Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is warning social media, such as google and facebook to be very careful, it comes after they are censoring and hiding information, who else agrees with him that they have to much power of what should been seen or not?" I agree, tech giants like Google, Facebook and YouTube have a monopoly on everything and now they are silencing or attempting to silence people who don't align with their views. It's fundamentally wrong and free speech needs to be defended for all not just the liberal left. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is warning social media, such as google and facebook to be very careful, it comes after they are censoring and hiding information, who else agrees with him that they have to much power of what should been seen or not? I agree, tech giants like Google, Facebook and YouTube have a monopoly on everything and now they are silencing or attempting to silence people who don't align with their views. It's fundamentally wrong and free speech needs to be defended for all not just the liberal left. " the tightening down of the vile hate speakers of the far right has fuck all to do with defending their 'free speech' its about decent people telling global companies we will go elsewhere if you host these people.. equally as we all would if it were the hate speech of the IS/Taliban.. cant have it both ways.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is warning social media, such as google and facebook to be very careful, it comes after they are censoring and hiding information, who else agrees with him that they have to much power of what should been seen or not? I agree, tech giants like Google, Facebook and YouTube have a monopoly on everything and now they are silencing or attempting to silence people who don't align with their views. It's fundamentally wrong and free speech needs to be defended for all not just the liberal left. " It's funny how these platforms are OK when they are peddling extreme right views but not so anything else! I suppose your going to deny, like trump that any such thing happened? One thing though he was right about the elections being rigged - he just didn't say it was in his favour! #Crooked Donald lock him up! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More likely the buffoon is worried about truth being told, knowledge is power and he wants to keep people's attentions on his rhetoric, lies and rants rather than the facts and the possible collusion with a foreign state.." What re the facts? People like you just being abusive serves no purpose whatsoever | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sites like facebook should be closed down,or regulated yes censored they are a discrace. The idea is that they should be fun nothing more. Anyone who approves of sites like facebook is very nieve about the way they are being used or is a criminal in some form. Yes this is a simple answer but sadly total freedom is not a good thing" So you are suggesting the there should be censorship instead? I don't agree with that. I know you are a the extreme end of the political spectrum and generally want things you don't like closed down, but who defines 'fun' in your world view then? Because criminals use a medium, or say things you don't like, doesn't mean you can just shut them down. That way lies totalitarianism. Where would you like it to end? Would you like Fab shut down because you don't like something someone posts? Would you like Twitter shut down because Trump uses it? -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More likely the buffoon is worried about truth being told, knowledge is power and he wants to keep people's attentions on his rhetoric, lies and rants rather than the facts and the possible collusion with a foreign state..What re the facts? People like you just being abusive serves no purpose whatsoever" Abusive? Read it again perhaps and note the word possible, do you think the ongoing investigations that have thus far had several people with links to trump plead guilty.. Cohen was his right hand man, his fixer for what Ten years? And the sheer hypocrisy of you even doing it wrongly trying to call others out won't be lost on most posters on here..  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sites like facebook should be closed down,or regulated yes censored they are a discrace. The idea is that they should be fun nothing more. Anyone who approves of sites like facebook is very nieve about the way they are being used or is a criminal in some form. Yes this is a simple answer but sadly total freedom is not a good thing" People with your mind set used to burn witches who were anything but that back in the dark ages.. Your typing the above on what, chalkboard.. 
Talking about closing down social media whilst using social media, yup ya thought that through..
You say naive but then say people are a criminal for using social media eg facebook..
You got simple right.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is warning social media, such as google and facebook to be very careful, it comes after they are censoring and hiding information, who else agrees with him that they have to much power of what should been seen or not? I agree, tech giants like Google, Facebook and YouTube have a monopoly on everything and now they are silencing or attempting to silence people who don't align with their views. It's fundamentally wrong and free speech needs to be defended for all not just the liberal left. " I think people like you see them as bastions of the left because their official policy bans hatespeech. Hence your champions Alex Jones, Katie Hopkins etc get banned. However no need for you to worry, still a shit tonne of race hate on social media. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sites like facebook should be closed down,or regulated yes censored they are a discrace. The idea is that they should be fun nothing more. Anyone who approves of sites like facebook is very nieve about the way they are being used or is a criminal in some form. Yes this is a simple answer but sadly total freedom is not a good thing So you are suggesting the there should be censorship instead? I don't agree with that. I know you are a the extreme end of the political spectrum and generally want things you don't like closed down, but who defines 'fun' in your world view then? Because criminals use a medium, or say things you don't like, doesn't mean you can just shut them down. That way lies totalitarianism. Where would you like it to end? Would you like Fab shut down because you don't like something someone posts? Would you like Twitter shut down because Trump uses it? -Matt" My comment is not political but tends to be interpreted that way as I say this to people offline in everyday conversation | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today..... "Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today..... "I understand that a well known contributor on this forum has been permanently banned. His misdemeanor was protecting his wife from racist slurs! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing. "What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately. This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews? https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html"The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store. As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'???? 
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing. "Throwing in silly insults like “libtards” dilutes your point. However you’re partly right, when he was banned it generated interest from a cross spectrum of people from those who never heard of him and wanted to know why he was banned, to those who found out about him and like what he says. But over all being banned from the biggest social media platforms will do more harm to his outreach. I’m in two minds as to if they should be banning hate speech guys like him. On one hand, I generally prefer to just ignore them, let him rant away and let people decide on their own. I just don’t go and watch him, no one is forced to go on there. Same as I do with LBC radio, Trumps Twitter, any BNP/EDL/UKIP, Daily Mail, Express etc. On the other hand, if I owned a company and people were using it as a platform for race hate. There’s no way I would allow them to do so. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there. "See centy..... you are again trying to blur the line between free speech and hate speech.... You defending him says all that needs to be said... I don’t want hate speech to be mainstream... I don’t want him sandy hook claims to be mainstream... it should be treated for what it is!!! You defending him is defending his right to say and claim the awful stuff he says, hate speech should never be defended | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there. "Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently. Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly."Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
See centy..... you are again trying to blur the line between free speech and hate speech....
You defending him says all that needs to be said...
I don’t want hate speech to be mainstream... I don’t want him sandy hook claims to be mainstream... it should be treated for what it is!!!
You defending him is defending his right to say and claim the awful stuff he says, hate speech should never be defended "Alex Jones is not guilty of any hate speech. He's never been convicted in a court of law of any hate speech. You keep saying these things and yet you never give any specific examples. He thinks sandy hook was a conspiracy theory, it's not hate speech to express that opinion, just as it isn't to talk about other conspiracy theories around 9/11, etc. Alex Jones has a right to freedom of speech just like everyone else. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews. "The incident in question happened outside the room. What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing. Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
See centy..... you are again trying to blur the line between free speech and hate speech....
You defending him says all that needs to be said...
I don’t want hate speech to be mainstream... I don’t want him sandy hook claims to be mainstream... it should be treated for what it is!!!
You defending him is defending his right to say and claim the awful stuff he says, hate speech should never be defended
Alex Jones is not guilty of any hate speech. He's never been convicted in a court of law of any hate speech. You keep saying these things and yet you never give any specific examples. He thinks sandy hook was a conspiracy theory, it's not hate speech to express that opinion, just as it isn't to talk about other conspiracy theories around 9/11, etc. Alex Jones has a right to freedom of speech just like everyone else. "No, he hasn't been convicted so he has not been found guilty of hate speech. Stalin was never found guilty of mass murder. Alex Jones has said many things. He accused special counsel and former FBI director Robert Mueller of being a pedophile and threatened to shoot him. He said that Jennifer Lopez should go to Somalia and “get gang r@ped.” He claimed that Barack Obama was a member of al-Qaeda. He claimed that Hillary Clinton ran a satanic child sex ring out of a pizzeria. One of his fans took a rifle there and fire off rounds. Jones promoted — and continues to promote — a conspiracy that the Sandy Hook shootings, which claimed the lives of 26 people, 20 of them children, was a hoax. This initiated a vicious, years-long harassment campaigns against the parents of murdered children. This is not the exercise of free speech. This is the propagation of lies and hate. Free speech is to provide an opposing opinion not to lie and abuse people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
See centy..... you are again trying to blur the line between free speech and hate speech....
You defending him says all that needs to be said...
I don’t want hate speech to be mainstream... I don’t want him sandy hook claims to be mainstream... it should be treated for what it is!!!
You defending him is defending his right to say and claim the awful stuff he says, hate speech should never be defended "I don't want this topic to be mainstream
Can we get back to the real world | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies "So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so. "No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand. I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in. As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour. I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
See centy..... you are again trying to blur the line between free speech and hate speech....
You defending him says all that needs to be said...
I don’t want hate speech to be mainstream... I don’t want him sandy hook claims to be mainstream... it should be treated for what it is!!!
You defending him is defending his right to say and claim the awful stuff he says, hate speech should never be defended
Alex Jones is not guilty of any hate speech. He's never been convicted in a court of law of any hate speech. You keep saying these things and yet you never give any specific examples. He thinks sandy hook was a conspiracy theory, it's not hate speech to express that opinion, just as it isn't to talk about other conspiracy theories around 9/11, etc. Alex Jones has a right to freedom of speech just like everyone else.
No, he hasn't been convicted so he has not been found guilty of hate speech.
Stalin was never found guilty of mass murder.
Alex Jones has said many things.
He accused special counsel and former FBI director Robert Mueller of being a pedophile and threatened to shoot him.
He said that Jennifer Lopez should go to Somalia and “get gang r@ped.”
He claimed that Barack Obama was a member of al-Qaeda.
He claimed that Hillary Clinton ran a satanic child sex ring out of a pizzeria. One of his fans took a rifle there and fire off rounds.
Jones promoted — and continues to promote — a conspiracy that the Sandy Hook shootings, which claimed the lives of 26 people, 20 of them children, was a hoax. This initiated a vicious, years-long harassment campaigns against the parents of murdered children.
This is not the exercise of free speech. This is the propagation of lies and hate. Free speech is to provide an opposing opinion not to lie and abuse people."None of the things you listed there amount to hate speech, probably why no charges have ever been brought and no convictions have ever been made against him. America has this thing called due process, and people are innocent until proven guilty, although you appear to think the opposite, (guilty until proven innocent in your world). Well the real world doesn't work like that no matter how hysterical you and others who think like you become over this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish "I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record. As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened. "Haha I assume this post is in jest? Hahaha Surely infowars reporting on an incident involving themselves isn't an accurate unbiased source of information!?! Haha Besides the fact he's notorious for making shit up, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just kidding around here. Oh you genuinely made me laugh hard this time. Before you tell me to go to infowars and watch it myself, I refer you to my comments about ignoring platforms for hatespeech and racism. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened. "You are quite amazing. You are now getting over excited about me varying my vocabulary with words that mean the same thing? You don't have to be physical to aggressively push into a space and rudely interupt aka "barging" or "muscling". Media attention. I have every intention to not provide any money to Infowars, ever so will not be their clickbait. Pick another video from another angle. His behaviour is the same. You clearly have different definitions for appropriate public behaviour | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
Haha I assume this post is in jest? Hahaha
Surely infowars reporting on an incident involving themselves isn't an accurate unbiased source of information!?! Haha
Besides the fact he's notorious for making shit up, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just kidding around here.
Oh you genuinely made me laugh hard this time.
Before you tell me to go to infowars and watch it myself, I refer you to my comments about ignoring platforms for hatespeech and racism.
"Hahahahahaha, and by the same token you think CNN are not being biased in this either? CNN have been calling for Alex Jones to be banned for months, they are not impartial in this by any stretch of the imagination. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
You are quite amazing. You are now getting over excited about me varying my vocabulary with words that mean the same thing? You don't have to be physical to aggressively push into a space and rudely interupt aka "barging" or "muscling".
Media attention.
I have every intention to not provide any money to Infowars, ever so will not be their clickbait.
Pick another video from another angle. His behaviour is the same.
You clearly have different definitions for appropriate public behaviour "Lots of reporters and journalists from various news networks push and shove and jostle for the best position to ask questions or get their microphone closest to the mouth of their intended target in a media scrum, even CNN reporters do it, I don't see you getting your knickers in a twist about it when it comes to others though? Alex Jones public behaviour in this case is no different to that of other journalists and reporters have engaged in, in the past. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
Haha I assume this post is in jest? Hahaha
Surely infowars reporting on an incident involving themselves isn't an accurate unbiased source of information!?! Haha
Besides the fact he's notorious for making shit up, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just kidding around here.
Oh you genuinely made me laugh hard this time.
Before you tell me to go to infowars and watch it myself, I refer you to my comments about ignoring platforms for hatespeech and racism.
Hahahahahaha, and by the same token you think CNN are not being biased in this either? CNN have been calling for Alex Jones to be banned for months, they are not impartial in this by any stretch of the imagination. "He didn’t mention CNN. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
Haha I assume this post is in jest? Hahaha
Surely infowars reporting on an incident involving themselves isn't an accurate unbiased source of information!?! Haha
Besides the fact he's notorious for making shit up, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just kidding around here.
Oh you genuinely made me laugh hard this time.
Before you tell me to go to infowars and watch it myself, I refer you to my comments about ignoring platforms for hatespeech and racism.
Hahahahahaha, and by the same token you think CNN are not being biased in this either? CNN have been calling for Alex Jones to be banned for months, they are not impartial in this by any stretch of the imagination.
He didn’t mention CNN. "He used the 'reply and quote' button to reply to a point being made about CNN and Infowars, so therefore was a continuation of the discussion. If he didn't want to link in CNN to his post then he shouldn't have used 'reply and quote'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
Haha I assume this post is in jest? Hahaha
Surely infowars reporting on an incident involving themselves isn't an accurate unbiased source of information!?! Haha
Besides the fact he's notorious for making shit up, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just kidding around here.
Oh you genuinely made me laugh hard this time.
Before you tell me to go to infowars and watch it myself, I refer you to my comments about ignoring platforms for hatespeech and racism.
Hahahahahaha, and by the same token you think CNN are not being biased in this either? CNN have been calling for Alex Jones to be banned for months, they are not impartial in this by any stretch of the imagination.
He didn’t mention CNN.
He used the 'reply and quote' button to reply to a point being made about CNN and Infowars, so therefore was a continuation of the discussion. If he didn't want to link in CNN to his post then he shouldn't have used 'reply and quote'. "You’re getting tiresome. Making fun of your misinformation and archaic opinions is becoming less fun. You know not everything is black and white. Not everyone who doesn’t like infowars is a CNN fan. Not everyone who opposes race-hate is a Corbyn fan. Your posts trying to deflect your own insecurities around your views onto other targets is childish and getting boring. You seem think that some kind of semantic micro-victory in an Internet forum somehow justifies your support for some of the worlds most bigoted people. That’s just silly. Have a good weekend. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there. "So if you write an article and submit it to "The Times", they should be obliged to publish it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
You are quite amazing. You are now getting over excited about me varying my vocabulary with words that mean the same thing? You don't have to be physical to aggressively push into a space and rudely interupt aka "barging" or "muscling".
Media attention.
I have every intention to not provide any money to Infowars, ever so will not be their clickbait.
Pick another video from another angle. His behaviour is the same.
You clearly have different definitions for appropriate public behaviour
Lots of reporters and journalists from various news networks push and shove and jostle for the best position to ask questions or get their microphone closest to the mouth of their intended target in a media scrum, even CNN reporters do it, I don't see you getting your knickers in a twist about it when it comes to others though?
Alex Jones public behaviour in this case is no different to that of other journalists and reporters have engaged in, in the past. "They don't try and get into camera shot. They don't talk over the person they are allegedly "interviewing". They do not stay to talk to other people's cameras after the interviewee has left. I also said clearly that there are plenty of actual news sites to see the video on from multiple angles. He does and says the same things in all of them  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
You are quite amazing. You are now getting over excited about me varying my vocabulary with words that mean the same thing? You don't have to be physical to aggressively push into a space and rudely interupt aka "barging" or "muscling".
Media attention.
I have every intention to not provide any money to Infowars, ever so will not be their clickbait.
Pick another video from another angle. His behaviour is the same.
You clearly have different definitions for appropriate public behaviour
Lots of reporters and journalists from various news networks push and shove and jostle for the best position to ask questions or get their microphone closest to the mouth of their intended target in a media scrum, even CNN reporters do it, I don't see you getting your knickers in a twist about it when it comes to others though?
Alex Jones public behaviour in this case is no different to that of other journalists and reporters have engaged in, in the past.
They don't try and get into camera shot.
They don't talk over the person they are allegedly "interviewing".
They do not stay to talk to other people's cameras after the interviewee has left.
I also said clearly that there are plenty of actual news sites to see the video on from multiple angles.
He does and says the same things in all of them "They don't talk over the person they are interviewing? I take it you never watched BBC Newsnight when Jeremy Paxman was there then? He talked over the people he was interviewing all the time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"just a follow up... Twitter have perma banned alex jones and infowars today.....
Which will only serve to make Jones and InfoWars even more notorious and more popular. Expect to see another spike in popularity of the Infowars mobile app in the coming days as a result of this. Thought Libtards would've learned their lesson from Facebook and YouTube on this but appears they've learned nothing.
What's the lesson to learn? It allows the security services to identify extremists far more accurately.
This clearly stable Alex Jones barging in and ranting at other people's press interviews?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/marco-rubio-alex-jones/index.html
The lesson that twitter should have learned from Facebook and YouTube is that banning Alex Jones only makes him more notorious and more popular. In the days after Facebook and YouTube banned him the infowars mobile app became the number one trending news app on the app store.
As for Alex Jones 'barging in' and ranting at other people's press interviews he did no such thing (although it's hardly surprising the Criminal News Network, CNN would try to put that slant on it). What actually happened was Alex Jones went to Congressional hearings on tech giants vs freedom of speech, rather than 'barging in' he waited patiently outside for them to come out of the hearings so he could interview them, just the same as all the other reporters there did. Why are you not accusing other reporters from other networks of 'barging in'????
Alex Jones behaviour was the same as all the other journalists and reporters there.
Centaur, what he did is on camera. He was not waiting patiently.
Please go ahead and claim the opposite of what is plain to see. It just looks a bit silly.
Yes I know full well its on video, watched all the footage on the Infowars website last night. CNN are not the only people who have camera's you know, Infowars filmed their own footage too. In what way did he 'barge in' as you put it? The footage shows he waited outside the room where the hearings were going on. Police asked him if he wanted to go into the room to listen to the hearings and he declined and stated he was waiting for them to come out to do interviews.
The incident in question happened outside the room.
What does waiting around before have to do with anything? You must have some exciting viewing.
Mow it makes sense why you are upset about Infowars being harder to access for right wing extremists. You have to make more of an effort to feed your conspiracies
So now you admit he didn't 'barge in' anywhere then as you first claimed. He waited outside the hearings with other journalists and reporters to ask questions and he is fully entitled to do so.
No. Centaur. You seem to have a pathological need to wilfully misinterpret any collection of words and "win" any tiny part of any discussion even if it is completely irrelevant to the point in hand.
I did not say at which point in the process of Rubio talking to the press that Alex Jones decided to muscle in.
As I said, anyone can watch the video and come to their own opinion about his behaviour.
I'm sure that they already have. You can can go and shout at some lamp posts if you wish
I haven't misrepresented anything here, you said he 'barged in', I've explained and showed how he never 'barged in' anywhere. I see now you've attempted to change the wording from 'barged in' to 'muscle in', Alex Jones never 'muscled in' anywhere either for the record.
As for your video, it's edited with a CNN slant on it, I'd suggest people watch the Infowars footage of the same encounter for a more balanced view of what really happened.
You are quite amazing. You are now getting over excited about me varying my vocabulary with words that mean the same thing? You don't have to be physical to aggressively push into a space and rudely interupt aka "barging" or "muscling".
Media attention.
I have every intention to not provide any money to Infowars, ever so will not be their clickbait.
Pick another video from another angle. His behaviour is the same.
You clearly have different definitions for appropriate public behaviour
Lots of reporters and journalists from various news networks push and shove and jostle for the best position to ask questions or get their microphone closest to the mouth of their intended target in a media scrum, even CNN reporters do it, I don't see you getting your knickers in a twist about it when it comes to others though?
Alex Jones public behaviour in this case is no different to that of other journalists and reporters have engaged in, in the past.
They don't try and get into camera shot.
They don't talk over the person they are allegedly "interviewing".
They do not stay to talk to other people's cameras after the interviewee has left.
I also said clearly that there are plenty of actual news sites to see the video on from multiple angles.
He does and says the same things in all of them
They don't talk over the person they are interviewing? I take it you never watched BBC Newsnight when Jeremy Paxman was there then? He talked over the people he was interviewing all the time. "Micro-victory? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
