Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech" Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech" Do a bit more research mate hes put a spin on it.It doesnt change the person who is getting the pension it just brings their partner in line with others of their age.Fair in my eyes why should someone get more benifits just because their partner is older than someone elses partner. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame." Cassic labour reaction jump on the tories without checking anything because Jeremy said so. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame.Cassic labour reaction jump on the tories without checking anything because Jeremy said so. " So you are saying that the government haven't slipped in a change to pensions?....because I've just seen the evidence of changes for around 300,000 current pensioners. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speechDo a bit more research mate hes put a spin on it.It doesnt change the person who is getting the pension it just brings their partner in line with others of their age.Fair in my eyes why should someone get more benifits just because their partner is older than someone elses partner." A change to the current financial position of some 300,000 pensioners....so JC was entirely correct. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speechDo a bit more research mate hes put a spin on it.It doesnt change the person who is getting the pension it just brings their partner in line with others of their age.Fair in my eyes why should someone get more benifits just because their partner is older than someone elses partner. A change to the current financial position of some 300,000 pensioners....so JC was entirely correct." I am saying read what it says. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speechDo a bit more research mate hes put a spin on it.It doesnt change the person who is getting the pension it just brings their partner in line with others of their age.Fair in my eyes why should someone get more benifits just because their partner is older than someone elses partner. A change to the current financial position of some 300,000 pensioners....so JC was entirely correct.I am saying read what it says." And I'm saying that I expect no empathy from you or any of your like.... detrimental changes that will affect both present and future pensioners will only ever be excused by those who look down on others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame.Cassic labour reaction jump on the tories without checking anything because Jeremy said so. " Oh really? Pension credit stopped, forcing thrm to claim the stingy universal credit isn't spin at all! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame.Cassic labour reaction jump on the tories without checking anything because Jeremy said so. Oh really? Pension credit stopped, forcing thrm to claim the stingy universal credit isn't spin at all! " I thought you was a socialist sorry.So you dont believe in equality . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The other big issue emerging is the failure of Government policy on replacing nuclear power plant. Toshiba and now Hitachi have pulled out. Between them, that is 15 per cent if planned future capacity gone. The existing stations are limping along with sticking plasters. The Government, for ideological reasons, wants private sector to build new ones. The private sector says the risks are too great, so they are walking away. The only realistic alternative now is vendors in China and Russia, both state-owned. Another shambles at the door of the Conservative Party and its ideological intransigence." Can't agree enough on this. Power stations are falling to bits. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Classic Tory smoke screen governance of the country, they have no shame.Cassic labour reaction jump on the tories without checking anything because Jeremy said so. Oh really? Pension credit stopped, forcing thrm to claim the stingy universal credit isn't spin at all! I thought you was a socialist sorry.So you dont believe in equality ." Your warped sense of equality fits well with the tories | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech" Old news | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Old news " What if it is? it's still debatable on tory sly tactics | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Amber Rudd quietly slipped in another cut. This time on pensioners who have a younger spouse still in work. Nice eh? Just heard it on Corbyn speech Old news What if it is? it's still debatable on tory sly tactics" How was the news presented, was it any different to other changes the government make? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ?" Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! " I shall rephrase. Should a 45yo get more from the state this year than their twin just because they have married a pensioner ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! " You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! I shall rephrase. Should a 45yo get more from the state this year than their twin just because they have married a pensioner ?" well explained thanks i wasnt getting through.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has it occurred to you that a compassionate government, rather than making a poor person even poorer to even things out, might have lifted the rest up to even things out? " It is a view point.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! I shall rephrase. Should a 45yo get more from the state this year than their twin just because they have married a pensioner ?well explained thanks i wasnt getting through. "Obviously yous two haven't bothered to read the details. The older partner cant get their pension till the younger reaches it. One 45yo. twin reaching 67 for example gets their pension, while other one gets shafted, even though paying in, until that twin's spouse is old enough.. Jeez!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has it occurred to you that a compassionate government, rather than making a poor person even poorer to even things out, might have lifted the rest up to even things out? " I think this only works if you pay the equivalent of the pension credit to all couples. Which increases the cost and reduces the incentive to look for work. Tbh, I can’t see why there isn’t a half way credit. But this story is more than the headline. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits?" they shouldn’t didn’t even know this whent on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits? they shouldn’t didn’t even know this whent on " It doesn't. Just the posters spin. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits? they shouldn’t didn’t even know this whent on It doesn't. Just the posters spin. " have I misunderstood? I though a couple, one aged 45 the other 70, gets more than a couple both aged 45 as the former gets pension credit? And the first couple gets the same as a couple both aged 70. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits? they shouldn’t didn’t even know this whent on " Sorry probably didnt explain that right, look at an earlier post on here i cut and pasted it from fabios post he explains it better than me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should someone get more state benefit just because they are married to a pensioner ? Even though they paid into the pension scheme ?! You obviously have not grasped this,yes and they will get it when they are of pension age.Why should someone for example 30 y/o married to a pensioner get pensioners benifits? they shouldn’t didn’t even know this whent on It doesn't. Just the posters spin. have I misunderstood? I though a couple, one aged 45 the other 70, gets more than a couple both aged 45 as the former gets pension credit? And the first couple gets the same as a couple both aged 70. " https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2019/01/pensioners-with-younger-partners-won-t-be-able-to-claim-pension-/ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has it occurred to you that a compassionate government, rather than making a poor person even poorer to even things out, might have lifted the rest up to even things out? " Yep, the one thing my privileged education taught me was you remove inequality by improving and raising standards. Not by reducing and lowering standards. It is how the human race has advanced. Seems the English public school system has been teaching the opposite for quite a while now. And look where it has got us.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
