Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. " You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. " Which one... lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. " Yep, that’s a concern. We know all about TR and his agenda, but the comments made by Sweeny were no better! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. Which one... lol" The BBC's John Sweeny came across as the hideous man. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. " No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. " Which party will he stand for do you think ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. Which party will he stand for do you think ?" He's a kipper  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. " Forgive me if I'm wrong, been out of the loop with work. But, even with an extension to article 50, are we actually allowed to elect MEPs this cycle? Would Tommy go independent? If so he's likely to just divide the vote between UKIP and the Tories where he stands. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. Forgive me if I'm wrong, been out of the loop with work. But, even with an extension to article 50, are we actually allowed to elect MEPs this cycle? Would Tommy go independent? If so he's likely to just divide the vote between UKIP and the Tories where he stands." I should know this, but how do you stand as an independent MEP? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The BBC was willing, and have on quite a few occasions stooped so low, to try, and have falsely smeared people reputation. They should be brought to justice. Even Donald Trump have called them fake news." Donald Trump calls everything fake news. He’s a maniac, why would you take stock in anything he says? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The BBC was willing, and have on quite a few occasions stooped so low, to try, and have falsely smeared people reputation. They should be brought to justice. Even Donald Trump have called them fake news." And trump has only racked up 9000 lies since taking up office .There is nobody more fake than trump and his trumpanzee supporters.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The BBC was willing, and have on quite a few occasions stooped so low, to try, and have falsely smeared people reputation. They should be brought to justice. Even Donald Trump have called them fake news." Oh that proves it then....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. " Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. " So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt it's gone viral it appears to have been taken down . "Racism is vital alright. I’m not sure how I feel about de-platforming race hate. On one side, personally if I owned the platform, for sure I wouldn’t want it on. But on the other hand, I believe in freedom of speech, both allowing people to say any bollocks they want and allowing people to criticise them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone have a summary of both vids? I can’t youtube at work..." Both vids? There is only one video. The link is in an earlier post to Panodrama on YouTube. In summary, Tommy Robinson plays the BBC Panorama team at its own game. The BBC plan to do a Panorama show about Tommy Robinson and try to get former disgruntled employees of Tommy Robinson to take part in the documentary. The BBC/Panorama crew work in collusion with the hope not hate campaign group on this (which they deny but the film shows the evidence that they are which calls into question the BBC's impartiality rules). The BBC and hope not hate then have a meeting with 2 male former disgruntled Tommy Robinson employees and attempt to blackma*l them to take part (they admit this in recorded audio telephone conversation). It seems lots of alcohol was consumed at the meeting. A hope not hate representative is then alleged to have sexually assaulted one of them after the meeting. Then a former female employee of Tommy Robinson who had fell out with Tommy Robinson is contacted by the BBC and offered £5000 to take part in the BBC Panorama documentary. She tells Tommy Robinson about this so they meet and she agrees with Tommy to meet John Sweeney of Panorama for lunch. The BBC and John Sweeney are unaware and the woman wears a hidden camera to the meeting. It's all on film where John Sweeney trys to get the woman d*unk on BBC expenses, he tells her if she takes part in the documentary he can cut the film to fit a certain narrative, and even suggests to the woman she should make up a false sexual allegation against Tommy Robinson for the documentary. John Sweeney then goes on to call homosexuals "woofters" or "poofters", he compares white working class people to "cannibals in the Amazon" or "Aliens from outer space" and says Labour have made a mistake of talking like the middle class instead of talking like the working class like Tommy Robinson using language such as "fuck off" (is that how the working class are defined in his eyes?) he says people with Irish heritage are "scumbags" and he admits he likes to insult Greek people by speaking in Turkish to them. All of this is recorded on film on hidden camera. The woman and Tommy Robinson also use a fake text messaging website where they come up with a fake text message together and send it to the woman's phone to make it look as though it had come from Tommy Robinson's phone. When John Sweeney and the BBC are confronted by Tommy Robinson about the hidden camera footage then John Sweeney tries to use the false text message as evidence against Robinson. The Panorama team got Panoramerd, and got a taste of their own medicine. Tommy Robinson has got them bang to rights with the undercover footage. The very next day after Tommy Robinson put the footage on Facebook then his Facebook account was removed. Collusion between the BBC and Facebook anyone? (especially now a certain Nick Clegg works there). What happened to free speech? Tommy Robinson was also deplatformed from Instagram which is a shoot off from Facebook. The Labour deputy leader Tom Watson working with hope not hate is also now trying to get Tommy Robinson and this video removed from YouTube. Forces are trying to remove Tommy Robinson from the Internet in the same way they removed Alex Jones of Infowars. The whole country needs to see this video to see how corrupt the BBC is. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt it's gone viral it appears to have been taken down .
Racism is vital alright.
I’m not sure how I feel about de-platforming race hate. On one side, personally if I owned the platform, for sure I wouldn’t want it on. But on the other hand, I believe in freedom of speech, both allowing people to say any bollocks they want and allowing people to criticise them. "He's banned from twitter and Facebook and I thought he wasn't banned from YouTube as Tom Watson of labour was calling for him to be banned a few days back . I'm torn over deplatforming him because he's a gift to the left if he becomes the right wing poster boy and brexit champion . Brexiters and the right fear him fucking up their agenda. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt it's gone viral it appears to have been taken down . "It had over 1 and a half million views on YouTube last night. If it's been removed from YouTube then the full Panodrama video is available on Infowars if anyone wants to see it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. " If you don't watch the video then you remain ignorant of the facts, so yes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt it's gone viral it appears to have been taken down .
Racism is vital alright.
I’m not sure how I feel about de-platforming race hate. On one side, personally if I owned the platform, for sure I wouldn’t want it on. But on the other hand, I believe in freedom of speech, both allowing people to say any bollocks they want and allowing people to criticise them. "If you'd watch the video you'd see the only racism being displayed in it is coming from the BBC's John Sweeney of the Panorama team. I gave a brief summary of the film above in the thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"YouTube’s policy on hate speech prohibits content which promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on attributes including religion, race, immigration status or nationality. I think tommys days are numbered.. "Maybe the BBC or John Sweeney should be removed from Facebook and YouTube then as John Sweeney was the one displaying hate and racism in the video. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. " Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"YouTube’s policy on hate speech prohibits content which promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on attributes including religion, race, immigration status or nationality. I think tommys days are numbered.. "Oh and before you start feeling too smug Tommy Robinson now has his own website, in the same way that Alex Jones has Infowars. You can't silence free speech. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types." I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hate speech isn't free speech . Tommy is in good company with info wars and Alex jones.He has also been banned from twitter Facebook and YouTube.. The far right revolution will not be televised... "Television is last century Bob, you're living in the past. The BBC's days are also numbered with the outdated licence fee. Some people used to say the Internet is the future but the future is already here! Oh and I still watch infowars regularly on YouTube, the clueless twats who run YouTube can't stop it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's still available on YouTube if you search for it. I've only watched the first 10 minutes so don't want to comment too much on the whole thing yet. However I have difficulty trusting anything Tommy says as, in the past, when I've researched into allegations he's made, they've normally turned out to be false or misleading. " You don't have to believe what Tommy Robinson says in this case, John Sweeney does all the talking himself on hidden camera. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. If you don't watch the video then you remain ignorant of the facts, so yes. " Haha. This is only true if the content of the video is “the facts”. Tommy Robinson’s single issue since he has been in the public eye is race hate. Why would I want to listen to anything he has to say. I believe he has the right to say it, but it’s my right to criticise his decade long campaign of racism. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. If you don't watch the video then you remain ignorant of the facts, so yes. Haha. This is only true if the content of the video is “the facts”. Tommy Robinson’s single issue since he has been in the public eye is race hate. Why would I want to listen to anything he has to say. I believe he has the right to say it, but it’s my right to criticise his decade long campaign of racism. " Don't listen to what Tommy Robinson says in the video then, listen to what John Sweeney of the BBC says on hidden camera! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. " You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. If you don't watch the video then you remain ignorant of the facts, so yes. Haha. This is only true if the content of the video is “the facts”. Tommy Robinson’s single issue since he has been in the public eye is race hate. Why would I want to listen to anything he has to say. I believe he has the right to say it, but it’s my right to criticise his decade long campaign of racism. Don't listen to what Tommy Robinson says in the video then, listen to what John Sweeney of the BBC says on hidden camera!" Why should we care. The BBC are representing the Tories, and Tommy Robinson is representing his agenda of race hate. I don’t like either, so why should I watch any of his bullshit? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I didn't have tommy down as a tin foiler conspiracy nutter but the more I think about it the right believe all sorts of crazy bullshit.So info wars is his natural home... It's highly amusing.. "There's nothing tin foil about the Panodrama film. It's all recorded on actual telephone conversations which are played on the film and on hidden camera footage which is shown on film. I think the phrase you're looking for is the BBC and Panorama got banged to rights! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. " If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. No thanks, I have no interest in anything this hate filled man has to say on any subject. You’re free to celebrate him and rejoice in the prospect of him becoming an MEP. And we’re free to see the kind of person you are. Remain ignorant then. The video has already gone viral on YouTube. So anyone who doesn’t listen to Tommy Robinson’s race hate is ignorant? I’m not as excited as you about one of his videos going viral. Actually I’m not excited about it even a little bit. If you don't watch the video then you remain ignorant of the facts, so yes. Haha. This is only true if the content of the video is “the facts”. Tommy Robinson’s single issue since he has been in the public eye is race hate. Why would I want to listen to anything he has to say. I believe he has the right to say it, but it’s my right to criticise his decade long campaign of racism. Don't listen to what Tommy Robinson says in the video then, listen to what John Sweeney of the BBC says on hidden camera! Why should we care. The BBC are representing the Tories, and Tommy Robinson is representing his agenda of race hate. I don’t like either, so why should I watch any of his bullshit? " My thoughts exactly. They’re both full of shit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. " How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. " Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The BBC was willing, and have on quite a few occasions stooped so low, to try, and have falsely smeared people reputation. They should be brought to justice. Even Donald Trump have called them fake news." Seems Donald Trump is fully justified to call the BBC fake news and this Panodrama film proves it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The BBC was willing, and have on quite a few occasions stooped so low, to try, and have falsely smeared people reputation. They should be brought to justice. Even Donald Trump have called them fake news. Seems Donald Trump is fully justified to call the BBC fake news and this Panodrama film proves it. " That is so funny. Just more Trumpland black-is-white and white-is-black nonsense. You really have to be on the outer fringes of society to consider someone like Robinson as the oracle of truth and the BBC as the fountain of fiction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. " You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is a patriot, Tommy is a patriot. They both want their swamps drained." Is “swamp” a euphemism for brown people? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. " This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is a patriot, Tommy is a patriot. They both want their swamps drained. Is “swamp” a euphemism for brown people? " I'd say it's more a euphemism for the establishment. But we'll done for trying to bring "brown people" into this?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. " That’s hardly something that would keep me awake at night. An anti-hate organisation working with the national broadcaster. As i said a couple of times. I am pro-free speech, which includes normal people as well as Tommy Robinson, you, and the other Tommy supporter posting on this thread. Freedom is speech isn’t restricted to racists you know. Everyone else is allowed to tell them that their archaic views are bullshit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. That’s hardly something that would keep me awake at night. An anti-hate organisation working with the national broadcaster. As i said a couple of times. I am pro-free speech, which includes normal people as well as Tommy Robinson, you, and the other Tommy supporter posting on this thread. Freedom is speech isn’t restricted to racists you know. Everyone else is allowed to tell them that their archaic views are bullshit. " Why did the BBC deny working with hope not hate then? Why not just admit it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. That’s hardly something that would keep me awake at night. An anti-hate organisation working with the national broadcaster. As i said a couple of times. I am pro-free speech, which includes normal people as well as Tommy Robinson, you, and the other Tommy supporter posting on this thread. Freedom is speech isn’t restricted to racists you know. Everyone else is allowed to tell them that their archaic views are bullshit. Why did the BBC deny working with hope not hate then? Why not just admit it? " Dunno mate. I can confirm, that I don’t care. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. That’s hardly something that would keep me awake at night. An anti-hate organisation working with the national broadcaster. As i said a couple of times. I am pro-free speech, which includes normal people as well as Tommy Robinson, you, and the other Tommy supporter posting on this thread. Freedom is speech isn’t restricted to racists you know. Everyone else is allowed to tell them that their archaic views are bullshit. Why did the BBC deny working with hope not hate then? Why not just admit it? Dunno mate. I can confirm, that I don’t care." I'll tell you why they wouldn't admit it......its because it would break the BBC's rules and guidelines on impartiality. And it appears as you just said you don't care, that you don't care if the BBC is impartial or not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. If you watch the hidden camera footage you'll see its John Sweeney who is the racist. He also exposes himself as classist and clearly looks down his nose at working class people. How come all of a sudden you’re concerned about racism? Besides if you genuinely thought he was, why on earth would you be interested in anything Tommy Robinson has to say! You’re a paradox wrapped in an enigma. Because it's holier than thou, liberal, globalist tossers like John Sweeney who have been throwing accusations of racism towards Tommy Robinson for years, when all the time it appeats now he holds many racist and classist views himself. John Sweeney is a hypocrite and his hypocrisy has been exposed for the world to see. Panorama is also the flagship BBC investigative news programme, and now it has also been exposed as not being impartial, its corrupt, and has shown itself employing practices such as blackma*l and intimidation, willingness to falsify information and abuse of BBC expenses. You’re making the same mistake there are the OP. Most people are against all racists, no matter what banner they come under. Tommy Robinson has one single agenda, promoting race hate. It’s not an allegation, it’s just his thing. This whole story seems to have touched a nerve with you Dave. Is it because you're a supporter of Hope not hate and Hope not hate have been exposed as working in collusion with the BBC on this. That’s hardly something that would keep me awake at night. An anti-hate organisation working with the national broadcaster. As i said a couple of times. I am pro-free speech, which includes normal people as well as Tommy Robinson, you, and the other Tommy supporter posting on this thread. Freedom is speech isn’t restricted to racists you know. Everyone else is allowed to tell them that their archaic views are bullshit. Why did the BBC deny working with hope not hate then? Why not just admit it? Dunno mate. I can confirm, that I don’t care. I'll tell you why they wouldn't admit it......its because it would break the BBC's rules and guidelines on impartiality. And it appears as you just said you don't care, that you don't care if the BBC is impartial or not. " They’re clearly not, the represent the ruling party, at this time, the Tories. I don’t need to listen to race hate enthusiasts to know that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? " I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. " Your silence speaks volumes. EDF demos? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. Your silence speaks volumes. EDF demos? " Silence? I answered your question. Who are the EDF? I've never been a member of any political party. I joined Vote Leave as a volunteer during the EU referendum campaign and that's it. If the establishment in this country betray Brexit and we don't leave the EU, then I will be applying for membership at Nigel Farage's new Brexit party. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway, I look forward to watching some real journalism when the BBC exposes the hate mob that is the Robinson fan club. You and your fellow hate-mongers must really be fearing the worst, when you resort to smearing the BBC before the programme is even aired. Then again, given who is backing and funding Robinson from the United States, it's not really surprising. " Reported that John Sweeney is undergoing investigation by the BBC now and may face disciplinary action. Wouldn't be surprised if they fire him. It's what he deserves. As for the BBC Panorama on Tommy Robinson wouldn't surprise me if the BBC head honchos decide to bin it after this controversy and attempt to sweep the whole thing under the carpet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway, I look forward to watching some real journalism when the BBC exposes the hate mob that is the Robinson fan club. You and your fellow hate-mongers must really be fearing the worst, when you resort to smearing the BBC before the programme is even aired. Then again, given who is backing and funding Robinson from the United States, it's not really surprising. Reported that John Sweeney is undergoing investigation by the BBC now and may face disciplinary action. Wouldn't be surprised if they fire him. It's what he deserves. As for the BBC Panorama on Tommy Robinson wouldn't surprise me if the BBC head honchos decide to bin it after this controversy and attempt to sweep the whole thing under the carpet. " Completely oblivious. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. " So John Sweeney, accused of saying something, bad. Tommy One-issue Robinson, campaigns for years to promote hate against muslims, good? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. So John Sweeney, accused of saying something, bad. Tommy One-issue Robinson, campaigns for years to promote hate against muslims, good?" Correction, John Sweeney not accused, but proven saying these things on hidden camera footage. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. So John Sweeney, accused of saying something, bad. Tommy One-issue Robinson, campaigns for years to promote hate against muslims, good?" You persuade a white supremacist tommy is prick.Their all away with the fairies.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. So John Sweeney, accused of saying something, bad. Tommy One-issue Robinson, campaigns for years to promote hate against muslims, good? Correction, John Sweeney not accused, but proven saying these things on hidden camera footage. " Right, you’re missing the main point here. I know clearly that you’re incapable of looking at the whole picture on any issue, you’re unable to think logically. Eventually it stops being fun laughing at how ridiculous your statements are. Just so you know what I’m talking about, you addressed John Sweeney, but failed to address Tommy Robinson and his campaign of hate in your reply. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Confucius would say. ! A democratic socialist skipper of a life boat, that is already full of survivors. ''He is going to get everybody killed''" Once again. Not every non-racist is a socialist. You'll find non-racists all over the political spectrum, with all different opinions on a wide range of topics. I hope this helps. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. " Intresting that as it seems to me anyone who voted to leave in your eyes is a racist and a tory pot kettle spring to mind. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head." Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here it is on Youtube if anyone wants to watch it, Panodrama, where the BBC gets a taste of its own medicine.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyK4 Seems like the BBC is utterly corrupt to the core. Your efforts to sanitise Yaxley, or whatever name he uses, might dupe some. Indeed, you appear to be part of a concerted PR effort involving rich extremists in the US to pitch Islam as extreme and Yaxley as the voice of moderate opinion. I’d rather amputate a limb than waste my time on a marketing programme for the political ambitions of a convicted thug, fraudster and racist. Then again, these threads are littered with your association with such types. I'm not being paid by anyone and happy to do this for free. I actually believe in free speech unlike some on here, and when the BBC's corruption is laid bare as the Panodrama film shows I'm happy to help expose it. The BBC has a long and tainted history, remember Jimmy Savile. You always fall into this pattern. Anyone who is against Tommy Robinson and race hate must be a massive fan of the BBC. Just like your Brexit arguments that anyone not in favour of blaming foreigners for everything must be a Corbyn supporter. It’s often not black and white. Not all non-racists are BBC watching Corbyn supporters. Intresting that as it seems to me anyone who voted to leave in your eyes is a racist and a tory pot kettle spring to mind." Yawn. If you can't win your argument, just making stuff up isn't interesting. Unless you make up sometime funny. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head." I was awaiting centys justification for Tommy’s actions in trying to intimidate people... And still waiting I see....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hands up who thinks tommy isn't a racist so we can sort the wheat from the chaff.., "No takers ..come on balls out don't be shy ... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You are persistent in your efforts to depict that race-hate thug as some sort of victim deserving of sympathy. Are you a member or supporter of any organisation he is associated with, past or present? I don't have to attempt to depict anything. The Panodrama film is self evident. The BBC and John Sweeney have hung themselves with their own rope. So John Sweeney, accused of saying something, bad. Tommy One-issue Robinson, campaigns for years to promote hate against muslims, good? Correction, John Sweeney not accused, but proven saying these things on hidden camera footage. Right, you’re missing the main point here. I know clearly that you’re incapable of looking at the whole picture on any issue, you’re unable to think logically. Eventually it stops being fun laughing at how ridiculous your statements are. Just so you know what I’m talking about, you addressed John Sweeney, but failed to address Tommy Robinson and his campaign of hate in your reply. " What was ridiculous about the statement I made? I just pointed out that John Sweeney was (to use a turn of phrase) caught red handed on hidden camera footage. That is just a statement of fact. Your assertion that John Sweeney is only 'accused' is what is ridiculous here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement "Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping. "Was the person he doorstepping one of the far left who doorstepepd? I assume so if it’s tit for tat... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping. "Tosh. The guy he was doorstepping was a journalist who had been part of the crowdfunding which enabled Yaxley-Lennon to be issued with a letter regarding being sued for defamation in relation to the Syrian kid in Huddersfield. Just Tommy being the thug and cretin that he always is | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping. "so this is the piss poor excuse being peddled...... okay then sport!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping. "these would be the legal officers who "served papers" on tommy robinson's house in broad daylight...... and actually not only was it in broad daylight... it was given to the policeman protecting his house (for some reason we are now as taxpayers having to protect this loony!) 50 yards away from his home......to then give to them!!! so please... lets not use the "imtimidation" line.........   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. " I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. Forgive me if I'm wrong, been out of the loop with work. But, even with an extension to article 50, are we actually allowed to elect MEPs this cycle? Would Tommy go independent? If so he's likely to just divide the vote between UKIP and the Tories where he stands. I should know this, but how do you stand as an independent MEP? " Not sure. Im not entirely sure if you can? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. " You're equally blinded by your love of Tommy Robinson. Seem to be happy to ignore his long well established record, yet demand someone else, who hasn't done anything half as bad, get the sack. Most people seem non-plussed about the John Sweeney thing. It's much more fun to poke the mindless Tommy supporters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping.
these would be the legal officers who "served papers" on tommy robinson's house in broad daylight......
and actually not only was it in broad daylight... it was given to the policeman protecting his house (for some reason we are now as taxpayers having to protect this loony!) 50 yards away from his home......to then give to them!!!
so please... lets not use the "imtimidation" line......... "Come on Centy, a comment on this is fare | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping.
these would be the legal officers who "served papers" on tommy robinson's house in broad daylight......
and actually not only was it in broad daylight... it was given to the policeman protecting his house (for some reason we are now as taxpayers having to protect this loony!) 50 yards away from his home......to then give to them!!!
so please... lets not use the "imtimidation" line.........
Come on Centy, a comment on this is fare "Power to the people as "wolfie" used to say from the Tooting popular front! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping.
these would be the legal officers who "served papers" on tommy robinson's house in broad daylight......
and actually not only was it in broad daylight... it was given to the policeman protecting his house (for some reason we are now as taxpayers having to protect this loony!) 50 yards away from his home......to then give to them!!!
so please... lets not use the "imtimidation" line.........
Come on Centy, a comment on this is fare
Power to the people as "wolfie" used to say from the Tooting popular front! "He used to sing "we'll keep the red flag flying here" didn't he? Sounds more like Corbyn | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"YouTube’s policy on hate speech prohibits content which promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on attributes including religion, race, immigration status or nationality. I think tommys days are numbered..
Oh and before you start feeling too smug Tommy Robinson now has his own website, in the same way that Alex Jones has Infowars. You can't silence free speech. "It has nothing to do with 'free speech'. You still clearly don't understand what that concept means. Yes, he is free to setup his own website. As is anyone. Nothing has ever stopped him from doing so. If private corporations don't want his shite on their sites then that is their call. -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yaxley-Lennon doorstepped a guy last night at 10.30pm and again at 05.10 this morning. ‘For a chat’ He’s not right in the head. Agreed and looks like he might be locked up again as a result. That was proper intimidation and incitement
Possible retaliation as a far left group had gone round to Tommy Robinson's house over the weekend. They knew Tommy Robinson wouldn't be there as it was widely known on social media he was away in Helsinki Finland at a meeting. It was a deliberate attempt by the far left to intimidate Tommy Robinson's family, wife and kids while he was out the country. Tit for tat doorstepping.
these would be the legal officers who "served papers" on tommy robinson's house in broad daylight......
and actually not only was it in broad daylight... it was given to the policeman protecting his house (for some reason we are now as taxpayers having to protect this loony!) 50 yards away from his home......to then give to them!!!
so please... lets not use the "imtimidation" line.........
Come on Centy, a comment on this is fare "he can't... because he was probably looking at tommy's allegations of what happened, but then the video of what actually happened come out on youtube to destroy those accusations.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"YouTube’s policy on hate speech prohibits content which promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on attributes including religion, race, immigration status or nationality. I think tommys days are numbered..
Oh and before you start feeling too smug Tommy Robinson now has his own website, in the same way that Alex Jones has Infowars. You can't silence free speech.
It has nothing to do with 'free speech'. You still clearly don't understand what that concept means.
Yes, he is free to setup his own website. As is anyone. Nothing has ever stopped him from doing so.
If private corporations don't want his shite on their sites then that is their call.
-Matt"If you'd bothered to watch the Panodrama film you'd see its the BBC's John Sweeney who is spouting shite. Anyway it seems bob was telling porkies. I checked the YouTube link I posted early in the thread and Tommy Robinson is still on YouTube. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have just watched this documentary made by Tommy Robinson. Some of the comments made by John Sweeney........ "Odious little toad of a man . BBC wont sack him because it would be akin to admitting their whole company are the same . They've been caught red handed and everyone slags off Tommy Robinson for bringing this important issue to the public's attention | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man..." He was clearly referring to John Sweeney. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man..." Yeah he's a racist cunt and only a racist cunt could support him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man... He was clearly referring to John Sweeney. " How do you get through the day with such a warped sense of reality? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man... He was clearly referring to John Sweeney. How do you get through the day with such a warped sense of reality? " Scroll back up and read the last few comments. The person who referred to "odious little toad of a man" was referring to John Sweeney. It's clear as day, there's nothing warped about it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man... He was clearly referring to John Sweeney. How do you get through the day with such a warped sense of reality? " Suspect that's all that gets him through the day. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. You're equally blinded by your love of Tommy Robinson. Seem to be happy to ignore his long well established record, yet demand someone else, who hasn't done anything half as bad, get the sack. Most people seem non-plussed about the John Sweeney thing. It's much more fun to poke the mindless Tommy supporters. " Are you condoning what sweeney did? would you have the same view if it was done to the leader of the greens for instance and not robinson? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. You're equally blinded by your love of Tommy Robinson. Seem to be happy to ignore his long well established record, yet demand someone else, who hasn't done anything half as bad, get the sack. Most people seem non-plussed about the John Sweeney thing. It's much more fun to poke the mindless Tommy supporters. Are you condoning what sweeney did? would you have the same view if it was done to the leader of the greens for instance and not robinson?" Not condoning Sweeney, but equally not getting distracted from Tommy being 100 times as bad. So just because Sweeney is bad doesn’t mean we ignore Tommy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. You're equally blinded by your love of Tommy Robinson. Seem to be happy to ignore his long well established record, yet demand someone else, who hasn't done anything half as bad, get the sack. Most people seem non-plussed about the John Sweeney thing. It's much more fun to poke the mindless Tommy supporters. Are you condoning what sweeney did? would you have the same view if it was done to the leader of the greens for instance and not robinson? Not condoning Sweeney, but equally not getting distracted from Tommy being 100 times as bad. So just because Sweeney is bad doesn’t mean we ignore Tommy "whos on about getting distracted? i thought the thread was about how panorama try to coheres people into smearing people they know by paying them and getting them d*unk on licence payers money. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow, this thread has gone well! Just for the record, it was Sweenys behaviour that I was highlighting. His behaviour and attitude are disgusting. He is no different to Tommy Robinson. He even says in the film that himself and TR have a lot in common. He should be sacked. I agree John Sweeney should be sacked but as you can see OP, so many on this thread are completely blinded by their hatred for Tommy Robinson to the extent where they refuse to even watch the hidden camera footage of John Sweeney. They don't even want to talk about John Sweeney and the BBC and are now attempting to derail the thread onto something unrelated to the Panodrama film. You're equally blinded by your love of Tommy Robinson. Seem to be happy to ignore his long well established record, yet demand someone else, who hasn't done anything half as bad, get the sack. Most people seem non-plussed about the John Sweeney thing. It's much more fun to poke the mindless Tommy supporters. Are you condoning what sweeney did? would you have the same view if it was done to the leader of the greens for instance and not robinson?" Of course I'm not condoning Sweeney. The whole situation is ridiculous. Robinson is not a reliable source. He's has one single agenda, race-hate. So nothing he has to say should have any meaning. The greens don't promote race-hate, so this situation would never apply. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"its classic defence/deflection in that they find someone to "muddy the waters" so to speak to then try to create a defence for someone else.... is what sweeney did good.... no does it take away from what he was trying to achieve.... nope sometime people need to remember "who" it is they are really trying to defend by muddying the waters... maybe THAT is the thing that tells you much more about people..... if you think those ends really justify these means.... that says a hell of a lot more about you, than you probably really want it to be! " talking total bollocks i would say the same thing if it was corbyn he was doing it to.Im no fan of robinson but trying to fit him up to make him look like a sexual predator is the lowest of the low but i dont expect much more from the left wing bbc. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now." working with hope not hate yes left wing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You’re right, Tommy is an odious little toad of a man... He was clearly referring to John Sweeney. " Correct | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing." LOL! The Tories hand pick BBC management so they are most certainly right wing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing." It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate." Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach." Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. " Who said im into tommy robinson? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. " Hope not hate do actually hate anything 1inch to the right of them. Antifa(cist) are raving fascist and Momentum? .... they are pretty similar... Just because they adopt a virtue signalling name doesn't mean they aren't kuntz. Whenever a so-called rightwing group kicks off it's called 'extremism'.... when the left kicks off it's called political activism. Personally i have no time for either side and identity politics is pure shyte....don't get sucked in by media portrayals and have to choose a side... tommy robinson and owen jones need to be blasted into space in my opinion... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. Hope not hate do actually hate anything 1inch to the right of them. Antifa(cist) are raving fascist and Momentum? .... they are pretty similar... Just because they adopt a virtue signalling name doesn't mean they aren't kuntz. Whenever a so-called rightwing group kicks off it's called 'extremism'.... when the left kicks off it's called political activism. Personally i have no time for either side and identity politics is pure shyte....don't get sucked in by media portrayals and have to choose a side... tommy robinson and owen jones need to be blasted into space in my opinion..." very well put. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. Hope not hate do actually hate anything 1inch to the right of them. Antifa(cist) are raving fascist and Momentum? .... they are pretty similar... Just because they adopt a virtue signalling name doesn't mean they aren't kuntz. Whenever a so-called rightwing group kicks off it's called 'extremism'.... when the left kicks off it's called political activism. Personally i have no time for either side and identity politics is pure shyte....don't get sucked in by media portrayals and have to choose a side... tommy robinson and owen jones need to be blasted into space in my opinion..." There you go, trying to equate anti-hate groups with hate groups. It’s simply not true. Tommy Robinson is not in any way equal to Owen Jones. They’re not equally extreme. Forget left and right and just look at what people are saying. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Left wing bbc" come on now.working with hope not hate yes left wing. It was only one program. Hope Not Hate are not left or right. Just anti-hate. Most right wingers are against hate.Just anti hate? they should practice what they preach. Why would you say that? If you’re into Tommy Robinson why would you suddenly say something like that! Proper hypocrisy there. Hope not hate do actually hate anything 1inch to the right of them. Antifa(cist) are raving fascist and Momentum? .... they are pretty similar... Just because they adopt a virtue signalling name doesn't mean they aren't kuntz. Whenever a so-called rightwing group kicks off it's called 'extremism'.... when the left kicks off it's called political activism. Personally i have no time for either side and identity politics is pure shyte....don't get sucked in by media portrayals and have to choose a side... tommy robinson and owen jones need to be blasted into space in my opinion..." “Antifa(cist) are raving fascist and Momentum?” No. That’s simply not true. Look up Fascism if you think otherwise. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry you are right...antifa are perfectly calm, law abiding citizens who engage in dialogue and would never smash up public places, after democratic elections, beat up supporters of public figures who oppose them, de-platform opposing voices, riot at locations where legal gatherings of people with whom they disagree.... if their actions aint fascist then i need a new dictionary. " What you are saying is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read. Definition of fascism 1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality So you believe that anti Fascists are infact Fascists? Got to say that doesn’t make a lot of sense. It seems you think they’re Fascists for quite rightly fighting Fascists. So you would also say that the Jewish fighters and others who knocked lumps out of Mosley’s blackshirts in the battle of Cable Street in the 30s were infact also Fascists on that basis then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in ." Not sure who you are referring to? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in . Not sure who you are referring to?" Tommy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in . Not sure who you are referring to? Tommy " Ah, I've not seen any news for a few days now. Will have to investigate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in . Not sure who you are referring to? Tommy " The legal situation is that he was charged with contempt and sent to prison. However another judge looked at the case and decided that certain legal technicalities had not been followed correctly and said he had to be released and the whole matter looked at again. That is what is happening now. When the matter now comes to court again he will be found either guilty or not guilty of the original offence. If he's found guilty again he will go back to prison and finish off the rest of his sentence. If he's found not guilty then he will be free to walk away and, no doubt, be due a pretty large amount of compensation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry you are right...antifa are perfectly calm, law abiding citizens who engage in dialogue and would never smash up public places, after democratic elections, beat up supporters of public figures who oppose them, de-platform opposing voices, riot at locations where legal gatherings of people with whom they disagree.... if their actions aint fascist then i need a new dictionary. What you are saying is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read. Definition of fascism 1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality So you believe that anti Fascists are infact Fascists? Got to say that doesn’t make a lot of sense. It seems you think they’re Fascists for quite rightly fighting Fascists. So you would also say that the Jewish fighters and others who knocked lumps out of Mosley’s blackshirts in the battle of Cable Street in the 30s were infact also Fascists on that basis then? " Good work that man. I thought about making a similar post. But my enthusiasm for proving the idiots wrong was waning yesterday. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry you are right...antifa are perfectly calm, law abiding citizens who engage in dialogue and would never smash up public places, after democratic elections, beat up supporters of public figures who oppose them, de-platform opposing voices, riot at locations where legal gatherings of people with whom they disagree.... if their actions aint fascist then i need a new dictionary. What you are saying is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read. Definition of fascism 1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality So you believe that anti Fascists are infact Fascists? Got to say that doesn’t make a lot of sense. It seems you think they’re Fascists for quite rightly fighting Fascists. So you would also say that the Jewish fighters and others who knocked lumps out of Mosley’s blackshirts in the battle of Cable Street in the 30s were infact also Fascists on that basis then? Good work that man. I thought about making a similar post. But my enthusiasm for proving the idiots wrong was waning yesterday. " It doesn't matter how often you prove what they say is lies or bullshit they still keep on saying it. They're not interested in the truth, only in getting their own way. How they get that does matter to them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in ." The appeal was on a point of law, not the evidence. A technicality - the original judge had erred in law. The judge who heard the appeal referred the case to the Attorney General for a decision on whether to abandon the case or start afresh. The AG has decided it is in the public interest to start afresh. One thing legal eagles do not like is their ruling being ignored, which is the allegation in this case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in ." It's appropriate that he is subject to the UK legal system and any of his behaviour results in fitting punishment accordingly. He's hardly a shining example of a model citizen. He loves the ego massage and being bankrolled by dubious sources from around the world. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in . It's appropriate that he is subject to the UK legal system and any of his behaviour results in fitting punishment accordingly. He's hardly a shining example of a model citizen. He loves the ego massage and being bankrolled by dubious sources from around the world. " The likes of Yaxley-Lennon make a lot of fuss about people from backgrounds they don't like not respecting our laws. Ironic in the extreme that they have a big problem adhering to them themselves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So hes now been re-charged for the same offence hes already been in prison for . Not sure how that works . He will go to prison again and probably never come out . What a lovely country we live in . It's appropriate that he is subject to the UK legal system and any of his behaviour results in fitting punishment accordingly. He's hardly a shining example of a model citizen. He loves the ego massage and being bankrolled by dubious sources from around the world. The likes of Yaxley-Lennon make a lot of fuss about people from backgrounds they don't like not respecting our laws. Ironic in the extreme that they have a big problem adhering to them themselves." He's a proper snowflake that Yaxley robinson Lennon . Maybe a little time in the big house will help him man up and not get so triggered. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Don't listen to what Tommy Robinson says in the video then, listen to what John Sweeney of the BBC says on hidden camera!" I've read a lot about the video, started to watch it and gave up after a few minutes of listening to waxy lemon, it was enough... As for John Sweeney, from all accounts they've got the jump on him as an investigative journalist... It's how they work and get people to open up and talk isn't it? You don't get a racist to be openly racist by coming across as being an anti racist do you? You would, if you were an investigative journalist try and be empathetic to their "cause" to make them feel confident to speak openly with you. You give them the idea that that part of the conversation, as you're holding the same repulsive views as them, would be edited out, when in truth it would only be the parts where encouragement to voice those views would be edited out. The press and investigative journalists in particular have been doing this forever and a day, fooling people into opening up... Roger Cooke didn't uncover fraudsters and drug dealers etc by pretending to be the police or from the press did he? As to the BBC being corrupt to the core, this is one weekly program, is it impartial, probably not, name me one news organisation that is, as a reader of the Express Online, I'm guessing that you don't really care if you're preferred news source is biased as long as it's biased in the same way as you are. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. " I’m no fan of Robinson, but on this I’m inclined to agree with you. If Nick Griffin can get elected to the European Parliament then so can Tommy Robinson. If, as I predict, our politicians sell us out on BREXIT, i would even consider voting for him myself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not seen it but also highly interested in avoiding anything that helps fuel this seemingly hideous man. You better hope we leave the EU before the European MEP elections in May then. Because if we don't I honestly think Tommy Robinson will be elected as a British MEP and that will give him the biggest platform he's ever had. I’m no fan of Robinson, but on this I’m inclined to agree with you. If Nick Griffin can get elected to the European Parliament then so can Tommy Robinson. If, as I predict, our politicians sell us out on BREXIT, i would even consider voting for him myself." As would a substantial amount of others, me included | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well if an active IRA man (Bobby Sands) can get elected to the British parliament as MP for a constituency then.....not impossible for Timmy Rottensin to get a euro ticket. Which he has every right to do. I wouldn't vote for him but i would pay good money to see so many people lose their shit whenever he takes his seat among the members. Could also spark a surge in support for similar figures in other eu countries.....VOTE YAXLEY!! "The main problem for him would be getting the votes in one constituency. The race hate enthusiasts are spread out across the country. I’m not sure there would be enough of them in a single place to get him elected. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would be good to see him go on hunger strike to gain followers..." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
