Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like the more centrist labour pro European mps are going to walk away from corbyns party.... " From what I have read, reason for leaving have had a great deal to with handling issues of antisemitism. To frame the move as offering a more pro EU option is giving only half the story. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm very much a floating voter but could never vote Labour with JC running the agenda...would have to see what a new party would look like but there's definitely room for a common sense party or one which promoted consensus politics...not sure how that would work in reality though." This is very much where I am at... corbyns leadership on the biggest issues and the cultists have very much driven me away from this Labour Party... I’d have more respect for him if he just came out and said he was a strong leaver rather than fudge the way he has dealt with brexit.. it is woefully bad... and his leadership on anti Semitic issues has been horrible | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Chuka Umunna says that the current parties are part of the problem, not the solution. “It is time we dumped this country’s old fashioned politics,” he says. The UK needs a political party “fit for the here and now” and the “first step in leaving the tribal politics behind”." It does sound very much like the break by the Gang of Four in the early 1980's. Corbyn's response to this will be interesting and show whether he can lead. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's all part of the Brexit madness. The Tories are falling apart. UKIP is lurching to the far right. The Lib Dems are invisible. Labour is falling to pieces. Parliament is falling to pieces. Government is drifting blindly. Business is failing. And we haven't even left the EU yet! " And you forgot to mention the worst of all scenarios, Liverpool may win the title. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
".... And you forgot to mention the worst of all scenarios, Liverpool may win the title." Nah... They will bottle it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaa! " I wouldn’t laugh quite yet, I bet the centre right split is coming if not this week, but next.... either the centrist pro eu Tories will go.... or the ERG, depending on which way may lurches | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's all part of the Brexit madness. The Tories are falling apart. UKIP is lurching to the far right. The Lib Dems are invisible. Labour is falling to pieces. Parliament is falling to pieces. Government is drifting blindly. Business is failing. And we haven't even left the EU yet! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There are many good Labour people left who are not extreme.Kinnock saw off off the far left. Extremes in any walk of life will cause friction and mayhem.Sadly Labour are assisting the Tory's in staying in power." That Corbyn is “extreme” or “far left” is a fallacy. A lot of his policies were pre-thatcher era tory policies. I’m not a big fan of his, but not in my lifetime have I seen as much bullshit made up about a politician. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There are many good Labour people left who are not extreme.Kinnock saw off off the far left. Extremes in any walk of life will cause friction and mayhem.Sadly Labour are assisting the Tory's in staying in power. That Corbyn is “extreme” or “far left” is a fallacy. A lot of his policies were pre-thatcher era tory policies. I’m not a big fan of his, but not in my lifetime have I seen as much bullshit made up about a politician. " I agree it says volumes about the right and nothing about the left. It's one of the reasons I will consider voting labour.They just need to come out with some green policies I can relate to.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ll absolutely defend corbyn is someone put up something that I feel is untrue for balance... but at the moment there’s no way I could vote for a corbyn led party, and I think their are probably a lot of disaffected labour support that feels the same way " I’m same as Fabio I can’t vote labour again under Corbyn | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. " Well when Douglas Carswell and Mark Reckless left the Conservative party to join ukip, they stood down as Conservative MP's and fought by elections for their seats as Ukip candidates (which they both won). Let's see if these Labour MP's have the balls to do the same, the honourable thing for them to do now would be to go to by elections in their Constituencies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. " While I think they should resign as MPs, I also thing they should wait until after 29th March as the political sideshow is not what is needed right now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. While I think they should resign as MPs, I also thing they should wait until after 29th March as the political sideshow is not what is needed right now." I think there is no time like the present. They should stand for what they believe in and strike while the iron is hot.It will be to their advantage to move quickly.I feel the will lose momentum giving labour the opportunity to prepare and undermine them over the next months. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. " Labour were already 2 MPs down, with Sheffield's Jared O Mara leaving to be an Independent and Peterborough's Fiona Onasaanya being booted out of the party after her recent conviction | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. Labour were already 2 MPs , with Sheffield's Jared O Mara leaving to be an Independent and Peterborough's Fiona Onasaanya being booted out of the party after her recent conviction " Labour also lost another MP last night as veteran Paul Flynn passed away. His death will now trigger a by election in his constituency. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"2 things... Not picking on you Fabio, but you are generally one of the most thoughtful posters here, and you say you cant support JC, can you tell me why? Can you name a single one of his and Labour's policies you disagree with? Can you name a single issue where he is or has been on the wrong side of the debate? ." sure... i think he actually does want brexit, which is why he is fudging from the top.... also he was wrong on the skriple affair basically believing the russians... his comments on venezuela leave me worried as well... then there is the stuff he did but only grudgingly.... there was a welfare bill the other week where labour were going to abstain, and when the snp and some more vocal labour mps said we are going to vote against, it was only under pressure that they finally changed position..... i do worry about some of the people at the top, only tom watson really feels me with confidence..... some of the others feel me with dread i am surprised to be honest it was only 7.... i think i could name a dozen labour mps that could join this group... john mann, john woodcock, ian murray, owen smith and liz kendall off the top of my head.... it will be interesting if they could peel off the more moderate tories like sarah wooleston and heidi allen for example... if they can do that then the new faction may get really really interesting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ll absolutely defend corbyn is someone put up something that I feel is untrue for balance... but at the moment there’s no way I could vote for a corbyn led party, and I think their are probably a lot of disaffected labour support that feels the same way I’m same as Fabio I can’t vote labour again under Corbyn " This | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaa! I wouldn’t laugh quite yet, I bet the centre right split is coming if not this week, but next.... either the centrist pro eu Tories will go.... or the ERG, depending on which way may lurches " i wouldnt bank on that the tories being tories will take one look at whats happening to labour and think oooo we got another five years in power | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we expect by elections now for the MPs who no longer are labour MPs. It would seem the democratic thing to do for their constituents. It's all very entertaining. Labour were already 2 MPs , with Sheffield's Jared O Mara leaving to be an Independent and Peterborough's Fiona Onasaanya being booted out of the party after her recent conviction Labour also lost another MP last night as veteran Paul Flynn passed away. His death will now trigger a by election in his constituency. " i wouldnt be suprised if we see another couple leave in the next few days 7 first for effect then another couple following as a plan to try to gain momentum for more to follow. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"sure... i think he actually does want brexit, which is why he is fudging from the top...." Really? I have listened to what he has said over years and what he said during the referendum. His position has been constant. He does not like how friendly the EU is to multinationals and because of the pro big business policies written into EU treaties he has voted against them. But he has always said that on balance the UK is better inside the EU than outside it providing we are fully engaged and driving change to make the institution more equitible. " also he was wrong on the skriple affair basically believing the russians... his comments on venezuela leave me worried as well..." So in your mind saying that we should not accuse Russia without proof, but wait until the police complete their investigation before making statements that accusing an already hostile country of committing an act of war is the same as supporting that country? I truly am a war-dog inside, but I want my political masters to be very reluctant to even bring me and my ilk out to show our teeth , forget letting us have the run of a long leash forget letting us off the lead completely. The problem with jingoistic politics is they involve the overuse of my type and that never ends well. JC seems to me to be the only leader not looking for any excuse to send in the troops. But hey, what do I know. And exactly what did he say about Venezuela that offended you so much? How has US inspired regime change worked out in the rest of the world? Would you like to name a success story for me? "then there is the stuff he did but only grudgingly...." Grudgingly? Do you mean he is nuanced, measured, does not rush his choices and listens to others? " there was a welfare bill the other week where labour were going to abstain, and when the snp and some more vocal labour mps said we are going to vote against, it was only under pressure that they finally changed position....." See above, he only picks fights he has a chance of winning. That sounds like the actions of a very clever man to me. "i do worry about some of the people at the top, only tom watson really feels me with confidence..... some of the others feel me with dread" Ah yes, so when you have a choice of the clusterfuck that is in power right now with the likes of BoJo and JRM fucking things up behind the scenes because they will make a killing in the ensuing mayhem, you would rather by default support their agenda than have a chance of having a democratic socialist government because you are not sure you can trust some of them. "i am surprised to be honest it was only 7.... i think i could name a dozen labour mps that could join this group... john mann, john woodcock, ian murray, owen smith and liz kendall off the top of my head...." With you there, there are many more Tories in disguise on the Labour benches. But I guess they are being held in reserve to mount another attack when this one fails. "it will be interesting if they could peel off the more moderate tories like sarah wooleston and heidi allen for example... if they can do that then the new faction may get really really interesting" That is not going to happen. However we may get LibDems Mk2 come the next election offering a 'third way' to split the anti Tory vote and help the Tories remain in power for another 5 years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" With you there, there are many more Tories in disguise on the Labour benches. But I guess they are being held in reserve to mount another attack when this one fails. " i respect what you normally say will.... but i think that this little bit says it all... I would like to think of the left as a "broad church" of opinions..(phrase i have heard a shed load today)... but calling moderates "red tories" sums up everything that is wrong at the moment! there is no room for discussion if you don't blindly follow the leader..... this party has moved so far left that the moderates don't feel like they have a home.... i think some of the bile and virtol i have seen today makes me think this 7 did the right thing, because it shone a light on the attacks.... and the attackers don't realise it! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, I will stick with JC and Labour and watch this lot go the way of the 'gang o four', and good riddance to them." Yes and look what happened to the leftist labour party then,the tories won and stayed in for 18 years | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Great statement from Tom Watson but it's incredible when the deputy leader of the Labour Party says there are times he doesn't recognise the party these days." The labour party is now a hard left party that does not believe in democracy. They have no place in the British political system as far as I am concerned. Nobody knows what will happen next as the face of British politics is changing due the non democratic practices of MP's. This breakaway group will no doubt never run the country but could be as influencial as UKIP in many ways. As a brexiteer I could not support them as they are remainers and therefore traitors but after the EU has gone into history they maybe important if they can find the right middle of the road policies | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"2 things... Not picking on you Fabio, but you are generally one of the most thoughtful posters here, and you say you cant support JC, can you tell me why? Can you name a single one of his and Labour's policies you disagree with? Can you name a single issue where he is or has been on the wrong side of the debate? Secondly, while so many are rushing to support these 7 has anyone actually looked at their voting history on the really controversial issues of the last 8/9 years? Or have any of you noticed that not 1 of them is resigning their parliamentary seats and standing for reelection? So to be clear while they claim to be resigning from the Labour party for reasons of principle and integrity, their voting record tells a different story and they have less integrity than the Tory MP's who joined UKIP." Will people do not look at these things they have better things to do with there lives | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"2 things... Not picking on you Fabio, but you are generally one of the most thoughtful posters here, and you say you cant support JC, can you tell me why? Can you name a single one of his and Labour's policies you disagree with? Can you name a single issue where he is or has been on the wrong side of the debate? Secondly, while so many are rushing to support these 7 has anyone actually looked at their voting history on the really controversial issues of the last 8/9 years? Or have any of you noticed that not 1 of them is resigning their parliamentary seats and standing for reelection? So to be clear while they claim to be resigning from the Labour party for reasons of principle and integrity, their voting record tells a different story and they have less integrity than the Tory MP's who joined UKIP.Will people do not look at these things they have better things to do with there lives" very true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" With you there, there are many more Tories in disguise on the Labour benches. But I guess they are being held in reserve to mount another attack when this one fails. i respect what you normally say will.... but i think that this little bit says it all... I would like to think of the left as a "broad church" of opinions..(phrase i have heard a shed load today)... but calling moderates "red tories" sums up everything that is wrong at the moment! there is no room for discussion if you don't blindly follow the leader..... this party has moved so far left that the moderates don't feel like they have a home.... i think some of the bile and virtol i have seen today makes me think this 7 did the right thing, because it shone a light on the attacks.... and the attackers don't realise it! " They are Red Tories because they would rather have a Tory government than a Labour government under a socialist leadership. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think Watson will also go, he's just delaying for effect. They clearly think their gamble is going to pay off, but I'm really not sure. There already is a party that holds their political position and that is the Lib Dems, and they don't poll very well these days. I think centrism is dead. What is very interesting is that they aren't a political party, they are a business, which means they don't have to reveal who their financial backers are. I'm not sure that the legaility of that won't be challenged. They could quite easily end up splitting the Tory vote instead of the Labour vote (lots of Tory voters types who are disillusioned with the current Tory infighting seem to like them), which would then end up giving Labour a significant majority at the next election. " Problem being the people who swing elections ie those of us in the middle will not entertain voting labour while jc is in charge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Great statement from Tom Watson but it's incredible when the deputy leader of the Labour Party says there are times he doesn't recognise the party these days.The labour party is now a hard left party that does not believe in democracy. They have no place in the British political system as far as I am concerned. Nobody knows what will happen next as the face of British politics is changing due the non democratic practices of MP's. This breakaway group will no doubt never run the country but could be as influencial as UKIP in many ways. As a brexiteer I could not support them as they are remainers and therefore traitors but after the EU has gone into history they maybe important if they can find the right middle of the road policies" Remainders are traitors? Really? 48% of the population are traitors? Every other person you speak to. Wow. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think Watson will also go, he's just delaying for effect. They clearly think their gamble is going to pay off, but I'm really not sure. There already is a party that holds their political position and that is the Lib Dems, and they don't poll very well these days. I think centrism is dead. What is very interesting is that they aren't a political party, they are a business, which means they don't have to reveal who their financial backers are. I'm not sure that the legaility of that won't be challenged. They could quite easily end up splitting the Tory vote instead of the Labour vote (lots of Tory voters types who are disillusioned with the current Tory infighting seem to like them), which would then end up giving Labour a significant majority at the next election. Problem being the people who swing elections ie those of us in the middle will not entertain voting labour while jc is in charge" Those people are ageing. The "centre ground" is a tiny percentage of the electorate. There are far greater political gains to be made if you can engage non voters (ie a significant proportion of the under 40s). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i respect what you normally say will.... but i think that this little bit says it all... I would like to think of the left as a "broad church" of opinions..(phrase i have heard a shed load today)... but calling moderates "red tories" sums up everything that is wrong at the moment! there is no room for discussion if you don't blindly follow the leader..... this party has moved so far left that the moderates don't feel like they have a home.... i think some of the bile and virtol i have seen today makes me think this 7 did the right thing, because it shone a light on the attacks.... and the attackers don't realise it! " Again I say look at voting records on contentious issues like universal credit and the rules that initiated Mrs May's 'hostile environment' that led to the Windrush scandal. I like JC because he is willing to listen to and be guided by views that he does not share. There is a reason that every story you hear about him is a scare story (that is proven in time to be false). The billionaires and multimillionaires that run the media and finance the tories are scared that after 40 years of r@ping our country they is a serious possibility that they may finally be held to account for their corruption and corruption of our politics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think Watson will also go, he's just delaying for effect. They clearly think their gamble is going to pay off, but I'm really not sure. There already is a party that holds their political position and that is the Lib Dems, and they don't poll very well these days. I think centrism is dead. What is very interesting is that they aren't a political party, they are a business, which means they don't have to reveal who their financial backers are. I'm not sure that the legaility of that won't be challenged. They could quite easily end up splitting the Tory vote instead of the Labour vote (lots of Tory voters types who are disillusioned with the current Tory infighting seem to like them), which would then end up giving Labour a significant majority at the next election. Problem being the people who swing elections ie those of us in the middle will not entertain voting labour while jc is in charge Those people are ageing. The "centre ground" is a tiny percentage of the electorate. There are far greater political gains to be made if you can engage non voters (ie a significant proportion of the under 40s). " I agree the centre ground is a waste land haunted by the ghosts of liberal democrats.The future is popularism by that extreme leftist or extreme rightists. A battle royal of ideological left and right is coming. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think Watson will also go, he's just delaying for effect. They clearly think their gamble is going to pay off, but I'm really not sure. There already is a party that holds their political position and that is the Lib Dems, and they don't poll very well these days. I think centrism is dead. What is very interesting is that they aren't a political party, they are a business, which means they don't have to reveal who their financial backers are. I'm not sure that the legaility of that won't be challenged. They could quite easily end up splitting the Tory vote instead of the Labour vote (lots of Tory voters types who are disillusioned with the current Tory infighting seem to like them), which would then end up giving Labour a significant majority at the next election. Problem being the people who swing elections ie those of us in the middle will not entertain voting labour while jc is in charge Those people are ageing. The "centre ground" is a tiny percentage of the electorate. There are far greater political gains to be made if you can engage non voters (ie a significant proportion of the under 40s). I agree the centre ground is a waste land haunted by the ghosts of liberal democrats.The future is popularism by that extreme leftist or extreme rightists. A battle royal of ideological left and right is coming. " Blame the increasing gap between rich and poor. When people have nothing, they vote for change. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party aren't particularly left wing, they've become centre left, whilst the conservatives have moved to a more extreme right position - especially as they continue to be led by the Rees Mogg faction. I'm naturally left biased but not fixated to one party. " How right you are. We now live in a country where Conservative government policies of the 70's are further to the left than anything JC and Labour are proposing but many believe that todays Labour party are communists in all but name. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"this a where its gets interesting... according to "politico's"... there are another dozen labour mp...a couple of lib dems and a dozen tories... including one cabinet minister... who are thinking of making the jump.... if this "movement" gets to say.... 20-25.... then it becomes an issue on all sides... so.... shall we start guessing names... because i reckon i could also name half a dozen tories who could "jump"........" Getting to 29 is the magic figure....theyre then the 3rd party in the House | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill..." I suspect youre correct in your analysis | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill..." I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections...." I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want." I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham..." Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party aren't particularly left wing, they've become centre left, whilst the conservatives have moved to a more extreme right position - especially as they continue to be led by the Rees Mogg faction. I'm naturally left biased but not fixated to one party. How right you are. We now live in a country where Conservative government policies of the 70's are further to the left than anything JC and Labour are proposing but many believe that todays Labour party are communists in all but name. " Some people who post here seem to genuinely think JC is some kind of far left loon. But it’s based on headlines and not based on his policies or voting records. I have to keep stating, I’m not especially a Corbyn supporter. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose." Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. " So what's your thoughts on arch Corbynite Chris Williamson and his Democracy Roadshow that's been touring various Constituencies? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. So what's your thoughts on arch Corbynite Chris Williamson and his Democracy Roadshow that's been touring various Constituencies? " As far as I'm aware, the purpose of it is to call for a mandatory reselection process, ie that there is no reselection without a members vote. I've got no problem with party members having more of a say in the running of the party. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like 3-5 (depending on which paper you read) Tories are set to join them. Interesting times if they do. I'm the medium term, looking more likely that they'd split the Tory vote. In the short term, May's majority looking very shaky. And then they'd either have to prop up May's government or force a general election.... " Our local MP, the one and only Nick Boles, has already been told that he probably won't get reselected at the next GE. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like 3-5 (depending on which paper you read) Tories are set to join them. Interesting times if they do. I'm the medium term, looking more likely that they'd split the Tory vote. In the short term, May's majority looking very shaky. And then they'd either have to prop up May's government or force a general election.... Our local MP, the one and only Nick Boles, has already been told that he probably won't get reselected at the next GE." I've no idea how selection works in the Tory party. The interesting thing about the constant attacks on Labour by the press, is that everyone seems to have some sort of opinion on the democratic process within the Labour party (although it's not often that well informed, see talk of "coups"). Nobody has any idea about the workings of the Tory party, or how they deal (or dont) with accusations such as racism, antisemitism or islamophobia... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like 3-5 (depending on which paper you read) Tories are set to join them. Interesting times if they do. I'm the medium term, looking more likely that they'd split the Tory vote. In the short term, May's majority looking very shaky. And then they'd either have to prop up May's government or force a general election.... Our local MP, the one and only Nick Boles, has already been told that he probably won't get reselected at the next GE. I've no idea how selection works in the Tory party. The interesting thing about the constant attacks on Labour by the press, is that everyone seems to have some sort of opinion on the democratic process within the Labour party (although it's not often that well informed, see talk of "coups"). Nobody has any idea about the workings of the Tory party, or how they deal (or dont) with accusations such as racism, antisemitism or islamophobia..." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like 3-5 (depending on which paper you read) Tories are set to join them. Interesting times if they do. I'm the medium term, looking more likely that they'd split the Tory vote. In the short term, May's majority looking very shaky. And then they'd either have to prop up May's government or force a general election.... Our local MP, the one and only Nick Boles, has already been told that he probably won't get reselected at the next GE. I've no idea how selection works in the Tory party. The interesting thing about the constant attacks on Labour by the press, is that everyone seems to have some sort of opinion on the democratic process within the Labour party (although it's not often that well informed, see talk of "coups"). Nobody has any idea about the workings of the Tory party, or how they deal (or dont) with accusations such as racism, antisemitism or islamophobia..." .Racism amongst the extremists in the Tory party doesn't exist, just ask any right wing lemon.. The prime minister even labelled her own party the "Nasty party ". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And then there were 8..." "Of course we don't have any policies yet" - Chukka Umunna... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like the more centrist labour pro European mps are going to walk away from corbyns party.... So this question is for the lefties.... we know who the righties are in here so I kindly ask you not to contribute Would you be tempted to vote for a more centre left party than corbyns labour?" No. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And then there were 8... "Of course we don't have any policies yet" - Chukka Umunna... " The splitters are looking for donations.The electoral commission are investigating them already. Some are asking why the groups company is registered where it is. Gemini Ltd is registered to a premises above the Unicorn Wetherspoons, in the Constituency of Tory Sir Graham Brady. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And then there were 8... "Of course we don't have any policies yet" - Chukka Umunna... The splitters are looking for donations.The electoral commission are investigating them already. Some are asking why the groups company is registered where it is. Gemini Ltd is registered to a premises above the Unicorn Wetherspoons, in the Constituency of Tory Sir Graham Brady." LOL. Next thing is you'll be trying to claim it's an ERG, pro BREXIT conspiracy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Looks like the more centrist labour pro European mps are going to walk away from corbyns party.... So this question is for the lefties.... we know who the righties are in here so I kindly ask you not to contribute Would you be tempted to vote for a more centre left party than corbyns labour?" Whether I'd be tempted to vote for them depends. Currently I'm only inclined to vote for people, parties or groups who are willing to take a strong pro EU, anti BREXIT stand. So yes. Long term it depends. If they position themselves permeability left of centre then probably not. If, however, they position themselves either pan central or slightly right of centre then quite possibly yea. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"1 labour 3 tories. join the independent group . " Mrs May will be able to bin the DUP and sign them up now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wonder if Frank Field is tempted.. " But isn't he pro leave? The independent split has already split. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? " When they want to be subject to electoral rules? I wonder why they want to keep their backers a secret.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? " When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i think they should all stand for re election in by elections now.All these people clearly stood on a manifesto to leave the eu see how their votes think about them now." I think everyone thinks they should. Apart from the MPs themselves. You underestimate Chukka's ego. I think a lot of this is about his ego. I think he sees himself as becoming Britain's Barak Obama. He was a rising star in New Labour and expected all the things that the PLP had put in place: being parachuted into a safe seat, uncontested reselection, a guaranteed place in the shadow cabinet.... The reforms within Labour to make it more democratic and accountable to it's members mean he would have to dane to do what his constituency party wanted him to do and not whatever the he'll he wanted, and he thinks he's far too important to listen to the plebs.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours." What the question is getting at is this: the Independent group are not a political party, they are currently a private business. This means they don't have to declare their financial backers to parliament. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"...... and here comes the tories.... sarah wooleston, heidi allen and anna soubry all go........ " Oh.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours. What the question is getting at is this: the Independent group are not a political party, they are currently a private business. This means they don't have to declare their financial backers to parliament. " Only as you just posted about it and have to justify why you're so bitter. At the moment the group isn't a party, it is small, unable to be elected. I saw it as a more a simple observation rather than a bone of contention. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours. What the question is getting at is this: the Independent group are not a political party, they are currently a private business. This means they don't have to declare their financial backers to parliament. Only as you just posted about it and have to justify why you're so bitter. At the moment the group isn't a party, it is small, unable to be elected. I saw it as a more a simple observation rather than a bone of contention. " I'm not bitter - but it's slightly worrying that they can do that, no? I'm wondering if this won't attract some sort of legal challenge. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"...... and here comes the tories.... sarah wooleston, heidi allen and anna soubry all go........ " Good riddance. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours. What the question is getting at is this: the Independent group are not a political party, they are currently a private business. This means they don't have to declare their financial backers to parliament. Only as you just posted about it and have to justify why you're so bitter. At the moment the group isn't a party, it is small, unable to be elected. I saw it as a more a simple observation rather than a bone of contention. I'm not bitter - but it's slightly worrying that they can do that, no? I'm wondering if this won't attract some sort of legal challenge. " Bollocks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When it's acknowledged? At the moment, Labours response is they are have stood by a mandate and should stand down. That they were likely to be de-selected, they will allow the Cons to win the next election. Blame sours. What the question is getting at is this: the Independent group are not a political party, they are currently a private business. This means they don't have to declare their financial backers to parliament. Only as you just posted about it and have to justify why you're so bitter. At the moment the group isn't a party, it is small, unable to be elected. I saw it as a more a simple observation rather than a bone of contention. I'm not bitter - but it's slightly worrying that they can do that, no? I'm wondering if this won't attract some sort of legal challenge. Bollocks." You think that nobody within parliament (either Tory or Labour) isn't looking for a way to force them to reveal their backers? *cough* Souros *cough* | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You think that nobody within parliament (either Tory or Labour) isn't looking for a way to force them to reveal their backers? *cough* Souros *cough*" it not soros... the rumors is that it more likely to be ex labour backers like lord sainsbury... just to make to both sided... the likes of Leave.EU are trying to get ex kippers to join the tories so they can de-select pro-eu tories.... so they are pushing the party right, just like momentum have pushed the labour party left...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You think that nobody within parliament (either Tory or Labour) isn't looking for a way to force them to reveal their backers? *cough* Souros *cough* it not soros... the rumors is that it more likely to be ex labour backers like lord sainsbury... just to make to both sided... the likes of Leave.EU are trying to get ex kippers to join the tories so they can de-select pro-eu tories.... so they are pushing the party right, just like momentum have pushed the labour party left...... " But not that left. Labour is currently 1995 left. It's certainly more to the right of any previous Labour government, with the exception of Blair's. It's to the right of Heath and of Churchills coalition.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You think that nobody within parliament (either Tory or Labour) isn't looking for a way to force them to reveal their backers? *cough* Souros *cough* it not soros... the rumors is that it more likely to be ex labour backers like lord sainsbury... just to make to both sided... the likes of Leave.EU are trying to get ex kippers to join the tories so they can de-select pro-eu tories.... so they are pushing the party right, just like momentum have pushed the labour party left...... But not that left. Labour is currently 1995 left. It's certainly more to the right of any previous Labour government, with the exception of Blair's. It's to the right of Heath and of Churchills coalition...." on the day that some of the more moderates left, derek hatton is welcomed back in with opened arms and george galloway is begging to be allowed back in...... sorry, thats not "'95 left"..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You think that nobody within parliament (either Tory or Labour) isn't looking for a way to force them to reveal their backers? *cough* Souros *cough* it not soros... the rumors is that it more likely to be ex labour backers like lord sainsbury... just to make to both sided... the likes of Leave.EU are trying to get ex kippers to join the tories so they can de-select pro-eu tories.... so they are pushing the party right, just like momentum have pushed the labour party left...... But not that left. Labour is currently 1995 left. It's certainly more to the right of any previous Labour government, with the exception of Blair's. It's to the right of Heath and of Churchills coalition.... on the day that some of the more moderates left, derek hatton is welcomed back in with opened arms and george galloway is begging to be allowed back in...... sorry, thats not "'95 left"....." Has the manifesto changed then? The whole of politics has shifted so far to the right, if Jeremy Corbyn is "far left", god knows what they'd make of the Attlee government. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When they want to be subject to electoral rules? I wonder why they want to keep their backers a secret...." I hear rumours, and only rumours, that a certain Tony Blair is something to do with the finance. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So when does a Movement become a Party? When they want to be subject to electoral rules? I wonder why they want to keep their backers a secret.... I hear rumours, and only rumours, that a certain Tony Blair is something to do with the finance." well he can afford it the pair of them made enough. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"wow.... heidi is not holding back in this presser... this is why she was the one tory mp i really did admire... ... political crush!!!!" Looks like you have gone all soft on her pmsl | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wonder if Frank Field is tempted.. But isn't he pro leave? The independent split has already split. " I am minded of the scene in the life of Brian.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"actually i think all three of them in their speeches made a very good case.... i don't always see eye to eye with anna soubry (i have had the pleasure as a civil servant in having to deal with her in mp capacity issues) but in the last 12-18 months the one thing she has does more than when i originally met her is gain my respect...." Me too we are politically poles apart but on the vexing issue of leaving the European Union I agree with her and she has kept on message . Most of the remain campaign have been a tad conciliatory, she has kept her firm stance . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Was that trolling? I don't know, but it all seemed pertinent. Mostly " Brilliant.., | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm very much a floating voter but could never vote Labour with JC running the agenda...would have to see what a new party would look like but there's definitely room for a common sense party or one which promoted consensus politics...not sure how that would work in reality though. This is very much where I am at... corbyns leadership on the biggest issues and the cultists have very much driven me away from this Labour Party... I’d have more respect for him if he just came out and said he was a strong leaver rather than fudge the way he has dealt with brexit.. it is woefully bad... and his leadership on anti Semitic issues has been horrible " Has it? He's done rather a lot over his career to fight antisemitism. You can Google it or I can make a lengthy post in here if you really want.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Great statement from Tom Watson but it's incredible when the deputy leader of the Labour Party says there are times he doesn't recognise the party these days.The labour party is now a hard left party that does not believe in democracy. They have no place in the British political system as far as I am concerned. Nobody knows what will happen next as the face of British politics is changing due the non democratic practices of MP's. This breakaway group will no doubt never run the country but could be as influencial as UKIP in many ways. As a brexiteer I could not support them as they are remainers and therefore traitors but after the EU has gone into history they maybe important if they can find the right middle of the road policies Remainders are traitors? Really? 48% of the population are traitors? Every other person you speak to. Wow." It is the MP's not doing what the MAJORITY voted for that are the traitors | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i think you will see another dozen from both sides go between now and the beginning of march (post next set of brexit votes)..... remember the other magic number is 4... which is the amount of tories that would need to defect for the may/dup coalition to not have a majority..... i could point at sir philip lee, justine greening and nick boles who i really expect to make the jump on the tory side sooner rather than later.... then we shall see..." My initial feeling was that a few more would go, but I'm not sure now. They will be weighing up whether they will hang onto their seats if they do, I suspect. In other news; Tony Blair is hotly tipped to join.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. " No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Great statement from Tom Watson but it's incredible when the deputy leader of the Labour Party says there are times he doesn't recognise the party these days.The labour party is now a hard left party that does not believe in democracy. They have no place in the British political system as far as I am concerned. Nobody knows what will happen next as the face of British politics is changing due the non democratic practices of MP's. This breakaway group will no doubt never run the country but could be as influencial as UKIP in many ways. As a brexiteer I could not support them as they are remainers and therefore traitors but after the EU has gone into history they maybe important if they can find the right middle of the road policies Remainders are traitors? Really? 48% of the population are traitors? Every other person you speak to. Wow.It is the MP's not doing what the MAJORITY voted for that are the traitors" MPs don't have to follow the majority any more than any other individual. What a nonsense. That leaves 48% without any representation whatsoever. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i think you will see another dozen from both sides go between now and the beginning of march (post next set of brexit votes)..... remember the other magic number is 4... which is the amount of tories that would need to defect for the may/dup coalition to not have a majority..... i could point at sir philip lee, justine greening and nick boles who i really expect to make the jump on the tory side sooner rather than later.... then we shall see... My initial feeling was that a few more would go, but I'm not sure now. They will be weighing up whether they will hang onto their seats if they do, I suspect. In other news; Tony Blair is hotly tipped to join...." How can he join a group of independent MPs? Did you just read one of the Dai3 Mash purges I posted? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. " What the fuck do you think you have from our present government? Enlightenment? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i think you will see another dozen from both sides go between now and the beginning of march (post next set of brexit votes)..... remember the other magic number is 4... which is the amount of tories that would need to defect for the may/dup coalition to not have a majority..... i could point at sir philip lee, justine greening and nick boles who i really expect to make the jump on the tory side sooner rather than later.... then we shall see... My initial feeling was that a few more would go, but I'm not sure now. They will be weighing up whether they will hang onto their seats if they do, I suspect. In other news; Tony Blair is hotly tipped to join.... How can he join a group of independent MPs? Did you just read one of the Dai3 Mash purges I posted? " I've no idea how he'd join a non party, but: https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/tony-blair-tipped-to-be-next-to-join-independent-group/20/02/ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. " I have no idea how the cons work at a local level, but within Labour, since it has been opened up democratically, a constituency Labour party can call a vote of no confidence. These are generally your rankand file members involved at a community level. The leeway for what you can get away with in terms of deviation from the party line are pretty wide. It's pretty hard to get a VONC called. I know people like to blame momentum, because it's a handy thing to scream about, but most constituency members aren't anything to do with momentum. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. What the fuck do you think you have from our present government? Enlightenment? " No, the electorate are generally very submissive. They prefer to be dominated that’s all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. I have no idea how the cons work at a local level, but within Labour, since it has been opened up democratically, a constituency Labour party can call a vote of no confidence. These are generally your rankand file members involved at a community level. The leeway for what you can get away with in terms of deviation from the party line are pretty wide. It's pretty hard to get a VONC called. I know people like to blame momentum, because it's a handy thing to scream about, but most constituency members aren't anything to do with momentum." Most members cannot get a word in edgeways if momentum members were at a meeting. They are loud obnoxious cunts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. I have no idea how the cons work at a local level, but within Labour, since it has been opened up democratically, a constituency Labour party can call a vote of no confidence. These are generally your rankand file members involved at a community level. The leeway for what you can get away with in terms of deviation from the party line are pretty wide. It's pretty hard to get a VONC called. I know people like to blame momentum, because it's a handy thing to scream about, but most constituency members aren't anything to do with momentum. Most members cannot get a word in edgeways if momentum members were at a meeting. They are loud obnoxious cunts. " Is this from personal experience of Labour branch meetings? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Is this from personal experience of Labour branch meetings?" I can’t speak for labour branch meetings.... but for the two labour leadership hustings I went to during both sets of contests I can tell you if you were a moderate and weren’t all corbyn then you were given a much rougher time...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. I have no idea how the cons work at a local level, but within Labour, since it has been opened up democratically, a constituency Labour party can call a vote of no confidence. These are generally your rankand file members involved at a community level. The leeway for what you can get away with in terms of deviation from the party line are pretty wide. It's pretty hard to get a VONC called. I know people like to blame momentum, because it's a handy thing to scream about, but most constituency members aren't anything to do with momentum. Most members cannot get a word in edgeways if momentum members were at a meeting. They are loud obnoxious cunts. " Correct....gobshites and morons for the most part in my experience (I speak as a Party member of 40 years standing) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A more centerist SDP like party would get support from moderate Labour voters. Unfortunately for them, all it will do is split the votes. Every vote the new party win, will be one less for Labour. The LibDems would almost certainly be thoroughly embarrassed in a general election featuring two labour parties, and would no doubt be looking to form some kind of coalition with the new group. History repeating itself yet again, but it was predictable the moment that Corbyn was made leader of the opposition. I predict another snap election, because the Tories will smell blood and go in for the kill... I'm not sure that they will, to be honest. It's just as likely that they split the Tory vote. I'm sure that if they were confident of gaining ex-labour support, they would be happy to call by-elections.... I suspect you are right. Recent history should tell any politician that you cannot guarantee a result. Hilary Clinton, Brexit, May's election in 2017.....you don't always get what you want. I'm pretty sure that New Labour is dead (which is what they essentially are). Leftist parties who stuck to that ideal/the third way principle were wiped out all over Europe. People forget that Labour polled the highest vote share since Tony Blair's second term at the last election. If the centre draws tory/ex liberal voters in significant numbers (and I think it will, especially if some Tories split), the result will be a Labour government. I'm also confused about where these people are going to stand going forward. I'm relatively sure Chukka won't get in on an independent ticket in Streatham... Many of these MPs are the ones being targeted for deselection at the next GE. They probably feel that they haven't got anything to lose. Deselection is down to a no confidence vote by their constituency Labour party. All they need to do to avoid it is represent their constituency views. No, and this applies equally to Conservative as well as Labour, all they have to do to avoid deselection is what their constituency associations say, and that's not always the same as their constituents views; especially if the association has been taken over by UKIP/ERG or momentum. I have no idea how the cons work at a local level, but within Labour, since it has been opened up democratically, a constituency Labour party can call a vote of no confidence. These are generally your rankand file members involved at a community level. The leeway for what you can get away with in terms of deviation from the party line are pretty wide. It's pretty hard to get a VONC called. I know people like to blame momentum, because it's a handy thing to scream about, but most constituency members aren't anything to do with momentum. Most members cannot get a word in edgeways if momentum members were at a meeting. They are loud obnoxious cunts. Is this from personal experience of Labour branch meetings?" It's certainly my experience. Theyre no better than Militant were (and we saw off those despicable Trots back in the day) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party under Corbyn has become a hostile environment. Closest thing to a cult of personality we will ever see in the UK Momentum are a cancer in that party. Aggressive and killing the entire social democratic movement. The espouse change they are puppets of the totalitarian left. No way would I support this version of this party. The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. " See, my analysis is the opposite of that. If it's a "personality cult", it's the shittest personality cult ever, seeing as he is widely criticised by other Labour MPs, and they appear not to face any repercussions other than engagement with their point/a rebuttal. Since reforms to the party were made under his leadership, MPs are more accountable to the membership than they had been before. However, if you look at the party under Blair: Constituencies had no say on the selection of their candidates, meaning that Tony could parachute his acolytes into safe Labour seats, whereupon they could have a career indefinitely, as they were effectively only answerable to the leadership. You could definitely be kicked out of the party entirely for criticising the glorious leader (See:Galloway and Iraq). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i think you will see another dozen from both sides go between now and the beginning of march (post next set of brexit votes)..... remember the other magic number is 4... which is the amount of tories that would need to defect for the may/dup coalition to not have a majority..... i could point at sir philip lee, justine greening and nick boles who i really expect to make the jump on the tory side sooner rather than later.... then we shall see..." These leavers ae not forming a party as such just voting is independants so nobody can be sure about what will happen,but Labour will suffer more than tories I think | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If May continues on the path of no deal the Conservatives will lose many many more. Its going to be devastating for the conservatives.The remainers in the party won't tolerate a no deal at any costs.Its all falling apart . :It's a beautiful thing to behold -)" Whats so beautiful about our government falling apart? showing your true colours now dont give a fuck about the country just to say "i was right". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If May continues on the path of no deal the Conservatives will lose many many more. Its going to be devastating for the conservatives.The remainers in the party won't tolerate a no deal at any costs.Its all falling apart . :It's a beautiful thing to behold -)Whats so beautiful about our government falling apart? showing your true colours now dont give a fuck about the country just to say "i was right". " If the last few years have shown anything, being able to say I was right, I won, is more important than consequences ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If May continues on the path of no deal the Conservatives will lose many many more. Its going to be devastating for the conservatives.The remainers in the party won't tolerate a no deal at any costs.Its all falling apart . :It's a beautiful thing to behold -)Whats so beautiful about our government falling apart? showing your true colours now dont give a fuck about the country just to say "i was right". " I don't give a flying fuck about a conservative government that will flush the economy down the shitter because extremists pull the strings There is nothing better than watching them fracture .Ive never voted for them and never will.You feel the same about corbyn.. Those who support this government are betting on a losing hand It's quite delicious to watch. Thankyou Prime Minister for the lols. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If May continues on the path of no deal the Conservatives will lose many many more. Its going to be devastating for the conservatives.The remainers in the party won't tolerate a no deal at any costs.Its all falling apart . :It's a beautiful thing to behold -)" May has no choice but to continue. Article 50 paragraph 3 . You tube James Obrien & jason hunt. She is stringing everyone along pretending there is a deal to be done in the hope the EU will fold & change its position. If was 1 against 1 maybe , but not 27 against one. There not going to fold. Then the uk is in the deepest of Shit. Anyone who tells you different is a fool. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party under Corbyn has become a hostile environment. Closest thing to a cult of personality we will ever see in the UK Momentum are a cancer in that party. Aggressive and killing the entire social democratic movement. The espouse change they are puppets of the totalitarian left. No way would I support this version of this party. The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. See, my analysis is the opposite of that. If it's a "personality cult", it's the shittest personality cult ever, seeing as he is widely criticised by other Labour MPs, and they appear not to face any repercussions other than engagement with their point/a rebuttal. Since reforms to the party were made under his leadership, MPs are more accountable to the membership than they had been before. However, if you look at the party under Blair: Constituencies had no say on the selection of their candidates, meaning that Tony could parachute his acolytes into safe Labour seats, whereupon they could have a career indefinitely, as they were effectively only answerable to the leadership. You could definitely be kicked out of the party entirely for criticising the glorious leader (See:Galloway and Iraq). " George Galloway pfft glory hound remember celebrity big brother? JC = need I say more? Those initials are pretty familiar. There are chants of his name, like a cult. Step one indoctrination. Selection has always been a problem it’s a shit system. Accountability? horseshit, more a case of momentum kicking up a fuss if people don’t agree with their politics. They forgotten the concept of social democracy. They use tactics of epic Maoist proportions, to railroad, harass, bully and intimidate members. They cannot realise it because they think they are doing just causes. Really they are acting like the people involved in China’s cultural revolution. How did that turn out? Or possibly the Khemer rouge? Just admit it, extreme left and extreme right touch each other they become indistinguishable from each other. That then forms a ring, like an arsehole. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party under Corbyn has become a hostile environment. Closest thing to a cult of personality we will ever see in the UK Momentum are a cancer in that party. Aggressive and killing the entire social democratic movement. The espouse change they are puppets of the totalitarian left. No way would I support this version of this party. The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. See, my analysis is the opposite of that. If it's a "personality cult", it's the shittest personality cult ever, seeing as he is widely criticised by other Labour MPs, and they appear not to face any repercussions other than engagement with their point/a rebuttal. Since reforms to the party were made under his leadership, MPs are more accountable to the membership than they had been before. However, if you look at the party under Blair: Constituencies had no say on the selection of their candidates, meaning that Tony could parachute his acolytes into safe Labour seats, whereupon they could have a career indefinitely, as they were effectively only answerable to the leadership. You could definitely be kicked out of the party entirely for criticising the glorious leader (See:Galloway and Iraq). George Galloway pfft glory hound remember celebrity big brother? JC = need I say more? Those initials are pretty familiar. There are chants of his name, like a cult. Step one indoctrination. Selection has always been a problem it’s a shit system. Accountability? horseshit, more a case of momentum kicking up a fuss if people don’t agree with their politics. They forgotten the concept of social democracy. They use tactics of epic Maoist proportions, to railroad, harass, bully and intimidate members. They cannot realise it because they think they are doing just causes. Really they are acting like the people involved in China’s cultural revolution. How did that turn out? Or possibly the Khemer rouge? Just admit it, extreme left and extreme right touch each other they become indistinguishable from each other. That then forms a ring, like an arsehole. " But my point about Galloway was that he was expelled for speaking out against the Government with respect to Iraq. His personality is irrelevant. I can't think of anyone who Corbyn has done anything more than mildly admonish (apart from those kicked out for antisemitism). Momentum might "kick up a fuss", whatever that means, but all of the changes made have made MPs more accountable to the membership, via an almost tedious commitment to having ballots on everything. It is, in fact the exact opposite of a dictatorship, which, like I said (and you seem unable to refute) was much more the case under Blair. If Momentum facilitate robust debate, then that can only be a good thing. I'm at a loss to see how a commitment to more democracy makes them anti social democracy, personally.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party under Corbyn has become a hostile environment. Closest thing to a cult of personality we will ever see in the UK Momentum are a cancer in that party. Aggressive and killing the entire social democratic movement. The espouse change they are puppets of the totalitarian left. No way would I support this version of this party. The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. See, my analysis is the opposite of that. If it's a "personality cult", it's the shittest personality cult ever, seeing as he is widely criticised by other Labour MPs, and they appear not to face any repercussions other than engagement with their point/a rebuttal. Since reforms to the party were made under his leadership, MPs are more accountable to the membership than they had been before. However, if you look at the party under Blair: Constituencies had no say on the selection of their candidates, meaning that Tony could parachute his acolytes into safe Labour seats, whereupon they could have a career indefinitely, as they were effectively only answerable to the leadership. You could definitely be kicked out of the party entirely for criticising the glorious leader (See:Galloway and Iraq). George Galloway pfft glory hound remember celebrity big brother? JC = need I say more? Those initials are pretty familiar. There are chants of his name, like a cult. Step one indoctrination. Selection has always been a problem it’s a shit system. Accountability? horseshit, more a case of momentum kicking up a fuss if people don’t agree with their politics. They forgotten the concept of social democracy. They use tactics of epic Maoist proportions, to railroad, harass, bully and intimidate members. They cannot realise it because they think they are doing just causes. Really they are acting like the people involved in China’s cultural revolution. How did that turn out? Or possibly the Khemer rouge? Just admit it, extreme left and extreme right touch each other they become indistinguishable from each other. That then forms a ring, like an arsehole. But my point about Galloway was that he was expelled for speaking out against the Government with respect to Iraq. His personality is irrelevant. I can't think of anyone who Corbyn has done anything more than mildly admonish (apart from those kicked out for antisemitism). Momentum might "kick up a fuss", whatever that means, but all of the changes made have made MPs more accountable to the membership, via an almost tedious commitment to having ballots on everything. It is, in fact the exact opposite of a dictatorship, which, like I said (and you seem unable to refute) was much more the case under Blair. If Momentum facilitate robust debate, then that can only be a good thing. I'm at a loss to see how a commitment to more democracy makes them anti social democracy, personally.... " Personality and politics go hand in hand. What is an election but a glorified popularity contest? Corbyn is classic, he appears to be innocent of everything, but then let’s his minions do all his dirty work. Like that Rottweiler McDonnell. Does shouting and heckling make it a debate? If momentum wanted to help the oppressed and disenfranchised, they could have ages ago. But no they want power. Some animals are more equal than others and this is JC and momentum in a nutshell. Like napoleon and his cadre from the Orwell classic. This split is reminiscent of the 1980’s, the wilderness beckons for the Labour Party, until they realise that hard left communist ideals are not what the British people want. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The labour party under Corbyn has become a hostile environment. Closest thing to a cult of personality we will ever see in the UK Momentum are a cancer in that party. Aggressive and killing the entire social democratic movement. The espouse change they are puppets of the totalitarian left. No way would I support this version of this party. The British public doesn’t do extremism. It never has. It prefers the status quo. The fringes don’t realise that. See, my analysis is the opposite of that. If it's a "personality cult", it's the shittest personality cult ever, seeing as he is widely criticised by other Labour MPs, and they appear not to face any repercussions other than engagement with their point/a rebuttal. Since reforms to the party were made under his leadership, MPs are more accountable to the membership than they had been before. However, if you look at the party under Blair: Constituencies had no say on the selection of their candidates, meaning that Tony could parachute his acolytes into safe Labour seats, whereupon they could have a career indefinitely, as they were effectively only answerable to the leadership. You could definitely be kicked out of the party entirely for criticising the glorious leader (See:Galloway and Iraq). George Galloway pfft glory hound remember celebrity big brother? JC = need I say more? Those initials are pretty familiar. There are chants of his name, like a cult. Step one indoctrination. Selection has always been a problem it’s a shit system. Accountability? horseshit, more a case of momentum kicking up a fuss if people don’t agree with their politics. They forgotten the concept of social democracy. They use tactics of epic Maoist proportions, to railroad, harass, bully and intimidate members. They cannot realise it because they think they are doing just causes. Really they are acting like the people involved in China’s cultural revolution. How did that turn out? Or possibly the Khemer rouge? Just admit it, extreme left and extreme right touch each other they become indistinguishable from each other. That then forms a ring, like an arsehole. But my point about Galloway was that he was expelled for speaking out against the Government with respect to Iraq. His personality is irrelevant. I can't think of anyone who Corbyn has done anything more than mildly admonish (apart from those kicked out for antisemitism). Momentum might "kick up a fuss", whatever that means, but all of the changes made have made MPs more accountable to the membership, via an almost tedious commitment to having ballots on everything. It is, in fact the exact opposite of a dictatorship, which, like I said (and you seem unable to refute) was much more the case under Blair. If Momentum facilitate robust debate, then that can only be a good thing. I'm at a loss to see how a commitment to more democracy makes them anti social democracy, personally.... Personality and politics go hand in hand. What is an election but a glorified popularity contest? Corbyn is classic, he appears to be innocent of everything, but then let’s his minions do all his dirty work. Like that Rottweiler McDonnell. Does shouting and heckling make it a debate? If momentum wanted to help the oppressed and disenfranchised, they could have ages ago. But no they want power. Some animals are more equal than others and this is JC and momentum in a nutshell. Like napoleon and his cadre from the Orwell classic. This split is reminiscent of the 1980’s, the wilderness beckons for the Labour Party, until they realise that hard left communist ideals are not what the British people want. " Hard left communist ideals? The current Labour manifesto is yo the right of Tory governments of the 70s... I still can't see how more openness democratically and dialogue (And open criticism) is anything like "Animal Farm" You speak as if the shadow cabinet have taken power by some armed coup as opposed to through secret ballots.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is the difference between being a movement of protest and a party of government. We see a lot of protest movements here and in Europe. But politicians with the vision to lead a nation are very thin on the ground." If you are talking about the Tiggers, you might have a point (no party, supposedly split because of Brexit, no actual policies....) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"who are tiggers?" The Independent Group. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s an unkown quantity at the moment. It will evolve into something. Whether that something is a credible alternative to Labour and Conservative, or capable of fielding enough candidates to contest a general election, I do not know. I guess we will find out at the next by-election." Like you said, it's a protest movement. Ian Austin gone, but refusing to join the tiggers. The splitters have split (again). It's mildly pythonesque | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s an unkown quantity at the moment. It will evolve into something. Whether that something is a credible alternative to Labour and Conservative, or capable of fielding enough candidates to contest a general election, I do not know. I guess we will find out at the next by-election. Like you said, it's a protest movement. Ian Austin gone, but refusing to join the tiggers. The splitters have split (again). It's mildly pythonesque " I wasn’t thinking of MPs when talking about protest movements. Corbyn is an excellent campaigner on issues close to his heart. I imagine his followers are big into single issue campaigns too. That is a movement, one demanding change. Converting that into a party of government people are prepared to vote for is what Labour is missing at the moment. The party that wins elections is the one that understands where the centre ground is at a moment in time. Their own polling will be telling them that is not happening. The caracture of Corbyn is probably the main reason. Not enough people believe he has the ability to lead a country. Not enough of those who actually matter when it comes to winning elections. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s an unkown quantity at the moment. It will evolve into something. Whether that something is a credible alternative to Labour and Conservative, or capable of fielding enough candidates to contest a general election, I do not know. I guess we will find out at the next by-election. Like you said, it's a protest movement. Ian Austin gone, but refusing to join the tiggers. The splitters have split (again). It's mildly pythonesque I wasn’t thinking of MPs when talking about protest movements. Corbyn is an excellent campaigner on issues close to his heart. I imagine his followers are big into single issue campaigns too. That is a movement, one demanding change. Converting that into a party of government people are prepared to vote for is what Labour is missing at the moment. The party that wins elections is the one that understands where the centre ground is at a moment in time. Their own polling will be telling them that is not happening. The caracture of Corbyn is probably the main reason. Not enough people believe he has the ability to lead a country. Not enough of those who actually matter when it comes to winning elections." Expect they often poll ahead of the Tories, and perusing the centre ground is an utter waste of time - See the collapse of the Lib Dems. What they should be (and are) doing is perusing non voters/the youth, and by which I mean the under 40s. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s an unkown quantity at the moment. It will evolve into something. Whether that something is a credible alternative to Labour and Conservative, or capable of fielding enough candidates to contest a general election, I do not know. I guess we will find out at the next by-election. Like you said, it's a protest movement. Ian Austin gone, but refusing to join the tiggers. The splitters have split (again). It's mildly pythonesque I wasn’t thinking of MPs when talking about protest movements. Corbyn is an excellent campaigner on issues close to his heart. I imagine his followers are big into single issue campaigns too. That is a movement, one demanding change. Converting that into a party of government people are prepared to vote for is what Labour is missing at the moment. The party that wins elections is the one that understands where the centre ground is at a moment in time. Their own polling will be telling them that is not happening. The caracture of Corbyn is probably the main reason. Not enough people believe he has the ability to lead a country. Not enough of those who actually matter when it comes to winning elections. Expect they often poll ahead of the Tories, and perusing the centre ground is an utter waste of time - See the collapse of the Lib Dems. What they should be (and are) doing is perusing non voters/the youth, and by which I mean the under 40s." I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. " I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. " You could substitute the word "right" for "left" and your statement would appear to contain the same meaningless crypto-academic nonsense as the original musing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. " I agree moderates are irrelevant .The world is in love with populism and the cult of personality and you must be anti establishment this style of politics needs to used by the left the same way the right uses it.Take the gloves off and take no prisoners and the left will win. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. You could substitute the word "right" for "left" and your statement would appear to contain the same meaningless crypto-academic nonsense as the original musing." No it wouldn't. Far right parties all over Europe have gained real power in the last few years. America has a fat right president. By "crypto-academic nonsense" do you actually mean "I either can't or won't engage with the content, so I'll make an attack on the author"?...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. You could substitute the word "right" for "left" and your statement would appear to contain the same meaningless crypto-academic nonsense as the original musing. No it wouldn't. Far right parties all over Europe have gained real power in the last few years. America has a fat right president. By "crypto-academic nonsense" do you actually mean "I either can't or won't engage with the content, so I'll make an attack on the author"?...... " I think that they did engage with the content....and I think that you have blindly nailed your colours to one mast without consideration of what you have put out there. Far left and far right are equal evils. And while you may have a typo in there, fat president is very apt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Like you said, it's a protest movement. Ian Austin gone, but refusing to join the tiggers. The splitters have split (again). It's mildly pythonesque " not quite..... there are various reasons why Ian Austin went, but was never likely to join the independent group at this stage... 1) he is the adopted son of jewish refugees... so the anti-semetic issues within the labour party played large.. as he said "if you are dealing with corbyns critics on anti-semetism harder than the anti-semites themselves.... thats a huge flag!" and it not hard to reason against that logic.... 2) he was one of the 3 labour mp's to vote for TM's deal... as he said it honoured his district's wishes..... he may eventually end up in the independent group... but whilst brexit is going on they are likley to keep distance.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Expect they often poll ahead of the Tories, and perusing the centre ground is an utter waste of time - See the collapse of the Lib Dems. What they should be (and are) doing is perusing non voters/the youth, and by which I mean the under 40s." Elections in this country are won and lost in a small number of swing seats, among voters who move between Labour and Conservative. Those are the people Labour needs to reach to win a majority of seats. Seats win elections. Vote counts do not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I will have to agree getting the under 40s vote is crucial.Those with one foot in the grave are always going to be conservatives because the labour voters all had hard working lives and are mostly dead already.. I'm unsure why people still nod sagely and repeat the mantra that British political success depends on persuing the centre ground swing voters. Those swing voters are in their 50s now and their number continues to diminish. It's almost like people wilfully ignore the collapse of the centre in politics all over the world. In the UK the Lib Dems, with their remain at any cost agenda are almost non-existent. Across Europe, left parties that refused to abandon "third way" politics and Blairite style centrism collapsed. The only left mainstream party that remained viable was the Labour party in the UK and this was only achieved by abandoning Blair and trying to move to a more socialist position. The right understand this, and have exploited it, whilst so-called moderates cling to centrism, refuse to offer an alternative and allow the Right to grow. You could substitute the word "right" for "left" and your statement would appear to contain the same meaningless crypto-academic nonsense as the original musing. No it wouldn't. Far right parties all over Europe have gained real power in the last few years. America has a fat right president. By "crypto-academic nonsense" do you actually mean "I either can't or won't engage with the content, so I'll make an attack on the author"?...... I think that they did engage with the content....and I think that you have blindly nailed your colours to one mast without consideration of what you have put out there. Far left and far right are equal evils. And while you may have a typo in there, fat president is very apt." If far left and far right are equal evils why have we not seen a lefty standing over the corpse of a women MP with a knife and gun screaming Britain first..??? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |