Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is encouraging violence against journalists. "Congressman Greg Gianforte was convicted of “body slamming” Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Trump mentioned this at his rally last week. Then Trump pointed, menacingly, towards the press pen in the arena. Again the crowd cheered and laughed. “And I thought,” Trump went on, “‘this is terrible, he’s going to lose the election.’ And then I thought, ‘Wait a minute, I know Montana pretty well, I think it’s going to help him.’ And it did.” At this point, the crowd went wild with cheering and applause. We’ve never been here before, have we? This is new and terrifying territory. Even Hitler had the sense early on to distance himself publicly from the violence he was sponsoring, to blame it on rogue elements of angry citizens." www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/donald-trump-fanatics-cruelly-laughing-13448925" I now openly call him Hitler In fact he is aiming for a totalitarian state where free speech is not permitted He is openly declaring , disagree with me and you will subject to vidence As you say what is frightening is the number of public across the free world who agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is encouraging violence against journalists. "Congressman Greg Gianforte was convicted of “body slamming” Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Trump mentioned this at his rally last week. Then Trump pointed, menacingly, towards the press pen in the arena. Again the crowd cheered and laughed. “And I thought,” Trump went on, “‘this is terrible, he’s going to lose the election.’ And then I thought, ‘Wait a minute, I know Montana pretty well, I think it’s going to help him.’ And it did.” At this point, the crowd went wild with cheering and applause. We’ve never been here before, have we? This is new and terrifying territory. Even Hitler had the sense early on to distance himself publicly from the violence he was sponsoring, to blame it on rogue elements of angry citizens." www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/donald-trump-fanatics-cruelly-laughing-13448925 I now openly call him Hitler In fact he is aiming for a totalitarian state where free speech is not permitted He is openly declaring , disagree with me and you will subject to vidence As you say what is frightening is the number of public across the free world who agree " The description of the audience in the article/ link is worrying. People have often said how did Hitler get people to go along with his camps etc. Trump is already doing it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently there’s is going to be the “inevitable” Blue Wave in the Mid Terms which will rein him in hopefully. " What does that mean? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash " For real ??? Who is stupid enough to idolise him??? Beggars belief if true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently there’s is going to be the “inevitable” Blue Wave in the Mid Terms which will rein him in hopefully. What does that mean? " The Democrats could swing a branch of Congress in their favour. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses"." Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun " You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses"." On Khashoggi he has as usual given mixed signals, maybe our Government are waiting till the rest of what the Turkish have is released rather than as trump has done in seeking to fob it off and go with the 'credible' line the Saudis put out.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are the other sides supporters less or more violent? One side burns Nike the other burns New Balance. One wears black and covers their faces the others wear the flag The lack of decent representation everywhere in the world makes me sad. " Do the leaders of the others side condemn or condone ? The leader of the so called free world is a nasty fascist bully he is a vile human and anyone who defends him holds a frightening and vile opinion There are extremists everywhere for most causes , good minded people Christian or not will be against all such behaviour I support animal rights , and am against testing And I'm vocally against any protester who is violent or destructive Trump supported the use of violence as a response to a weak man speaking their mind | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". On Khashoggi he has as usual given mixed signals, maybe our Government are waiting till the rest of what the Turkish have is released rather than as trump has done in seeking to fob it off and go with the 'credible' line the Saudis put out.. " Trump acknowledged Thursday it “certainly looks” as though missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi is dead, and he threatened “very severe” consequences if the Saudis are found to have murdered him. His warning came as the administration toughened its response to a disappearance that has sparked global outrage. - the Times | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. " The rules apply both sides If rules are broken I think you will find needless violence in response is also against the rules You're picking and choosing your rules Bit like Christianity , pick and mix | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are the other sides supporters less or more violent? One side burns Nike the other burns New Balance. One wears black and covers their faces the others wear the flag The lack of decent representation everywhere in the world makes me sad. Do the leaders of the others side condemn or condone ? The leader of the so called free world is a nasty fascist bully he is a vile human and anyone who defends him holds a frightening and vile opinion There are extremists everywhere for most causes , good minded people Christian or not will be against all such behaviour I support animal rights , and am against testing And I'm vocally against any protester who is violent or destructive Trump supported the use of violence as a response to a weak man speaking their mind " The silence from them speaks just as much in my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun " There are no bigger snowflakes than the Christian Right .Guns are good questions are bad.Lying is all right as long as it serves a higher purpose they forget that bit about bearing false witness in the Ten Commandments. Trumps thousands of lies and the whole birther movement says all you need to know about these good righteous Christians. Good job hell is imaginary because they all would burn... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. The rules apply both sides If rules are broken I think you will find needless violence in response is also against the rules You're picking and choosing your rules Bit like Christianity , pick and mix " Keep trying to spin it. There's no rule against physically removing tresspassers from private property. That's what security are for at these venues. Ben is just embarassed that they didn't even need the heavies to get him out, an old man did it himself. That's a little less soya milk and bit more gym for you Ben. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". On Khashoggi he has as usual given mixed signals, maybe our Government are waiting till the rest of what the Turkish have is released rather than as trump has done in seeking to fob it off and go with the 'credible' line the Saudis put out.. " If that chap was killed in a fist fight where is his body? The Saudi account is laughable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". On Khashoggi he has as usual given mixed signals, maybe our Government are waiting till the rest of what the Turkish have is released rather than as trump has done in seeking to fob it off and go with the 'credible' line the Saudis put out.. Trump acknowledged Thursday it “certainly looks” as though missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi is dead, and he threatened “very severe” consequences if the Saudis are found to have murdered him. His warning came as the administration toughened its response to a disappearance that has sparked global outrage. - the Times" And he also said he wants to maintain a close relationship and not touch arms sales to them so his very severe consequences are already watered down, maybe he's worried they will want the 100 million dollars back they contributed to assist the USA in Syria.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". On Khashoggi he has as usual given mixed signals, maybe our Government are waiting till the rest of what the Turkish have is released rather than as trump has done in seeking to fob it off and go with the 'credible' line the Saudis put out.. If that chap was killed in a fist fight where is his body? The Saudi account is laughable. " Think the Turks know some of what went on so let's see but yes the fist fight claim does sound weak.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are the other sides supporters less or more violent? One side burns Nike the other burns New Balance. One wears black and covers their faces the others wear the flag The lack of decent representation everywhere in the world makes me sad. Do the leaders of the others side condemn or condone ? The leader of the so called free world is a nasty fascist bully he is a vile human and anyone who defends him holds a frightening and vile opinion There are extremists everywhere for most causes , good minded people Christian or not will be against all such behaviour I support animal rights , and am against testing And I'm vocally against any protester who is violent or destructive Trump supported the use of violence as a response to a weak man speaking their mind The silence from them speaks just as much in my opinion. " So from that may I clearly infer that you find the actions of trump and his supporters vile Corbin may or may not be anti Semitic Let's for argument say he is , as the leader of the other side I feel to understand how one leader being a bad person somehow justifies anther leader with equally loathsome opinions ? It matters not what or who does not condemn the stupid stuff that (the other side) does Trump is doing stupid stuff and this thread is about that If you feel strongly about the bad stuff the others do start a thread I'll support it ! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses"." No he didn't say that he was condoning the physical assault of a journalist who was asking legitimate questions, as we expect them to do. Since when have politicians been 'superior' to the people they're paid to serve? You have a strange view of democracy, just wait until the state comes kicking you up the arse without recourse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". No he didn't say that he was condoning the physical assault of a journalist who was asking legitimate questions, as we expect them to do. Since when have politicians been 'superior' to the people they're paid to serve? You have a strange view of democracy, just wait until the state comes kicking you up the arse without recourse." It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In fact he is aiming for a totalitarian state where free speech is not permitted " Sounds like the EU then. People seem to forget or ignore the fact that the Left wing are just as (if not more) intolerant, violent, anti freedom of speech and anti democratic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are the other sides supporters less or more violent? One side burns Nike the other burns New Balance. One wears black and covers their faces the others wear the flag The lack of decent representation everywhere in the world makes me sad. Do the leaders of the others side condemn or condone ? The leader of the so called free world is a nasty fascist bully he is a vile human and anyone who defends him holds a frightening and vile opinion There are extremists everywhere for most causes , good minded people Christian or not will be against all such behaviour I support animal rights , and am against testing And I'm vocally against any protester who is violent or destructive Trump supported the use of violence as a response to a weak man speaking their mind The silence from them speaks just as much in my opinion. So from that may I clearly infer that you find the actions of trump and his supporters vile Corbin may or may not be anti Semitic Let's for argument say he is , as the leader of the other side I feel to understand how one leader being a bad person somehow justifies anther leader with equally loathsome opinions ? It matters not what or who does not condemn the stupid stuff that (the other side) does Trump is doing stupid stuff and this thread is about that If you feel strongly about the bad stuff the others do start a thread I'll support it ! " No I’m good in this one thanks. At least you inferred correct though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never understood how, in a democracy like Germany, someone like Adolf Hitler could win. That was until I witnessed Donald Trump's campaign tactics." Socrates did warn us... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. " Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies." The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? " Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump could be balls deep in a kid and trumpanzees would defend him .They still think Obama is an African muslamb.. " I always find it fascinating to see where the far right draw their lines. Sexual assault, supporting nazis, ruining the environment, tax breaks for his rich mates and himself, all okay. What does he have to do for them to turn on him. Remember when Katie Hopkins, got fired from LBC after broadcasting for however long because they deemed something she said was too racist. Hilarious | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. " I guess i'm a dinosaur but where I come from, if a guy gets manhandled by a grandpa then the absolute last thing he'd do is admit that it happened in public. I realise it gives him oppression points in left wing circles but honestly, grow a pair Ben. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies." They were always sad pathetic snowflakes .If only they could put their hands down their tight panties and untwist .. So butt hurt its cringeworthy...The real right must be pissed.Steve bannon and the alt reich will be fuming at such snowflakery ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump could be balls deep in a kid and trumpanzees would defend him .They still think Obama is an African muslamb.. I always find it fascinating to see where the far right draw their lines. Sexual assault, supporting nazis, ruining the environment, tax breaks for his rich mates and himself, all okay. What does he have to do for them to turn on him. Remember when Katie Hopkins, got fired from LBC after broadcasting for however long because they deemed something she said was too racist. Hilarious " I find it fascinating that you didn't actually mention the worst thing that Trump has done. You're just framing everything if your own language and seem a bit blind to how more moderate people perceive his flaws. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. I guess i'm a dinosaur but where I come from, if a guy gets manhandled by a grandpa then the absolute last thing he'd do is admit that it happened in public. I realise it gives him oppression points in left wing circles but honestly, grow a pair Ben. " It's assault. If Gianforte thinks it's ok to manhandle a reporter, what else does he think it's acceptable to do? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump could be balls deep in a kid and trumpanzees would defend him .They still think Obama is an African muslamb.. I always find it fascinating to see where the far right draw their lines. Sexual assault, supporting nazis, ruining the environment, tax breaks for his rich mates and himself, all okay. What does he have to do for them to turn on him. Remember when Katie Hopkins, got fired from LBC after broadcasting for however long because they deemed something she said was too racist. Hilarious I find it fascinating that you didn't actually mention the worst thing that Trump has done. You're just framing everything if your own language and seem a bit blind to how more moderate people perceive his flaws. " By far the worst thing he has done is to pull the United States out of the Paric climate accord. This is what history will look back and judge him on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. " Some people think it's ok. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. " and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. " The debate was about the president seemingly advocating force against a journalist. Your response seems a little angry and aggressive ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. I guess i'm a dinosaur but where I come from, if a guy gets manhandled by a grandpa then the absolute last thing he'd do is admit that it happened in public. I realise it gives him oppression points in left wing circles but honestly, grow a pair Ben. It's assault. If Gianforte thinks it's ok to manhandle a reporter, what else does he think it's acceptable to do?" If Ben Jacobs thinks it's ok to invade private property, what else does he think it's acceptable to do? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
". Too many safe spaces and people deeply offended by another persons opinion. If someone came on my property to do things i do not want i would more then likely do more than body slam. " Another poster was talking about Gianforte's reaction was due to his safe space being violated! Hilariously by a Guardian journalist who's 10 stone wet through. Trumps an idiot of the highest order and doesn't appreciate the responsibility that goes hand in hand with high office. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It wasn't a legitimate question because he didn't have the proper permission to be there. I like democracy not anarchy. Get permission like everyone else at the event. Proper permission? what's happened to Republicans, they've turned into the snowflakes they supposedly detest. Don't like something someone says? Ok, body slam them into the floor- poor babies. The politician's safe space was invaded. Are you saying that isn't a serious violation? Let's not lose sight of what we're talking about here. Gianforte plead guilty to a misdemeanor assault on a citizen The president of the united states is championing him. This is wrong in anybody's language/politics. I guess i'm a dinosaur but where I come from, if a guy gets manhandled by a grandpa then the absolute last thing he'd do is admit that it happened in public. I realise it gives him oppression points in left wing circles but honestly, grow a pair Ben. It's assault. If Gianforte thinks it's ok to manhandle a reporter, what else does he think it's acceptable to do? If Ben Jacobs thinks it's ok to invade private property, what else does he think it's acceptable to do?" Ben Jacobs isn't the president of the US. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What more frightening is he could get another term in office " Lucky for the world, that he can only serve 4 years or 8 years maximum. So he won't stay there for over a decade, like Thatcher or Blair did. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. " The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The debate was about the president seemingly advocating force against a journalist. Your response seems a little angry and aggressive ?" aggressive? fucking right I am...this world does not need fucking IDIOT CUNTS MAKING IT WORSE. sitting back while I eyelash my soft cheeks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. " Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. " what are you talking about ? biology wise? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. " Lol which senators did that? What’s a snowball going to prove? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise?" It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. " new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. " Yeah whatsboutisms for the win . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT " I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. Yeah whatsboutisms for the win . " We can decide a winner based on a game of tummy sticks if you prefer? But I've got a mean bodyslam so I fancy my chances of starting on top. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"love him or hate him i do think he will get another term.when it comes down to it americans are gona think am i better off financialy since he got in and the answer is yes wether you like it or not. be thankfull they dont let anyone have more than two terms in office" He's 72. He won't want another term. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is encouraging violence against journalists. "Congressman Greg Gianforte was convicted of “body slamming” Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Trump mentioned this at his rally last week. Then Trump pointed, menacingly, towards the press pen in the arena. Again the crowd cheered and laughed. “And I thought,” Trump went on, “‘this is terrible, he’s going to lose the election.’ And then I thought, ‘Wait a minute, I know Montana pretty well, I think it’s going to help him.’ And it did.” At this point, the crowd went wild with cheering and applause. We’ve never been here before, have we? This is new and terrifying territory. Even Hitler had the sense early on to distance himself publicly from the violence he was sponsoring, to blame it on rogue elements of angry citizens." www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/donald-trump-fanatics-cruelly-laughing-13448925" When he starts dismembering them in his embassies I'll take him seriously. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is encouraging violence against journalists. "Congressman Greg Gianforte was convicted of “body slamming” Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Trump mentioned this at his rally last week. Then Trump pointed, menacingly, towards the press pen in the arena. Again the crowd cheered and laughed. “And I thought,” Trump went on, “‘this is terrible, he’s going to lose the election.’ And then I thought, ‘Wait a minute, I know Montana pretty well, I think it’s going to help him.’ And it did.” At this point, the crowd went wild with cheering and applause. We’ve never been here before, have we? This is new and terrifying territory. Even Hitler had the sense early on to distance himself publicly from the violence he was sponsoring, to blame it on rogue elements of angry citizens." www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/donald-trump-fanatics-cruelly-laughing-13448925 When he starts dismembering them in his embassies I'll take him seriously. " Maybe it'll take him a couple of weeks to remember what actually happened ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" The debate was about the president seemingly advocating force against a journalist. " The Saudis obviously liked what he said. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is encouraging violence against journalists. "Congressman Greg Gianforte was convicted of “body slamming” Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Trump mentioned this at his rally last week. Then Trump pointed, menacingly, towards the press pen in the arena. Again the crowd cheered and laughed. “And I thought,” Trump went on, “‘this is terrible, he’s going to lose the election.’ And then I thought, ‘Wait a minute, I know Montana pretty well, I think it’s going to help him.’ And it did.” At this point, the crowd went wild with cheering and applause. We’ve never been here before, have we? This is new and terrifying territory. Even Hitler had the sense early on to distance himself publicly from the violence he was sponsoring, to blame it on rogue elements of angry citizens." www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/donald-trump-fanatics-cruelly-laughing-13448925 When he starts dismembering them in his embassies I'll take him seriously. Maybe it'll take him a couple of weeks to remember what actually happened ? " In fact I'm surprised he hasn't tried to go Muslim, and try and install Sharia law then he could start stoning anyone who disagrees with him. At least he'd be seen as modern, progressive and accepting of other cultures. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" The debate was about the president seemingly advocating force against a journalist. The Saudis obviously liked what he said." He's also big fan of putin and little Kim and their management of their press.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. " Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends?" That's how they see it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends?" I honestly don't know who to believe these days. Everyone's got an agenda, and willing to put a spin on information to tell a story to their benefit. Some argue he is? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends? I honestly don't know who to believe these days. Everyone's got an agenda, and willing to put a spin on information to tell a story to their benefit. Some argue he is? " Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. " Never forget. "The point of fake news is not to tell another narrative, the main aim of fake news is to dismantle the credibility of institutions, including journalism, but not only journalism.” Kari Huhta, Diplomatic Editor, Helsingin Sanomat, Finland | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. Never forget. "The point of fake news is not to tell another narrative, the main aim of fake news is to dismantle the credibility of institutions, including journalism, but not only journalism.” Kari Huhta, Diplomatic Editor, Helsingin Sanomat, Finland " Yes, yes, yes! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends? I honestly don't know who to believe these days. Everyone's got an agenda, and willing to put a spin on information to tell a story to their benefit. Some argue he is? Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. " Words like alternative facts and fake news are the tools of trump regime . This new language shapes peoples' minds to what the Trump wants them to think, feel and even see. Groucho Marx once said: "Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. Never forget. "The point of fake news is not to tell another narrative, the main aim of fake news is to dismantle the credibility of institutions, including journalism, but not only journalism.” Kari Huhta, Diplomatic Editor, Helsingin Sanomat, Finland " True, and my comment wasn't necessarily aimed at Mr Trumps constant jibes at the press. But it's clear that there HAVE been premeditated inaccuracies in reporting on his actions by some papers. It's also clear that Trump has contradicted himself and made things as clear as mud! In a time where countries can apparently murder people in embassies, politicians can dance around the issue due to money and where the public generally believe the story that most suits their agenda, it's incredibly difficult to direct information from intelligence? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump wouldn't even be in power if politicians actually kept their promises, put policies in place for the citizens rather than to help themselves/ business/banks/rich friends and listened and acted on citizens fears. When you have decades of broken promises and neglect people will eventually get to the stage where anyone else is worth taking a chance on. Anger should be directed at the political 'elite' and there record of failure, rather than people like Trump or those who voted for someone that you or i may not have. Is Trump helping the poorer people and ignoring his rich friends? I honestly don't know who to believe these days. Everyone's got an agenda, and willing to put a spin on information to tell a story to their benefit. Some argue he is? Fair point. It's difficult knowing what's true anymore. Words like alternative facts and fake news are the tools of trump regime . This new language shapes peoples' minds to what the Trump wants them to think, feel and even see. Groucho Marx once said: "Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" " And your own eyes in thus instance are fed by the stories of others? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. " You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. The rules apply both sides If rules are broken I think you will find needless violence in response is also against the rules You're picking and choosing your rules Bit like Christianity , pick and mix Keep trying to spin it. There's no rule against physically removing tresspassers from private property. That's what security are for at these venues. Ben is just embarassed that they didn't even need the heavies to get him out, an old man did it himself. That's a little less soya milk and bit more gym for you Ben. " You assume the law has some sort of moral superiority. It doesn't. You sound remarkably like someone else on the forums who defended armed Nazis marching through Charlottesville because "It's not against the law in the USA". Let us not forget that the holocaust was perfectly legal at the time. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. " Case closed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. Case closed. " compelling. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. " I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. The rules apply both sides If rules are broken I think you will find needless violence in response is also against the rules You're picking and choosing your rules Bit like Christianity , pick and mix Keep trying to spin it. There's no rule against physically removing tresspassers from private property. That's what security are for at these venues. Ben is just embarassed that they didn't even need the heavies to get him out, an old man did it himself. That's a little less soya milk and bit more gym for you Ben. You assume the law has some sort of moral superiority. It doesn't. You sound remarkably like someone else on the forums who defended armed Nazis marching through Charlottesville because "It's not against the law in the USA". Let us not forget that the holocaust was perfectly legal at the time. " Armed Nazis you say, no I've never defended Antifa. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meanwhile the Saudi secret services butcher a British journo and nothing's said." Christ! When did this happen?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. " Do you? I don't think you do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. Do you? I don't think you do. " Think what you like. I know you're just using semantic nonsense to try and give credibility to something you don't even believe in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just read the article - is The Daily Record genuinely supposed to be a newspaper aimed at adults? Chucking around "Hitler" comparisons is such cheap journalism, it's quite laughable to think anyone takes this comic/rag seriously Much as I dislike Trump, I think I probably have a deeper contempt for those that actually think Trump is anywhere near as bad as Hitler. Come on people, we're supposed to be grown-ups on here " To be fair, I think in reality he's a lot more like Mussolini. He even went as far as to borrow one of his slogans: "drain the swamp". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. Do you? I don't think you do. Think what you like. I know you're just using semantic nonsense to try and give credibility to something you don't even believe in. " Genetics is a rapidly advancing field of Science. "Belief"; in that context is an odd choice of word. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. Do you? I don't think you do. Think what you like. I know you're just using semantic nonsense to try and give credibility to something you don't even believe in. Genetics is a rapidly advancing field of Science. "Belief"; in that context is an odd choice of word. " Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash " . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. " I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. " Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? " Abortion fanatics, SJWs, reverse racists, misandrists, Marxists. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? Abortion fanatics, SJWs, reverse racists, misandrists, Marxists. " Reverse racists haha. That’s fucking amazing haha. Made my day. 2018 winner of the stupidest comment award. We can close the Internet now, you’ve won. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Enemies ?.Surely you mean people with a different approach to running a civilised country...I am no Conservative but neither Mrs May or Boris is an enemy to me..... " No civilised country has ever been run by marxist ideology. People don't die trying to cross boarders out of civilised countries. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? Abortion fanatics, SJWs, reverse racists, misandrists, Marxists. Reverse racists haha. That’s fucking amazing haha. Made my day. 2018 winner of the stupidest comment award. We can close the Internet now, you’ve won. " Only white people can be racist, right? Because racism is prejudice plus power innit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? Abortion fanatics, SJWs, reverse racists, misandrists, Marxists. Reverse racists haha. That’s fucking amazing haha. Made my day. 2018 winner of the stupidest comment award. We can close the Internet now, you’ve won. " . To be blunt, it's stuff like this that turns people on to trump or the many other types. Alot of us are just fed up with liberals. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The latest in a long long line of nasty facist bile to spew forth from his mouth or twitter feed. Plenty of people on Fab idolise him, so be prepared for the backlash . I don't idolise him despite being a conservative myself. I've never seen anyone idolise him here. He's just the enemy of my enemy as far as I'm concerned. Your enemies are Mexicans, Muslims, women and poor people? Abortion fanatics, SJWs, reverse racists, misandrists, Marxists. Reverse racists haha. That’s fucking amazing haha. Made my day. 2018 winner of the stupidest comment award. We can close the Internet now, you’ve won. . To be blunt, it's stuff like this that turns people on to trump or the many other types. Alot of us are just fed up with liberals." They aren't liberals, they are leftists. It's their way or the gulag. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trump is not advocating violence against journalists. That is why he has been harsher than our own government on the suspected killing of Khashoggi. He has simply stated that if soy boy guardian journalists are going to tresspass onto private property and act aggressively to their superiors then she shouldn't cry like little bitches when they get escorted out. Ben sounded like milhouse from the Simpsons: "He broke my glasses, he broke my glasses". Always happy to hear a Christian advocate and condone violence to solve a problem Are you suggesting only strong people with. Guns have the right to voice their opinion ? As you say the man was puny Yet you suggest aggression If placing a provocative question is aggressive , say goodbye to democracy and hello to I have the biggest gun You don't have the right to voice your opinion in a private space without permission. Get permission like every other journalist at the event and you'll find you aren't getting thrown out by grandpa's. Don't play the victim because you don't want to follow the rules. The rules apply both sides If rules are broken I think you will find needless violence in response is also against the rules You're picking and choosing your rules Bit like Christianity , pick and mix Keep trying to spin it. There's no rule against physically removing tresspassers from private property. That's what security are for at these venues. Ben is just embarassed that they didn't even need the heavies to get him out, an old man did it himself. That's a little less soya milk and bit more gym for you Ben. You assume the law has some sort of moral superiority. It doesn't. You sound remarkably like someone else on the forums who defended armed Nazis marching through Charlottesville because "It's not against the law in the USA". Let us not forget that the holocaust was perfectly legal at the time. Armed Nazis you say, no I've never defended Antifa. " He was probably referring to me, and Antifa are nothing more than a violent vigilante group, of which vigilantism is against the law in the USA. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The true danger is underestimating the stupidity of the sheeple that are following and supporting him. and this is also why I fucking hate the religious right and the fucking flatearther cunts... it is growing.. nasa is fake (man made)climate change is a lie cern are opening a gateway to hell etc etc etc in fact any fucking president/prime minister/king/queen) that uses twitter(or any other methods) should be fucked right out of the atmosphere..CUNTS. The religious right are the greatest threat to civilisation.Anti intellectualism and the exaltation of ignorance,will destroy America.A sitting congressman told a crowd that evolution and the Big Bang are “lies straight from the pit of hell,”the chairman of a Senate environmental panel brought a snowball into the chamber as evidence that climate change is a hoax. Cunts cunts cunts .. Anti intellectualism is hardly exclusive property of "the religious right" when the looney left deny the entire field of biology now. what are you talking about ? biology wise? It ranges from those who will say there's no such thing as biological sex - Nicholas Matte of Toronto University to those who say there is no difference between a trans woman and a biological woman, a view you'll find on multiple threads here. new one to me...I suppose I'd disagree with a no difference in bio to trans.Easy enough to respect though.... but lets get back to it.. TRUMP IS A CUNT I don't find it easy to respect people who deny hard science. I have no difficulty criticising trump but i expect we are triggered by different things. I do agree with the poster who said he used Hitler tactics to get elected, he did. I disagree that the other candidate was better. You aren't a biologist are you? I am, amd I can see exactly where they are coming from. I can think of at least one species of bird that has three distinct sexes. I love the semantic games the left play. So you are a biologist, you don't agree with them, but you see where their bullshit comes from. Yes i see where their bullshit comes from too, it's still a lie. Do you? I don't think you do. Think what you like. I know you're just using semantic nonsense to try and give credibility to something you don't even believe in. Genetics is a rapidly advancing field of Science. "Belief"; in that context is an odd choice of word. Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. " Social construct? I'm not a fucking sociologist. If we are going to play that game, you could write me a 3000 word, referenced (peer reviewed sources only please) on sex, hermaphroditism, breeding types and the hormonal control thereof if you like... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Here we go again, a leader who is strong and does things his own way. Must be the second coming of Hitler or Stalin! Some people seriously need to get over themselves. I’m not ashamed to say that I do support the President, at least he usually does what he says he is going to do." Because delivering on what you say is more important than assessing the worth of what is said and impact of actions that would be taken. Brilliant. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. Social construct? I'm not a fucking sociologist. If we are going to play that game, you could write me a 3000 word, referenced (peer reviewed sources only please) on sex, hermaphroditism, breeding types and the hormonal control thereof if you like..." No need, that doesn't prove anything. You're buying into a logical fallacy that any exception would disprove the entire rule. It's just semantic games. It's like your trying to say that the existence of down syndrome babies proves that humans have holes in their hearts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. Social construct? I'm not a fucking sociologist. If we are going to play that game, you could write me a 3000 word, referenced (peer reviewed sources only please) on sex, hermaphroditism, breeding types and the hormonal control thereof if you like... No need, that doesn't prove anything. You're buying into a logical fallacy that any exception would disprove the entire rule. It's just semantic games. It's like your trying to say that the existence of down syndrome babies proves that humans have holes in their hearts. " No I'm not. There is less of a "rule" than you think. It's biology ffs, for almost every "rule" there are a myriad of organisms that don't confirm. Grasping concepts is important for children, which is why certain themes are built and expanded on up until A-level, but after that you ought to be able to grasp the nettle of variability. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. Social construct? I'm not a fucking sociologist. If we are going to play that game, you could write me a 3000 word, referenced (peer reviewed sources only please) on sex, hermaphroditism, breeding types and the hormonal control thereof if you like... No need, that doesn't prove anything. You're buying into a logical fallacy that any exception would disprove the entire rule. It's just semantic games. It's like your trying to say that the existence of down syndrome babies proves that humans have holes in their hearts. No I'm not. There is less of a "rule" than you think. It's biology ffs, for almost every "rule" there are a myriad of organisms that don't confirm. Grasping concepts is important for children, which is why certain themes are built and expanded on up until A-level, but after that you ought to be able to grasp the nettle of variability." Really, how small is that rule then? What % of the human population can objectively be categorised as biologically male or female based on a combination of their chromosomes, reproductive anatomy, external genitalia, hormones and gonads? - key word being combination, not all need be present, before you ask me if women without wombs are women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Journalist enters private property/restricted area, and gets physically removed as a result. What is the problem? " Exactly what would happen if someone else walked into a private property so no problem that I can see. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's the name of this bird with three sexes, I'd love to read up about them?" In this particular case the sexes are zz, zy and yy. I believe that zy can mate with zz and yy. I've been trying to find an online source - it's a kind of finch. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When I did biology you need two sexes for reproduction a male and a female and I never learnt about any species that required three?. That's quite fascinating and I'd like to learn more." Seriously The very fact we have hermaphrodite illustrates things are more complex And yes humans are also born hermaphrodite So absolutely it's complex and tgatpwa hard biological fact Our simplistic Christian friend only seems to have the capacity to work on a binary thought process Well let's be clear , hermaphrodite humans exist I think they due complex biological processes Christians think that god specifically designed them The fact remains despite the idiotic deflection Trump is a narrow minded bully who advocates and condones violence as a solution | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When I did biology you need two sexes for reproduction a male and a female and I never learnt about any species that required three?. That's quite fascinating and I'd like to learn more. Seriously The very fact we have hermaphrodite illustrates things are more complex And yes humans are also born hermaphrodite So absolutely it's complex and tgatpwa hard biological fact Our simplistic Christian friend only seems to have the capacity to work on a binary thought process Well let's be clear , hermaphrodite humans exist I think they due complex biological processes Christians think that god specifically designed them The fact remains despite the idiotic deflection Trump is a narrow minded bully who advocates and condones violence as a solution " . But aren't hermaphroditic people still only male or female?. I mean they can only reproduce one way, either the female way or the male way? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Sure it is hun. Go start a thread called "biological sex is a social construct - change my mind" and we'll unpick your bullshit there where you can't stall for time or complain about a thread going off track. Social construct? I'm not a fucking sociologist. If we are going to play that game, you could write me a 3000 word, referenced (peer reviewed sources only please) on sex, hermaphroditism, breeding types and the hormonal control thereof if you like... No need, that doesn't prove anything. You're buying into a logical fallacy that any exception would disprove the entire rule. It's just semantic games. It's like your trying to say that the existence of down syndrome babies proves that humans have holes in their hearts. No I'm not. There is less of a "rule" than you think. It's biology ffs, for almost every "rule" there are a myriad of organisms that don't confirm. Grasping concepts is important for children, which is why certain themes are built and expanded on up until A-level, but after that you ought to be able to grasp the nettle of variability. Really, how small is that rule then? What % of the human population can objectively be categorised as biologically male or female based on a combination of their chromosomes, reproductive anatomy, external genitalia, hormones and gonads? - key word being combination, not all need be present, before you ask me if women without wombs are women. " Still looking for an answer from our enlightened friends... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meanwhile the Saudi secret services butcher a British journo and nothing's said. Christ! When did this happen?! " Seriously though, when? What did i miss? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"?" The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"?" I've sent you an essay. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. " Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law " Hitler was a socialist #justsaying | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" If that chap was killed in a fist fight where is his body? The Saudi account is laughable. " to be fair the saudi's are saying it was a "chokehold"... lets give them some credit... oh.. and the 15 on 1 stuff... unless jamal thought he was jackie chan, thats not really a fair "fight"... and who on earth would you have a bone saw just "hanging around" by chance! I mean... co-incidence??? and yet.... the president says the story is "credible"... I know.... what a nice chappie to be giving them the benefit of the doubt!!! oh, and one last thing... how is MBS going to able to have an independent enquiry if he is the one leading the commission into what happened... unless he is going to torture himself!.... ooops... too soon??? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? I've sent you an essay. " . Very interesting it was too. Thanks | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying " Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS." "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. " I wonder'if you dare admit how much of Hitler's thinking mirrors your own Shall we discuss eugenics? Or perhaps your distorted view of survival of the fittest Of course puny humans with squeaky voices deserve ridicule beaten up by older members of society Shall we discuss how we feel stupid people deserve to die then not add to the gene pool Please let's discuss this xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. I wonder'if you dare admit how much of Hitler's thinking mirrors your own Shall we discuss eugenics? Or perhaps your distorted view of survival of the fittest Of course puny humans with squeaky voices deserve ridicule beaten up by older members of society Shall we discuss how we feel stupid people deserve to die then not add to the gene pool Please let's discuss this xxx" Nah I'm still waiting for an answer to my question thanks. It's funny how all the lefties back down when they actually have to state some facts to back up their framing language. Inflammatory language, no facts and anti-capitalist - you have more in common with Hitler than me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. " See what seems apparent is your petty mind is obsessed with the simplistic left and right view or line Not realising left right East or West are irelevant only actions and consequences I don't care Hitler identified socialist I don't care Hitler 2 trump identifies hard right They both share something loathsome which is to identify groups of humans for their followers to hate and persecute | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. I wonder'if you dare admit how much of Hitler's thinking mirrors your own Shall we discuss eugenics? Or perhaps your distorted view of survival of the fittest Of course puny humans with squeaky voices deserve ridicule beaten up by older members of society Shall we discuss how we feel stupid people deserve to die then not add to the gene pool Please let's discuss this xxx Nah I'm still waiting for an answer to my question thanks. It's funny how all the lefties back down when they actually have to state some facts to back up their framing language. Inflammatory language, no facts and anti-capitalist - you have more in common with Hitler than me. " Oh young sir lol Allow me to apologise , I have no idea what your question is . And I'm not socialist sorry to disappoint | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. I wonder'if you dare admit how much of Hitler's thinking mirrors your own Shall we discuss eugenics? Or perhaps your distorted view of survival of the fittest Of course puny humans with squeaky voices deserve ridicule beaten up by older members of society Shall we discuss how we feel stupid people deserve to die then not add to the gene pool Please let's discuss this xxx Nah I'm still waiting for an answer to my question thanks. It's funny how all the lefties back down when they actually have to state some facts to back up their framing language. Inflammatory language, no facts and anti-capitalist - you have more in common with Hitler than me. " As for I have more in common with Hitler Please state where I align with his thinking xxx Now I know you do with regards disability And I know you do with regards homosexuality Please justify your false statement xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have we discovered a human hermaphrodite that can reproduce both ways or even a Finch?. I looked all I could find was a sandpiper with four "genders"? The left keep switching between sex and gender as it suits their argument. I found a UK government website saying "gender is assigned at birth" next to a picture of a birth certificate and wrote to them to ask them why they were lying. No reply. It's still online. Ok some in the far right are members of the kkk Ok some members of the right dress up in Nazi uniform and advocate Hitler's doctrine Ok some Christians deny the holocaust If we are randomly throwing beliefs and actions of random sides Some on the right think homosexuality should not be permitted Christians who think this have been known to violently towards homosexuals Some Christian right wingers don't like non whites and have been known to kill them Oddly this thread is about the hard right wing Christian Adolf trump And his vile condoning of violence I don't agree with the reporter braking the law either and completely agree the police should have been called to action the correct justice Violence was not needed or justified , it broke the law The president of the fucking United States should not condone anyone right left or hermaphrodite to violently or otherwise break the law Hitler was a socialist #justsaying Hitlers’ party had its own left wing. Commonly known in history as the Strasserites. Otto and Greggor Strasser. It was considered such a threat that Otto was kicked out of the NSDAP in 1930, and escaped to exile in Czechoslovakia. His brother Gregor was not so fortunate, he was killed in the night of the long knives. The party itself was indeed socialist, but the Strassers were industrialists who hated the Jews because of their anti capitalist standpoint. They also attached themselves to the SA, who were taken out and replaced by Hitlers SS. "We must take from the right nationalism, without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" I think that sums it up rather nicely. I think that when most people think of right wing, they think capitalism. Hitler was a fanatical anti-capitalist. See what seems apparent is your petty mind is obsessed with the simplistic left and right view or line Not realising left right East or West are irelevant only actions and consequences I don't care Hitler identified socialist I don't care Hitler 2 trump identifies hard right They both share something loathsome which is to identify groups of humans for their followers to hate and persecute " Listen to the language games again. It wasn't that Hitler "identified" as a socialist. He was one because he acted exactly like a nationalist one would act. He felt perfectly entitled to seize private property from citizens and use it for his idea of the common good. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx" Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? " I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx " Well funnily enough, between the two of us, you are the one that thinks it's important a mother can kill her baby if she finds out the baby has down syndrome before its born. I don't. So i think your views of eugenics are much closer to Hitlers than mine. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx Well funnily enough, between the two of us, you are the one that thinks it's important a mother can kill her baby if she finds out the baby has down syndrome before its born. I don't. So i think your views of eugenics are much closer to Hitlers than mine. " Maybe you will only find the post where I think it is important a lady has that choice if she has been r ped Happy searching xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx Well funnily enough, between the two of us, you are the one that thinks it's important a mother can kill her baby if she finds out the baby has down syndrome before its born. I don't. So i think your views of eugenics are much closer to Hitlers than mine. Maybe you will only find the post where I think it is important a lady has that choice if she has been r ped Happy searching xxx " As you aske what is your opinion there ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx Well funnily enough, between the two of us, you are the one that thinks it's important a mother can kill her baby if she finds out the baby has down syndrome before its born. I don't. So i think your views of eugenics are much closer to Hitlers than mine. Maybe you will only find the post where I think it is important a lady has that choice if she has been r ped Happy searching xxx As you aske what is your opinion there ? " So things we know Broken , the male Thinks a r ped woman should have the child And people who do thing's he thinks are stupid should not contribute to the gene pool And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx Or maybe I misunderstand xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx Well funnily enough, between the two of us, you are the one that thinks it's important a mother can kill her baby if she finds out the baby has down syndrome before its born. I don't. So i think your views of eugenics are much closer to Hitlers than mine. Maybe you will only find the post where I think it is important a lady has that choice if she has been r ped Happy searching xxx As you aske what is your opinion there ? " You're basically talking about a ridiculous scenario. The morning after pill is 95% effective up to 5 days after the event. It is not considered abortion and even Catholic hospitals in the US will provide it. The morality of taking a life is irrelevant to how the child was conceived and the only relevant factor is the point at which you argue human life begins. Believe it or not, I don't believe it is when egg hits sperm but it's certainly before you'd have a 12 week scan and know a baby has down syndrome. I'm glad to know you are pro-life and against 99% of the abortions that actually happen and you're pro-capitalist too. We should have a beer and hang out, sounds like we agree on a lot more than we disagree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx " That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx" Look above I said exactly my standpoint Violence was not part of it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx Look above I said exactly my standpoint Violence was not part of it " You're victim shaming the politician | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx" And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force " His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx xx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx Look above I said exactly my standpoint Violence was not part of it You're victim shaming the politician" Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. " Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx xx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx Look above I said exactly my standpoint Violence was not part of it You're victim shaming the politician Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x" The politician is the victim. If the journalist just played by the rules then this would never have happened and grandpa wouldn't have made him look like a little bitch x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault," He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. " More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meanwhile the Saudi secret services butcher a British journo and nothing's said. Christ! When did this happen?! Seriously though, when? What did i miss?" Waits patiently for news on the British journalist... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol " He won the subsequent election so you can see how many fucks the people of Montana give about the broken glasses of a soy boy, nissan leaf driving beta male who sits when he pees. To be honest, some of Gregs views are a bit silly but they haven't stopped him accumulating an impressive net worth of $315m. But if he can do a two handed ch0keslam outside a WWE ring then his net worth might not be his biggest achievement. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol He won the subsequent election so you can see how many fucks the people of Montana give about the broken glasses of a soy boy, nissan leaf driving beta male who sits when he pees. To be honest, some of Gregs views are a bit silly but they haven't stopped him accumulating an impressive net worth of $315m. But if he can do a two handed ch0keslam outside a WWE ring then his net worth might not be his biggest achievement. " Excellent Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x Again just to be clear You advocate violence and laugh at the weak man as he is beaten The US law disagrees with you Can I a, have evidence he pees sitting down B a reason you feel this was worth mentioning C that he drives an electric car D why that is a. Relevant and b a bad thing ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like to pee sitting down. " Stop trolling. Everyone knows you guzzle whiskey like its water and once wrestled a bear. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like to pee sitting down. " So do I But I have an impression that someone is suggesting it makes a person somehow less worthy of respect . I would say less manly but we all know that binary code is fixed genetics xxx so although I have no idea what the insult may mean I'm fairly convinced it was intended as an insult By inference it seems a man is a man if he has the xy but also able to physically harm another grr , ha ha ha ha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol He won the subsequent election so you can see how many fucks the people of Montana give about the broken glasses of a soy boy, nissan leaf driving beta male who sits when he pees. To be honest, some of Gregs views are a bit silly but they haven't stopped him accumulating an impressive net worth of $315m. But if he can do a two handed ch0keslam outside a WWE ring then his net worth might not be his biggest achievement. Excellent Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x Again just to be clear You advocate violence and laugh at the weak man as he is beaten The US law disagrees with you Can I a, have evidence he pees sitting down B a reason you feel this was worth mentioning C that he drives an electric car D why that is a. Relevant and b a bad thing ?" The reporter was in the wrong in the first instance when he entered private property/restricted area without permission. Which part of this are you failing to understand? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol He won the subsequent election so you can see how many fucks the people of Montana give about the broken glasses of a soy boy, nissan leaf driving beta male who sits when he pees. To be honest, some of Gregs views are a bit silly but they haven't stopped him accumulating an impressive net worth of $315m. But if he can do a two handed ch0keslam outside a WWE ring then his net worth might not be his biggest achievement. Excellent Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x Again just to be clear You advocate violence and laugh at the weak man as he is beaten The US law disagrees with you Can I a, have evidence he pees sitting down B a reason you feel this was worth mentioning C that he drives an electric car D why that is a. Relevant and b a bad thing ? The reporter was in the wrong in the first instance when he entered private property/restricted area without permission. Which part of this are you failing to understand? " Not according to the law | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"l 're iterate And weak people who pee sitting down , who like electric cars asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx and the president of the country should also declare to the whole world that such behaviour is to be commended xxx " Finally we agree on something | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'll 're iterate And weak people asking politicians about their policies so it can be freely reported , deserve to be thrown to the floor and beaten xxx That's just framing bollucks. Tresspassers deserve to be removed from private property, which you support because you're definately not a socialist. Xxx And I bet he was asked to leave in the first instance and probably kicked off about freedom of the press .... then got removed by force His glasses were broken because he kept shoving recording devices in the politicians face, who rightly batted them away. If you're planning to invade private property and get into someone face then there will be consequences... They'd also attempted the same thing the day before. Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna, field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey witnessed the incident at Gianforte’s campaign headquarters in Montana, according to an account published on the Fox News website. After Jacobs asked Gianforte his question, Acuna wrote: “Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. “Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the man, as he moved on top the reporter and began yelling something to the effect of ‘I’m sick and tired of this!’ … To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff’s deputies.” Jacobs subsequently reported the incident to the police. The Gallatin county sheriff’s office said on Wednesday night it had completed its investigation and that Gianforte had been issued with a charge of misdemeanour assault. “Following multiple interviews and an investigation by the Gallatin county sheriff’s office it was determined there was probable cause to issue a citation to Greg Gianforte for misdemeanor assault, He "slammed" someone by grabbing their neck with both hands, is he the undertaker? Do you realise how hard that is to do? I hope his hand wasn't injured by any of the punches. He might get a nasty scrape off those glasses. More victim shaming xxx According to your hero Don he is the man x also that witness statement is from the fox reporters lol He won the subsequent election so you can see how many fucks the people of Montana give about the broken glasses of a soy boy, nissan leaf driving beta male who sits when he pees. To be honest, some of Gregs views are a bit silly but they haven't stopped him accumulating an impressive net worth of $315m. But if he can do a two handed ch0keslam outside a WWE ring then his net worth might not be his biggest achievement. Excellent Actually by definition you were victim shaming lol Saying the reporter deserved to be beaten , and whimpered like a whatever , and beaten by grandpa The reporter was by law the victim and you openly shamed him x Again just to be clear You advocate violence and laugh at the weak man as he is beaten The US law disagrees with you Can I a, have evidence he pees sitting down B a reason you feel this was worth mentioning C that he drives an electric car D why that is a. Relevant and b a bad thing ? The reporter was in the wrong in the first instance when he entered private property/restricted area without permission. Which part of this are you failing to understand? Not according to the law " I wonder what Jesus would have suggested | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like to pee sitting down. Stop trolling. Everyone knows you guzzle whiskey like its water and once wrestled a bear. " Ah that's not trolling, at home i do sit down, as does my son, as my dad taught me. As a plumber he'd spent too long smelling other people's stale piss behind their toilets and he didn't want to have the same experience at home! So we sit, and no arguments about seat position either... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's good and selective. How about your and his view on eugenics And would that view be left wing right wing Or no wing just inhuman xxx Tell us what you think my views are in eugenics and I'll confirm or deny? I have no idea but you are on record suggesting People who do stupid things deserve to die and that means their stupid genes won't enter the gene pool . For the rest I would wait for you to tell us , guessing would be foolish x As I said a discussion would be interesting Or you could simply have stated you did not agree with Hitler and his ideas on s Social engineering ie eugenics xxx " So what about the social engineering that is happening right here? The working class areas of the UK, and England in particular, are being flooded with third world immigrants. They are not just made to live together, but they are made to live on top of each other, squeezed together like sardines in a tin. Multiculturalism is failing, and it is the poorer people who, as usual, are paying the price. If they ever moan then they are labelled “racist” and are ostracised. We are being forced into this experiment, and the business owners who benefit from the cheaper labour do not have to worry, they are not being overwhelmed by other cultures crowding into their areas. In all honesty, I don’t blame those immigrants for coming here. I do blame big business and govt for facilitating them. They are sold this dream of a land of milk and honey, and then find out when the shit hits the fan, that they are working for peanuts and being forced to live in overcrowded accommodation among people who are being forced to put up with them. Still living the dream huh? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |