if your sister and brother-in-law were high up in a charity and saw waste, mismanagement and fraud, and all they did was left, then they're vicariously responsible for those crimes unless they whistleblew.

There will obviously be some waste in charities, as in any sector, but if fraud is seen then it has to be reported.

Obviously feeding and resourcing a refugee camp in the middle of a war-zone is massively different than making some school dinners, and to make any comparison is absurd. That cost must include all the logistics, security, health issues etc etc etc.

We can't just send them some Pret sandwiches in the post! "

They both raised issues with the charities concerned, before making anonomous reports to outside agencies. This sparked a massive witch hunt, leading to both of them deciding that they would prefer not to work for organisations that ignored the evidence, but spent time and effort trying to find "whistleblowers".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilk_TreMan
over a year ago

Wherever the party is!


"Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect.

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size."

No you're not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Aid agencies do an excellent job, and the world is full of generous people giving their hard earned money to good causes. The trouble is that once that money gets to the country it is meant for, there is always the chance that it is seized by its govt and used for anything from buying weapons to refurbishing the leaders palace.

As for the money charged to feed refugees, someone has obviously seen an opportunity to print money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 18/03/19 17:13:02]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im not sure about the above figures but jordan has had 650,000 refugees since 2011 at a cost of €8 billion euros so far. This year they think the bill will be over a billion euros. .

Expensive for tiny jordan.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect.

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size.

No you're not. "

Really?

Do you know me, my experiences, background, training, or that of members of my family?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"Aid agencies do an excellent job, and the world is full of generous people giving their hard earned money to good causes. The trouble is that once that money gets to the country it is meant for, there is always the chance that it is seized by its govt and used for anything from buying weapons to refurbishing the leaders palace.

As for the money charged to feed refugees, someone has obviously seen an opportunity to print money. "

There is always that chance. I think that everyone can see the problem.

I think that charities are trying to spend their money on those in need.

What's your solution? I certainly don't have one.

Lots of people think that the chance of funds being diverted is a good reason to not intervene at all...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


"

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size."

You've seen or heard something somewhere - a source you do not cite - and present it here as fact.

Excuse while I find some salt for your hearsay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon


"

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size.

You've seen or heard something somewhere - a source you do not cite - and present it here as fact.

Excuse while I find some salt for your hearsay.

"

It was the BBC news (or ITV, not sure which one I was watching, but I think it was more likely the BBC one), last night, female reporter, she was also getting grief privately from the Syrians running the camp for "exporting our terrorists but not willing to take them back".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bandjam91Couple
over a year ago

London


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

Do you think there's a handy wholesaler round the corner?

Charities get a lot of food donated direct by huge food companies.

For free."

Not in Syria they don't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bandjam91Couple
over a year ago

London


"And just for comparison....

UK hospitals pay around £4 a day for meals for patients.

Prisons...£2.

Schools, around 60p per day for lunches.

You can't compare the camps in the middle of nowhere with the logistics and resources required in that climate with your local hospital or primary school..

Unless the numbers behind the headline are looked into it's lacking in detail as to what makes up that figure..

There are too many of the same charities serving the same aims etc and much more could be done if they combined but that's another debate perhaps..

It seems a strange thing to be concerned about given its not public money..

It bothers me because so much good could be done with that money, and someone is lining their own pockets with it instead.

The same thing happened in Africa.

The money raised around the world is enough to have turned the whole place around, but instead much of it got syphoned off into crooked government departments over there.

FYI, my sister and BiL were at one point quite high up in a charity, both left because of the waste, mis-management and fraud that went on, a lot of it quite blatant."

"A" charity. There are thousands.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bandjam91Couple
over a year ago

London


"Do you think the only cost of a refugee camp is food?

Where does the money come from to purchase the accomodation, to install sanitation and running water, electricity, hospitals, classrooms, recreation etc.

How much do you think it would cost to build a new town here?

A lot more than the figure you quote, I suspect.

The quoted figure was " just to feed everyone here", I'm aware of the logistics required to build and run a camp that size.

No you're not.

Really?

Do you know me, my experiences, background, training, or that of members of my family?"

You clearly know f*ck all about international crisis response.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon

News: 19 cents to feed a child for a day.

Update March 2008: For the sake of precision: due to the recent fuel and food price increase, the cost to feed a child per day is now 25 cents.

I received a lot of queries about the 19 cents it costs to feed a child a day. Here is some background info:

1/ Question: Part of what programme does that figure come from?

Answer: That figure comes from the WFP School Feeding Programme. As much as 'feeding the hungry' is a short term solution to the 'hunger issue', 'proper education' is one of the pillars for a longer term solution to the problem of poverty (and 'hunger' as a result of it).

To encourage kids to come to school in developing countries, WFP provides them with a free meal.

2/ Question: How is the figure calculated. It can not be that low, can it?

I asked a WFP expert. Here is her...

Answer:

It is an average that was calculated in 2000, by simply taking all that WFP spent on school feeding programs by country and dividing it by the number of beneficiaries and then by an estimated average number of school days per year (we used 180). It was across all countries and all types of school feeding (just school breakfast or snacks, just school lunches, two meals a day/breakfast + lunch, boarding school meals of three meals per day, and/or take-home rations which may be provided as the only WFP input, or may be combined with one of the meals described).

Depending on the country, the costs actually varied from about 6 cents a day up to about a dollar a day. [Note: At the same point in history, the U.S. public school lunch program cost about $2.12 per day, but of course the meals were much more sophisticated and varied than the WFP-provided school meals.]

Since 2000, WFP has:

- almost doubled the number of beneficiaries

- improved our reporting systems and calculations, and added some parts of the "essential package" (especially micronutrient fortification, de-worming and HIV/AIDS prevention education) everywhere we can.

So the food cost per day has actually dropped a bit (due to economies of scale and more accurate accounting), but we have maintained the 19 cents per day in order to ensure that we are responsibly addressing those essential elements that WFP can implement (as strongly recommended by our donors, school feeding and education experts and others).

3/ Question: What does that US$0.19 per day buy? What 'meal' are the children given?

Again, I asked a WFP expert. Her

Answer: School meals vary dramatically from one country to the next, but the WFP component generally consists of:

- a grain-based and fortified flour such as Corn-Soy Blend (CSB) or Wheat-Soy Blend (WSB) along with oil, sugar and/or salt. Those basic components can be used for a nutritious drink or porridge; or

- a staple grain (such as rice, sorghum or millet) along with "condiments" (oil, sugar and/or salt), to which the community adds the ingredients for a sauce; or fortified biscuits (baked in either a "salty" or a "sweet" form to accommodate local taste preferences).

Take-home rations are included in these calculations, and they consist of one or more food items (usually one) which is of significant value in that location. So in Pakistan, it is a can of cooking oil, in another country it is a bag of wheat or corn, etc.. Take-home rations are economic incentives for the family to send their child/children to school and generally are given monthly or quarterly to students who have maintained good school attendance. We do not require that the child him/herself eat that food. That is why take-home rations are sometimes combined with in-school meals. The take-home rations serve as the economic incentive for the parents to send the child to school/offset the loss of the child's labor at home, but a nutritious school meal is required to ensure that the child is not hungry and has enough energy to learn.

WFP has found take-home rations to be an extremely effective method of increasing school enrolment and attendance of girls and child laborers (in food-insecure locations where girls are not attending school or where child labor is a particular problem), and we have been also been having good results with take-home rations combined with school meals for children from households affected by HIV/AIDS and other particularly vulnerable children.

4/ Question: Does the 19 cents per day include the overhead, the transport, etc..

Answer: Yes, the US$0.19/day includes the total cost. The food itself, the cost to the organisation to deliver the food, manage the process, the cost to monitor the school feeding system ensuring the food gets where it supposed to go, etc...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

brecon

That quote was from an Aid workers blog.

Whilst its not the same per se as a camp in Syria, it shows what sort of value for money a worldwide aid program can achieve, and also that the cost doesn't just cover the food itself, there are a number of other factors taken into account.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *bandjam91Couple
over a year ago

London


"That quote was from an Aid workers blog.

Whilst its not the same per se as a camp in Syria, it shows what sort of value for money a worldwide aid program can achieve, and also that the cost doesn't just cover the food itself, there are a number of other factors taken into account."

The context is massively different. It talks about "take home rations" which clearly shows it's talking about costs in an area with food insecurity, not in a camp in a war zone. Also, the WFP are massive and economies of scale will make their costs lower than another aid organisation of similar size.

Stop spouting shit you know nothing about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top