Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The fact that opposition members (whatever they call themselves in the US) are involved, makes me worried that the guy is being strung out by a lot of lies." the same things were said about Weinstein, Cosby and Saville.. problem is when its political then people tend to lose impartiality and even empathy.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" " In a way I hope that the 'right' decide to steamroller Kavanaugh into the supreme Court because I think it may turn out to be the biggest mistake the 'right' makes and results in their total defeat in the mid-terms. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"anyone been watching this...... have to say its been riveting to watch dr ford i don't think kavanaugh gets confirmed after this...." Jeez, whatever happened to the fundamental process of justice being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The fact that opposition members (whatever they call themselves in the US) are involved, makes me worried that the guy is being strung out by a lot of lies." I watched some of the live coverage on sky news when Ford was being questioned. Her story has so many holes in it, it looks like a block of Swiss Cheese. Also that she's kept this to herself for decades and has only decided to come forward now also looks extremely fishy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Jeez, whatever happened to the fundamental process of justice being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law? "This is not a court of law, nor is its decision governed by the same requirement of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to refuse his confirmation, it is a committee deciding on if someone should be offered a job. That you fail or refuse to understand this speaks volumes about you Centy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I watched some of the live coverage on sky news when Ford was being questioned. Her story has so many holes in it, it looks like a block of Swiss Cheese. Also that she's kept this to herself for decades and has only decided to come forward now also looks extremely fishy." You also defend saVile and all the others who have been convicted of historical sexual and child sexual misconduct on the same grounds, or was that someone else? Or maybe is it only right wing sexual predators you defend? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I watched some of the live coverage on sky news when Ford was being questioned. Her story has so many holes in it, it looks like a block of Swiss Cheese. Also that she's kept this to herself for decades and has only decided to come forward now also looks extremely fishy. You also defend saVile and all the others who have been convicted of historical sexual and child sexual misconduct on the same grounds, or was that someone else? Or maybe is it only right wing sexual predators you defend?" No I defend people like Sir Cliff Richard who have had their good name dragged through the mud by false accusers and liars. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Ford was paid a fee by the Clinton foundation in a dirty brown envelope for yesterday's 'performance'. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I watched some of the live coverage on sky news when Ford was being questioned. Her story has so many holes in it, it looks like a block of Swiss Cheese. Also that she's kept this to herself for decades and has only decided to come forward now also looks extremely fishy. You also defend saVile and all the others who have been convicted of historical sexual and child sexual misconduct on the same grounds, or was that someone else? Or maybe is it only right wing sexual predators you defend? No I defend people like Sir Cliff Richard who have had their good name dragged through the mud by false accusers and liars. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Ford was paid a fee by the Clinton foundation in a dirty brown envelope for yesterday's 'performance'. " I, in now way, want to call into any doubt Dr Fords testimony. But *if* it were something that were induced by money (I don't think it is), the thing is I wouldn't even know which side would be most likely to do it. As it stands it looks more likely the his own side could have done it. The GOP are as much back stabbing bastards as the Tories are. -Matt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" " where dose there colour come into it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" where dose there colour come into it " because it is going to be seen as the ol boys club protecting one of their own.... the democratic attack ads for the midterms election bascially just wrote themselves yesterday and you are going to focus those at women.... the republicans may have gotten their judge..... but i truely believe yesterday they lost the house and the senate | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" where dose there colour come into it because it is going to be seen as the ol boys club protecting one of their own.... the democratic attack ads for the midterms election bascially just wrote themselves yesterday and you are going to focus those at women.... the republicans may have gotten their judge..... but i truely believe yesterday they lost the house and the senate " You and your predictions dude. I refer you to the one at the top of the thread. Please as a fellow Arsenal fan do not predict our title chances. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" " Eh ?? ? What's the race reference _abio?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" where dose there colour come into it because it is going to be seen as the ol boys club protecting one of their own.... the democratic attack ads for the midterms election bascially just wrote themselves yesterday and you are going to focus those at women.... the republicans may have gotten their judge..... but i truely believe yesterday they lost the house and the senate " 
Is this the same as your predictions that remain would win the referendum and Clinton would win the Presidency? 
Any prediction you make on here invariably turns out to be wrong, and is virtually guaranteed to get the opposite result!
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" where dose there colour come into it because it is going to be seen as the ol boys club protecting one of their own.... the democratic attack ads for the midterms election bascially just wrote themselves yesterday and you are going to focus those at women.... the republicans may have gotten their judge..... but i truely believe yesterday they lost the house and the senate
Is this the same as your predictions that remain would win the referendum and Clinton would win the Presidency?
Any prediction you make on here invariably turns out to be wrong, and is virtually guaranteed to get the opposite result!
"He watches too much CNN.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" where dose there colour come into it because it is going to be seen as the ol boys club protecting one of their own.... the democratic attack ads for the midterms election bascially just wrote themselves yesterday and you are going to focus those at women.... the republicans may have gotten their judge..... but i truely believe yesterday they lost the house and the senate
Is this the same as your predictions that remain would win the referendum and Clinton would win the Presidency?
Any prediction you make on here invariably turns out to be wrong, and is virtually guaranteed to get the opposite result!
"Fabio may not be getting the job as the next Mystic Meg after all, his predictions are always way off the mark! Lol. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"i pity people who are laughing at sexual assault... i really do... I am not a bit surprised at who is doing it right now.... go back and watch what the poor woman endured yestrday, Dr.Ford for me is an absolute hero in courage, the fact she came forward at all those months ago before he was selected (she actually sent the original letter when she sae he was on the long list) go and have a real good look at yourselves right now... please do you may laugh, and chuckle, I'm not! and on that, I'm done!" Who is laughing at alleged sexual assault? I pity people that try and use it as deflection. That’s just nasty. I thought better of you to be honest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"i pity people who are laughing at sexual assault... i really do... I am not a bit surprised at who is doing it right now.... go back and watch what the poor woman endured yestrday, Dr.Ford for me is an absolute hero in courage, the fact she came forward at all those months ago before he was selected (she actually sent the original letter when she sae he was on the long list) go and have a real good look at yourselves right now... please do you may laugh, and chuckle, I'm not! and on that, I'm done!" Did you watch the poor judge too!? Sounded pretty genuine to me but eh ho Fabio you be judge and jury all rolled in to one as you seem to have all the evidence!You have an agenda it probably wouldn't matter to you if he was innocent!  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"i pity people who are laughing at sexual assault... i really do... I am not a bit surprised at who is doing it right now.... go back and watch what the poor woman endured yestrday, Dr.Ford for me is an absolute hero in courage, the fact she came forward at all those months ago before he was selected (she actually sent the original letter when she sae he was on the long list) go and have a real good look at yourselves right now... please do you may laugh, and chuckle, I'm not! and on that, I'm done! Did you watch the poor judge too!? Sounded pretty genuine to me but eh ho Fabio you be judge and jury all rolled in to one as you seem to have all the evidence!You have an agenda it probably wouldn't matter to you if he was innocent! "Take a bit of your own advice " go and have a real good look at yourself right now.... please do"! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think the guy should have got the job, this woman had no witnesses, nobody corroborated her story who was there, she can't remember where the house was or who was there. If all that is required is a "story" to stop somebody getting a job then we're going to hell in a handbag. What happens if Corbyn gets elected, can I just say he assaulted me with a cucumber and EVERYBODY should be believe me because I cried?. If anybody doubts my story can I just shut them down with lines like "how dare you laugh at cucumber assaults". " Come on its one of Trumps men you can say what ever you want and they will think its true,don't let facts get in the way! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think the guy should have got the job, this woman had no witnesses, nobody corroborated her story who was there, she can't remember where the house was or who was there. " Corroborated by Kav's own calendar https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-is-pressed-key-july-entry-his-calendar-only-point/?utm_term=.fe6f212f4891 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think the guy should have got the job, this woman had no witnesses, nobody corroborated her story who was there, she can't remember where the house was or who was there. Corroborated by Kav's own calendar https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-is-pressed-key-july-entry-his-calendar-only-point/?utm_term=.fe6f212f4891" . I've just read that story, it didn't corroborate it at all, everybody mentioned in that interview (2 of which don't even like the guy) have denied Ford's allegations. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph "Yes, we really need to know if she is telling the truth. If she is, then he needs to hang. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph "She did one and it confirmed she was telling the truth.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"He refused " Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused " Did he? I can’t find one source on that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Funny.. there's several sources that say he's a rapist .. but they've been ignored ??!?" With an FBI investigation underway I can’t think of one reason why they would be now? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. " . You don't know much about polygraphs either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Funny.. there's several sources that say he's a rapist .. but they've been ignored ??!? With an FBI investigation underway I can’t think of one reason why they would be now? " Swetnick and Ramirez certainly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think the guy should have got the job, this woman had no witnesses, nobody corroborated her story who was there, she can't remember where the house was or who was there. Corroborated by Kav's own calendar https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-is-pressed-key-july-entry-his-calendar-only-point/?utm_term=.fe6f212f4891. I've just read that story, it didn't corroborate it at all, everybody mentioned in that interview (2 of which don't even like the guy) have denied Ford's allegations." Think you must have read a different account to the rest of the world then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think the guy should have got the job, this woman had no witnesses, nobody corroborated her story who was there, she can't remember where the house was or who was there. Corroborated by Kav's own calendar https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-is-pressed-key-july-entry-his-calendar-only-point/?utm_term=.fe6f212f4891. I've just read that story, it didn't corroborate it at all, everybody mentioned in that interview (2 of which don't even like the guy) have denied Ford's allegations. Think you must have read a different account to the rest of the world then" . No I just read the article, I think perhaps you read it and read what you wanted to read in it, unless you can point me to the bit in the article that claims what you stated? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph "Dr. Ford already took a polygraph test by an expert, and the expert said Dr. Ford passed with flying colors. You know he won't take one. Now the FBI is going to investigate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. . You don't know much about polygraphs either. " Neither does he.. You've got the hots for me boy? Read the above again slowly and try and show where it's anything but a quote and not an opinion like a lot of this thread is.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's hard to call when it's he says/She says however I watched a video on FB of the Ford woman being questioned by a female judge who repeatedly asked her why she claimed to have a fear of flying when in fact she is a frequent flyer and has flown all over the world yet she just smirked at the judge and gave some ridiculous answer?" That standard of evidence is only allowed to make accusations it seems. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's going to be interesting to see what the FBI could investigate and conclude this time, them having already undertaken earlier investigations upon him, I think. " Was that before the allegations were made, if they conclude their is a viable case to investigate within time limits etc or if others are made then would think they will have to follow due process? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why don’t they use Polygraphs in court? " Polygraphs can be fooled with training, it only really works if the person taking it believes it is infallible. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why don’t they use Polygraphs in court? Polygraphs can be fooled with training, it only really works if the person taking it believes it is infallible." they are no admissable in court.... however the FBI do use them as part of their job application process, and can refuse a job offer based on them... so in the report they will say if one was offered and whether it was refused or accepted.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Rumours starting to abound that someone who made a false accusation about Kavanaugh has been referred for consideration to be prosecuted. In before conspiracy and cover ups. " apparently they are talking about the person who made the "rhode island" accusations.... they are still talking to the lawyers of the other two accusers as well as ford | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Rumours starting to abound that someone who made a false accusation about Kavanaugh has been referred for consideration to be prosecuted. In before conspiracy and cover ups. apparently they are talking about the person who made the "rhode island" accusations.... they are still talking to the lawyers of the other two accusers as well as ford" Hi _abio *waving my arm* you said "whiteguys protecting their white guys", can you clarify what you meant? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" " Why the reference about a person's colour?..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. . You don't know much about polygraphs either. Neither does he.. You've got the hots for me boy? Read the above again slowly and try and show where it's anything but a quote and not an opinion like a lot of this thread is.. " . Please don't refer to me as boy! It's something that niggles me from my heritage. No I've not got the hots for you, I was pointing out that polygraphs are not accurate for telling the truth only for detecting lies, it all depends on the questions she was asked while taking it, I've looked for a recording but it seems they've refused to release transcripts, audio or video. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. . You don't know much about polygraphs either. Neither does he.. You've got the hots for me boy? Read the above again slowly and try and show where it's anything but a quote and not an opinion like a lot of this thread is.. . Please don't refer to me as boy! It's something that niggles me from my heritage. No I've not got the hots for you, I was pointing out that polygraphs are not accurate for telling the truth only for detecting lies, it all depends on the questions she was asked while taking it, I've looked for a recording but it seems they've refused to release transcripts, audio or video." Apologies for any offence, she was treated as the victim by the ex FBI expert who asked 2 questions concerning the allegation and on both it showed she was not lying.. That a person would undertake one says something and equally that he has thus far not done so does to.. This has legs it would appear.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?....." Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He refused Strange as he has said previously that they can be taken as gospel when used in hiring people.. . You don't know much about polygraphs either. Neither does he.. You've got the hots for me boy? Read the above again slowly and try and show where it's anything but a quote and not an opinion like a lot of this thread is.. . Please don't refer to me as boy! It's something that niggles me from my heritage. No I've not got the hots for you, I was pointing out that polygraphs are not accurate for telling the truth only for detecting lies, it all depends on the questions she was asked while taking it, I've looked for a recording but it seems they've refused to release transcripts, audio or video. Apologies for any offence, she was treated as the victim by the ex FBI expert who asked 2 questions concerning the allegation and on both it showed she was not lying.. That a person would undertake one says something and equally that he has thus far not done so does to.. This has legs it would appear.. " . I agree but it really does come down to the details of the questions asked. Kavanaugh is not denying she was sexually assaulted, he's denying it was him, she could genuinely believe it was him but is mistaken, she can't remember the date, the place or who was there accurately, her own life long best friend denies her account of events, 36 years is a long time to mess about with anybody's memories, his as well. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph
She did one and it confirmed she was telling the truth.. "Polygraphs are not 100% reliable and also can not prove what your saying is the truth, only that you are not lying. A subtle but important difference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph
She did one and it confirmed she was telling the truth..
Polygraphs are not 100% reliable and also can not prove what your saying is the truth, only that you are not lying. A subtle but important difference.
"Poor choice of words, what it showed that her reaction to the very specific questions was that she wasn't lying when she responded.. And yes I know they are not 100%, like dna evidence there are flaws and she could be wrong in her memory of whom with the trauma of the alleged assault.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why don’t they use Polygraphs in court? " Ted Bundy passed a Polygraph | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?..... Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own..." Shame you couldn't have just said that in the first place without the racial cobblers but thanks for the reply. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make them both submit to a polygraph
She did one and it confirmed she was telling the truth..
Polygraphs are not 100% reliable and also can not prove what your saying is the truth, only that you are not lying. A subtle but important difference.
"Irony being that they are not admissible in court, but the fbi routinely used them as part of their job process, so on the report they can ask him if he wants to take one, he can accept or decline, but it will be noted They will also check her test and confirm the results of the original | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"anyone been watching this...... have to say its been riveting to watch dr ford i don't think kavanaugh gets confirmed after this...." I will assume you would have had no problem with what happened Emmett Till on the unsubstantiated word of a white woman. After all "believe all women" That's correct isn't it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?..... Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own..." What would you say if someone had said, about another situation, 'that's a 11 black guys protecting their black guy?". Would you think, "oh, it's just black people protecting their own"? Or would you call it out for something else? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?..... Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own... What would you say if someone had said, about another situation, 'that's a 11 black guys protecting their black guy?". Would you think, "oh, it's just black people protecting their own"? Or would you call it out for something else?" So did you not see the picture of the republican side of the senate committee then... I thought it was quite iconic | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I think the main issues are ... PJ, Mark ford, Dr Ford, Dr Ford's best mate Leland Keyser and Brett where all allegedly in the house The flip side is all of the above aside Dr Ford said this party/get- together - never happen" Aside from Dr Ford they testified that they couldn't remember, which given the time elapsed seems a fair response. The only one to deny it with absolute certainty is Kavanaugh, hence him producing his calendars with every minutiae of life marked off. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?..... Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own... What would you say if someone had said, about another situation, 'that's a 11 black guys protecting their black guy?". Would you think, "oh, it's just black people protecting their own"? Or would you call it out for something else? So did you not see the picture of the republican side of the senate committee then... I thought it was quite iconic " I used to think more of you and your posts... Until now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The issue with regards to the drinking is 2 fold.... 1) legal drinking age in Maryland is 21... I am sure everyone has d*unk early so that I would have let slide if not for........... 2) he painted himself out to be a saint in the confirmation hearing and especially in the Fox News interview and I am guessing it was that interview that brought half of Maryland and Yale to say “that is not the kavanagh I knew!” The thing that worried me is that the opening statement he gave was so political I could never see him as being the slightest bit impartial which you would at least like to have the pretence he would be " So you can't get him on jumped up sexual assault charges, are you now going for charging him with under age drinking? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The issue with regards to the drinking is 2 fold.... 1) legal drinking age in Maryland is 21... I am sure everyone has d*unk early so that I would have let slide if not for........... 2) he painted himself out to be a saint in the confirmation hearing and especially in the Fox News interview and I am guessing it was that interview that brought half of Maryland and Yale to say “that is not the kavanagh I knew!” The thing that worried me is that the opening statement he gave was so political I could never see him as being the slightest bit impartial which you would at least like to have the pretence he would be So you can't get him on jumped up sexual assault charges, are you now going for charging him with under age drinking? "Depends if it was a black guy who served the beer | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The issue with regards to the drinking is 2 fold.... 1) legal drinking age in Maryland is 21... I am sure everyone has d*unk early so that I would have let slide if not for........... 2) he painted himself out to be a saint in the confirmation hearing and especially in the Fox News interview and I am guessing it was that interview that brought half of Maryland and Yale to say “that is not the kavanagh I knew!” The thing that worried me is that the opening statement he gave was so political I could never see him as being the slightest bit impartial which you would at least like to have the pretence he would be " Funnily enough I wouldn't describe you, Fabio, as being the slightest bit impartial! So a bit hypocritical don't you think! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The drinking issue actually doesn’t bother me that much... the fact he has lied about it, especially to the senate does! If he had just admitted it at the beginning it would not be the issue it is now.... See.... there are so many similarities between gorsich and kavanagh Both went to Georgetown prep Then both went to Yale Then both were on the dc circuit The only difference is that one has sexual allegations over his head... the other one didn’t! I am not a fan of gorsich but I could live with the pick....at least gorsich was honest throughout his confirmation......this one has either lied or refused to answer questions all the way through " Stick to the facts and try not letting your anti trump bias cloud your mind. Everyone she said was there have denied it. Her BEST friend said she does not know him and NEVER met him. Case Closed Confirm him. Get over it Ps.. Her gofundme is at 800k | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All victims of sexual assault should be Believed and I really mean that. However show me the evidence in this case?? This is so full of holes and inconsistent. It’s been a hit job from the very beginning from the people yelling and reeeing to Cory and his stupid Spartacus moment. (Remember his past no wonder he scarpered) All orchestrated by the Democrats. No wonder he lost his shit. As for the underage drinking he likes beer "Yes all the VICTIMS should be believed but not all the accusers. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"this have turned from "11 white guys too scared to ask a woman questions" to "11 white guys protecting their white guy!" Why the reference about a person's colour?..... Obviously didn’t read my explanation further up but I’ll quote it again... Because it would give the impression of the old boys club protecting one of their own... What would you say if someone had said, about another situation, 'that's a 11 black guys protecting their black guy?". Would you think, "oh, it's just black people protecting their own"? Or would you call it out for something else? So did you not see the picture of the republican side of the senate committee then... I thought it was quite iconic " I didn't think of it in racist terms, if that's what you're asking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The issue with regards to the drinking is 2 fold.... 1) legal drinking age in Maryland is 21... I am sure everyone has d*unk early so that I would have let slide if not for........... 2) he painted himself out to be a saint in the confirmation hearing and especially in the Fox News interview and I am guessing it was that interview that brought half of Maryland and Yale to say “that is not the kavanagh I knew!” The thing that worried me is that the opening statement he gave was so political I could never see him as being the slightest bit impartial which you would at least like to have the pretence he would be " I'm not sure when it became 21 in Maryland but I'm pretty sure when I was there 79/80 it was 21 for spirits but 18 for wine and beer. In fact we used to joke about it. It was important to know where to go where everyone who was in the group could get a drink. It was 21 for all in Pennsylvania, 21 spirits 18 the rest in Maryland, 18 for all in Virginia but no one new what it was in West Virginia because no one in West Virginia cared. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The issue with regards to the drinking is 2 fold.... 1) legal drinking age in Maryland is 21... I am sure everyone has d*unk early so that I would have let slide if not for........... 2) he painted himself out to be a saint in the confirmation hearing and especially in the Fox News interview and I am guessing it was that interview that brought half of Maryland and Yale to say “that is not the kavanagh I knew!” The thing that worried me is that the opening statement he gave was so political I could never see him as being the slightest bit impartial which you would at least like to have the pretence he would be Funnily enough I wouldn't describe you, Fabio, as being the slightest bit impartial! So a bit hypocritical don't you think! "I don't think Fabio is in the running for Judge of the Supreme Court of The United States. I would expect a Judge to be impartial, or at least show a veneer of impartiality, especially one being nominated to the Supreme Court. I don't expect it from posters on a thread. In fact I expect the complete opposite. There is nothing hypocritical about expecting impartiality from a Judge while not being impartial oneself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The left have always been desperate to fill the supreme court with lefty judges. Most of the stuff they try to pass gets voted down democratically by the people of the United States which they then circumvent via left wing judges. " The right and the centre (let’s be real, the Democrats are a centre party at best), both spend their time filling the Supreme Court with their own leaning judges. Their whole system is built around it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The left have always been desperate to fill the supreme court with lefty judges. Most of the stuff they try to pass gets voted down democratically by the people of the United States which they then circumvent via left wing judges. The right and the centre (let’s be real, the Democrats are a centre party at best), both spend their time filling the Supreme Court with their own leaning judges. Their whole system is built around it." . Yes I'd agree but also add they get most of the stuff like say gay marriage or abortion passed via left leaning judges who somehow foresee both these things inside a 200 year old document, it's never read that way by right leaning judges. The difference being that both those things are not exactly mandated by a democratic vote and therefore sneaked in via the court. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Look at this chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement, All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus, we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine?. " That old chestnut eh?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass." The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass." What if he’s innocent? What has happened to us if innocent until proven guilty doesn’t stand anymore. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What is with these conservatives.A black guy gets down on one knee and they lose their shit and it's the end of the world,but r&pe ..that's ok .. ". I'm a mixed race conservative and I couldn't care less what somebody does on one knee or both, you don't have a right to protest while at work though. The problem I have in this case is hearsay, there's a reason why we don't use it in courts,I mean that's the reason you hate Tommy Robinson right?. If there's evidence I hope the guy gets jail time but honestly it looks like there's none and this is just a political witch hunt. If you want to go down the line of hearsay then fine but don't complain when somebody says Jeremy Corbyn t@rtured me in a Czech stasi prison cell while sucking off Brezhnev and because you just have to take there word for it he cannot be prime minister despite being elected fairly and democratically. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What is with these conservatives.A black guy gets down on one knee and they lose their shit and it's the end of the world,but r&pe ..that's ok .. .
I'm a mixed race conservative and I couldn't care less what somebody does on one knee or both, you don't have a right to protest while at work though.
The problem I have in this case is hearsay, there's a reason why we don't use it in courts,I mean that's the reason you hate Tommy Robinson right?.
If there's evidence I hope the guy gets jail time but honestly it looks like there's none and this is just a political witch hunt.
If you want to go down the line of hearsay then fine but don't complain when somebody says Jeremy Corbyn t@rtured me in a Czech stasi prison cell while sucking off Brezhnev and because you just have to take there word for it he cannot be prime minister despite being elected fairly and democratically."I’m a Green Remainer and I think it’s quite sad that because of his Political leanings he is being castigated like this. The accusations keep getting weirder and more desperate. If he is found to have done it may he rot. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What is with these conservatives.A black guy gets down on one knee and they lose their shit and it's the end of the world,but r&pe ..that's ok .. "What r@pe? Stop lying | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court " the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one?" I'm taking it you have not seen her ex sworn statement that just came in? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one?" . I've got a question for you!. Do you think the McCann's murdered there child because they've refused to do a polygraph test, I mean surely they would if they wanted to help out?. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one?. I've got a question for you!. Do you think the McCann's murdered there child because they've refused to do a polygraph test, I mean surely they would if they wanted to help out?." sure, why not then..... this is not a court of law... this is a job interview! the FBI use polygraph tests as part of their job interview process, and will offer and withdraw job offers based on them... if they are good enough for the FBI, then as part of this FBI investigation then they are good enough for me... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one?. I've got a question for you!. Do you think the McCann's murdered there child because they've refused to do a polygraph test, I mean surely they would if they wanted to help out?. sure, why not then..... this is not a court of law... this is a job interview! the FBI use polygraph tests as part of their job interview process, and will offer and withdraw job offers based on them... if they are good enough for the FBI, then as part of this FBI investigation then they are good enough for me..." . There bollocks, there pseudo science crap and they certainly haven't been accepted on the legal, scientific or evidential side. There's literally thousands of cases of false positives and dozens of cases of false negatives. Try reading up on them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" There bollocks, there pseudo science crap and they certainly haven't been accepted on the legal, scientific or evidential side. There's literally thousands of cases of false positives and dozens of cases of false negatives. Try reading up on them." then make the case for the FBI and a lot of companies to then NOT use them as part of their job hiring processes..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" There bollocks, there pseudo science crap and they certainly haven't been accepted on the legal, scientific or evidential side. There's literally thousands of cases of false positives and dozens of cases of false negatives. Try reading up on them. then make the case for the FBI and a lot of companies to then NOT use them as part of their job hiring processes....." . No your question was why kavanaugh was not willing to take one, I've just told you, they produce false positives at a very high rate and unfortunately some uneducated people who just don't know about them will jump to, it must be true because etc etc. There pseudo science nonsense, why the FBI use them I haven't a clue | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He should take the test and stop being a fucking snowflake.Man the fuck up if you want the job. " This hit job has now well and truly fallen apart. He will be confirmed this week by 53 / 47. Then we can sit back and watch the peaceful tolerant left smash, burn, riot and harass. The country will see just how unhinged the left has become , right in time for the mid terms  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is a job interview to the highest court in the US.It appears he is a liar and lied under oath from I've read. His credibility is being chipped away .Sad times. "What did he lie about? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They produce false positives at a very high rate,ie you could be telling the truth and they would indicate your lying. However they produce false negatives much less, ie you were lying and it said you were telling the truth but and here's the crucial part, you can be taught how to beat one, the CIA do the training for it. She had little to lose when she took the test, if she'd failed you'd never have even heard of her. He has everything to lose from a false positive which occurs at a high rate because unfortunately an uneducated public know very little about them except what they see on Jeremy Kyle" ...you imagine it easy for her to bring back the memories she’d tried to erase!? Nobody gets in a witness box to do that unless their is some truth. Given she isn’t the only person to accuse him there appears to be reasonable doubt in his complete innocence and therefore a full investigation should take place - he is after all supposed to be taking one of the most senior judicial positions in rhe US. If he was judging his own case it is likely he would ask for an investigation - seems to be a bit reticent on this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What did he lie about? " Besides lying about handling stolen democratic documents for the republicans during his confirmation hearings to become a federal appeals court judge, how about the obvious lies about what he wrote in his high school yearbook? Regardless of political affiliations you have to see that the 2 above not only rule him out for a seat on the supreme court, but rule him unfit to sit in judgement in any court. There are plenty of other right-wing judges who are more than qualified for the seat. Why are the republicans so set on someone who clearly (from what has emerged so far) should not a judge, period? Could it be that by appointing a man they can prove to have previously broken the law on their behalf they feel they will be able to fully control? Is your unwillingness to see what is happening also part of the same partisanship that seems to have taken over right wing politics that says it does not matter what they have done if they are on our side then that's OK? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What did he lie about? Besides lying about handling stolen democratic documents for the republicans during his confirmation hearings to become a federal appeals court judge, how about the obvious lies about what he wrote in his high school yearbook? Regardless of political affiliations you have to see that the 2 above not only rule him out for a seat on the supreme court, but rule him unfit to sit in judgement in any court. There are plenty of other right-wing judges who are more than qualified for the seat. Why are the republicans so set on someone who clearly (from what has emerged so far) should not a judge, period? Could it be that by appointing a man they can prove to have previously broken the law on their behalf they feel they will be able to fully control? Is your unwillingness to see what is happening also part of the same partisanship that seems to have taken over right wing politics that says it does not matter what they have done if they are on our side then that's OK?" "Things he wrote in his school book" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Still no evidence. That’s kinda important. " This is something the left don't like to hear. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
""Things he wrote in his school book" "No! You really don't get it do you? Things he LIED about last week while under oath! And things he lied about under oath when being confirmed to the federal appeals court. And illegal things he did while working for George W. administration. You watched him lie last week and defend those lies because he wrote the proof of lying when he was 15 or 16. I think you need to learn objectivity and how to understand issues of probity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
""Things he wrote in his school book"
No!
You really don't get it do you?
Things he LIED about last week while under oath! And things he lied about under oath when being confirmed to the federal appeals court. And illegal things he did while working for George W. administration.
You watched him lie last week and defend those lies because he wrote the proof of lying when he was 15 or 16. I think you need to learn objectivity and how to understand issues of probity."What was he proven to lie about? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. " Totally agree and it's quite ironic that they call themselves democrats. Loved when killary and oborea categorically stated that 45 and his supporters would have to accept the result of the election when they thought it was in the bag. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did anyone wonder why Mitchell kept asking about the polygraph? Now it seems she knew all along that Dr ford had been coaching people to pass them This circus act is well and truly over. Welcome judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme court the FBI would have the full polygraph results and would be able to confirm/deny..... and her laywers said it was an FBI authorised officer who took the original test so actually they would be able to question him if that was the case.... also, one other thing strikes me as being odd... she has statement that she would be happy for the FBI to do another one.... he keeps refusing to do on when offered... if he wanting to help in any way possible to help his case and innocence.... and this was a way that would help his situation, then would you not take one?. I've got a question for you!. Do you think the McCann's murdered there child because they've refused to do a polygraph test, I mean surely they would if they wanted to help out?. sure, why not then..... this is not a court of law... this is a job interview! the FBI use polygraph tests as part of their job interview process, and will offer and withdraw job offers based on them... if they are good enough for the FBI, then as part of this FBI investigation then they are good enough for me..." good enough for you? Fortunately for all involved what is good enough for you is wholly irrelevant. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer.. "I don’t mean to keep asking these questions but r&pe victim is it now? What was the allegation? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
I don’t mean to keep asking these questions but r&pe victim is it now?
What was the allegation?
"Sorry are you a fan of emboldening r@pe culture like trump ? Classy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
I don’t mean to keep asking these questions but r&pe victim is it now?
What was the allegation?
Sorry are you a fan of emboldening r@pe culture like trump ?
Classy "That’s childish and a tactic already been used in this thread. I’m asking a question. I’m not seeking to minimise or deflect. I’m asking what’s been reported like my polygraph question. See my comment what should be done to him if this anecdotal claim is proved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
I don’t mean to keep asking these questions but r&pe victim is it now?
What was the allegation?
Sorry are you a fan of emboldening r@pe culture like trump ?
Classy
That’s childish and a tactic already been used in this thread.
I’m asking a question. I’m not seeking to minimise or deflect. I’m asking what’s been reported like my polygraph question.
See my comment what should be done to him if this anecdotal claim is proved. "If you say so .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
I don’t mean to keep asking these questions but r&pe victim is it now?
What was the allegation?
Sorry are you a fan of emboldening r@pe culture like trump ?
Classy
That’s childish and a tactic already been used in this thread.
I’m asking a question. I’m not seeking to minimise or deflect. I’m asking what’s been reported like my polygraph question.
See my comment what should be done to him if this anecdotal claim is proved.
If you say so .. "Excellent retort. Point proved. Anyway for the record I’m not in the Trump camp. I am firmly in the Green. But I like to see accuracy and not lies. I have a friend who spent some time away for a crime he didn’t commit due to intolerance and think it sets a very dangerous precedent for those who preach it to not live it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer.. "Who was r@ped? Did I miss something? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No surprise that the Republicans want a loud, aggressive, white male on the Supreme Court. I watched both testimonies and both were compelling. Sadly they stereotyped divisions in America - she was quiet apologetic, unassuming and clearly out of her depth. He was aggressive, pushy and triggered like the offended gammon that he is. His face bears the traces of the unhealthy over-consumption of alcohol and I did not see anything to make me feel that he would present a calm, measured and controlled presence as a Supreme Court Judge. Add to that two other women have now come along with similar stories and other class mates and student friends have challenged his testimony then the amount of smoke becomes just a bit too much. Ask yourself as a Swinger, if you were named in an Adultery or indecency charge case in Arkansas, Texas or Louisiana (you know places where our lifestyle is underground) and you ended up in the Supreme Court because of complications and challenges - would you want this guy standing over you and passing judgement? Do you trust him to be fair and impartial or do you think that he will fall back on right wing, christian moral values." "White male" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They produce false positives at a very high rate,ie you could be telling the truth and they would indicate your lying. However they produce false negatives much less, ie you were lying and it said you were telling the truth but and here's the crucial part, you can be taught how to beat one, the CIA do the training for it. She had little to lose when she took the test, if she'd failed you'd never have even heard of her. He has everything to lose from a false positive which occurs at a high rate because unfortunately an uneducated public know very little about them except what they see on Jeremy Kyle ...you imagine it easy for her to bring back the memories she’d tried to erase!? Nobody gets in a witness box to do that unless their is some truth. Given she isn’t the only person to accuse him there appears to be reasonable doubt in his complete innocence and therefore a full investigation should take place - he is after all supposed to be taking one of the most senior judicial positions in rhe US. If he was judging his own case it is likely he would ask for an investigation - seems to be a bit reticent on this." . No I've said all along that the FBI should investigate whatever is needed to be. Your making assumptions like alot of people on here based on feelings, "there must be some truth because what's she's done isn't easy" , frankly that's just nonsense that would get you literally nowhere in any court. She's been proved a liar under oath several times from her "I don't like flying/can't fly" to her "Ive never coached or know anything about polygraphs". Every single witness including her own friends deny her events or ever being at the party. To the other claims, well two are from women who went to school with him and say he was lovely but lied because he loved a drink and drank heavily, again subjective, what he calls drinking heavily might be completely different to what they call drinking heavily, he was asked if he'd ever passed out while drinking in school and he's got loads of testimony from school and college friends who say that's true (by the way while thinking of his school drinking as ruling him out from the job, Barack Obama in his own words before he was president said, he liked to drink heavily, smoke, smoke pot, take cocaine, womanise and get in fights on the beach, I didn't hear anybody say doing that as a young kid should exclude him from the job as president as a grown man?). The other woman who claims she was in group r@pe gangs is being investigated by the FBI for being a complete bullshitter, her ex boyfriend is on record saying she's a fruit bat and made threats to kill him and his unborn child, she's got a list of priors as long as your arm fraud to harassment. Fords ex boyfriend of seven years completely debunks her testimony, where he states she flew all over Hawaii with him without ever mentioning a fear of flying, helped her best friend pass polygraphs for jobs and even stole his credit card and ran up bills that she denied until he threatened to take it to the fraud department?. Not one single person can verify that these women have ever even mentioned in passing these allegations in 36 years until this month?. The allegations are nothing but personal hearsay and apart from that he's already had six FBI investigations one of which was for the White House secretary job which probably included nuclear code knowledge, you don't think the FBI haven't already scoured everybody for that bloody job??. You don't like the FBI and think there might be bias, well he was also on Kenneth starrs team who tried to impeach Clinton for the actual crime that was proven of sticking his dick in young girls faces all over the Whitehouse, Harvey Weinstein the Hollywood pervert paid huge amounts of money to private detectives to dig up any and all dirt on anybody who was connected to the impeachment, they couldn't find anything at all on kavanaugh back then either, they sent letters and phone calls to every single school and college friends back then saying they'll pay big money for a sworn statement of any dirt and not one person came forward including ford herself??. The only thing they can find is that he once threw ice at somebody 34 years ago in a bar room argument. Trump derangement syndrome(tds) is a very real mental illness that's been qualified by bonafide phycologists, liberals are literally going crazy from trumps presidency, there seems a few on here as well and like so many mental illnesses they don't actually know there ill, they see and hear things they think are real but there not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They produce false positives at a very high rate,ie you could be telling the truth and they would indicate your lying. However they produce false negatives much less, ie you were lying and it said you were telling the truth but and here's the crucial part, you can be taught how to beat one, the CIA do the training for it. She had little to lose when she took the test, if she'd failed you'd never have even heard of her. He has everything to lose from a false positive which occurs at a high rate because unfortunately an uneducated public know very little about them except what they see on Jeremy Kyle ...you imagine it easy for her to bring back the memories she’d tried to erase!? Nobody gets in a witness box to do that unless their is some truth. Given she isn’t the only person to accuse him there appears to be reasonable doubt in his complete innocence and therefore a full investigation should take place - he is after all supposed to be taking one of the most senior judicial positions in rhe US. If he was judging his own case it is likely he would ask for an investigation - seems to be a bit reticent on this.. No I've said all along that the FBI should investigate whatever is needed to be. Your making assumptions like alot of people on here based on feelings, "there must be some truth because what's she's done isn't easy" , frankly that's just nonsense that would get you literally nowhere in any court. She's been proved a liar under oath several times from her "I don't like flying/can't fly" to her "Ive never coached or know anything about polygraphs". Every single witness including her own friends deny her events or ever being at the party. To the other claims, well two are from women who went to school with him and say he was lovely but lied because he loved a drink and drank heavily, again subjective, what he calls drinking heavily might be completely different to what they call drinking heavily, he was asked if he'd ever passed out while drinking in school and he's got loads of testimony from school and college friends who say that's true (by the way while thinking of his school drinking as ruling him out from the job, Barack Obama in his own words before he was president said, he liked to drink heavily, smoke, smoke pot, take cocaine, womanise and get in fights on the beach, I didn't hear anybody say doing that as a young kid should exclude him from the job as president as a grown man?). The other woman who claims she was in group r@pe gangs is being investigated by the FBI for being a complete bullshitter, her ex boyfriend is on record saying she's a fruit bat and made threats to kill him and his unborn child, she's got a list of priors as long as your arm fraud to harassment. Fords ex boyfriend of seven years completely debunks her testimony, where he states she flew all over Hawaii with him without ever mentioning a fear of flying, helped her best friend pass polygraphs for jobs and even stole his credit card and ran up bills that she denied until he threatened to take it to the fraud department?. Not one single person can verify that these women have ever even mentioned in passing these allegations in 36 years until this month?. The allegations are nothing but personal hearsay and apart from that he's already had six FBI investigations one of which was for the White House secretary job which probably included nuclear code knowledge, you don't think the FBI haven't already scoured everybody for that bloody job??. You don't like the FBI and think there might be bias, well he was also on Kenneth starrs team who tried to impeach Clinton for the actual crime that was proven of sticking his dick in young girls faces all over the Whitehouse, Harvey Weinstein the Hollywood pervert paid huge amounts of money to private detectives to dig up any and all dirt on anybody who was connected to the impeachment, they couldn't find anything at all on kavanaugh back then either, they sent letters and phone calls to every single school and college friends back then saying they'll pay big money for a sworn statement of any dirt and not one person came forward including ford herself??. The only thing they can find is that he once threw ice at somebody 34 years ago in a bar room argument. Trump derangement syndrome(tds) is a very real mental illness that's been qualified by bonafide phycologists, liberals are literally going crazy from trumps presidency, there seems a few on here as well and like so many mental illnesses they don't actually know there ill, they see and hear things they think are real but there not. " There is also another mental illness that has been identified by psychologists now called Brexit anxiety disorder which Remainers suffer from and there seems to be a few on here who have both of the above conditions relating to Trump and Brexit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. " I didn't call everyone I disagree with a Nazi. I said certain people were "acting" more like the fourth "Reich" by what they are trying to do, which isn't the proper proceedures that are used to confirm a supreme court judge, and they know it. I'd have to say I'm a bit more left than right, but not what I would call far left. I'm quite sure you wake up everyday thanking God your not a leftist, most far right republicans probably do the same, but I'm also quite sure God could care less about your political affiliation. Try thanking God for the things he does care about, I'm sure you can find a few........ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
Who was r@ped? Did I miss something?
"Open your fucking eyes. Trump stood at that lecturn and mocked women for coming forward about being sexually abused. The camera panning around to the woman holding the ‘women for trump’ sign and smiling was eerie as fuck. This lunatic is normalising so much horrendous behaviour. Thankfully (despite the liar-in-chiefs latest tweets) support for Kavanagh and Trump amongst woman as plummeted. -Matt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump last Friday describes Dr ford as a very fine woman .Today he mocks a r@pe victim and the trumpanzees cheer .Sad times for the right to go so low into the sewer..
Who was r@ped? Did I miss something?
Open your fucking eyes. Trump stood at that lecturn and mocked women for coming forward about being sexually abused. The camera panning around to the woman holding the ‘women for trump’ sign and smiling was eerie as fuck. This lunatic is normalising so much horrendous behaviour.
Thankfully (despite the liar-in-chiefs latest tweets) support for Kavanagh and Trump amongst woman as plummeted.
-Matt"You didn't answer the question Matt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. I didn't call everyone I disagree with a Nazi. I said certain people were "acting" more like the fourth "Reich" by what they are trying to do, which isn't the proper proceedures that are used to confirm a supreme court judge, and they know it. I'd have to say I'm a bit more left than right, but not what I would call far left. I'm quite sure you wake up everyday thanking God your not a leftist, most far right republicans probably do the same, but I'm also quite sure God could care less about your political affiliation. Try thanking God for the things he does care about, I'm sure you can find a few........" Nazis don't have a pair swinging between their legs these days .Its all dog whistles to white supremacists .Even in this forum they've refused to condem the KKK.The alt right are just a lower case KKK .They prefer to go under the radar or crawl back under a rock when called out for their bullshit . Their hated of other races is apparent in ther mumblings from their dribbling minds about movements like black lives matter and how white South Africans have at since apartheid and how the pic brigade no longer let's be racist assholes .They aren't I'll or mental they are a cancer.They are shady as fuck. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. I didn't call everyone I disagree with a Nazi. I said certain people were "acting" more like the fourth "Reich" by what they are trying to do, which isn't the proper proceedures that are used to confirm a supreme court judge, and they know it. I'd have to say I'm a bit more left than right, but not what I would call far left. I'm quite sure you wake up everyday thanking God your not a leftist, most far right republicans probably do the same, but I'm also quite sure God could care less about your political affiliation. Try thanking God for the things he does care about, I'm sure you can find a few........ Nazis don't have a pair swinging between their legs these days .Its all dog whistles to white supremacists .Even in this forum they've refused to condem the KKK.The alt right are just a lower case KKK .They prefer to go under the radar or crawl back under a rock when called out for their bullshit . Their hated of other races is apparent in ther mumblings from their dribbling minds about movements like black lives matter and how white South Africans have at since apartheid and how the pic brigade no longer let's be racist assholes .They aren't I'll or mental they are a cancer.They are shady as fuck. "There is white supremacists in this forum??? And they stick up for the KKK? And they hate on different races? Please message me their names so I can pre block them, or are you making things up again? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. I didn't call everyone I disagree with a Nazi. I said certain people were "acting" more like the fourth "Reich" by what they are trying to do, which isn't the proper proceedures that are used to confirm a supreme court judge, and they know it. I'd have to say I'm a bit more left than right, but not what I would call far left. I'm quite sure you wake up everyday thanking God your not a leftist, most far right republicans probably do the same, but I'm also quite sure God could care less about your political affiliation. Try thanking God for the things he does care about, I'm sure you can find a few........ Nazis don't have a pair swinging between their legs these days .Its all dog whistles to white supremacists .Even in this forum they've refused to condem the KKK.The alt right are just a lower case KKK .They prefer to go under the radar or crawl back under a rock when called out for their bullshit . Their hated of other races is apparent in ther mumblings from their dribbling minds about movements like black lives matter and how white South Africans have at since apartheid and how the pic brigade no longer let's be racist assholes .They aren't I'll or mental they are a cancer.They are shady as fuck.
There is white supremacists in this forum???
And they stick up for the KKK?
And they hate on different races?
Please message me their names so I can pre block them, or are you making things up again?"No naming and shaming now it's a against the rules ..Dog whistles are ok .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"the several sources that say he's a r@pist and the way that he acts guilty about it is a problem " This is the problem .No smoke without fire .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why don’t they use Polygraphs in court? Ted Bundy passed a Polygraph " Somebody should tell that twat Jeremy Kyle | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It's funny, the left wing is "right" in this situation, and generally wants everyone to have the sqme freedoms and rights, and they also want the environment and nature treated right. Yet, as usual, the far right wing nuts are acting more like the fourth "Reich" by trying to circumvent known legal proceedures, to get another dirty scumbag in power to protect the dirty scumbag we have for a president from getting impeached. Even if Mr. Mueller has undeniable proof of trump committing high crimes against the US, a corrupted right wing supreme court judge could very likely stop impeachment proceedings in it's tracks, and trump knows this. That's the main reason why, but not the only reason why he picked him to protect his ass. The moment you got to calling every one you disagree with a nazi is when I stopped reading. I wake up everyday and thank God I am not a leftist. I didn't call everyone I disagree with a Nazi. I said certain people were "acting" more like the fourth "Reich" by what they are trying to do, which isn't the proper proceedures that are used to confirm a supreme court judge, and they know it. I'd have to say I'm a bit more left than right, but not what I would call far left. I'm quite sure you wake up everyday thanking God your not a leftist, most far right republicans probably do the same, but I'm also quite sure God could care less about your political affiliation. Try thanking God for the things he does care about, I'm sure you can find a few........ Nazis don't have a pair swinging between their legs these days .Its all dog whistles to white supremacists .Even in this forum they've refused to condem the KKK.The alt right are just a lower case KKK .They prefer to go under the radar or crawl back under a rock when called out for their bullshit . Their hated of other races is apparent in ther mumblings from their dribbling minds about movements like black lives matter and how white South Africans have at since apartheid and how the pic brigade no longer let's be racist assholes .They aren't I'll or mental they are a cancer.They are shady as fuck.
There is white supremacists in this forum???
And they stick up for the KKK?
And they hate on different races?
Please message me their names so I can pre block them, or are you making things up again?"There’s plenty of them on here. No one will say too much about them, or else they end up getting blocked. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"the several sources that say he's a r@pist and the way that he acts guilty about it is a problem This is the problem .No smoke without fire .." There are zero sources to say he is a rapist. Zero. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"the several sources that say he's a r@pist and the way that he acts guilty about it is a problem This is the problem .No smoke without fire .." that's a fact | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"the several sources that say he's a r@pist and the way that he acts guilty about it is a problem This is the problem .No smoke without fire .. that's a fact " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
